Conjugate index: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>777sms
No edit summary
 
en>Addbot
m Bot: Migrating 2 interwiki links, now provided by Wikidata on d:q175648
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The author is known as Irwin. Hiring is her day job now and she will not change it anytime soon. Playing baseball is the pastime he will never quit performing. Puerto Rico is exactly where he's been living for many years and he will never transfer.<br><br>Check out my website :: std home test ([http://fastrolls.com/index.php?do=/profile-72113/info/ this])
In [[mathematics]], the '''Halpern–Läuchli theorem''' is a partition result about finite products of infinite [[Tree (set theory)|trees]]. Its original purpose was to give a model for set theory in which the [[Boolean prime ideal theorem]] is true but the [[axiom of choice]] is false. It is often called the Halpern–Läuchli theorem, but the proper attribution for the theorem as it is formulated below is to Halpern–Läuchli–Laver–Pincus or HLLP (named after James D. Halpern, Hans Läuchli, [[Richard Laver]], and David Pincus), following (Milliken 1979).
 
Let d,r &lt; ω, <math>\langle T_i: i \in d \rangle</math> be a sequence of finitely splitting trees of height ω. Let
 
:<math>\bigcup_{n \in \omega} \left(\prod_{i<d}T_i(n)\right) = C_1 \cup \cdots \cup C_r,</math>
 
then there exists a sequence of subtrees <math>\langle S_i: i \in d \rangle</math> [[Milliken's tree theorem|strongly embedded]] in <math>\langle T_i: i \in d \rangle</math> such that
 
:<math>\bigcup_{n \in \omega} \left(\prod_{i<d}S_i(n)\right) \subset C_k\text{ for some }k \le r. </math>
 
Alternatively, let
 
: <math>S^d_{\langle T_i: i \in d \rangle} = \bigcup_{n \in \omega} \left(\prod_{i<d}T_i(n)\right)</math>
 
and
 
: <math>\mathbb{S}^d=\bigcup_{\langle T_i: i \in d \rangle} S^d_{\langle T_i: i \in d \rangle}.</math>.
 
The HLLP theorem says that not only is the collection <math>\mathbb{S}^d</math> [[partition regular]] for each ''d''&nbsp;<&nbsp;''ω'', but that the homogeneous subtree guaranteed by the theorem is '''strongly embedded''' in
 
:<math>T= \langle T_i: i \in d \rangle.\ </math>
 
==References==
#J.D. Halpern and H. Läuchli, A partition theorem, ''Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.'' '''124''' (1966), 360–367
#Keith R. Milliken, A Ramsey Theorem for Trees, ''J. Comb. Theory (Series A)''  '''26''' (1979), 215–237
#Keith R. Milliken, A Partition Theorem for the Infinite Subtrees of a Tree, ''Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.'' '''263''' No.1 (1981), 137–148
#J.D. Halpern and David Pincus, Partitions of Products, ''Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.'' '''267''', No.2 (1981), 549–568.
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Halpern-Lauchli theorem}}
[[Category:Ramsey theory]]
[[Category:Theorems in the foundations of mathematics]]
[[Category:Trees (set theory)]]

Latest revision as of 09:29, 15 March 2013

In mathematics, the Halpern–Läuchli theorem is a partition result about finite products of infinite trees. Its original purpose was to give a model for set theory in which the Boolean prime ideal theorem is true but the axiom of choice is false. It is often called the Halpern–Läuchli theorem, but the proper attribution for the theorem as it is formulated below is to Halpern–Läuchli–Laver–Pincus or HLLP (named after James D. Halpern, Hans Läuchli, Richard Laver, and David Pincus), following (Milliken 1979).

Let d,r < ω, Ti:id be a sequence of finitely splitting trees of height ω. Let

nω(i<dTi(n))=C1Cr,

then there exists a sequence of subtrees Si:id strongly embedded in Ti:id such that

nω(i<dSi(n))Ck for some kr.

Alternatively, let

STi:idd=nω(i<dTi(n))

and

𝕊d=Ti:idSTi:idd..

The HLLP theorem says that not only is the collection 𝕊d partition regular for each d < ω, but that the homogeneous subtree guaranteed by the theorem is strongly embedded in

T=Ti:id.

References

  1. J.D. Halpern and H. Läuchli, A partition theorem, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 124 (1966), 360–367
  2. Keith R. Milliken, A Ramsey Theorem for Trees, J. Comb. Theory (Series A) 26 (1979), 215–237
  3. Keith R. Milliken, A Partition Theorem for the Infinite Subtrees of a Tree, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 263 No.1 (1981), 137–148
  4. J.D. Halpern and David Pincus, Partitions of Products, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 267, No.2 (1981), 549–568.