|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{cleanup|date=December 2008}}
| | Hello. Allow me introduce the writer. Her title is Refugia Shryock. South Dakota is exactly where I've always been residing. To collect coins is one of [http://indianrajneet.com/groups/best-strategies-for-keeping-candida-albicans-from-increasing/ over the counter std test] issues I adore most. He utilized to be unemployed but now he is a pc operator but his marketing never arrives. |
| '''Universal Intelligence''' is a term used by some to describe what they see as organization, or order of the universe. It has been described as "the intrinsic tendency for things to self-organize and co-evolve into ever more complex, intricately interwoven and mutually compatible forms."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.co-intelligence.org/I-fivedimensions.html |title=Five Dimensions of Co-Intelligence |publisher=Co-intelligence.org |date= |accessdate=2009-02-26}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| A general description may include broad philosophies and terminology. For example, it has been described as that which resides within or beyond nature—from [[ecological wisdom]] to the [[Tao]] and "God's will". While it includes concepts like [[self-organization]], [[co-evolution]], and co-intelligence, from a theological construct it isn't generally described as a personal "[[God]]" in the usual [[Abrahamic]], [[monotheism|monotheistic]], sense, but an impersonal god in the [[pantheism|pantheistic]] sense. This is a basic theological viewpoint in [[Vitalism]], but the concepts are mutually exclusive ([[heresy|heretical]]).
| |
| | |
| In [[chiropractic]] [[philosophy]], it is used as the starting point, as an ''[[a priori and a posteriori|a priori]]'' principle: "There is a Universal Intelligence in all matter continually giving to it its properties and actions, thus maintaining it in existence." It is related to the chiropractic terms [[Innate Intelligence]] and Educated Intelligence.{{citation needed|date=September 2011}}
| |
| | |
| In attempting to design an [[artificial intelligence|artificial machine intelligence]], the term universal intelligence is a descriptive term based on a mathematical formula.
| |
| | |
| == Etymology ==
| |
| | |
| The term universal intelligence was possibly first used by the Greek philosopher Anaxagoras 450BC: "He introduced the idea of a [[Nous]], the eternal mind, which transforms chaos into order and through it the material world comes into being."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thebigview.com/mind/timeline01.html |title=Timeline - Epistemology in Antiquity |publisher=Thebigview.com |date= |accessdate=2009-02-26}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| == Use in chiropractic philosophy ==
| |
| | |
| The term "Universal Intelligence" is used as a starting point in [[chiropractic]] philosophy. In order to establish the existence of a Universal Intelligence, [[inductive reasoning]] is used, while the rest of chiropractic philosophy is deductive in nature. This concept is based upon the idea that organization bespeaks an intelligence, and thus, the order and organization of atoms, which are universal, bespeaks an intelligence of the universe.
| |
| | |
| The concept of Universal Intelligence was first expounded upon by [[D. D. Palmer]] in his 1910 book, ''"The Chiropractor's Adjuster"'':<ref name = "Chiro Adjuster">Palmer DD.(1910)''The Chiropractor’s Adjuster'': A Textbook of the Science, Art and Philosophy of Chiropractic for Students and Practitioners. Portland, OR: Portland Printing House</ref>
| |
| | |
| : "As the Intelligent Energy that operates the human machine is derived from an Infinite Source, the '''Universal Intelligence''', and is, therefore, limited only by the capacity of the brain to transform and individualize it, it is evident that any excess, deficiency or irregularity of action, either of which is a form of disease, must be due to some mechanical obstruction which prevents its normal transmission."
| |
| | |
| The first principle of chiropractic philosophy is called the Major Premise:
| |
| | |
| : "A Universal Intelligence is in all matter and continually gives to it all its properties and actions, thus maintaining it in existence."
| |
| | |
| R. W. Stephenson, D.C., Ph. C., was the first to put chiropractic philosophy into a systematic and organized manner, which appeared in his 1927 publication, ''"Chiropractic Textbook:"''<ref name = "Chiropractic Textbook">R. W. Stephenson, D.C., Ph. C.(1927)''Chiropractic Textbook'. Palmer School of Chiropractic</ref>
| |
| | |
| : "Universal Intelligence is in all matter and continually gives to it all the properties and actions. The expression of this intelligence through matter is the Chiropractic meaning of life; therefore life is necessarily the union of intelligence and matter. Force unites intelligence and matter. Universal Intelligence gives force to both inorganic and organic matter. That force which Universal Intelligence gives to organic matter as a higher order of its manifestations, is called [[Innate Intelligence]]."<ref name="Chiropractic Textbook"/>
| |
| | |
| [[B. J. Palmer]] wrote extensively on chiropractic and mentions Universal Intelligence numerous times:
| |
| | |
| : "Education, so far as health problems and religious theories are concerned, works from outside in; from below upward. Universal intelligence and [[Innate intelligence]] work from above downward, within outward." vol 22
| |
| | |
| : "Behind the Universe is a Universal Intelligence which has directed its functions in millions of ways for millions of years. It follows a definite pattern which never varies, each to its kind and form." vol 22 "THE BIGNESS OF THE FELLOW WITHIN", By B. J. PALMER, D.C., Ph. C., COPYRIGHT, 1949, BY B. J. PALMER
| |
| | |
| : "We assume you have read our writings and know whereof WE speak. If you can imagine the derision, contempt, scoffing he presents in trying to make it appear that we are establishing an unfounded, ungrounded, fantastical religious “cult”, then you know what we are opposing. No where in any of my writings will you find anything taking on any appearance of a religion, other than to acknowledge as fundamental a Universal Intelligence, call it God if one must, which is personified in man as a Unital Innate Intelligence; one of which is all intelligence, all powerful sufficient for the Universe, the other of which is all intelligent and all powerful sufficient unto the unit, be that unit man or animal, insect or tree, etc., as exemplified in any, every, and all LIVING objects." vol 26, "CONFLICTS CLARIFY" By B. J. PALMER, D.C., Ph. C. President, the Palmer School of Chiropractic, COPYRIGHT 1951, BY B. J. PALMER
| |
| | |
| : "Why title IT “UNIVERSAL INTELLIGENCE?” Because man, with his limited horizon, suggests IT possesses knowledge, understanding, ideas, ideals, discrimination between life and death, normal and abnormal, right and wrong, good and bad, constructive and destructive values of materials; adapts itself to conditions to preserve its integrity in all living products it creates and sustains. That IT IS “universal” is an all-inclusive term of time, abilities, materials, beyond human scope. IT is that intangible SOURCE from which spring all things superior TO mortal man, IN man, TO which all men aspire, revere and seek to comprehend its unlimited possibilities and responsibilities."<ref>vol 37, "THE GLORY OF GOING ON", by B. J. PALMER D.C., Ph. C., Original Copyright 1961 B. J. Palmer, Printed in The United States of America THE PALMER SCHOOL PRESS, DAVENPORT, IOWA</ref>
| |
| | |
| === Religious implications ===
| |
| | |
| While it would be easy for someone who already believes in [[God]] to conclude that these early chiropractors were talking about God, they were not talking about a personal God in the usual [[Judeo-Christian]], [[monotheism|monotheistic]], sense, but an impersonal god in a [[pantheism|pantheistic]] sense, which is a basic theological viewpoint in [[Vitalism]]. The concepts are mutually exclusive ([[heresy|heretical]]) to practicing believers. However, Christians believe that God is omnipotent characteristically and therefore not limited by assignments.
| |
| | |
| : "It is important to remember that the chiropractic concept of a Universal Intelligence is a [[principle]] of organization. While it may share some of the attributes of God: omnipresent, without solicitude, and immutable, the concept of God has the characteristics of love, justice, righteousness, and personality. None of which are a part of Universal Intelligence." (Joseph B. Strauss, Copyright 1991 "Chiropractic Philosophy")
| |
| | |
| The comparison of Universal Intelligence to God is mentioned in various writings throughout the early chiropractic years:
| |
|
| |
| : "You may call this Universal Intelligence—God, if you choose." Vol. 1 "The Science of Chiropractic Its Principles and Philosophies" By B. J. PALMER, D. C., Ph. C.
| |
| | |
| : "We know there is a Universal Intelligence—call it “God” if you wish. We know there is an Innate Intelligence in the unit—be it tree, bird, reptile, animal, or man. The evidence is everywhere surrounding us and in us. This evidence appeals to reason, logic, common sense, and facts. It is not necessary to “believe” or “have faith” in those facts. But, where the two meet, if they do before or after death, is unknown to us. We can “believe” and “have faith” in any way we please, but there is no evidence to sustain any reason, logic, common sense, or facts." Palmer Vol. 22 1949
| |
| | |
| Even while there are religious implications with Universal Intelligence, the most influential of the early chiropractors, [[BJ Palmer]], had his doubts about various religious teachings and even criticized the [[Bible]]:
| |
| | |
| : "‘God’ is a name given to the life-giving universal principle. It is, according to the Book, both good and bad. Stories recited are constructive and destructive. These stories are full of [[Contradictions in the bible|contradictions]]. Our study of The Book made us distrust its reliability when confronted with facts as we know them. We were in doubt. We had questions for which we found no answers. That there was a Universal Intelligence was true, but it did not exist as The Book told the stories. It was not a He or Him. There were no places such as [[heaven]] or [[hell]]. The Book was not ‘the [[Revelation|Word of God]]’ because Universal Intelligence does not speak words, language. If Universal Intelligence did speak words, was it English, Greek, Latin, German, French, Chinese, or what have you—all of which are in use now, some of which were not in use then, all of which are spoken of today as ‘the word of God.’" Vol. 22
| |
| | |
| Palmer also speaks of the division of religion and medicine, as seen by this quote:
| |
| | |
| : "In the name of education, years before [[Christ]], [[Thales]], a Greek philosopher, had the idea that man was two halves of a whole—that he was divisible. He propounded and advocated a new approach to the study of man, viz., —the [[soul]], spirit, ego, subconscious mind was one study—the [[Human body|corporeal]], material, matter, tissue structure was the other study. The soul was given to the theologians—and they have claimed it was their prior arts rights for exclusive study and investigation ever since." pg 39 Vol 22
| |
| | |
| == Modern usage ==
| |
| | |
| [[James A. Putnam]] states:
| |
| | |
| : "Our ability, or even an insect's ability, to analyze hoards of always changing, almost random data coming to us at the speed of light is demonstration that something magnificent is occurring within our minds. What this means is our conscious mind is in communication with a subconscious mind that already knows what to do. It also means the universe is in communication with our subconscious minds. The universe sends us information for which we must already know the meaning. Our intelligence contains the meaning of the universe. Universal intelligence is our intelligence."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://newphysicstheory.com/Universal%20Intelligence.htm |title=Universal Intelligence James A Putnam |publisher=Newphysicstheory.com |date= |accessdate=2009-02-26}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| : "Judging from the universality of phenomena, the nature of such phenomena, and the [[logical truth|logical necessity]] of an adequate cause therefor, it is assumed that there is a Universal Intelligence which is the governing power of nature. Everything which exists is, in its degree, a manifestation of an Intelligence which is superior to the individual's comprehension. This Intelligent Power is not found alone in the great crises such as the first appearance of life and the dawning of consciousness or mind, but in the whole continuous, purposeful process."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.oldandsold.com/articles29/evolution-20.shtml |title=Apparent Objects Of The Universal Intelligence |publisher=Oldandsold.com |date= |accessdate=2009-02-26}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| : "There is more to intelligence than human intelligence. Intelligence is a property of the universe and of all that is in it. Universal Intelligence is the intrinsic tendency for things to self-organize and co-evolve into ever more complex, intricately interwoven and mutually compatible forms. Our human intelligence is but one manifestation of that universal dynamic. The more we are conscious of universal intelligence and connect ourselves to it, the more intelligence (and wisdom) we will have to work with. One might also describe Universal Intelligence as the mind or will of God or Spirit."<ref>{{cite web|author=Integrative Spirituality |url=http://www.integrativespirituality.org/postnuke/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=187 |title=Principles of effective co-intelligent collaboration :: Integrative Spirituality :: Religion, Spirituality that is Open Source, Integral, rEvolutionary |publisher=Integrative Spirituality |date= |accessdate=2009-02-26}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| Steven Dutch, Natural and Applied Sciences, [[University of Wisconsin]] - Green Bay says:
| |
| | |
| : "In his Enquiry, [[David Hume|Hume]] accurately described the [[Argument from design]] as "useless" because in and of itself it can never "establish any new principles of conduct and behavior." The Argument From Design only shows at best that there is intelligent design in the universe; it tells us nothing about whether the entity cares about human beings, communicates with them, or has moral scruples. Of itself, intelligent design does not validate any theology beyond deism."
| |
| | |
| : "On the other hand, [[intelligent design]] does not violate any known facts or logical principles. So why does it meet with such fierce opposition? True, many people leap immediately from the notion of intelligent design to the theology of their particular sect, but the proper response by anyone who claims intellectual rigor is to show the hidden assumptions in that leap of reasoning."
| |
| | |
| : "Still, it's legitimate to raise the possibility that order in the universe arises solely from the properties of the universe itself. Or is it? We know that some cases of complex order are the result of intelligent design. We do not know that any other origin for complex order is possible. What basis do we have even for postulating such a possibility? The bottom line is that none of the criticisms of the Argument From Design are compelled by any empirical or logical evidence; they are inspired solely by the desire to discredit the Argument From Design for the sake of discrediting it."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/Hume.htm |title=David Hume and the Argument from Design |publisher=Uwgb.edu |date= |accessdate=2009-02-26}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| [[The Secret (2006 film)|"The Secret"]] interviewee Bob Proctor references "Universal Intelligence" when referring to the subconscious, stating that it is the place from which we attract things into our lives.
| |
| | |
| == Use in artificial intelligence ==
| |
| | |
| There is a desire to create an "[[artificial intelligence]]" in a machine. In doing so the first problem is defining intelligence. "How can we hope to create artificial intelligence if we can't even say what intelligence is?"<ref>http://www.vetta.org/documents/Benelearn-UniversalIntelligence-Talk.pdf</ref> To help make this distinction, a mathematical formula has been devised to standardize a universal intelligence for comparison among various machine intelligence systems, although its usefulness and ability to be calculated may be in question.
| |
| | |
| ::<math>\Upsilon (\pi)=\sum_{\mu \in E}{2^{-K(\mu)}V_\mu^\pi}</math>
| |
| :where ''E'' is the set of all payoff/outcome functions (see page 11) (loosely speaking), π is a "universal" strategy, ''K'' is the [[Kolmogorov complexity]], and (page 9)
| |
| ::<math>V_\mu^\pi = \mathbf{E} \left ( \sum_{i=1}^\infty r_i \right )</math>
| |
| | |
| According to Ben Goertzel, Ph. D, "Since universal intelligence is only definable up to an arbitrary constant, it's of at best ~heuristic~ value in thinking about the constructure of real AI systems. In reality, different universally intelligent modules may be practically applicable to different types of problems."<ref>{{cite web|author=Ben Goertzel (ben@webmind.com) |url=http://www.sl4.org/archive/0104/1137.html |title=RE: PAPER: Theory of Universal AI based on Algorithmic Complexity |publisher=SL4 |date=2001-04-16 |accessdate=2009-02-26}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| == See also ==
| |
| | |
| * [[Teleological argument]]
| |
| | |
| == References ==
| |
| {{reflist|2}}
| |
| | |
| == External links ==
| |
| * [http://csdl2.computer.org/persagen/DLAbsToc.jsp?resourcePath=/dl/proceedings/&toc=comp/proceedings/iis/1997/8218/00/8218toc.xml&DOI=10.1109/IIS.1997.645201 Creating Machines with Universal Intelligence]
| |
| * [http://www.worldchiropracticalliance.org/resources/greens/green4.htm Nothing in the natural order of the universe is random ... our existence is not mere "luck."]
| |
| * [http://www.journalchirohumanities.com/volumes/vol_9/pdfs/MirtzUniversal.pdf Universal Intelligence: A Theological Entity in Conflict with Lutheran Theology]
| |
| * [http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/Hume.htm David Hume and the Argument from Design]
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Chiropractic]]
| |
| [[Category:Fringe science]]
| |
| [[Category:Pseudoscience]]
| |
| [[Category:Religious philosophical concepts]]
| |
| [[Category:Theology]]
| |