|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Image:Ergodicity.gif|thumb|right|250px|In an energy landscape with a potential barrier separating two regions of configuration space (bottom sketch), Monte Carlo sampling may be unable to sample the system over a sufficient range of configurations to accurately calculate thermodynamic data, compared to a favourable energy structure (top plot).]]
| | Alyson is the name individuals use to call me and I believe it seems fairly good when you say it. What me and my family adore is bungee leaping but I've been using on new things lately. Alaska is where he's usually been residing. Since he was eighteen he's been working as an information officer but he ideas on changing it.<br><br>Also visit my web blog; [http://165.132.39.93/xe/visitors/372912 best psychic] |
| | |
| '''Umbrella sampling''' is a technique in [[computational physics]] and [[chemistry]], used to improve [[Sampling (statistics)|sampling]] of a system (or different systems) where [[ergodicity]] is hindered by the form of the system's [[energy landscape]]. It was first suggested by Torrie and Valleau in 1977 [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WHY-4DDR2HH-3V&_user=126524&_coverDate=02%2F28%2F1977&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000010360&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=126524&md5=950772b2b4de26ad320fd672ec611557]. It is related to [[Importance sampling]] in statistics.
| |
| | |
| Systems in which an energy barrier separates two regions of configuration space may suffer from poor sampling in [[Metropolis Monte Carlo]] runs, as the low probability of overcoming the potential barrier can leave inaccessible configurations poorly sampled – or even entirely unsampled – by the simulation. An easily visualised example occurs with a solid at its melting point: considering the state of the system with an [[order parameter]] ''Q'', both liquid (low ''Q'') and solid (high ''Q'') phases are low in energy, but are separated by a [[Thermodynamic free energy|free energy]] barrier at intermediate values of ''Q''. This prevents the simulation from adequately sampling both phases.
| |
| | |
| Umbrella sampling is a means of "bridging the gap" in this situation. The standard Boltzmann weighting for Monte Carlo sampling is replaced by a potential chosen to cancel the influence of the energy barrier present. The [[Markov chain]] generated has a distribution given by:
| |
| | |
| :<math>\pi(\mathbf{r}^N) = \frac{w(\textbf{r}^N) \exp{(-U(\mathbf{r}^N})/k_B T)}{\int{w(\mathbf{r^\prime}^N) \exp{(-U(\mathbf{r^\prime}^N})/k_B T)} d\mathbf{r^\prime}^N},</math>
| |
| | |
| with ''w''('''r'''<sup>''N''</sup>) a function chosen to promote configurations that would otherwise be inaccessible to a Boltzmann-weighted Monte Carlo run. In the example above, ''w'' may be chosen such that ''w'' = ''w''(''Q''), taking high values at intermediate ''Q'' and low values at low/high ''Q'', facilitating barrier crossing.
| |
| | |
| Values for a thermodynamic property ''A'' deduced from a sampling run performed in this manner can be transformed into canonical-ensemble values by applying the formula:
| |
| | |
| :<math>\langle A \rangle = \frac{\langle A / w \rangle_\pi}{\langle 1 / w \rangle_\pi},</math> | |
| | |
| with the ''<math>\pi</math>'' subscript indicating values from the umbrella-sampled simulation. Series of umbrella sampling simulations can be analyzed using the weighted histogram analysis method (WHAM)<ref>{{cite journal|last=Kumar|first=Shankar|coauthors=Rosenberg, John M., Bouzida, Djamal, Swendsen, Robert H., Kollman, Peter A.|title=THE weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method|journal=Journal of Computational Chemistry|date=30 September 1992|volume=13|issue=8|pages=1011–1021|doi=10.1002/jcc.540130812}}</ref> or its generalization.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Bartels|first=C|title=Analyzing biased Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations|journal=Chemical Physics Letters|date=7 December 2000|volume=331|issue=5-6|pages=446–454|doi=10.1016/S0009-2614(00)01215-X|bibcode = 2000CPL...331..446B }}</ref>
| |
| | |
| Subtleties exist in deciding the most computationally efficient way to apply the umbrella sampling method, as described in Frenkel & Smit's book ''Understanding Molecular Simulation''.
| |
| | |
| Alternatives to umbrella sampling for computing [[Potential of mean force|potentials of mean force]] or [[reaction rate]]s are [[free energy perturbation]] and [[transition path sampling#Transition interface sampling|transition interface sampling]]. A further alternative which functions in full non-equilibrium is [[transition path sampling#Stochastic process rare event sampling|S-PRES]].
| |
| | |
| == References ==
| |
| {{Reflist}}
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Monte Carlo methods]]
| |
| [[Category:Molecular dynamics]]
| |
| [[Category:Computational chemistry]]
| |
| [[Category:Theoretical chemistry]]
| |
Alyson is the name individuals use to call me and I believe it seems fairly good when you say it. What me and my family adore is bungee leaping but I've been using on new things lately. Alaska is where he's usually been residing. Since he was eighteen he's been working as an information officer but he ideas on changing it.
Also visit my web blog; best psychic