Set (mathematics): Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>ClueBot NG
m Reverting possible vandalism by 190.242.54.93 to version by 148.129.71.40. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (1182018) (Bot)
 
en>ClueBot NG
m Reverting possible vandalism by 120.59.137.53 to version by Richard001. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (1627111) (Bot)
Line 1: Line 1:
Rhoda Largo is historical past of the people use to call her and   [http://Fycongress.com/index.php?do=/profile-10793/info/ glee costume] her husband doesn't think itrrrs great at the whole. My day job is a database administrator and [http://browse.deviantart.com/?q=I+don%27t I don't] think I'll change it anytime inside the. She is really fond of to   [http://paylasim.hol.es/index.php?do=/blog/4770/the-1-minute-rule-for-audio-experience/ bridesmaid dress] play crochet and she's been doing it for much too long. Northern Marianas [http://Dict.leo.org/?search=Islands Islands] is the biggest I love most and i also love normal living here. Go to my website to find out more: http://[http://360vc.myblackicoffee.com/space.php?uid=200284&do=blog&id=179971 360vc.myblackicoffee.com]/space.php?uid=200284&do=blog&id=179971
In the [[mathematics|mathematical]] field of [[category theory]], the '''category of sets''', denoted as '''Set''', is the [[Category (mathematics)|category]] whose [[Category theory|objects]] are [[Set (mathematics)|sets]].  The arrows or [[morphism]]s between sets ''A'' and ''B'' are all [[function (mathematics)|function]]s from ''A'' to ''B''.  Care must be taken in the definition of '''Set''' to avoid  [[paradoxes of set theory|set-theoretic paradoxes]].
 
Many other categories (such as the [[category of groups]], with [[group homomorphisms]] as arrows) add structure to the objects of the category of sets and/or restrict the arrows to functions of a particular kind.
 
==Properties of the category of sets==
The [[epimorphism]]s in '''Set''' are the [[surjective]] maps, the [[monomorphism]]s are the [[injective]] maps, and the [[isomorphism]]s are the [[bijective]] maps.
 
The [[empty set]] serves as the [[initial object]] in '''Set''' with [[empty function]]s as morphisms. Every [[singleton (mathematics)|singleton]] is a [[terminal object]], with the functions mapping all elements of the source sets to the single target element as morphisms. There are thus no [[zero object]]s in '''Set'''.
 
The category '''Set''' is [[complete category|complete and co-complete]]. The [[product (category theory)|product]] in this category is given by the [[cartesian product]] of sets. The [[coproduct (category theory)|coproduct]] is given by the [[disjoint union]]: given sets ''A''<sub>''i''</sub> where ''i'' ranges over some index set ''I'', we construct the coproduct as the union of ''A''<sub>''i''</sub>×{''i''} (the cartesian product with ''i'' serves to ensure that all the components stay disjoint).
 
'''Set''' is the prototype of a [[concrete category]]; other categories are concrete if they "resemble" '''Set''' in some well-defined way.
 
Every two-element set serves as a [[subobject classifier]] in '''Set'''. The power object of a set ''A'' is given by its [[power set]], and the [[exponential object]] of the sets ''A'' and ''B'' is given by the set of all functions from ''A'' to ''B''. '''Set''' is thus a [[topos]] (and in particular [[cartesian closed category|cartesian closed]]).
 
'''Set''' is not [[abelian category|abelian]], [[additive category|additive]] or [[preadditive category|preadditive]]. Its [[zero morphism]]s are the empty functions ∅ → ''X''.<ref>Section I.7 of {{harvnb|Pareigis|1970}}</ref>
 
Every '''not initial''' object in '''Set''' is [[injective object|injective]] and (assuming the [[axiom of choice]]) also [[projective module|projective]].
 
==Foundations for the category of sets==
 
In [[Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory]] the collection of all sets is not a set; this follows from the [[axiom of foundation]].  One refers to collections that are not sets as [[proper class]]es.  One can't handle proper classes as one handles sets; in particular, one can't write that those proper classes belong to a collection (either a set or a proper class).  This is a problem: it means that the category of sets cannot be formalized straightforwardly in this setting.
 
One way to resolve the problem is to work in a system that gives formal status to proper classes, such as [[NBG set theory]].  In this setting, categories formed from sets are said to be ''small'' and those (like '''Set''') that are formed from proper classes are said to be ''large''.
 
Another solution is to assume the existence of [[Grothendieck universe]]s.  Roughly speaking, a Grothendieck universe is a set which is itself a model of ZF(C) (for instance if a set belongs to a universe, its elements and its powerset will belong to the universe).  The existence of Grothendieck universes (other than the empty set and the set <math>V_\omega</math> of all [[hereditarily finite set]]s) is not implied by the usual ZF axioms; it is an additional, independent axiom, roughly equivalent to the existence of [[strongly inaccessible cardinal]]s. Assuming this extra axiom, one can limit the objects of '''Set''' to the elements of a particular universe.  (There is no "set of all sets" within the model, but one can still reason about the class ''U'' of all inner sets, i. e., elements of ''U''.)
 
In one variation of this scheme, the class of sets is the union of the entire tower of Grothendieck universes.  (This is necessarily a [[proper class]], but each Grothendieck universe is a set because it is an element of some larger Grothendieck universe.)  However, one does not work directly with the "category of all sets".  Instead, theorems are expressed in terms of the category '''Set'''<sub>''U''</sub> whose objects are the elements of a sufficiently large Grothendieck universe ''U'', and are then shown not to depend on the particular choice of ''U''.  As a foundation for [[category theory]], this approach is well matched to a system like [[Tarski–Grothendieck set theory]] in which one cannot reason directly about proper classes; its principal disadvantage is that a theorem can be true of all '''Set'''<sub>''U''</sub> but not of '''Set'''.
 
Various other solutions, and variations on the above, have been proposed.<ref>Mac Lane 1969</ref><ref>Feferman 1969</ref><ref>Blass 1984</ref>
 
The same issues arise with other concrete categories, such as the [[category of groups]] or the [[category of topological spaces]].
 
== See also ==
* [[Set theory]]
* [[Small set (category theory)]]
 
==Notes==
<references/>
 
==References==
 
*Blass, A. [http://www.math.lsa.umich.edu/~ablass/interact.pdf The interaction between category theory and set theory]. Contemporary Mathematics 30 (1984).
*Feferman, S. Set-theoretical foundations of category theory. Springer Lect. Notes Math. 106 (1969): 201–247.
*Lawvere, F.W. [http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/reprints/articles/11/tr11.pdf An elementary theory of the category of sets (long version) with commentary]
*Mac Lane, S. One universe as a foundation for category theory. Springer Lect. Notes Math. 106 (1969): 192–200.
* {{cite book |authorlink=Mac Lane|first=Saunders |last=Mac Lane |title=Categories for the Working Mathematician |date=September 1998 |publisher=Springer |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=eBvhyc4z8HQC&printsec=frontcover&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false |isbn=0-387-98403-8}} (Volume 5 in the series [[Graduate Texts in Mathematics]])
*{{Citation
| last=Pareigis
| first=Bodo
| title=Categories and functors
| year=1970
| isbn=978-0-12-545150-5
| publisher=[[Academic Press]]
| series=Pure and applied mathematics
| volume=39
}}
 
==External links==
* [http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Category_of_a_set Category of a set] at [http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/ Encyclopedia of Mathematics]
* [http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Baire_theorem Baire category theorem] at [http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/ Encyclopedia of Mathematics]
 
[[Category:Category-theoretic categories|Sets]]
[[Category:Basic concepts in set theory]]

Revision as of 13:05, 19 December 2013

In the mathematical field of category theory, the category of sets, denoted as Set, is the category whose objects are sets. The arrows or morphisms between sets A and B are all functions from A to B. Care must be taken in the definition of Set to avoid set-theoretic paradoxes.

Many other categories (such as the category of groups, with group homomorphisms as arrows) add structure to the objects of the category of sets and/or restrict the arrows to functions of a particular kind.

Properties of the category of sets

The epimorphisms in Set are the surjective maps, the monomorphisms are the injective maps, and the isomorphisms are the bijective maps.

The empty set serves as the initial object in Set with empty functions as morphisms. Every singleton is a terminal object, with the functions mapping all elements of the source sets to the single target element as morphisms. There are thus no zero objects in Set.

The category Set is complete and co-complete. The product in this category is given by the cartesian product of sets. The coproduct is given by the disjoint union: given sets Ai where i ranges over some index set I, we construct the coproduct as the union of Ai×{i} (the cartesian product with i serves to ensure that all the components stay disjoint).

Set is the prototype of a concrete category; other categories are concrete if they "resemble" Set in some well-defined way.

Every two-element set serves as a subobject classifier in Set. The power object of a set A is given by its power set, and the exponential object of the sets A and B is given by the set of all functions from A to B. Set is thus a topos (and in particular cartesian closed).

Set is not abelian, additive or preadditive. Its zero morphisms are the empty functions ∅ → X.[1]

Every not initial object in Set is injective and (assuming the axiom of choice) also projective.

Foundations for the category of sets

In Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory the collection of all sets is not a set; this follows from the axiom of foundation. One refers to collections that are not sets as proper classes. One can't handle proper classes as one handles sets; in particular, one can't write that those proper classes belong to a collection (either a set or a proper class). This is a problem: it means that the category of sets cannot be formalized straightforwardly in this setting.

One way to resolve the problem is to work in a system that gives formal status to proper classes, such as NBG set theory. In this setting, categories formed from sets are said to be small and those (like Set) that are formed from proper classes are said to be large.

Another solution is to assume the existence of Grothendieck universes. Roughly speaking, a Grothendieck universe is a set which is itself a model of ZF(C) (for instance if a set belongs to a universe, its elements and its powerset will belong to the universe). The existence of Grothendieck universes (other than the empty set and the set of all hereditarily finite sets) is not implied by the usual ZF axioms; it is an additional, independent axiom, roughly equivalent to the existence of strongly inaccessible cardinals. Assuming this extra axiom, one can limit the objects of Set to the elements of a particular universe. (There is no "set of all sets" within the model, but one can still reason about the class U of all inner sets, i. e., elements of U.)

In one variation of this scheme, the class of sets is the union of the entire tower of Grothendieck universes. (This is necessarily a proper class, but each Grothendieck universe is a set because it is an element of some larger Grothendieck universe.) However, one does not work directly with the "category of all sets". Instead, theorems are expressed in terms of the category SetU whose objects are the elements of a sufficiently large Grothendieck universe U, and are then shown not to depend on the particular choice of U. As a foundation for category theory, this approach is well matched to a system like Tarski–Grothendieck set theory in which one cannot reason directly about proper classes; its principal disadvantage is that a theorem can be true of all SetU but not of Set.

Various other solutions, and variations on the above, have been proposed.[2][3][4]

The same issues arise with other concrete categories, such as the category of groups or the category of topological spaces.

See also

Notes

  1. Section I.7 of Template:Harvnb
  2. Mac Lane 1969
  3. Feferman 1969
  4. Blass 1984

References

  • Blass, A. The interaction between category theory and set theory. Contemporary Mathematics 30 (1984).
  • Feferman, S. Set-theoretical foundations of category theory. Springer Lect. Notes Math. 106 (1969): 201–247.
  • Lawvere, F.W. An elementary theory of the category of sets (long version) with commentary
  • Mac Lane, S. One universe as a foundation for category theory. Springer Lect. Notes Math. 106 (1969): 192–200.
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 (Volume 5 in the series Graduate Texts in Mathematics)
  • Many property agents need to declare for the PIC grant in Singapore. However, not all of them know find out how to do the correct process for getting this PIC scheme from the IRAS. There are a number of steps that you need to do before your software can be approved.

    Naturally, you will have to pay a safety deposit and that is usually one month rent for annually of the settlement. That is the place your good religion deposit will likely be taken into account and will kind part or all of your security deposit. Anticipate to have a proportionate amount deducted out of your deposit if something is discovered to be damaged if you move out. It's best to you'll want to test the inventory drawn up by the owner, which can detail all objects in the property and their condition. If you happen to fail to notice any harm not already mentioned within the inventory before transferring in, you danger having to pay for it yourself.

    In case you are in search of an actual estate or Singapore property agent on-line, you simply should belief your intuition. It's because you do not know which agent is nice and which agent will not be. Carry out research on several brokers by looking out the internet. As soon as if you end up positive that a selected agent is dependable and reliable, you can choose to utilize his partnerise in finding you a home in Singapore. Most of the time, a property agent is taken into account to be good if he or she locations the contact data on his website. This may mean that the agent does not mind you calling them and asking them any questions relating to new properties in singapore in Singapore. After chatting with them you too can see them in their office after taking an appointment.

    Have handed an trade examination i.e Widespread Examination for House Brokers (CEHA) or Actual Property Agency (REA) examination, or equal; Exclusive brokers are extra keen to share listing information thus making certain the widest doable coverage inside the real estate community via Multiple Listings and Networking. Accepting a severe provide is simpler since your agent is totally conscious of all advertising activity related with your property. This reduces your having to check with a number of agents for some other offers. Price control is easily achieved. Paint work in good restore-discuss with your Property Marketing consultant if main works are still to be done. Softening in residential property prices proceed, led by 2.8 per cent decline within the index for Remainder of Central Region

    Once you place down the one per cent choice price to carry down a non-public property, it's important to accept its situation as it is whenever you move in – faulty air-con, choked rest room and all. Get round this by asking your agent to incorporate a ultimate inspection clause within the possibility-to-buy letter. HDB flat patrons routinely take pleasure in this security net. "There's a ultimate inspection of the property two days before the completion of all HDB transactions. If the air-con is defective, you can request the seller to repair it," says Kelvin.

    15.6.1 As the agent is an intermediary, generally, as soon as the principal and third party are introduced right into a contractual relationship, the agent drops out of the image, subject to any problems with remuneration or indemnification that he could have against the principal, and extra exceptionally, against the third occasion. Generally, agents are entitled to be indemnified for all liabilities reasonably incurred within the execution of the brokers´ authority.

    To achieve the very best outcomes, you must be always updated on market situations, including past transaction information and reliable projections. You could review and examine comparable homes that are currently available in the market, especially these which have been sold or not bought up to now six months. You'll be able to see a pattern of such report by clicking here It's essential to defend yourself in opposition to unscrupulous patrons. They are often very skilled in using highly unethical and manipulative techniques to try and lure you into a lure. That you must also protect your self, your loved ones, and personal belongings as you'll be serving many strangers in your home. Sign a listing itemizing of all of the objects provided by the proprietor, together with their situation. HSR Prime Recruiter 2010

External links