<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Paraxial_approximation</id>
	<title>Paraxial approximation - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Paraxial_approximation"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Paraxial_approximation&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-17T16:01:02Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0-wmf.28</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Paraxial_approximation&amp;diff=242986&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>en&gt;Srleffler: Thanks for the last edit. This edit completes the fix.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Paraxial_approximation&amp;diff=242986&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2014-08-27T02:30:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the last edit. This edit completes the fix.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Paraxial_approximation&amp;amp;diff=242986&amp;amp;oldid=10858&quot;&gt;Show changes&lt;/a&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>en&gt;Srleffler</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Paraxial_approximation&amp;diff=10858&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>en&gt;Srleffler: The accuracy statement is confusing because it follows the second-order cosine expression immediately with a statement about the first-order approximation, without explanation. The whole approximation either passes or fails.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Paraxial_approximation&amp;diff=10858&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2014-01-17T02:23:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The accuracy statement is confusing because it follows the second-order cosine expression immediately with a statement about the first-order approximation, without explanation. The whole approximation either passes or fails.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Paraxial_approximation&amp;amp;diff=10858&amp;amp;oldid=242985&quot;&gt;Show changes&lt;/a&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>en&gt;Srleffler</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Paraxial_approximation&amp;diff=242985&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>en&gt;Rodolfo Hermans: Quantify the error percentage for angles about 10 degrees</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Paraxial_approximation&amp;diff=242985&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2011-05-26T11:57:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Quantify the error percentage for angles about 10 degrees&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The writer is called Wilber Pegues. What me and my family members love is doing ballet but I&amp;#039;ve been using on new things lately. Kentucky is exactly where I&amp;#039;ve usually been residing. Credit authorising is where my primary income arrives from.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My blog post: good psychic - [http://koreanyelp.com/index.php?document_srl=1798&amp;amp;mid=SchoolNews please click the up coming article] -&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>en&gt;Rodolfo Hermans</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>