Multiplicity of infection: Difference between revisions
en>Alan Liefting m category sorting using AWB |
No MOI can guarantee an infection of ALL cells by at least one virion. Therefore, stating that an MOI of 8 would infect 100% of cells is false; I changed it to approximately 100%. |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[mathematical logic]], an '''atomic formula''' (also known simply as an '''atom''') is a [[formula (mathematical logic)|formula]] with no deeper [[proposition]]al structure, that is, a formula that contains no [[logical connective]]s or equivalently a formula that has no strict [[subformula]]s. Atoms are thus the simplest [[well-formed formula]]s of the logic. Compound formulas are formed by combining the atomic formulas using the logical connectives. | |||
The precise form of atomic formulas depends on the logic under consideration; for [[propositional logic]], for example, the atomic formulas are the [[propositional variable]]s. For [[predicate logic]], the atoms are predicate symbols together with their arguments, each argument being a [[first-order logic#Formation rules|term]]. In [[model theory]], atomic formula are merely [[string (computer science)|strings]] of symbols with a given [[signature (logic)|signature]], which may or may not be [[satisfiable]] with respect to a given model.<ref>{{cite book|author1=Wilfrid Hodges|title=A Shorter Model Theory|year=1997|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=0-521-58713-1|pages=11–14}}</ref> | |||
==Atomic formula in first-order logic== | |||
The well-formed terms and propositions of ordinary [[first-order logic]] have the following [[syntax]]: | |||
[[Term algebra|Terms]]: | |||
* <math>t \equiv c \ | \ x \ | \ f (t_{1}, ..., t_{n})</math>, | |||
that is, a term is [[recursive definition|recursively defined]] to be a constant ''c'' (a named object from the [[domain of discourse]]), or a variable ''x'' (ranging over the objects in the domain of discourse), or an ''n''-ary function ''f'' whose arguments are terms ''t''<sub>''k''</sub>. Functions map [[tuple]]s of objects to objects. | |||
Propositions: | |||
* <math>A, B, ... \equiv P (t_{1}, ..., t_{n}) \ | \ A \wedge B \ | \top | \ A \vee B \ | \perp | \ A \supset B \ | \ \forall x. A \ | \ \exists x. \ A </math>, | |||
that is, a proposition is recursively defined to be an ''n''-ary [[predicate (mathematics)|predicate]] ''P'' whose arguments are terms ''t''<sub>''k''</sub>, or an expression composed of [[logical connective]]s (and, or) and [[quantifier]]s (for-all, there-exists) used with other propositions. | |||
An '''atomic formula''' or '''atom''' is simply a predicate applied to a tuple of terms; that is, an atomic formula is a formula of the form ''P'' (''t''<sub>1</sub>, …, ''t''<sub>''n''</sub>) for ''P'' a predicate, and the ''t''<sub>''k''</sub> terms. | |||
All other well-formed formulae are obtained by composing atoms with logical connectives and quantifiers. | |||
For example, the formula ∀''x. P'' (''x'') ∧ ∃''y. Q'' (''y'', ''f'' (''x'')) ∨ ∃''z. R'' (''z'') contains the atoms | |||
* <math> P (x) </math> | |||
* <math>Q (y, f (x))</math> | |||
* <math>R (z)</math> | |||
When all of the terms in an atom are [[ground term]]s, then the atom is called a [[ground atom]] or ''ground predicate''. | |||
== See also == | |||
* In [[model theory]], [[Structure (mathematical logic)|structures]] assign an interpretation to the atomic formulas. | |||
* In [[proof theory]], [[Polarity (proof theory)|polarity]] assignment for atomic formulas is an essential component of [[focusing (proof theory)|focusing]]. | |||
* [[Atomic sentence]] | |||
== References == | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
* {{cite book | author = Hinman, P. | title = Fundamentals of Mathematical Logic | publisher = A K Peters | year = 2005 | isbn = 1-56881-262-0}} | |||
[[Category:Predicate logic]] | |||
[[Category:Logical expressions]] | |||
[[de:Aussage (Logik)#einfache Aussagen - zusammengesetzte Aussagen]] |
Revision as of 16:18, 18 August 2013
In mathematical logic, an atomic formula (also known simply as an atom) is a formula with no deeper propositional structure, that is, a formula that contains no logical connectives or equivalently a formula that has no strict subformulas. Atoms are thus the simplest well-formed formulas of the logic. Compound formulas are formed by combining the atomic formulas using the logical connectives.
The precise form of atomic formulas depends on the logic under consideration; for propositional logic, for example, the atomic formulas are the propositional variables. For predicate logic, the atoms are predicate symbols together with their arguments, each argument being a term. In model theory, atomic formula are merely strings of symbols with a given signature, which may or may not be satisfiable with respect to a given model.[1]
Atomic formula in first-order logic
The well-formed terms and propositions of ordinary first-order logic have the following syntax:
that is, a term is recursively defined to be a constant c (a named object from the domain of discourse), or a variable x (ranging over the objects in the domain of discourse), or an n-ary function f whose arguments are terms tk. Functions map tuples of objects to objects.
Propositions:
that is, a proposition is recursively defined to be an n-ary predicate P whose arguments are terms tk, or an expression composed of logical connectives (and, or) and quantifiers (for-all, there-exists) used with other propositions.
An atomic formula or atom is simply a predicate applied to a tuple of terms; that is, an atomic formula is a formula of the form P (t1, …, tn) for P a predicate, and the tk terms.
All other well-formed formulae are obtained by composing atoms with logical connectives and quantifiers.
For example, the formula ∀x. P (x) ∧ ∃y. Q (y, f (x)) ∨ ∃z. R (z) contains the atoms
When all of the terms in an atom are ground terms, then the atom is called a ground atom or ground predicate.
See also
- In model theory, structures assign an interpretation to the atomic formulas.
- In proof theory, polarity assignment for atomic formulas is an essential component of focusing.
- Atomic sentence
References
43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.
- 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
de:Aussage (Logik)#einfache Aussagen - zusammengesetzte Aussagen
- ↑ 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534