Gain: Difference between revisions
en>Yobot m →Current gain: WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes + general fixes using AWB (8032) |
en>ClueBot NG m Reverting possible vandalism by 58.164.43.254 to version by Kmarinas86. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (1590929) (Bot) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{distinguish|Collective noun}} | |||
{{ExamplesSidebar|10em| | |||
<!-- OK, there are enough examples now. There is no pedagogical benefit in adding any more. --> | |||
* [[advice (disambiguation)|advice]] | |||
* [[air]] | |||
* [[art]] | |||
* [[blood]] | |||
* [[butter]] | |||
* [[data]] | |||
* [[deodorant]] | |||
* [[equipment (disambiguation)|equipment]] | |||
* [[evidence]] | |||
* [[food]] | |||
* [[furniture]] | |||
* [[waste|garbage]] | |||
* [[graffiti]] | |||
* [[grass]] | |||
* [[homework]] | |||
* [[housework]] | |||
* [[information]] | |||
* [[knowledge]] | |||
* [[luggage]] | |||
* [[mathematics]] | |||
* [[meat]] | |||
* [[milk]] | |||
* [[money]] | |||
* [[music]] | |||
* [[notation]] | |||
* [[paper]] | |||
* [[pollution]] | |||
* [[wikt:progress|progress]] | |||
* [[sand]] | |||
* [[soap]] | |||
* [[software]] | |||
* [[sugar]] | |||
* [[traffic]] | |||
* [[transportation]] | |||
* [[travel]] | |||
* [[Waste|trash]] | |||
* [[water]] | |||
}} | |||
In [[linguistics]], a '''mass noun''' or '''uncountable noun''' is a [[noun]] with the syntactic property that ''any'' quantity of it is treated as an undifferentiated unit, rather than as something with discrete subsets. Non-count nouns are distinguished from [[count noun]]s. | |||
Given that different languages have different grammatical features, the actual test for which nouns are mass nouns may vary between languages. In English, mass nouns are characterized by the fact that they cannot be directly modified by a [[Numeral (linguistics)|numeral]] without specifying a unit of measurement, and that they cannot combine with an indefinite article (''a'' or ''an''). Thus, the mass noun "water" is quantified as "20 litres of water" while the count noun "chair" is quantified as "20 chairs". However, both mass and count nouns can be quantified in relative terms without unit specification (e.g., "much water," "so many chairs"). | |||
Some mass nouns can be used in English in the plural to mean "more than one instance (or example) of a certain sort of entity"—for example, "''Many cleaning agents today are technically not soaps, but detergents.''" In such cases they no longer play the role of mass nouns, but (syntactically) they are treated as count nouns. | |||
Some nouns have both a mass [[word sense|sense]] and a count sense (for example, ''paper''). | |||
==Relating grammatical number to physical discreteness== | |||
In English (and in many other languages), there is a tendency for nouns referring to liquids (''water'', ''juice''), powders (''sugar'', ''sand''), or substances (''metal'', ''wood'') to be used in mass syntax, and for nouns referring to objects or people to be count nouns. This is not a hard-and-fast rule; however, mass nouns such as ''furniture'' and ''cutlery'', which represent more easily quantified objects, show that the mass/count distinction should be thought of as a property of the terms themselves, rather than as a property of their referents. For example, the same set of chairs can be referred to as "seven chairs" and as "furniture"; although both ''chair'' and ''furniture'' are referring to the same thing, the former is a count noun and the latter a mass noun. The Middle English mass noun ''pease'' has become the count noun ''pea'' by [[morphological reanalysis]]. | |||
For another illustration of the principle that the count/non-count distinction lies not in an object but rather in the expression that refers to it, consider the English words "fruit" and "vegetables". The objects that these words describe are, objectively speaking, similar (that is, they're all edible plant parts); yet the word "fruit" is (usually) non-count, whereas "vegetables" is a plural count form. One can see that the difference is in the language, not in the reality of the objects. Meanwhile, [[German language|German]] has a general word for "vegetables" that, like English "fruit", is (usually) non-count: ''das Gemüse''. British English has a slang word for "vegetables" that acts the same way: "veg" [rhymes with "edge"]. | |||
In languages that have a [[partitive case]], the distinction is explicit and mandatory. For example, in [[Finnish language|Finnish]], ''join vettä'', "I drank (some) water", the word ''vesi'', "water", is in the partitive case. The related sentence ''join veden'', "I drank (the) water", using the [[accusative case]] instead, assumes that there was a specific countable portion of water that was completely drunk. | |||
The work of logicians like [[Godehard Link]] and [[Manfred Krifka]] established that the mass/count distinction can be given a precise, mathematical definition in terms of [[quantization (linguistics)|quantization]] and [[cumulativity]]. | |||
==Cumulativity and mass nouns== | |||
An expression ''P'' has [[cumulativity|cumulative reference]] if and only if<ref>Krifka, Manfred 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem and Peter van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expressions 75-115. Dordrecht: Foris.</ref><ref>Nicolas, David (2008) Mass nouns and plural logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 31.2, pp.211-244 http://d.a.nicolas.free.fr/Nicolas-Mass-nouns-and-plural-logic-Revised-2.pdf</ref> for any ''X'' and ''Y'': | |||
*If ''X'' can be described as ''P'' and ''Y'' can be described as ''P'', as well, then the sum of ''X'' and ''Y'' can also be described as ''P''. | |||
In more formal terms (Krifka 1998): | |||
<math>\forall X \subseteq U_p [CUM_p (X) \Leftrightarrow \exists x,y [ X(x) \,\wedge\, X(y) \,\wedge\, \neg (x=y)] \;\wedge\; \forall x,y [X(x) \,\wedge\, X(y) \Rightarrow X(x \,\oplus\, y)]]</math> | |||
which may be read as: ''X'' is cumulative if there exists at least one pair'' x,y'', where ''x'' and ''y'' are distinct, and both have the property ''X'', and if for all possible pairs ''x'' and ''y'' fitting that description, ''X'' is a property of the sum of ''x'' and ''y''.<ref>Borer, Hagit. (2005) ''Structuring Sense: In Name Only''. Volume 1. Oxford: OUP. (p. 124)</ref> | |||
Consider, for example ''cutlery'': If one collection of cutlery is combined with another, we still have "cutlery." Similarly, if water is added to water, we still have "water." But if a chair is added to another, we don't have "a chair," but rather two chairs. Thus the nouns "cutlery" and "water" have cumulative reference, while the expression "a chair" does not. The expression "chairs", however, does, suggesting that the generalization is not actually specific to the mass-count distinction. As many have noted, it is possible to provide an alternative analysis, by which mass nouns and plural count nouns are assigned a similar semantics, as distinct from that of singular count nouns.<ref name=Gillon>Brendan S. Gillon (1992) Towards a common semantics for English count and mass nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 597–639</ref> | |||
An expression ''P'' has [[quantization (linguistics)|quantized reference]] if and only if, for any X: | |||
*If ''X'' can be described as ''P'', then no proper part of ''X'' can be described as ''P''. | |||
This can be seen to hold in the case of the noun ''house'': no proper part of ''a house'', for example the bathroom, or the entrance door, is itself a house. Similarly, no proper part of ''a man'', say his index finger, or his knee, can be described as ''a man''. Hence, ''house'' and ''man'' have quantized reference. However, collections of ''cutlery'' do have proper parts that can themselves be described as ''cutlery''. Hence ''cutlery'' does not have quantized reference. Notice again that this is probably not a fact about mass-count syntax, but about prototypical examples, since many singular count nouns have referents whose proper parts can be described by the same term. Examples include divisible count nouns like "rope", "string", "stone", "tile", etc.<ref name=Gillon/> | |||
Some expressions are neither quantized nor cumulative. Examples of this include [[collective noun]]s like ''committee''. A committee may well contain a proper part which is itself a committee. Hence this expression isn't quantized. It isn't cumulative, either: the sum of two separate committees isn't necessarily a ''committee''. In terms of the mass/count distinction, ''committee'' behaves like a count noun. By some accounts, these examples are taken to indicate that the best characterization of mass nouns is that they are ''cumulative nouns''. On such accounts, count nouns should then be characterized as ''non-cumulative'' nouns: this characterization correctly groups ''committee'' together with the count nouns. If, instead, we had chosen to characterize count nouns as ''quantized nouns'', and mass nouns as ''non-quantized'' ones, then we would (incorrectly) be led to expect ''committee'' to be a mass noun. However, as noted above, such a characterization fails to explain many central phenomena of the mass-count distinction. | |||
==Multiple senses for one noun== | |||
Many English [[noun]]s can be used in either mass or count syntax, and in these cases, they take on cumulative reference when used as mass nouns. For example, one may say that "there's ''apple'' in this sauce," and then ''apple'' has cumulative reference, and, hence, is used as a mass noun. The names of animals, such as "chicken", "fox" or "lamb" are count when referring to the animals themselves, but are mass when referring to their meat, fur, or other substances produced by them. (e.g., "I'm cooking chicken tonight" or "This coat is made of fox.") Conversely, "[[fire]]" is frequently used as a mass noun, but "a fire" refers to a discrete entity. Interestingly, "fire" as a count noun does allow cumulative reference, since if two fires join in a forest, they are referred to as one fire.{{dubious|reason=joining things often makes a bigger thing, that's not what is meant by cumulative reference.|date=January 2011}} Substance terms like "water" which are frequently used as mass nouns, can be used as count nouns to denote arbitrary units of a substance ("Two ''waters'' please") or of several types/varieties ("''waters'' of the world").<ref>Tsoulas, George (2006). Plurality of mass nouns and the grammar of number. [[Generative Linguistics in the Old World]].</ref> One may say that mass nouns that are used as count nouns are "[[wikt:countify|countified]]" and that count ones that are used as mass nouns are "[[wikt:massify|massified]]". However, this may confuse syntax and semantics, by presupposing that words which denote substances are mass nouns by default. According to many accounts, nouns do not have a lexical specification for mass-count status, and instead are specified as such only when used in a sentence.<ref>Keith Allan. 1980. Nouns and Countability. Language, 56(3):41-67.</ref> Nouns differ in the extent to which they can be used flexibly, depending largely on their meanings and the context of use. For example the count noun "house" is difficult to use as mass (though clearly possible), and the mass noun "cutlery" is most frequently used as mass, despite the fact that it denotes objects, and has count equivalents in other languages: | |||
* Bad: *There is house on the road. (Bad even if the situation of war is considered) | |||
* Bad: *There is a cutlery on the table. (Bad even if just one fork is on the table) | |||
* Good: You get a lot of house for your money since the recession. | |||
* Good: Spanish cutlery is my favorite. (type / kind reading) | |||
In some languages, such as [[Chinese (language)|Chinese]] and [[Japanese language|Japanese]], it has been claimed by some that all nouns are effectively mass nouns, requiring a [[measure word]] to be quantified.<ref>{{cite journal |last=[[Gennaro Chierchia|Chierchia]] |first=Gennaro |year=1998 |title=Reference to Kinds across Languages |journal=[[Natural Language Semantics]] |volume=6 |issue=4 |pages=339–405 |doi=10.1023/A:1008324218506}}</ref> | |||
==Quantification== | |||
Some [[Quantification|quantifiers]] are specific to mass nouns (e.g., ''an amount of'') or count nouns (e.g., ''a number of'', ''every''). Others can be used with both types (e.g., ''a lot of'', ''some''). | |||
===The words ''fewer'' and ''less''=== | |||
{{main|Fewer vs. less}} | |||
Where ''much'' and ''little'' qualify mass nouns, ''many'' and ''few'' have an analogous function for count nouns: | |||
* How much damage? —Very little. | |||
* How many mistakes? —Very few. | |||
Whereas ''more'' and ''most'' are the [[comparative]] and [[superlative]] of both ''much'' and ''many'', ''few'' and ''little'' have differing comparative and superlative (''fewer'', ''fewest'' and ''less'', ''least''). However, [[suppletion|suppletive]] use of ''less'' and ''least'' with count nouns is common in many contexts, some of which attract criticism as [[nonstandard dialect|nonstandard]] or low-[[prestige (sociolinguistics)|prestige]].<ref name="mwdeu-less-fewer">{{cite book|title=Merriam-Webster's dictionary of English usage |publisher=Merriam-Webster |year=1995 |edition=2nd |page=592 |chapter=less, fewer|isbn=0-87779-132-5 |url=http://books.google.com/?id=2yJusP0vrdgC&pg=PA592|author1=Merriam-Webster,|author2=Inc,}}</ref> This criticism dates back to at least 1770; the usage dates back to [[Old English]].<ref name="mwdeu-less-fewer" /> In 2008, [[Tesco]] changed supermarket [[Point of sale|checkout]] signs reading "Ten items or less" after complaints that it was bad grammar; it switched to "Up to ten items" rather than "Ten items or fewer" at the suggestion of the [[Plain English Campaign]].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2659948/Tesco-to-ditch-ten-items-or-less-sign-after-good-grammar-campaign.html |title=Tesco to ditch 'ten items or less' sign after good grammar campaign |accessdate=16 April 2010 |first=Tom |last=Peterkin |work=Daily Telegraph |date=1 September 2008}}</ref> | |||
==Conflation of collective noun and mass noun== | |||
There is often confusion about the two different concepts of ''[[collective noun]]'' and ''mass noun''. Generally, collective nouns are not mass nouns, but rather are a special subset of [[count noun]]s. However, the term "collective noun" is often used to mean "mass noun" (even in some dictionaries), because users conflate two different kinds of verb number invariability: (a) that seen with mass nouns such as "water" or "furniture", with which only singular verb forms are used because the constituent matter is ''grammatically'' nondiscrete (although it may ["water"] or may not ["furniture"] be ''[[etic]]ally'' nondiscrete); and (b) that seen with collective nouns, which is the result of the [[English collective nouns#Metonymic merging of grammatical number|metonymical shift]] between the group and its (both grammatically and etically) discrete constituents. | |||
Some words, including "[[mathematics]]" and "[[physics]]", have developed true mass-noun senses despite having grown from count-noun roots. | |||
==See also== | |||
* [[Plurale tantum]] | |||
==References== | |||
{{Reflist}}10. Laycock, Henry (2010). "Mass Nouns, Count Nouns and Non-Count Nouns: Philosophical Aspects". | |||
http://www.scribd.com/doc/53696109/0080965008-Concise-Encyclopedia-of-Philosophy-of-Language, Elsevier, London, p. 417 | |||
==External links== | |||
* [http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/index.pperl?date=19970221 The Mavens Word of the Day: less/fewer] | |||
* [http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/jRiNmJkM/ Semantic Archives: Mass nouns, count nouns and non-count nouns] | |||
* [http://www.sfu.ca/~jeffpell/papers/PellSch.pdf F.J. Pelletier L.K. Schubert (2001) Mass Expressions in D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (eds) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 10] | |||
* [http://d.a.nicolas.free.fr/Nicolas-Mass-nouns-and-plural-logic-Revised-2.pdf D. Nicolas (2008) Mass nouns and plural logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 31.2, pp.211–244] | |||
{{lexical categories|state=collapsed}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Mass Noun}} | |||
[[Category:Grammar]] | |||
[[Category:Grammatical number]] |
Revision as of 10:29, 17 November 2013
Template:Distinguish Template:ExamplesSidebar In linguistics, a mass noun or uncountable noun is a noun with the syntactic property that any quantity of it is treated as an undifferentiated unit, rather than as something with discrete subsets. Non-count nouns are distinguished from count nouns.
Given that different languages have different grammatical features, the actual test for which nouns are mass nouns may vary between languages. In English, mass nouns are characterized by the fact that they cannot be directly modified by a numeral without specifying a unit of measurement, and that they cannot combine with an indefinite article (a or an). Thus, the mass noun "water" is quantified as "20 litres of water" while the count noun "chair" is quantified as "20 chairs". However, both mass and count nouns can be quantified in relative terms without unit specification (e.g., "much water," "so many chairs").
Some mass nouns can be used in English in the plural to mean "more than one instance (or example) of a certain sort of entity"—for example, "Many cleaning agents today are technically not soaps, but detergents." In such cases they no longer play the role of mass nouns, but (syntactically) they are treated as count nouns.
Some nouns have both a mass sense and a count sense (for example, paper).
Relating grammatical number to physical discreteness
In English (and in many other languages), there is a tendency for nouns referring to liquids (water, juice), powders (sugar, sand), or substances (metal, wood) to be used in mass syntax, and for nouns referring to objects or people to be count nouns. This is not a hard-and-fast rule; however, mass nouns such as furniture and cutlery, which represent more easily quantified objects, show that the mass/count distinction should be thought of as a property of the terms themselves, rather than as a property of their referents. For example, the same set of chairs can be referred to as "seven chairs" and as "furniture"; although both chair and furniture are referring to the same thing, the former is a count noun and the latter a mass noun. The Middle English mass noun pease has become the count noun pea by morphological reanalysis.
For another illustration of the principle that the count/non-count distinction lies not in an object but rather in the expression that refers to it, consider the English words "fruit" and "vegetables". The objects that these words describe are, objectively speaking, similar (that is, they're all edible plant parts); yet the word "fruit" is (usually) non-count, whereas "vegetables" is a plural count form. One can see that the difference is in the language, not in the reality of the objects. Meanwhile, German has a general word for "vegetables" that, like English "fruit", is (usually) non-count: das Gemüse. British English has a slang word for "vegetables" that acts the same way: "veg" [rhymes with "edge"].
In languages that have a partitive case, the distinction is explicit and mandatory. For example, in Finnish, join vettä, "I drank (some) water", the word vesi, "water", is in the partitive case. The related sentence join veden, "I drank (the) water", using the accusative case instead, assumes that there was a specific countable portion of water that was completely drunk.
The work of logicians like Godehard Link and Manfred Krifka established that the mass/count distinction can be given a precise, mathematical definition in terms of quantization and cumulativity.
Cumulativity and mass nouns
An expression P has cumulative reference if and only if[1][2] for any X and Y:
- If X can be described as P and Y can be described as P, as well, then the sum of X and Y can also be described as P.
In more formal terms (Krifka 1998):
which may be read as: X is cumulative if there exists at least one pair x,y, where x and y are distinct, and both have the property X, and if for all possible pairs x and y fitting that description, X is a property of the sum of x and y.[3]
Consider, for example cutlery: If one collection of cutlery is combined with another, we still have "cutlery." Similarly, if water is added to water, we still have "water." But if a chair is added to another, we don't have "a chair," but rather two chairs. Thus the nouns "cutlery" and "water" have cumulative reference, while the expression "a chair" does not. The expression "chairs", however, does, suggesting that the generalization is not actually specific to the mass-count distinction. As many have noted, it is possible to provide an alternative analysis, by which mass nouns and plural count nouns are assigned a similar semantics, as distinct from that of singular count nouns.[4]
An expression P has quantized reference if and only if, for any X:
- If X can be described as P, then no proper part of X can be described as P.
This can be seen to hold in the case of the noun house: no proper part of a house, for example the bathroom, or the entrance door, is itself a house. Similarly, no proper part of a man, say his index finger, or his knee, can be described as a man. Hence, house and man have quantized reference. However, collections of cutlery do have proper parts that can themselves be described as cutlery. Hence cutlery does not have quantized reference. Notice again that this is probably not a fact about mass-count syntax, but about prototypical examples, since many singular count nouns have referents whose proper parts can be described by the same term. Examples include divisible count nouns like "rope", "string", "stone", "tile", etc.[4]
Some expressions are neither quantized nor cumulative. Examples of this include collective nouns like committee. A committee may well contain a proper part which is itself a committee. Hence this expression isn't quantized. It isn't cumulative, either: the sum of two separate committees isn't necessarily a committee. In terms of the mass/count distinction, committee behaves like a count noun. By some accounts, these examples are taken to indicate that the best characterization of mass nouns is that they are cumulative nouns. On such accounts, count nouns should then be characterized as non-cumulative nouns: this characterization correctly groups committee together with the count nouns. If, instead, we had chosen to characterize count nouns as quantized nouns, and mass nouns as non-quantized ones, then we would (incorrectly) be led to expect committee to be a mass noun. However, as noted above, such a characterization fails to explain many central phenomena of the mass-count distinction.
Multiple senses for one noun
Many English nouns can be used in either mass or count syntax, and in these cases, they take on cumulative reference when used as mass nouns. For example, one may say that "there's apple in this sauce," and then apple has cumulative reference, and, hence, is used as a mass noun. The names of animals, such as "chicken", "fox" or "lamb" are count when referring to the animals themselves, but are mass when referring to their meat, fur, or other substances produced by them. (e.g., "I'm cooking chicken tonight" or "This coat is made of fox.") Conversely, "fire" is frequently used as a mass noun, but "a fire" refers to a discrete entity. Interestingly, "fire" as a count noun does allow cumulative reference, since if two fires join in a forest, they are referred to as one fire.To succeed in selling a home, it is advisable be competent in real estate advertising and marketing, authorized, monetary, operational aspects, and other information and skills. This is essential as a result of you want to negotiate with more and more sophisticated buyers. You could outperform rivals, use latest technologies, and stay ahead of the fast altering market.
Home is where the center is, and choosing the right house is a part of guaranteeing a contented expertise in Singapore. Most expats sign up for a two-year lease with the option to resume, so it is value taking the time to choose a neighbourhood that has the services you want. The experts at Expat Realtor have compiled the next data that will help you negotiate your means by way of the property minefield. Some government state properties for rent. Over 2000 units available for lease however occupancy is often excessive. Some properties come under a bidding system. Their property brokers embody DTZ and United Premas. Up to date serviced residences located just off Orchard Highway. one hundred sixty Orchard Highway, #06-01 Orchard Level, Singapore 238842. Institute Of Property Agents
There is no such thing as a deal too small. Property agents who're willing to find time for any deal even when the commission is small are those you want in your side. They also show humbleness and might relate with the average Singaporean higher. Relentlessly pursuing any deal, calling prospects even without being prompted. Even when they get rejected a hundred times, they still come back for more. These are the property brokers who will find consumers what they want finally, and who would be the most profitable in what they do. four. Honesty and Integrity
As a realtor, you're our own business. Due to this fact, it is imperative that you handle yours prices and spend money correctly in order to market your property successfully. Also, beware of mentors who always ask you to pay for pointless costs. Such mentors typically are recruiting to develop a staff and see you as a option to defray advertising and marketing prices. For foreigners who want to register with CEA as salespersons, they might want to have a valid Employment Cross (EP) issued by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM). They should consult an property agent that is ready to assist their future registration software, who would then examine with CEA. Thereafter, after they register for the RES Course, they might want to produce a letter of assist from the property agent."
Main Real Property Brokers with in depth local knowledge, Carole Ann, Elizabeth and their group of extremely skilled property consultants provide a personalised service, for those looking to buy, lease or promote in Singapore. Relocation companies out there. Properties for the aesthete. Boutique real property agency for architecturally distinguished, unique properties for rent and on the market. Caters to the niche market of design-savvy people. Sale, letting and property management and taxation services. three Shenton Means, #10-08 Shenton Home, Singapore 068805. Buy property, promote or leasing estate company. 430 Lorong 6 Toa Payoh, #08-01 OrangeTee Constructing, Singapore 319402. HIGH Date / Age of property Estate Agents and Home Search Services Property Information Highlights Prime Achievers
From the above info, you may see that saving on agent's commission will not cover the expenses wanted to market your home efficiently. As well as, it's essential make investments a whole lot of time, vitality and effort. By taking yourself away from your work and other endeavors, additionally, you will incur unnecessary opportunity prices. There may be additionally no assurance you could beat the market and get the outcomes you need. That is why you want an agent - not simply an ordinary agent - you want knowledgeable and competent specialist, geared up with the best instruments and knowledge to serve you and lead you to success! Within the midst of this ‘uniquely Singapore' Property GSS, our most needed foreign customers are nowhere to be seen. Different types of Public Residential properties
Based on Kelvin, other agents may also make use of your agent's listings. "If your pricing is on the excessive aspect, these brokers may use your house to persuade their patrons why Http://Trafficstooges.Com/Singapore-Property-Condominium they should purchase another residence." To counter this, Kelvin says it is crucial for your agent to supply a current market analysis before putting up your private home for sale. "This helps you worth your property appropriately and realistically." When property is made accessible (HIGH is issued) to the client. Becoming a successful property agent is a distinct story altogether! Hi, I would like to ask how I might be a property agent and whether there are courses I might take. And if I need to be at a certain age. www. Property BUYER com.sg (your impartial Mortgage Advisor) In private properties in Substance terms like "water" which are frequently used as mass nouns, can be used as count nouns to denote arbitrary units of a substance ("Two waters please") or of several types/varieties ("waters of the world").[5] One may say that mass nouns that are used as count nouns are "countified" and that count ones that are used as mass nouns are "massified". However, this may confuse syntax and semantics, by presupposing that words which denote substances are mass nouns by default. According to many accounts, nouns do not have a lexical specification for mass-count status, and instead are specified as such only when used in a sentence.[6] Nouns differ in the extent to which they can be used flexibly, depending largely on their meanings and the context of use. For example the count noun "house" is difficult to use as mass (though clearly possible), and the mass noun "cutlery" is most frequently used as mass, despite the fact that it denotes objects, and has count equivalents in other languages:
- Bad: *There is house on the road. (Bad even if the situation of war is considered)
- Bad: *There is a cutlery on the table. (Bad even if just one fork is on the table)
- Good: You get a lot of house for your money since the recession.
- Good: Spanish cutlery is my favorite. (type / kind reading)
In some languages, such as Chinese and Japanese, it has been claimed by some that all nouns are effectively mass nouns, requiring a measure word to be quantified.[7]
Quantification
Some quantifiers are specific to mass nouns (e.g., an amount of) or count nouns (e.g., a number of, every). Others can be used with both types (e.g., a lot of, some).
The words fewer and less
Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church. Where much and little qualify mass nouns, many and few have an analogous function for count nouns:
- How much damage? —Very little.
- How many mistakes? —Very few.
Whereas more and most are the comparative and superlative of both much and many, few and little have differing comparative and superlative (fewer, fewest and less, least). However, suppletive use of less and least with count nouns is common in many contexts, some of which attract criticism as nonstandard or low-prestige.[8] This criticism dates back to at least 1770; the usage dates back to Old English.[8] In 2008, Tesco changed supermarket checkout signs reading "Ten items or less" after complaints that it was bad grammar; it switched to "Up to ten items" rather than "Ten items or fewer" at the suggestion of the Plain English Campaign.[9]
Conflation of collective noun and mass noun
There is often confusion about the two different concepts of collective noun and mass noun. Generally, collective nouns are not mass nouns, but rather are a special subset of count nouns. However, the term "collective noun" is often used to mean "mass noun" (even in some dictionaries), because users conflate two different kinds of verb number invariability: (a) that seen with mass nouns such as "water" or "furniture", with which only singular verb forms are used because the constituent matter is grammatically nondiscrete (although it may ["water"] or may not ["furniture"] be etically nondiscrete); and (b) that seen with collective nouns, which is the result of the metonymical shift between the group and its (both grammatically and etically) discrete constituents.
Some words, including "mathematics" and "physics", have developed true mass-noun senses despite having grown from count-noun roots.
See also
References
43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.10. Laycock, Henry (2010). "Mass Nouns, Count Nouns and Non-Count Nouns: Philosophical Aspects".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/53696109/0080965008-Concise-Encyclopedia-of-Philosophy-of-Language, Elsevier, London, p. 417
External links
- The Mavens Word of the Day: less/fewer
- Semantic Archives: Mass nouns, count nouns and non-count nouns
- F.J. Pelletier L.K. Schubert (2001) Mass Expressions in D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (eds) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 10
- D. Nicolas (2008) Mass nouns and plural logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 31.2, pp.211–244
- ↑ Krifka, Manfred 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem and Peter van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expressions 75-115. Dordrecht: Foris.
- ↑ Nicolas, David (2008) Mass nouns and plural logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 31.2, pp.211-244 http://d.a.nicolas.free.fr/Nicolas-Mass-nouns-and-plural-logic-Revised-2.pdf
- ↑ Borer, Hagit. (2005) Structuring Sense: In Name Only. Volume 1. Oxford: OUP. (p. 124)
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Brendan S. Gillon (1992) Towards a common semantics for English count and mass nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 597–639
- ↑ Tsoulas, George (2006). Plurality of mass nouns and the grammar of number. Generative Linguistics in the Old World.
- ↑ Keith Allan. 1980. Nouns and Countability. Language, 56(3):41-67.
- ↑ One of the biggest reasons investing in a Singapore new launch is an effective things is as a result of it is doable to be lent massive quantities of money at very low interest rates that you should utilize to purchase it. Then, if property values continue to go up, then you'll get a really high return on funding (ROI). Simply make sure you purchase one of the higher properties, reminiscent of the ones at Fernvale the Riverbank or any Singapore landed property Get Earnings by means of Renting
In its statement, the singapore property listing - website link, government claimed that the majority citizens buying their first residence won't be hurt by the new measures. Some concessions can even be prolonged to chose teams of consumers, similar to married couples with a minimum of one Singaporean partner who are purchasing their second property so long as they intend to promote their first residential property. Lower the LTV limit on housing loans granted by monetary establishments regulated by MAS from 70% to 60% for property purchasers who are individuals with a number of outstanding housing loans on the time of the brand new housing purchase. Singapore Property Measures - 30 August 2010 The most popular seek for the number of bedrooms in Singapore is 4, followed by 2 and three. Lush Acres EC @ Sengkang
Discover out more about real estate funding in the area, together with info on international funding incentives and property possession. Many Singaporeans have been investing in property across the causeway in recent years, attracted by comparatively low prices. However, those who need to exit their investments quickly are likely to face significant challenges when trying to sell their property – and could finally be stuck with a property they can't sell. Career improvement programmes, in-house valuation, auctions and administrative help, venture advertising and marketing, skilled talks and traisning are continuously planned for the sales associates to help them obtain better outcomes for his or her shoppers while at Knight Frank Singapore. No change Present Rules
Extending the tax exemption would help. The exemption, which may be as a lot as $2 million per family, covers individuals who negotiate a principal reduction on their existing mortgage, sell their house short (i.e., for lower than the excellent loans), or take part in a foreclosure course of. An extension of theexemption would seem like a common-sense means to assist stabilize the housing market, but the political turmoil around the fiscal-cliff negotiations means widespread sense could not win out. Home Minority Chief Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) believes that the mortgage relief provision will be on the table during the grand-cut price talks, in response to communications director Nadeam Elshami. Buying or promoting of blue mild bulbs is unlawful.
A vendor's stamp duty has been launched on industrial property for the primary time, at rates ranging from 5 per cent to 15 per cent. The Authorities might be trying to reassure the market that they aren't in opposition to foreigners and PRs investing in Singapore's property market. They imposed these measures because of extenuating components available in the market." The sale of new dual-key EC models will even be restricted to multi-generational households only. The models have two separate entrances, permitting grandparents, for example, to dwell separately. The vendor's stamp obligation takes effect right this moment and applies to industrial property and plots which might be offered inside three years of the date of buy. JLL named Best Performing Property Brand for second year running
The data offered is for normal info purposes only and isn't supposed to be personalised investment or monetary advice. Motley Fool Singapore contributor Stanley Lim would not personal shares in any corporations talked about. Singapore private home costs increased by 1.eight% within the fourth quarter of 2012, up from 0.6% within the earlier quarter. Resale prices of government-built HDB residences which are usually bought by Singaporeans, elevated by 2.5%, quarter on quarter, the quickest acquire in five quarters. And industrial property, prices are actually double the levels of three years ago. No withholding tax in the event you sell your property. All your local information regarding vital HDB policies, condominium launches, land growth, commercial property and more
There are various methods to go about discovering the precise property. Some local newspapers (together with the Straits Instances ) have categorised property sections and many local property brokers have websites. Now there are some specifics to consider when buying a 'new launch' rental. Intended use of the unit Every sale begins with 10 p.c low cost for finish of season sale; changes to 20 % discount storewide; follows by additional reduction of fiftyand ends with last discount of 70 % or extra. Typically there is even a warehouse sale or transferring out sale with huge mark-down of costs for stock clearance. Deborah Regulation from Expat Realtor shares her property market update, plus prime rental residences and houses at the moment available to lease Esparina EC @ Sengkang - ↑ 8.0 8.1 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 - ↑ Template:Cite news