Invariance mechanics: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Luckas-bot
m r2.7.1) (Robot: Adding ro:Mecanică invariantivă
 
en>Chris the speller
m →‎Supersymmetry: replaced: dimesional → dimensional using AWB
Line 1: Line 1:
Hello and welcome. My title is Ling. I am a manufacturing and distribution officer. To perform handball is the thing she enjoys most of all. Her  extended auto [https://www.geico.com/getaquote/auto/mechanical-breakdown-insurance/ warranty spouse] and her  [http://ganafc.com/xe/link/2514287 extended auto warranty] [http://i4p.info/article.php?id=114728 auto warranty] chose to reside in Delaware but  car warranty she [http://www.continentalwarranty.org/ requirements] to transfer because of her family members.<br><br>Also visit my homepage; [http://Www.Claysculpturesbydon.com/UserProfile/tabid/170/userId/5546/Default.aspx http://Www.Claysculpturesbydon.com/UserProfile/tabid/170/userId/5546/Default.aspx]
'''Realization''', in the [[system theory]] context refers to a [[State space (controls)|state space]] model implementing a given input-output behavior. That is, given an input-output relationship, a realization is a quadruple of ([[time-variant system|time-varying]]) [[Matrix (mathematics)|matrices]] <math>[A(t),B(t),C(t),D(t)]</math> such that
: <math>\dot{\mathbf{x}}(t) = A(t) \mathbf{x}(t) + B(t) \mathbf{u}(t)</math>
: <math>\mathbf{y}(t) = C(t) \mathbf{x}(t) + D(t) \mathbf{u}(t)</math>
with <math>(u(t),y(t))</math> describing the input and output of the system at time <math>t</math>.
 
==LTI System==
For a [[linear time-invariant system]] specified by a [[transfer function|transfer matrix]], <math> H(s) </math>, a realization is any quadruple of matrices <math> (A,B,C,D) </math> such that <math> H(s) = C(sI-A)^{-1}B+D</math>.
 
=== Canonical realizations ===
Any given transfer function which is [[strictly proper]] can easily be transferred into state-space by the following approach (this example is for a 4-dimensional, single-input, single-output system)):
 
Given a transfer function, expand it to reveal all coefficients in both the numerator and denominator. This should result in the following form:
:<math> H(s) = \frac{n_{1}s^{3} + n_{2}s^{2} + n_{3}s + n_{4}}{s^{4} + d_{1}s^{3} + d_{2}s^{2} + d_{3}s + d_{4}}</math>.
 
The coefficients can now be inserted directly into the state-space model by the following approach:
:<math>\dot{\textbf{x}}(t) = \begin{bmatrix}
                              -d_{1}& -d_{2}& -d_{3}& -d_{4}\\
                                1&      0&      0&      0\\
                                0&      1&      0&      0\\
                                0&      0&      1&      0
                            \end{bmatrix}\textbf{x}(t) +
                            \begin{bmatrix} 1\\ 0\\ 0\\ 0\\ \end{bmatrix}\textbf{u}(t)</math>
 
:<math> \textbf{y}(t) = \begin{bmatrix} n_{1}& n_{2}& n_{3}& n_{4} \end{bmatrix}\textbf{x}(t)</math>.
 
This state-space realization is called '''controllable canonical form''' (also known as phase variable canonical form) because the resulting model is guaranteed to be [[Controllability|controllable]] (i.e., because the control enters a chain of integrators, it has the ability to move every state).
 
The transfer function coefficients can also be used to construct another type of canonical form
:<math>\dot{\textbf{x}}(t) = \begin{bmatrix}
                              -d_{1}&  1&  0&  0\\
                              -d_{2}&  0&  1&  0\\
                              -d_{3}&  0&  0&  1\\
                              -d_{4}&  0&  0&  0
                            \end{bmatrix}\textbf{x}(t) +
                            \begin{bmatrix} n_{1}\\ n_{2}\\ n_{3}\\ n_{4} \end{bmatrix}\textbf{u}(t)</math>
 
:<math> \textbf{y}(t) = \begin{bmatrix} 1& 0& 0& 0 \end{bmatrix}\textbf{x}(t)</math>.
 
This state-space realization is called '''observable canonical form''' because the resulting model is guaranteed to be [[Observability|observable]] (i.e., because the output exits from a chain of integrators, every state has an effect on the output).
 
==General System==
===<math>D = 0</math>===
If we have an input <math>u(t)</math>, an output <math>y(t)</math>, and a [[weighting pattern]] <math>T(t,\sigma)</math> then a realization is any triple of matrices <math>[A(t),B(t),C(t)]</math> such that <math>T(t,\sigma) = C(t) \phi(t,\sigma) B(\sigma)</math> where <math>\phi</math> is the [[state-transition matrix]] associated with the realization.<ref>{{cite book|first=Roger W.|last=Brockett|title=Finite Dimensional Linear Systems|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|year=1970|isbn=978-0-471-10585-5}}</ref>
 
==System identification==
{{main|System identification}}
System identification techniques take the experimental data from a system and output a realization.  Such techniques can utilize both input and output data (e.g. [[eigensystem realization algorithm]]) or can only include the output data (e.g. [[frequency domain decomposition]]).  Typically an input-output technique would be more accurate, but the input data is not always available.
 
==References==
{{Reflist}}
 
[[Category:Models of computation]]
[[Category:Systems theory]]

Revision as of 16:48, 20 November 2013

Realization, in the system theory context refers to a state space model implementing a given input-output behavior. That is, given an input-output relationship, a realization is a quadruple of (time-varying) matrices such that

with describing the input and output of the system at time .

LTI System

For a linear time-invariant system specified by a transfer matrix, , a realization is any quadruple of matrices such that .

Canonical realizations

Any given transfer function which is strictly proper can easily be transferred into state-space by the following approach (this example is for a 4-dimensional, single-input, single-output system)):

Given a transfer function, expand it to reveal all coefficients in both the numerator and denominator. This should result in the following form:

.

The coefficients can now be inserted directly into the state-space model by the following approach:

.

This state-space realization is called controllable canonical form (also known as phase variable canonical form) because the resulting model is guaranteed to be controllable (i.e., because the control enters a chain of integrators, it has the ability to move every state).

The transfer function coefficients can also be used to construct another type of canonical form

.

This state-space realization is called observable canonical form because the resulting model is guaranteed to be observable (i.e., because the output exits from a chain of integrators, every state has an effect on the output).

General System

If we have an input , an output , and a weighting pattern then a realization is any triple of matrices such that where is the state-transition matrix associated with the realization.[1]

System identification

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church. System identification techniques take the experimental data from a system and output a realization. Such techniques can utilize both input and output data (e.g. eigensystem realization algorithm) or can only include the output data (e.g. frequency domain decomposition). Typically an input-output technique would be more accurate, but the input data is not always available.

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534