|
|
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Image:Adoption SFD ANI s.gif|thumb|327px|Dynamic stock and flow diagram of model ''New product adoption'' (model from article by [[John Sterman]] 2001)]]
| | Alyson is the title individuals use to contact me and I think it sounds quite good when you say it. Distributing manufacturing is where her primary earnings comes from. What I love performing is football but I don't have the time lately. I've usually cherished living in Kentucky but now I'm considering other choices.<br><br>Feel free to visit my blog post clairvoyance - [http://example.internetdevels.com/autocomplete/node/1074985 this post example.internetdevels.com], |
| '''System dynamics''' is an approach to understanding the behaviour of [[complex system]]s over time. It deals with internal feedback loops and time delays that affect the behaviour of the entire system.<ref name="sysdyn">[http://sysdyn.clexchange.org MIT System Dynamics in Education Project (SDEP)<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> What makes using system dynamics different from other approaches to studying complex systems is the use of [[feedback]] loops and [[Stock and flow|stocks and flows]]. These elements help describe how even seemingly simple systems display baffling [[nonlinearity]].
| |
| | |
| ==Overview==
| |
| System dynamics (SD) is a methodology and mathematical modeling technique for framing, understanding, and discussing complex issues and problems. Originally developed in the 1950s to help corporate managers improve their understanding of industrial processes, system dynamics is currently being used throughout the public and private sector for policy analysis and design.<ref name ="UDE"/>
| |
| | |
| Convenient [[Graphical user interface|GUI]] system dynamics software developed into user friendly versions by the 1990s and have been applied to diverse systems. SD models solve the problem of simultaneity (mutual causation) by updating all variables in small time increments with positive and negative feedbacks and time delays structuring the interactions and control. The best known SD model is probably the 1972 [[The Limits to Growth]]. This model forecast that exponential growth would lead to economic collapse during the 21st century under a wide variety of growth scenarios.
| |
| | |
| System dynamics is an aspect of [[systems theory]] as a method for understanding the dynamic behavior of complex systems. The basis of the method is the recognition that the structure of any system — the many circular, interlocking, sometimes time-delayed relationships among its components — is often just as important in determining its behavior as the individual components themselves. Examples are [[chaos theory]] and [[social dynamics]]. It is also claimed that because there are often properties-of-the-whole which cannot be found among the properties-of-the-elements, in some cases the behavior of the whole cannot be explained in terms of the behavior of the parts.
| |
| | |
| ==History==
| |
| System dynamics was created during the mid-1950s<ref>Forrester, Jay (1971). Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Technology Review 73(3): 52–68</ref> by Professor [[Jay Forrester]] of the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]]. In 1956, Forrester accepted a professorship in the newly formed [[MIT Sloan School of Management]]. His initial goal was to determine how his background in science and engineering could be brought to bear, in some useful way, on the core issues that determine the success or failure of corporations. Forrester's insights into the common foundations that underlie engineering, which led to the creation of system dynamics, were triggered, to a large degree, by his involvement with managers at [[General Electric]] (GE) during the mid-1950s. At that time, the managers at GE were perplexed because employment at their appliance plants in Kentucky exhibited a significant three-year cycle. The [[business cycle]] was judged to be an insufficient explanation for the employment instability. From hand simulations (or calculations) of the [[stock-flow-feedback]] structure of the GE plants, which included the existing corporate decision-making structure for hiring and layoffs, Forrester was able to show how the instability in GE employment was due to the internal structure of the firm and not to an external force such as the business cycle. These [[hand simulations]] were the beginning of the field of system dynamics.<ref name ="UDE">Michael J. Radzicki and Robert A. Taylor (2008). [http://www.systemdynamics.org/DL-IntroSysDyn/start.htm "Origin of System Dynamics: Jay W. Forrester and the History of System Dynamics"]. In: ''U.S. Department of Energy's Introduction to System Dynamics''. Retrieved 23 Oktober 2008.</ref>
| |
| | |
| During the late 1950s and early 1960s, Forrester and a team of graduate students moved the emerging field of system dynamics from the hand-simulation stage to the formal [[computer modeling]] stage. [[Richard Bennett (computer scientist)]] created the first system dynamics computer modeling language called SIMPLE (Simulation of Industrial Management Problems with Lots of Equations) in the spring of 1958. In 1959, [[Phyllis Fox]] and [[Alexander Pugh]] wrote the first version of
| |
| [[DYNAMO (programming language)|DYNAMO]] (DYNAmic MOdels), an improved version of SIMPLE, and the system dynamics language became the industry standard for over thirty years. Forrester published the first, and still classic, book in the field titled Industrial Dynamics in 1961.<ref name ="UDE"/>
| |
| | |
| From the late 1950s to the late 1960s, system dynamics was applied almost exclusively to corporate/managerial problems. In 1968, however, an unexpected occurrence caused the field to broaden beyond corporate modeling. [[John F. Collins|John Collins]], the former mayor of Boston, was appointed a visiting professor of Urban Affairs at MIT. The result of the Collins-Forrester collaboration was a book titled Urban Dynamics. The [[Urban Dynamics]] model presented in the book was the first major non-corporate application of system dynamics.<ref name ="UDE"/>
| |
| | |
| The second major noncorporate application of system dynamics came shortly after the first. In 1970, Jay Forrester was invited by the [[Club of Rome]] to a meeting in Bern, Switzerland. The Club of Rome is an organization devoted to solving what its members describe as the "predicament of mankind"—that is, the global crisis that may appear sometime in the future, due to the demands being placed on the Earth's carrying capacity (its sources of renewable and nonrenewable resources and its sinks for the disposal of pollutants) by the world's exponentially growing population. At the Bern meeting, Forrester was asked if system dynamics could be used to address the predicament of mankind. His answer, of course, was that it could. On the plane back from the Bern meeting, Forrester created the first draft of a system dynamics model of the world's socioeconomic system. He called this model WORLD1. Upon his return to the United States, Forrester refined WORLD1 in preparation for a visit to MIT by members of the Club of Rome. Forrester called the refined version of the model WORLD2. Forrester published WORLD2 in a book titled [[World Dynamics]].<ref name ="UDE"/>
| |
| | |
| ==Topics in systems dynamics==
| |
| The elements of system dynamics diagrams are feedback, accumulation of flows into stocks and time delays.
| |
| | |
| As an illustration of the use of system dynamics, imagine an organisation that plans to introduce an innovative new durable consumer product. The organisation needs to understand the possible market dynamics in order to design marketing and production plans.
| |
| | |
| ===Causal loop diagrams===
| |
| {{Main|Causal loop diagram}}
| |
| In the system dynamics methodology, a problem or a system (e.g., ecosystem, political system or mechanical system) is first represented as a [[causal loop diagram]].<ref>Sterman, John D. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. New York: McGraw</ref> A causal loop diagram is a simple map of a system with all its constituent components and their interactions. By capturing interactions and consequently the feedback loops (see figure below), a causal loop diagram reveals the structure of a system. By understanding the structure of a system, it becomes possible to ascertain a system’s behavior over a certain time period.<ref>Meadows, Donella. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Earthscan</ref>
| |
| | |
| The causal loop diagram of the new product introduction may look as follows:
| |
| | |
| [[Image:Adoption CLD.svg|centre|Causal loop diagram of ''New product adoption'' model|frame]]
| |
| | |
| There are two feedback loops in this diagram. The positive reinforcement (labeled R) loop on the right indicates that the more people have already adopted the new product, the stronger the word-of-mouth impact. There will be more references to the product, more demonstrations, and more reviews. This positive feedback should generate sales that continue to grow.
| |
| | |
| The second feedback loop on the left is negative reinforcement (or "balancing" and hence labeled B). Clearly growth can not continue forever, because as more and more people adopt, there remain fewer and fewer potential adopters.
| |
| | |
| Both feedback loops act simultaneously, but at different times they may have different strengths. Thus one would expect growing sales in the initial years, and then declining sales in the later years.
| |
| | |
| [[Image:Adoption CLD ANI.gif|centre|Causal loop diagram of ''New product adoption'' model with nodes values after calculus|frame]]
| |
| In this dynamic causal loop diagram :
| |
| *step1 : (+) green arrows show that ''Adoption rate'' is function of ''Potential Adopters'' and ''Adopters''
| |
| *step2 : (-) red arrow shows that ''Potential adopters'' decreases by ''Adoption rate''
| |
| *step3 : (+) blue arrow shows that ''Adopters'' increases by ''Adoption rate''
| |
| | |
| ===Stock and flow diagrams===
| |
| {{Main|Stock and flow}}
| |
| Causal loop diagrams aid in visualizing a system’s structure and behavior, and analyzing the system qualitatively. To perform a more detailed quantitative analysis, a causal loop diagram is transformed to a [[stock and flow]] diagram. A Stock and flow model helps in studying and analyzing the system in a quantitative way, such models are usually built and simulated using computer software.
| |
| | |
| A stock is the term for any entity that accumulates or depletes over time. A flow is the rate of change in a stock.
| |
| | |
| [[Image:Simple stock and flow diagram.gif|centre|frame|A flow is the rate of accumulation of the stock]]
| |
| | |
| In our example, there are two stocks: Potential adopters and Adopters. There is one flow: New adopters. For every new adopter, the stock of potential adopters declines by one, and the stock of adopters increases by one.
| |
| | |
| [[Image:Adoption SFD.gif|centre|Stock and flow diagram of ''New product adoption'' model|frame]]
| |
| | |
| ===Equations===
| |
| The real power of system dynamics is utilised through simulation. Although it is possible to perform the modeling in a [[spreadsheet]], there are a [[List of system dynamics software|variety of software]] packages that have been optimised for this.
| |
| | |
| The steps involved in a simulation are:
| |
| | |
| *Define the problem boundary
| |
| *Identify the most important stocks and flows that change these stock levels
| |
| *Identify sources of information that impact the flows
| |
| *Identify the main feedback loops
| |
| *Draw a causal loop diagram that links the stocks, flows and sources of information
| |
| *Write the equations that determine the flows
| |
| *Estimate the parameters and initial conditions. These can be estimated using statistical methods, expert opinion, market research data or other relevant sources of information.<ref name="Sterman2001CMR">{{cite journal |last=Sterman |first=John D. |year=2001 |month= |title=System dynamics modeling: Tools for learning in a complex world |journal=California management review |volume=43 |issue=4 |pages=8–25}}</ref>
| |
| *Simulate the model and analyse results.
| |
| | |
| In this example, the equations that change the two stocks via the flow are:
| |
| | |
| <math> \ \mbox{Potential adopters} = \int_{0} ^{t} \mbox{-New adopters }\,dt </math>
| |
| <!-- I don't want to mark up this great contribution, but shouldn't this be something like potential adopters at t(0) - sum(new adopters at t(i))? Yes -->
| |
| <math> \ \mbox{Adopters} = \int_{0} ^{t} \mbox{New adopters }\,dt </math>
| |
| | |
| ===Equations in discrete time===
| |
| List of all the equations in [[discrete time]], in their order of execution in each year, for years 1 to 15 :
| |
| | |
| <math>1) \ \mbox{Probability that contact has not yet adopted}=\mbox{Potential adopters} / (\mbox{Potential adopters } + \mbox{ Adopters}) </math>
| |
| <math>2) \ \mbox{Imitators}=q \cdot \mbox{Adopters} \cdot \mbox{Probability that contact has not yet adopted}</math>
| |
| <math>3) \ \mbox{Innovators}=p \cdot \mbox{Potential adopters} </math>
| |
| <math>4) \ \mbox{New adopters}=\mbox{Innovators}+\mbox{Imitators} </math>
| |
| <math>4.1) \ \mbox{Potential adopters}\ -= \mbox{New adopters }\ </math>
| |
| <math>4.2) \ \mbox{Adopters}\ += \mbox{New adopters }\ </math>
| |
| | |
| <math>\ p=0.03 </math>
| |
| <math>\ q=0.4 </math>
| |
| | |
| ====Dynamic simulation results====
| |
| The dynamic simulation results show that the behaviour of the system would be to have growth in '''adopters''' that follows a classical s-curve shape.<br />
| |
| The increase in '''adopters''' is very slow initially, then exponential growth for a period, followed ultimately by saturation.
| |
| | |
| [[Image:Adoption SFD ANI.gif|centre|Dynamic stock and flow diagram of ''New product adoption'' model|frame]]
| |
| [[Image:SFDD VAL.gif|centre|Stocks and flows values for years = 0 to 15|frame]]
| |
| | |
| ===Equations in continuous time===
| |
| To get intermediate values and better accuracy, the model can run in continuous time : we multiply the number of units of time and we proportionally divide values that change stock levels. In this example we multiply the 15 years by 4 to obtain 60 trimesters, and we divide the value of the flow by 4.<br>
| |
| Dividing the value is the simplest with the [[Euler method]], but other methods could be employed instead, such as [[Runge–Kutta methods]].
| |
| | |
| List of the equations in continuous time for trimesters = 1 to 60 :
| |
| *They are the same equations as in the section '''Equation in discrete time''' above, except equations '''4.1''' and '''4.2''' replaced by following :
| |
| <math>10) \ \mbox{Valve New adopters}\ = \mbox{New adopters} \cdot TimeStep </math>
| |
| <math>10.1) \ \mbox{Potential adopters}\ -= \mbox{Valve New adopters} </math>
| |
| <math>10.2) \ \mbox{Adopters}\ += \mbox{Valve New adopters } </math>
| |
| | |
| <math> \ TimeStep = 1/4 </math>
| |
| | |
| *In the below stock and flow diagram, the intermediate flow 'Valve New adopters' calculates the equation :
| |
| <math> \ \mbox{Valve New adopters}\ = \mbox{New adopters } \cdot TimeStep </math>
| |
| [[Image:Adaption SFD continuous time.png|centre|Dynamic stock and flow diagram of ''New product adoption'' model in continuous time|frame]]
| |
| | |
| ==Application==
| |
| System dynamics has found application in a wide range of areas, for example [[Population dynamics|population]], [[ecology|ecological]] and [[Economics|economic]] systems, which usually interact strongly with each other.
| |
| | |
| System dynamics have various "back of the envelope" management applications. They are a potent tool to:
| |
| *Teach [[system thinking]] reflexes to persons being coached
| |
| *Analyze and compare assumptions and [[mental models]] about the way things work
| |
| *Gain qualitative insight into the workings of a system or the consequences of a decision
| |
| *Recognize archetypes of dysfunctional systems in everyday practice
| |
| | |
| Computer software is used to [[computer simulation|simulate]] a system dynamics [[model (abstract)|model]] of the situation being studied. Running "what if" simulations to test certain policies on such a model can greatly aid in understanding how the system changes over time. System dynamics is very similar to [[systems thinking]] and constructs the same [[causal loop diagram]]s of systems with feedback. However, system dynamics typically goes further and utilises simulation to study the behaviour of systems and the impact of alternative policies.<ref name="SysDynSociety">[http://www.systemdynamics.org/ System Dynamics Society<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>
| |
| | |
| System dynamics has been used to investigate resource dependencies, and resulting problems, in product development.<ref name="Repenning:2001kx">{{cite journal |last=Repenning |first=Nelson P. |year=2001 |month= |title= Understanding fire fighting in new product development |journal= The Journal of Product Innovation Management |volume= 18 |issue=5|pages= 285–300|doi= 10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00099-6}}</ref><ref name="Repenning:1999ng">Nelson P. Repenning (1999). ''Resource dependence in product development improvement efforts'', Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management Department of Operations Management/System Dynamics Group, dec 1999.</ref>
| |
| | |
| ===Example===
| |
| [[Image:Causal Loop Diagram of a Model.gif|thumb|600px|center|Causal loop diagram of a model examining the growth or decline of a life insurance company.<ref name ="Tay Feedback"/>]]
| |
| | |
| The figure above is a causal loop diagram of a system dynamics model created to examine forces that may be responsible for the growth or decline of [[life insurance company|life insurance companies]] in the [[United Kingdom]]. A number of this figure's features are worth mentioning. The first is that the model's negative feedback loops are identified by "C's," which stand for "Counteracting" loops. The second is that double slashes are used to indicate places where there is a significant delay between causes (i.e., variables at the tails of arrows) and effects (i.e., variables at the heads of arrows). This is a common causal loop diagramming convention in system dynamics. Third, is that thicker lines are used to identify the feedback loops and links that author wishes the audience to focus on. This is also a common system dynamics diagramming convention. Last, it is clear that a decision maker would find it impossible to think through the dynamic behavior inherent in the model, from inspection of the figure alone.<ref name ="Tay Feedback">Michael J. Radzicki and Robert A. Taylor (2008). [http://www.systemdynamics.org/DL-IntroSysDyn/start.htm "Feedback"]. In: ''U.S. Department of Energy's Introduction to System Dynamics''. Retrieved 23 October 2008.</ref>
| |
| | |
| === Example of piston motion ===
| |
| *1.Objective : study of a crank-connecting rod system.
| |
| We want to model a crank-connecting rod system through a system dynamic model. Two different full descriptions of the physical system with related systems of equations can be found [[Piston motion equations#Position|hereafter]] {{en icon}} and [[:fr:Système bielle-manivelle#Équations horaires|hereafter]] {{fr icon}} : they give the same results. In this example, the crank, with variable radius and angular frequency, will drive a piston with a variable connecting rod length.
| |
| | |
| *2.System dynamic modeling : the system is now modelled, according to a stock and flow system dynamic logic.
| |
| Below figure shows stock and flow diagram :<br>
| |
| [[Image:TRUE Piston SFD.png|centre|Stock and flow diagram for crank-connecting rod system dynamic |frame]]
| |
| | |
| *3.Simulation : the behavior of the crank-connecting rod dynamic system can then be simulated.
| |
| Next figure is a 3D simulation, created using the [[Procedural animation]] technic. Variables of the model animate all parts of this animation : crank, radius, angular frequency, rod length, piston position.<br>
| |
| [[Image:TRUE Procedural Animation.gif|centre|3D [[Procedural animation]] of the crank-connecting rod system modeled in 2|frame]]
| |
| | |
| ==See also==
| |
| {{multicol}}
| |
| ;Related subjects
| |
| *[[Causal loop diagram]]
| |
| *[[Ecosystem model]]
| |
| *[[Plateau Principle]]
| |
| *[[System Archetypes]]
| |
| *[[System Dynamics Society]]
| |
| *[[Twelve leverage points]]
| |
| *[[Viable system phenomena]]
| |
| *[[Wicked problems]]
| |
| *[[World3]]
| |
| *[[Population dynamics]]
| |
| *[[Predator-prey interaction]]
| |
| {{multicol-break}}
| |
| ;Related fields
| |
| *[[Dynamical systems theory]]
| |
| *[[Operations research]]
| |
| *[[Social dynamics]]
| |
| *[[Systems theory]]
| |
| *[[Systems thinking]]
| |
| *[[TRIZ]]
| |
| {{multicol-break}}
| |
| ;Related scientists
| |
| * [[Bruce Hannon]]
| |
| * [[Jay Forrester]]
| |
| * [[Dennis Meadows]]
| |
| * [[Donella Meadows]]
| |
| * [[Peter Senge]]
| |
| * [[Graeme Snooks]]
| |
| * [[John Sterman]]
| |
| {{multicol-break}}
| |
| {{Portal|Systems science}}
| |
| {{Multicol-end}}
| |
| *[[List of system dynamics software]]
| |
| | |
| ==References==
| |
| {{Reflist}}
| |
| | |
| ==Further reading==
| |
| *{{cite book |last= Forrester |first=Jay W. |title=Industrial Dynamics |year=1961 |publisher=Pegasus Communications |location= |isbn= 1-883823-36-6 }}
| |
| *{{cite book |last= Forrester |first=Jay W. |title=Urban Dynamics |year=1969 |publisher=Pegasus Communications |location= |isbn= 1-883823-39-0 }}
| |
| *{{cite book |last= Meadows |first=Donella H. |title=[[Limits to Growth]]|year=1972 |publisher=University books |location=New York |isbn= 0-87663-165-0}}
| |
| *{{cite book |last= Morecroft |first=John |title=Strategic Modelling and Business Dynamics: A Feedback Systems Approach |year=2007 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |location= |isbn=0-470-01286-2 }}
| |
| *{{cite book |last= Roberts | first=Edward B. | title=Managerial Applications of System Dynamics | year = 1978 | publisher = MIT Press | location = Cambridge | isbn =0-262-18088-X }}
| |
| *{{cite book |last= Randers | first=Jorgen | title=Elements of the System Dynamics Method| year = 1980 | publisher = MIT Press | location = Cambridge | isbn =0-915299-39-9 }}
| |
| *{{cite book |last= Senge |first=Peter |title=[[The Fifth Discipline]]|year=1990 |publisher=Currency |location= |isbn= 0-385-26095-4}}
| |
| *{{cite book |last= Sterman |first=John D. |title=[[Business dynamics|Business Dynamics]]: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world |year=2000 |publisher=McGraw Hill |location= |isbn=0-07-231135-5 }}
| |
| | |
| ==External links==
| |
| {{Commons category|systems dynamics}}
| |
| *[http://www.systemdynamics.org/DL-IntroSysDyn/ Study Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy's Introducing System Dynamics - ]
| |
| *[http://web.mit.edu/jsterman/www/DID.html Desert Island Dynamics] "An Annotated Survey of the Essential System Dynamics Literature"
| |
| | |
| {{Systems}}
| |
| {{Systems Engineering}}
| |
| | |
| {{DEFAULTSORT:System Dynamics}}
| |
| [[Category:Complex systems theory|Dynamics]]
| |
| [[Category:Operations research]]
| |
| [[Category:Risk]]
| |
| [[Category:Scientific modeling]]
| |
| [[Category:Systems theory|Dynamics]]
| |