|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Cleanup|date=May 2010}}
| | Hello from United Kingdom. I'm glad to came across you. My first name is Blaine. <br>I live in a small town called St Lawrence in nothern United Kingdom.<br>I was also born in St Lawrence 27 years ago. Married in December 2003. I'm working at the post office.<br><br>Look at my web blog :: [http://biesiada.org/ricar/index.php Fifa 15 coin Generator] |
| | |
| In [[applied mathematics]] and [[mechanical engineering]], the '''Rayleigh–Ritz method''' (after [[Walther Ritz]] and [[Lord Rayleigh]]) is a widely used, classical method for the calculation of the natural [[oscillation|vibration]] [[frequency]] of a structure in the second or higher order. It is a [[direct variational method]] in which the minimum of a functional defined on a [[normed linear space]] is approximated by a linear combination of elements from that space. This method will yield solutions when an analytical form for the true solution may be intractable.
| |
| | |
| The method is also widely used in [[quantum chemistry]].
| |
| | |
| Typically in [[mechanical engineering]] it is used for finding the approximate real [[resonant frequency|resonant frequencies]] of multi [[degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)|degree of freedom]] systems, such as [[spring mass system]]s or [[flywheel]]s on a shaft with varying [[cross section (geometry)|cross section]]. It is an extension of [[Rayleigh's method]]. It can also be used for finding [[buckling load]]s and post-buckling behaviour for columns.
| |
| | |
| The following discussion uses the simplest case, where the system has two lumped springs and two lumped masses, and only two mode shapes are assumed. Hence ''M'' = [''m''<sub>1</sub>, ''m''<sub>2</sub>] and ''K'' = [''k''<sub>1</sub>, ''k''<sub>2</sub>].
| |
| | |
| A [[mode shape]] is assumed for the system, with two terms, one of which is weighted by a factor ''B'', e.g. ''Y'' = [1, 1] + ''B''[1, −1].
| |
| [[Simple harmonic motion]] theory says that the [[velocity]] at the time when deflection is zero, is the [[angular frequency]] <math>\omega</math> times the deflection (y) at time of maximum deflection. In this example the [[kinetic energy]] (KE) for each mass is <math>\frac{1}{2}\omega^2 Y_1^2 m_1</math> etc., and the [[potential energy]] (PE) for each [[Spring (device)|spring]] is <math>\frac{1}{2} k_1 Y_1^2</math> etc. For [[continuous system]]s the expressions are more complex.
| |
| | |
| We also know, since no [[damping]] is assumed, that KE when y=0 equals the PE when v=0 for the whole system. As there is no damping all locations reach v=0 simultaneously.
| |
| | |
| so, since KE = PE,
| |
| | |
| : <math>\sum_{i=1}^2 \left(\frac{1}{2} \omega^2 Y_i^2 M_i\right)=\sum_{i=1}^2 \left(\frac{1}{2} K_i Y_i^2\right)</math>
| |
| | |
| Note that the overall amplitude of the mode shape cancels out from each side, always. That is, the actual size of the assumed deflection does not matter, just the mode ''shape''.
| |
| | |
| Mathematical manipulations then obtain an expression for <math>\omega</math>, in terms of B, which can be [[derivative|differentiated]] with respect to B, to find the minimum, i.e. when <math>d\omega/dB=0</math>. This gives the value of B for which <math>\omega</math> is lowest. This is an upper bound solution for <math>\omega</math> if <math>\omega</math> is hoped to be the predicted fundamental frequency of the system because the mode shape is ''assumed'', but we have found the lowest value of that upper bound, given our assumptions, because B is used to find the optimal 'mix' of the two assumed mode shape functions.
| |
| | |
| There are many tricks with this method, the most important is to try and choose realistic assumed mode shapes. For example in the case of [[beam deflection]] problems it is wise to use a deformed shape that is analytically similar to the expected solution. A [[quartic function|quartic]] may fit most of the easy problems of simply linked beams even if the order of the deformed solution may be lower. The springs and masses do not have to be discrete, they can be continuous (or a mixture), and this method can be easily used in a [[spreadsheet]] to find the natural frequencies of quite complex distributed systems, if you can describe the distributed KE and PE terms easily, or else break the continuous elements up into discrete parts.
| |
| | |
| This method could be used [[iteratively]], adding additional mode shapes to the previous best solution, or you can build up a long expression with many Bs and many mode shapes, and then differentiate them [[partial differentiation|partially]].
| |
| | |
| == See also ==
| |
| *[[Ritz method]]
| |
| | |
| ==External links==
| |
| *http://www.math.nps.navy.mil/~bneta/4311.pdf - Course on Calculus of Variations, has a section on Rayleigh–Ritz method.
| |
| | |
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Rayleigh-Ritz Method}}
| |
| [[Category:Numerical differential equations]]
| |
| [[Category:Dynamical systems]]
| |
| | |
| [[de:Verfahren von Ritz]]
| |
Hello from United Kingdom. I'm glad to came across you. My first name is Blaine.
I live in a small town called St Lawrence in nothern United Kingdom.
I was also born in St Lawrence 27 years ago. Married in December 2003. I'm working at the post office.
Look at my web blog :: Fifa 15 coin Generator