|
|
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[File:evariste galois.jpg|thumb|right|Évariste Galois (1811–1832)]]
| | Have you been wondering "how do I accelerate my computer" lately? Well odds are if you are reading this article; then you are experiencing one of several computer issues that thousands of people discover that they face regularly.<br><br>Document files let the user to input data, images, tables plus different ingredients to enhance the presentation. The just issue with this structure compared to other file types including .pdf for example is its ability to be commonly editable. This signifies that anybody viewing the file will change it by accident. Also, this file format is opened by additional programs yet it refuses to guarantee which what we see in the Microsoft Word application may nevertheless be the same whenever you see it using another system. However, it really is nevertheless preferred by most computer consumers for its ease of utilize and features.<br><br>Although this problem affects millions of computer users throughout the world, there is an effortless method to fix it. We see, there's 1 reason for a slow loading computer, plus that's considering a PC cannot read the files it needs to run. In a nutshell, this simply means that whenever we do anything on Windows, it requires to read up on how to do it. It's traditionally a really 'dumb' program, which has to have files to tell it to do everything.<br><br>It is normal which the imm32.dll error is caused due to a mis-deletion activity. If you cannot discover the imm32.dll anywhere on your computer, there is no doubt which it must be mis-deleted whenever uninstalling programs or additional unneeded files. Hence, we can straight cope it from additional programs or download it from a safe web and then put it on the computer.<br><br>When it comes to software, this really is the vital piece since it is the one running your program also as additional programs needed inside a functions. Always keep the cleanliness of the program from obsolete information by getting a superior [http://bestregistrycleanerfix.com/registry-mechanic pc tools registry mechanic]. Protect it from a virus online by providing a workable virus security program. You could also have a monthly clean up by running the defragmenter system. This means it will enhance the performance of your computer plus for you to avoid any mistakes. If you think anything is wrong with the computer software, plus we don't understand how to fix it then refer to a technician.<br><br>Files with the DOC extension are additionally susceptible to viruses, yet this is solved by superior antivirus programs. Another issue is that .doc files can be corrupted, unreadable or damaged due to spyware, adware, and malware. These cases will prevent consumers from correctly opening DOC files. This really is when efficient registry products become beneficial.<br><br>Whenever the registry is corrupt or full of mistakes, the signs is felt by the computer owner. The slow performance, the frequent program crashes and the nightmare of all computer owners, the blue screen of death.<br><br>So inside summary, when comparing registry cleaning, make sure the 1 you choose gives you the following.A backup and restore facility, rapidly operation, automatic deletion facility, start-up management, an effortless technique of contact plus a cash back guarantee. |
| In [[mathematics]], more specifically in [[abstract algebra]], '''Galois theory''', named after [[Évariste Galois]], provides a connection between [[field theory (mathematics)|field theory]] and [[group theory]]. Using Galois theory, certain problems in field theory can be reduced to group theory, which is in some sense simpler and better understood.
| |
| | |
| Originally, Galois used [[permutation group]]s to describe how the various [[root of a function|root]]s of a given [[polynomial]] equation are related to each other. The modern approach to Galois theory, developed by [[Richard Dedekind]], [[Kronecker|Leopold Kronecker]] and [[Emil Artin]], among others, involves studying [[automorphism]]s of [[field extension]]s.
| |
| | |
| Further [[abstraction]] of Galois theory is achieved by the theory of [[Galois connection]]s.
| |
| | |
| ==Application to classical problems==
| |
| | |
| The birth of Galois theory was originally motivated by the following question, whose answer is known as the [[Abel–Ruffini theorem]].
| |
| | |
| :''Why is there no formula for the roots of a fifth (or higher) degree polynomial equation in terms of the coefficients of the polynomial, using only the usual algebraic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division) and application of radicals (square roots, cube roots, etc)?''
| |
| | |
| Galois theory not only provides a beautiful answer to this question, it also explains in detail why it ''is'' possible to solve equations of degree four or lower in the above manner, and why their solutions take the form that they do. Further, it gives a conceptually clear, and often practical, means of telling when some particular equation of higher degree can be solved in that manner.
| |
| | |
| Galois theory also gives a clear insight into questions concerning problems in [[compass and straightedge]] construction.
| |
| It gives an elegant characterisation of the ratios of lengths that can be constructed with this method.
| |
| Using this, it becomes relatively easy to answer such classical problems of geometry as
| |
| :''Which regular [[polygon]]s are [[constructible polygon]]s?''<ref name="Stewart"/>
| |
| :''Why is it not possible to [[trisect every angle]] using a [[compass and straightedge]]?''<ref name="Stewart"/>
| |
| | |
| == History ==
| |
| {{see also|Abstract algebra#Early group theory}}
| |
| Galois theory originated in the study of [[symmetric functions]] – the coefficients of a [[monic polynomial]] are (up to sign) the [[elementary symmetric polynomial]]s in the roots. For instance, {{nowrap|1=(''x'' – ''a'')(''x'' – ''b'') = ''x''<sup>2</sup> – (''a'' + ''b'')''x'' + ''ab''}}, where 1, {{nowrap|1=''a'' + ''b''}} and ''ab'' are the elementary polynomials of degree 0, 1 and 2 in two variables.
| |
| | |
| This was first formalized by the 16th century French mathematician [[François Viète]], in [[Viète's formulas]], for the case of positive real roots. In the opinion of the 18th century British mathematician [[Charles Hutton]],<ref>{{Harv|Funkhouser|1930}}</ref> the expression of coefficients of a polynomial in terms of the roots (not only for positive roots) was first understood by the 17th century French mathematician [[Albert Girard]]; Hutton writes:
| |
| <blockquote>...[Girard was] the first person who understood the general doctrine of the formation of the coefficients of the powers from the sum of the roots and their products. He was the first who discovered the rules for summing the powers of the roots of any equation.</blockquote>
| |
| | |
| In this vein, the [[discriminant]] is a symmetric function in the roots which reflects properties of the roots – it is zero if and only if the polynomial has a multiple root, and for quadratic and cubic polynomials it is positive if and only if all roots are real and distinct, and negative if and only if there is a pair of distinct complex conjugate roots. See [[discriminant#Nature of the roots|Discriminant:Nature of the roots]] for details.
| |
| | |
| The cubic was first partly solved by the 15th/16th century Italian mathematician [[Scipione del Ferro]], who did not however publish his results; this method only solved one of three classes, as the others involved taking square roots of negative numbers, and [[complex numbers]] were not known at the time. This solution was then rediscovered independently in 1535 by [[Niccolò Fontana Tartaglia]], who shared it with [[Gerolamo Cardano]], asking him to not publish it. Cardano then extended this to the other two cases, using square roots of negatives as intermediate steps; see details at [[Cubic_equation#Cardano.27s_method|Cardano's method]]. After the discovery of Ferro's work, he felt that Tartaglia's method was no longer secret, and thus he published his complete solution in his 1545 ''[[Ars Magna (Gerolamo Cardano)|Ars Magna]].'' His student [[Lodovico Ferrari]] solved the quartic polynomial; his solution was also included in Cardano’s ''Ars Magna.''
| |
| | |
| A further step was the 1770 paper ''Réflexions sur la résolution algébrique des équations'' by the French-Italian mathematician [[Joseph Louis Lagrange]], in his method of [[Lagrange resolvents]], where he analyzed Cardano and Ferrarri's solution of cubics and quartics by considering them in terms of ''permutations'' of the roots, which yielded an auxiliary polynomial of lower degree, providing a unified understanding of the solutions and laying the groundwork for group theory and Galois theory. Crucially, however, he did not consider ''composition'' of permutations. Lagrange's method did not extend to quintic equations or higher, because the resolvent had higher degree.
| |
| | |
| The quintic was almost proven to have no general solutions by radicals by [[Paolo Ruffini]] in 1799, whose key insight was to use [[permutation group|permutation ''groups'']], not just a single permutation. His solution contained a gap, which Cauchy considered minor, though this was not patched until the work of Norwegian mathematician [[Niels Henrik Abel]], who published a proof in 1824, thus establishing the [[Abel–Ruffini theorem]].
| |
| | |
| While Ruffini and Abel established that the ''general'' quintic could not be solved, some ''particular'' quintics can be solved, such as (''x'' − 1)<sup>5</sup>=0, and the precise criterion by which a ''given'' quintic or higher polynomial could be determined to be solvable or not was given by [[Évariste Galois]], who showed that whether a polynomial was solvable or not was equivalent to whether or not the permutation group of its roots – in modern terms, its [[Galois group]] – had a certain structure – in modern terms, whether or not it was a [[solvable group]]. This group was always solvable for polynomials of degree four or less, but not always so for polynomials of degree five and greater, which explains why there is no general solution in higher degree.
| |
| | |
| ==Permutation group approach to Galois theory==<!-- [[Galois group of a polynomial]] redirects here-->
| |
| | |
| Given a polynomial, it may be that some of the roots are connected by various [[algebraic equation]]s. For example, it may be that for two of the roots, say ''A'' and ''B'', that {{nowrap|1=''A''<sup>2</sup> + 5''B''<sup>3</sup> = 7}}. The central idea of Galois theory is to consider those [[permutation]]s (or rearrangements) of the roots having the property that ''any'' algebraic equation satisfied by the roots is ''still satisfied'' after the roots have been permuted. An important proviso is that we restrict ourselves to algebraic equations whose coefficients are [[rational number]]s. (One might instead specify a certain [[field (mathematics)|field]] in which the coefficients should lie but, for the simple examples below, we will restrict ourselves to the field of rational numbers.)
| |
| | |
| These permutations together form a [[permutation group]], also called the [[Galois group]] of the polynomial (over the rational numbers). To illustrate this point, consider the following examples:
| |
| | |
| ===First example: a quadratic equation===
| |
| Consider the [[quadratic equation]]
| |
| :<math>x^2 - 4x + 1 = 0.\ </math>
| |
| By using the [[Quadratic equation#Quadratic formula|quadratic formula]], we find that the two roots are
| |
| :<math>A = 2 + \sqrt{3},</math>
| |
| :<math>B = 2 - \sqrt{3}.</math>
| |
| Examples of algebraic equations satisfied by ''A'' and ''B'' include
| |
| :<math> A + B = 4,\ </math>
| |
| | |
| and
| |
| | |
| :<math> AB = 1.\ </math>
| |
| Obviously, in either of these equations, if we exchange ''A'' and ''B'', we obtain another true statement. For example, the equation ''A'' + ''B'' = 4 becomes simply ''B'' + ''A'' = 4. Furthermore, it is true, but far less obvious, that this holds for ''every'' possible [[algebraic equation]] with rational [[coefficients]] relating the ''A'' and ''B'' values above (in any such equation, swapping ''A'' and ''B'' yields another true equation). To prove this requires the theory of [[symmetric polynomial]]s.
| |
| | |
| (One might object that ''A'' and ''B'' are related by the algebraic equation
| |
| <math>A - B - 2\sqrt{3} = 0</math>,
| |
| which does ''not'' remain true when ''A'' and ''B'' are exchanged. However, this equation does not concern us, because it has the coefficient <math>-2\sqrt{3}</math> which is [[Quadratic irrational#Square root of non-square is irrational|not rational]]). | |
|
| |
| We conclude that the Galois group of the polynomial ''x''<sup>2</sup> − 4''x'' + 1 consists of two permutations: the [[Permutation#Special permutations|identity]] permutation which leaves ''A'' and ''B'' untouched, and the [[transposition (mathematics)|transposition]] permutation which exchanges ''A'' and ''B''. It is a [[cyclic group]] of order two, and therefore [[group isomorphism|isomorphic]] to '''Z'''/2'''Z'''.
| |
| | |
| A similar discussion applies to any quadratic polynomial ''ax''<sup>2</sup> + ''bx'' + ''c'', where ''a'', ''b'' and ''c'' are rational numbers.
| |
| * If the polynomial has only one root, for example ''x''<sup>2</sup> − 4''x'' + 4 = (''x''−2)<sup>2</sup>, then the Galois group is trivial; that is, it contains only the identity permutation.
| |
| * If it has two distinct ''rational'' roots, for example ''x''<sup>2</sup> − 3''x'' + 2 = (''x''−2)(''x''−1), the Galois group is again trivial.
| |
| * If it has two ''irrational'' roots (including the case where the roots are [[complex number|complex]]), then the Galois group contains two permutations, just as in the above example.
| |
| | |
| ===Second example===
| |
| Consider the polynomial
| |
| :<math>x^4 - 10x^2 + 1,\ </math>
| |
| which can also be written as
| |
| :<math>(x^2 - 5)^2 - 24.\ </math>
| |
| We wish to describe the Galois group of this polynomial, again over the field of [[rational number]]s. The polynomial has four roots:
| |
| :<math>A = \sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3}</math>
| |
| :<math>B = \sqrt{2} - \sqrt{3}</math>
| |
| :<math>C = -\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3}</math>
| |
| :<math>D = -\sqrt{2} - \sqrt{3}.</math>
| |
| There are 24 possible ways to permute these four roots, but not all of these permutations are members of the Galois group. The members of the Galois group must preserve any algebraic equation with rational coefficients involving ''A'', ''B'', ''C'' and ''D''.
| |
| | |
| Among these equations, we have:
| |
| :<math>AB=-1</math>
| |
| :<math>AC=1</math>
| |
| :<math>A+D=0</math>
| |
| | |
| It follows that, if <math>\varphi</math> is a permutation that belongs to the Galois group, we must have:
| |
| :<math>\varphi(B)=\frac{-1}{\varphi(A)}, \quad \varphi(C)=\frac{1}{\varphi(A)}, \quad \varphi(D)=-\varphi(A). </math>
| |
| This implies that the permutation is well defined by the image of ''A'', that the Galois group has 4 elements, which are
| |
| :(''A'', ''B'', ''C'', ''D'') → (''A'', ''B'', ''C'', ''D'')
| |
| :(''A'', ''B'', ''C'', ''D'') → (''B'', ''A'', ''D'', ''C'')
| |
| :(''A'', ''B'', ''C'', ''D'') → (''C'', ''D'', ''A'', ''B'')
| |
| :(''A'', ''B'', ''C'', ''D'') → (''D'', ''C'', ''B'', ''A''),
| |
| and the Galois group is isomorphic to the [[Klein four-group]].
| |
| | |
| ==Modern approach by field theory==
| |
| | |
| In the modern approach, one starts with a [[field extension]] ''L''/''K'' (read: ''L'' over ''K''), and examines the group of field [[automorphisms]] of ''L''/''K'' (these are [[bijective]] [[ring homomorphism]]s α: ''L'' → ''L'' such that α(''x'') = ''x'' for all ''x'' in ''K''). See the article on [[Galois group]]s for further explanation and examples.
| |
| | |
| The connection between the two approaches is as follows. The coefficients of the polynomial in question should be chosen from the base field ''K''. The top field ''L'' should be the field obtained by adjoining the roots of the polynomial in question to the base field. Any permutation of the roots which respects algebraic equations as described above gives rise to an automorphism of ''L''/''K'', and vice versa.
| |
| | |
| In the first example above, we were studying the extension '''Q'''(√3)/'''Q''', where '''Q''' is the field of [[rational numbers]], and '''Q'''(√3) is the field obtained from '''Q''' by adjoining √3. In the second example, we were studying the extension '''Q'''(''A'',''B'',''C'',''D'')/'''Q'''.
| |
| | |
| There are several advantages to the modern approach over the permutation group approach.
| |
| * It permits a far simpler statement of the [[fundamental theorem of Galois theory]].
| |
| * The use of base fields other than '''Q''' is crucial in many areas of mathematics. For example, in [[algebraic number theory]], one often does Galois theory using [[number field]]s, [[finite field]]s or [[local field]]s as the base field.
| |
| * It allows one to more easily study infinite extensions. Again this is important in algebraic number theory, where for example one often discusses the [[absolute Galois group]] of '''Q''', defined to be the Galois group of ''K''/'''Q''' where ''K'' is an [[algebraic closure]] of '''Q'''.
| |
| * It allows for consideration of [[separable extension|inseparable]] extensions. This issue does not arise in the classical framework, since it was always implicitly assumed that arithmetic took place in [[characteristic (algebra)|characteristic]] zero, but nonzero characteristic arises frequently in number theory and in [[algebraic geometry]].
| |
| * It removes the rather artificial reliance on chasing roots of polynomials. That is, different polynomials may yield the same extension fields, and the modern approach recognizes the connection between these polynomials.
| |
| | |
| ==Solvable groups and solution by radicals==
| |
| | |
| The notion of a [[solvable group]] in [[group theory]] allows one to determine whether a polynomial is solvable in radicals, depending on whether its Galois group has the property of solvability. In essence, each field extension ''L''/''K'' corresponds to a [[factor group]] in a [[composition series]] of the Galois group. If a factor group in the composition series is [[cyclic group|cyclic]] of order ''n'', and if in the corresponding field extension ''L''/''K'' the field ''K'' already contains a [[Root of unity|primitive ''n''-th root of unity]], then it is a radical extension and the elements of ''L'' can then be expressed using the ''n''th root of some element of ''K''.
| |
| | |
| If all the factor groups in its composition series are cyclic, the Galois group is called ''solvable'', and all of the elements of the corresponding field can be found by repeatedly taking roots, products, and sums of elements from the base field (usually '''Q''').
| |
| | |
| One of the great triumphs of Galois Theory was the proof that for every ''n'' > 4, there exist polynomials of degree ''n'' which are not solvable by radicals—the [[Abel–Ruffini theorem]]. This is due to the fact that for ''n'' > 4 the [[symmetric group]] ''S''<sub>''n''</sub> contains a [[simple group|simple]], non-cyclic, [[normal subgroup]], namely the [[alternating group]] ''A''<sub>''n''</sub>.
| |
| | |
| [[image:Non solvable quintic.jpg|right|450px|thumb|For the polynomial <math>f(x) = x^5-x-1</math>, the lone real root <math>x</math> =1.1673... is algebraic, but not expressible in terms of radicals. The other four roots are [[complex numbers]].]]
| |
| | |
| ===A non-solvable quintic example===
| |
| | |
| [[Bartel Leendert van der Waerden|Van der Waerden]]<ref> van der Waerden, Modern Algebra (1949 English edn.), Vol. 1, Section 61, p.191 </ref> cites the polynomial <math>f(x) = x^5-x-1</math>. By the [[rational root theorem]] this has no rational zeros. Neither does it have linear factors modulo 2 or 3.
| |
| | |
| The Galois group of <math>f(x)</math> modulo 2 is cyclic of order 6, because <math>f(x)</math> factors modulo 2 into <math>x^2+x+1</math> and a cubic polynomial.
| |
| | |
| <math>f(x)</math> has no linear or quadratic factor modulo 3, and hence is irreducible modulo 3. Thus its Galois group modulo 3 contains an element of order 5.
| |
| | |
| It is known<ref>V. V. Prasolov, Polynomials (2004), Theorem 5.4.5(a)</ref> that a Galois group modulo a prime is isomorphic to a subgroup of the Galois group over the rationals. A permutation group on 5 objects with elements of orders 6 and 5 must be the symmetric group <math>S_5</math>, which is therefore the Galois group of <math>f(x)</math>. This is one of the simplest examples of a non-solvable quintic polynomial. According to [[Serge Lang]], [[Emil Artin]] found this example.<ref>{{citation|title=Algebraic Number Theory|volume=110|series=Graduate Texts in Mathematics|first=Serge|last=Lang|authorlink=Serge Lang|publisher=Springer|year=1994|isbn=9780387942254|page=121|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=u5eGtA0YalgC&pg=PA}}.</ref>
| |
| | |
| ==Inverse Galois problem==
| |
| {{main|Inverse Galois problem}}
| |
| | |
| All finite groups do occur as Galois groups. It is easy to construct field extensions with any given finite group as Galois group, as long as one does not also specify the [[ground field]].
| |
| | |
| For that, choose a field ''K'' and a finite group ''G''. [[Cayley's theorem]] says that ''G'' is (up to isomorphism) a subgroup of the [[symmetric group]] ''S'' on the elements of ''G''. Choose indeterminates {''x''<sub>α</sub>}, one for each element α of ''G'', and adjoin them to ''K'' to get the field ''F'' = ''K''({''x''<sub>α</sub>}). Contained within ''F'' is the field ''L'' of symmetric [[rational function]]s in the {''x''<sub>α</sub>}. The Galois group of ''F''/''L'' is ''S'', by a basic result of Emil Artin. ''G'' acts on ''F'' by restriction of action of ''S''. If the fixed field of this action is ''M'', then, by the [[fundamental theorem of Galois theory]], the Galois group of ''F''/''M'' is ''G''.
| |
| | |
| It is an open problem to prove the existence of a field extension of the rational field '''Q''' with a given finite group as Galois group. Hilbert played a part in solving the problem for all symmetric and alternating groups. [[Igor Shafarevich]] proved that every solvable finite group is the Galois group of some extension of '''Q'''. Various people have solved the inverse Galois problem for selected non-abelian [[simple group]]s. Existence of solutions has been shown for all but possibly one ([[Mathieu group]] M<sub>23</sub>) of the 26 sporadic simple groups. There is even a polynomial with integral coefficients whose Galois group is the [[Monster group]].
| |
| | |
| ==See also==
| |
| *[[Reed–Solomon error correction]]
| |
| *[[Differential Galois theory]]
| |
| *[[Grothendieck's Galois theory]]
| |
| | |
| == Notes ==
| |
| {{reflist|refs=
| |
| <ref name="Stewart">{{cite book
| |
| | author=Ian Stewart
| |
| | title =Galois Theory
| |
| | publisher=Chapman and Hall
| |
| | year=1989
| |
| | isbn=0-412-34550-1
| |
| | authorlink=Ian Stewart (mathematician)
| |
| }}</ref>
| |
| }}
| |
| | |
| ==References==
| |
| * {{cite book | author=Emil Artin | title=Galois Theory | publisher=Dover Publications | year=1998 | isbn=0-486-62342-4 | authorlink=Emil Artin}} ''(Reprinting of second revised edition of 1944, The University of Notre Dame Press)''.
| |
| * {{cite book | author=[[Jörg Bewersdorff]] | title=Galois Theory for Beginners: A Historical Perspective| publisher=American Mathematical Society | year=2006 | isbn=0-8218-3817-2}} .
| |
| * {{cite book|author=Harold M. Edwards | authorlink = Harold Edwards (mathematician)| title=Galois Theory | publisher=Springer-Verlag | year = 1984 | isbn=0-387-90980-X}} ''(Galois' original paper, with extensive background and commentary.)''
| |
| * {{cite journal| first= H. Gray | last=Funkhouser | title=A short account of the history of symmetric functions of roots of equations | journal=American Mathematical Monthly | year=1930 | volume= 37 | issue=7 | pages=357–365 | doi=10.2307/2299273| publisher= The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 37, No. 7| ref= harv| jstor= 2299273 }}
| |
| * {{springer|title=Galois theory|id=p/g043160}}
| |
| * {{cite book | author=Nathan Jacobson| title=Basic Algebra I (2nd ed) | publisher=W.H. Freeman and Company | year=1985 | isbn=0-7167-1480-9 | authorlink=Nathan Jacobson}} ''(Chapter 4 gives an introduction to the field-theoretic approach to Galois theory.)''
| |
| * {{Cite book | last1=Janelidze | first1=G. | last2=Borceux | first2=Francis | title=Galois theories | publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] | isbn=978-0-521-80309-0 | year=2001 | ref=harv | postscript=<!--None-->}} (This book introduces the reader to the Galois theory of [[Grothendieck]], and some generalisations, leading to Galois [[groupoids]].)
| |
| * {{Cite book | last1=Lang | first1=Serge | author1-link=Serge Lang | title=Algebraic Number Theory | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | isbn=978-0-387-94225-4 | year=1994 | ref=harv | postscript=<!--None-->}}
| |
| * {{cite book|author=M. M. Postnikov | title=Foundations of Galois Theory | publisher=Dover Publications | year = 2004 | isbn=0-486-43518-0}}
| |
| * {{cite book|author=Joseph Rotman | title =Galois Theory (2nd edition)| publisher=Springer| year=1998 | isbn=0-387-98541-7}}
| |
| * {{Cite book | last1=Völklein | first1=Helmut | title=Groups as Galois groups: an introduction | publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] | isbn=978-0-521-56280-5 | year=1996 | ref=harv | postscript=<!--None-->}}
| |
| * {{Cite book | last1=van der Waerden | first1=Bartel Leendert | author1-link=Bartel Leendert van der Waerden | title=Moderne Algebra |language= German |publisher=Springer | year=1931 | location=Berlin |ref=harv | postscript=<!--None-->}}. '''English translation''' (of 2nd revised edition): {{Cite book | title = Modern algebra | publisher=Frederick Ungar |location= New York |year= 1949}} ''(Later republished in English by Springer under the title "Algebra".)''
| |
| * {{Cite web |title=(Some) New Trends in Galois Theory and Arithmetic |first=Florian |last=Pop |authorlink=Florian Pop|url=http://www.math.upenn.edu/~pop/Research/files-Res/Japan01.pdf |year=2001 |ref=harv |postscript=<!--None-->}}
| |
| | |
| ==External links==
| |
| | |
| Some on-line tutorials on Galois theory appear at:
| |
| * http://www.math.niu.edu/~beachy/aaol/galois.html
| |
| * http://nrich.maths.org/public/viewer.php?obj_id=1422
| |
| * http://www.jmilne.org/math/CourseNotes/ft.html
| |
| | |
| Online textbooks in French, German, Italian and English can be found at:
| |
| * http://www.galois-group.net/
| |
| | |
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Galois Theory}}
| |
| [[Category:Galois theory|*]]
| |