Deal–Grove model: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Monkbot
Line 1: Line 1:
The chain rule for [[Kolmogorov complexity]] is an analogue of the chain rule for [[information entropy]], which states:
They call me Emilia. Bookkeeping is her day occupation now. To do aerobics is a factor that I'm completely addicted to. For years he's been living in North Dakota and his family enjoys it.<br><br>my page: [http://www.teenvalley.net/blog/17832 http://www.teenvalley.net/]
 
:<math>
H(X,Y) = H(X) + H(Y|X)
</math>
 
That is, the combined [[randomness]] of two sequences ''X'' and ''Y'' is the sum of the randomness of ''X'' plus whatever randomness is left in ''Y'' once we know ''X''.
This follows immediately from the definitions of [[conditional entropy|conditional]] and [[joint entropy]] fact from [[probability theory]] that the [[joint probability]] is the product of the [[marginal probability|marginal]] and [[conditional probability]]:
 
:<math>
P(X,Y) = P(X) P(Y|X) \,
</math>
 
The equivalent statement for Kolmogorov complexity does not hold exactly; it is true only up to a [[logarithm]]ic term:
 
:<math>
K(x,y) = K(x) + K(y|x) + O(\log(K(x,y)))
</math>
 
(An exact version, ''KP''(''x'',&nbsp;''y'')&nbsp;=&nbsp;''KP''(''x'')&nbsp;+&nbsp;''KP''(''y''|''x''*)&nbsp;+&nbsp;O(1),
holds for the prefix complexity ''KP'', where  ''x*'' is a shortest program for ''x''.)
 
It states that the shortest program printing ''X'' and ''Y'' is obtained by concatenating a shortest program printing ''X'' with a program printing ''Y'' given ''X'', plus [[Big-O notation|at most]] a logarithmic factor. The results implies that [[Mutual information#Absolute mutual information|algorithmic mutual information]], an analogue of mutual information for Kolmogorov complexity is symmetric: ''I(x:y) = I(y:x) + O(log K(x,y))'' for all ''x,y''.
 
==Proof==
 
The ≤ direction is obvious: we can write a program to produce ''x'' and ''y'' by concatenating a program to produce ''x'', a program to produce ''y'' given
access to ''x'', and (whence the log term) the length of one of the programs, so
that we know where to separate the two programs for ''x'' and ''y''|''x'' (log(''K''(''x'',&nbsp;''y'')) upper-bounds this length).
 
For the ≥ direction, it suffices to show that for all k,l such that k+l = K(x,y) we have that either
 
      ''K(x|k,l) ≤ k + O(1)''  or  ''K(y|x,k,l) ≤ l + O(1)''.
 
Consider the list ''(a<sub>1</sub>,b<sub>1</sub>), (a<sub>2</sub>,b<sub>2</sub>), ..., (a<sub>e</sub>,b<sub>e</sub>)'' of all pairs ''(a,b)'' produced by programs of length exactly ''K(x,y)'' [hence K(a,b) ≤ K(x,y)]. Note that this list
* contains the pair ''(x,y)'',
* can be [[recursively enumerable|enumerated]] given ''k'' and ''l'' (by running all programs of length ''K(x,y)'' in parallel),
* has at most ''2<sup>K(x,y)</sup>'' elements (because there are at most 2<sup>n</sup> programs of length n).  
 
First, suppose that ''x'' appears less than ''2<sup>l</sup>'' times as first element. We can specify ''y'' given ''x,k,l'' by enumerating ''(a<sub>1</sub>,b<sub>1</sub>), (a<sub>2</sub>,b<sub>2</sub>), ...'' and then selecting ''(x,y)'' in the sub-list of pairs ''(x,b)''. By assumption, the index of ''(x,y)'' in this sub-list is less than ''2<sup>l</sup>'' and hence, there is a program for ''y'' given ''x,k,l'' of length ''l + O(1)''.
Now, suppose that ''x'' appears at least ''2<sup>l</sup>'' times as first element. This can happen for at most ''2<sup>K(x,y)-l</sup> = 2<sup>k</sup>'' different strings. These strings can be enumerated given ''k,l'' and hence ''x'' can be specified by its index in this enumeration. The corresponding program for ''x'' has size ''k + O(1)''. Theorem proved.
 
 
==References==
* {{cite book
  | last = Li
  | first = Ming
  | coauthors = Vit&aacute;nyi, Paul
  | title = An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications
  | location = New York
  | publisher = [[Springer-Verlag]]
  |date=February 1997
  | isbn = 0-387-94868-6 }}
 
* {{cite article
  | last = Kolmogorov
  | first = A.N.
  | title = Logical basis for information theory and probability theory
  | journal = IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  | number = 5
  | volume = 14
  | pages = 662-664
  | year = 1968 }}
 
* {{cite article
  | first = A.
  | last = Zvonkin
  | coauthors = L. Levin 
  | title = The complexity of finite objects and the development of the concepts of information and randomness by means of the theory of algorithms.
  | journal = Russian Mathematical Surveys
  | volume = 25
  | number = 6
  | pages = 83-124
  | year = 1970}}
 
 
[[Category:Algorithmic information theory|*]]
[[Category:Information theory|*]]
[[Category:Computability theory]]
[[Category:Theory of computation]]
[[Category:Articles containing proofs]]

Revision as of 17:00, 18 February 2014

They call me Emilia. Bookkeeping is her day occupation now. To do aerobics is a factor that I'm completely addicted to. For years he's been living in North Dakota and his family enjoys it.

my page: http://www.teenvalley.net/