Michael J. Hopkins: Difference between revisions
en>Phil Boswell m convert dodgy URL to ID using AWB |
en>Gilliam m Reverted edits by 194.65.225.163 (talk) to last version by 65.96.162.253 |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{further|Classical conditioning}} | |||
In [[experimental psychology]] the term ''conditioned emotional response'' refers to a phenomenon that is seen in [[classical conditioning]] after a conditioned stimulus (CS) has been paired with an emotion-producing unconditioned stimulus (US) such as electric shock. The conditioned emotional response is usually measured through its effect in suppressing an ongoing response. For example, a rat first learns to press a lever through [[operant conditioning]]. Classical conditioning follows: in a series of trials the rat is exposed to a CS, often a light or a noise. Each CS is followed by the US, an electric shock. As an association between the CS and US develops, the rat slows or stops its lever pressing when the CS comes on. The slower the rat presses, the stronger its conditioned emotional response, or "fear." | |||
Researchers working on theories of conditioning often use the conditioned emotional response to measure the strength of the association between CS and US. They use the ''suppression ratio'' to quantify this strength. | |||
[ | The '''suppression ratio''' equals the number of responses made during a CS divided by the number of responses made during the CS plus the number of responses made during a period just before the CS that has the same duration as the CS: | ||
[ | |||
[ | <math>SR = D / (D+B)</math>. | ||
[ | |||
[ | Where SR = suppression Ratio, D = responding during CS and B = responding before CS. | ||
*If SR = 0, there were no responses during the CS and conditioning is strong. | |||
*If SR = 1/2, the response rate did not change when the CS was presented and there is no evidence of conditioning | |||
*It would be unusual for SR to be greater than 1/2. This would mean the subject responded faster during the CS than before; this could happen if the US were something positive, like food, instead of shock. | |||
[[Category:Behavioral concepts]] | |||
[[Category:Experimental psychology]] | |||
[[Category:Emotion]] | |||
[[Category:Learning]] | |||
Revision as of 17:42, 17 January 2014
47 year-old Podiatrist Hyslop from Alert Bay, has lots of hobbies and interests that include fencing, property developers in condo new launch singapore and handball. Just had a family trip to Monasteries of Haghpat and Sanahin. In experimental psychology the term conditioned emotional response refers to a phenomenon that is seen in classical conditioning after a conditioned stimulus (CS) has been paired with an emotion-producing unconditioned stimulus (US) such as electric shock. The conditioned emotional response is usually measured through its effect in suppressing an ongoing response. For example, a rat first learns to press a lever through operant conditioning. Classical conditioning follows: in a series of trials the rat is exposed to a CS, often a light or a noise. Each CS is followed by the US, an electric shock. As an association between the CS and US develops, the rat slows or stops its lever pressing when the CS comes on. The slower the rat presses, the stronger its conditioned emotional response, or "fear."
Researchers working on theories of conditioning often use the conditioned emotional response to measure the strength of the association between CS and US. They use the suppression ratio to quantify this strength.
The suppression ratio equals the number of responses made during a CS divided by the number of responses made during the CS plus the number of responses made during a period just before the CS that has the same duration as the CS:
Where SR = suppression Ratio, D = responding during CS and B = responding before CS.
- If SR = 0, there were no responses during the CS and conditioning is strong.
- If SR = 1/2, the response rate did not change when the CS was presented and there is no evidence of conditioning
- It would be unusual for SR to be greater than 1/2. This would mean the subject responded faster during the CS than before; this could happen if the US were something positive, like food, instead of shock.