Human mitochondrial molecular clock: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Rjwilmsi
m Journal cites (journal names):, using AWB (8068)
 
en>Monkbot
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[mathematics]], in the subfield of [[ring theory]], a ring ''R'' is a '''polynomial identity ring''' if there is, for some ''N'' > 0, an element ''P'' other than 0 of the [[free algebra]], Z<''X''<sub>1</sub>, ''X''<sub>2</sub>, ..., ''X''<sub>''N''</sub>>, over the [[ring of integers]] in ''N'' variables ''X''<sub>1</sub>, ''X''<sub>2</sub>, ..., ''X''<sub>''N''</sub> such that for all ''N''-[[tuple]]s ''r''<sub>1</sub>, ''r''<sub>2</sub>, ..., ''r''<sub>''N''</sub> taken from ''R'' it happens that


:<math>P(r_1, r_2, \ldots, r_N) = 0.\ </math>


Nobody ever got criticised for bringing in someone famous, who'd videos of himself  [http://tinyurl.com/kecvhhb ugg boots sale] or herself in her or his  [http://tinyurl.com/kecvhhb http://tinyurl.com/kecvhhb] heyday - or, the clips might be of those under the speaker's or her tutelage in the event he is a trainer instead of a performer.<br><br>On the other hand, if you are looking at methods to produce teams and cause them to become much more powerful the next day than they were before the speaker stood up, them I think I will have to reply "no". Indeed, it would not matter if that was your goal, who the speaker is.<br><br>The only way for teams to make changes that are significant and sustainable to their behaviors that are working is in order for them to to discover the advancements for themselves. And as groups as well, rather than as a set of [http://Www.squidoo.com/search/results?q=individuals individuals]. Loudspeakers talk as teams and never to an audience as people.<br>And also the act of speaking, however entertaining and no matter the level to which the crowd are encouraged to get concerned, is basically a mainly passive and one way thing. Where the response can become "yes" is when the techniques are not just talked about, but really used with actual teams in a indiana team building environment.<br><br>Team-building tasks are, as the next word in the description suggests, energetic, although Conference talking may be passive. And active, in turn, means that the participants may take place as a team. They are given a chance to learn for themselves by that and that's something I am very much in favour of.<br>But how suitable is it to get some one from a totally different planet to give advice to a group of company-oriented members of personnel. Will they get anything useful from it at work to them, although they may love it and get a buzz out of meeting someone who they might have [http://Www.Wonderhowto.com/search/admired/ admired] from afar from some time?<br><br>My viewpoint is the fact that it is dependent upon what your aims are for encouraging the guest speaker along in the first place. If it's to inspire your people, to send them away raring to get back to work and get their teeth steadfastly into the jobs which will have built up while they've been attending the conference, then the solution is a firm "yes".<br><br>These kind of demos are consistently fascinating and, in my own experience, always leave people with a sense of "yes, I could do that[http://tinyurl.com/kecvhhb ugg boots sale] that uplifts a-team long enough to have at least a little, and hopefully bigger, effect back where it matters. If talking at people, alone, created positive and actual change in groups, then it might never be necessary to ever operate a-team building event.<br><br>Having worked in the industry for many, many years there are few, if any,  [http://tinyurl.com/kecvhhb discount ugg boots] team periods that present any surprised or my facilitation team colleagues. Having had the benefit of a good briefing from our client contacts, we likely  [http://tinyurl.com/kecvhhb ugg boots sale] understand exactly what the team issues are well enough at the onset of the action to just stand up and say "Here are your learning factors".<br><br>But that would not have any effect. Learning is necessary for groups to take possession of the changes and education isn't learning. Learning calls for  [http://tinyurl.com/kecvhhb discount ugg boots] proactive effort and understanding on behalf of these included and favorable change demands it to be bought in to by all associates.
Strictly the ''X''<sub>''i''</sub> here are "non-commuting indeterminates", and so "polynomial identity" is a slight [[abuse of notation|abuse of language]], since "polynomial" here stands for what is usually called a "non-commutative polynomial". The abbreviation '''PI-ring''' is common. More generally, the free algebra over any ring ''S'' may be used, and gives the concept of '''PI-algebra'''.
 
If the degree of the polynomial ''P'' is defined in the usual way, the polynomial ''P'' is called '''monic''' if at least one of its terms of highest degree has coefficient equal to 1.
 
Every commutative ring is a PI-ring, satisfying the polynomial identity ''XY'' - ''YX'' = 0. Therefore PI-rings are usually taken as ''close generalizations of commutative rings''. If the ring has [[Characteristic (algebra)|characteristic]] ''p'' different from zero then it satisfies the polynomial identity ''pX'' = 0. To exclude such examples, sometimes it is defined that PI-rings must satisfy a monic polynomial identity.<ref>J.C. McConnell, J.C. Robson, ''Noncommutative Noetherian Rings, Graduate studies in Mathematics, Vol 30''</ref>
 
==Examples==
* For example if ''R'' is a [[commutative ring]] it is a PI-ring: this is true with
::<math>P(X_1,X_2)=X_1X_2-X_2X_1=0~</math>
 
* A major role is played in the theory by the '''standard identity''' ''s''<sub>''N''</sub>, of length ''N'', which generalises the example given for commutative rings (''N'' = 2). It derives from the [[Leibniz formula for determinants]]
 
::<math>\det(A) = \sum_{\sigma \in S_N} \sgn(\sigma) \prod_{i = 1}^N a_{i,\sigma(i)}</math>
 
:by replacing each product in the summand by the product of the ''X''<sub>i</sub> in the order given by the permutation &sigma;. In other words each of the ''N''! orders is summed, and the coefficient is 1 or &minus;1 according to the [[signature of a permutation|signature]].
 
::<math>s_N(X_1,\ldots,X_N) = \sum_{\sigma \in S_N} \sgn(\sigma) X_{\sigma(1)}\dotsm X_{\sigma(N)}=0~</math>
:The ''k''&times;''k'' [[matrix ring]] over any commutative ring satisfies a standard identity; the [[Amitsur&ndash;Levitzki theorem]] states that it satisfies ''s''<sub>2''k''</sub>. The degree of this identity is optimal since the matrix ring can not satisfy any monic polynomial of degree less than&nbsp;2''k''.
 
* Given a field ''k'' of characteristic zero, take ''R'' to be the [[exterior algebra]] over a [[countably infinite]]-dimensional [[vector space]] with basis ''e''<sub>1</sub>, ''e''<sub>2</sub>, ''e''<sub>3</sub>, ... Then ''R'' is generated by the elements of this basis and
 
::''e''<sub>''i''</sub>''e''<sub>''j''</sub> = &minus;''e''<sub>''j''</sub>''e''<sub>''i''</sub>.
 
:This ring does not satisfy ''s''<sub>''N''</sub> for any ''N'' and therefore can not be embedded in any matrix ring. In fact ''s''<sub>''N''</sub>(''e''<sub>1</sub>,''e''<sub>2</sub>,...,''e''<sub>''N''</sub>) =&nbsp;''N''!''e''<sub>1</sub>''e''<sub>2</sub>...''e''<sub>''N''</sub>&nbsp;&ne;&nbsp;0. On the other hand it is a PI-ring since it satisfies [[''x'',&nbsp;''y''],&nbsp;''z'']&nbsp;:=&nbsp;''xyz''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;''xzz''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;''zxy''&nbsp;+&nbsp;''zyz''&nbsp;=&nbsp;0. It is enough to check this for monomials in the ''e'''s. Now, a monomial of even degree commutes with every element. Therefore if either ''x'' or ''y'' is a monomial of even degree [''x'',&nbsp;''y''] :=&nbsp;''xy''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;''yx''&nbsp;=&nbsp;0. If both are of odd degree then [''x'',&nbsp;''y'']&nbsp;=&nbsp;''xy''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;''yx''&nbsp;=&nbsp;2''xy'' has even degree and therefore commutes with ''z'', i.e. [[''x'',&nbsp;''y''],&nbsp;''z'']&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.
 
==Properties==
* Any [[subring]] or [[homomorphism|homomorphic image]] of a PI-ring is a PI-ring.
* A finite [[direct product]] of PI-rings is a PI-ring.
* A direct product of PI-rings, satisfying the same identity, is a PI-ring.
* It can always be assumed that the identity that the PI-ring satisfies is [[multilinear]].
* If a ring is finitely generated by ''n'' elements as a [[module (mathematics)|module]] over its [[Center (algebra)|center]] then it satisfies every alternating multilinear polynomial of degree larger than ''n''. In particular it satisfies ''s''<sub>''N''</sub> for ''N''&nbsp;>&nbsp;''n'' and therefore it is a PI-ring.
* If ''R'' and ''S'' are PI-rings then their [[tensor product]] over the integers, <math>R\otimes_\mathbb{Z}S</math>, is also a PI-ring.
* If ''R'' is a PI-ring, then so is the ring of ''n''&times;''n''-matrices with coefficients in ''R''.
 
==PI-rings as generalizations of commutative rings==
Among noncommutative rings, PI-rings satisfy the [[Köthe conjecture]]. [[Finitely generated algebra|Affine]] PI-algebras over a [[field (mathematics)|field]] satisfy the [[Kurosh conjecture]], the [[Nullstellensatz]] and the [[catenary ring|catenary property]] for [[prime ideals]].
 
If ''R'' is a PI-ring and ''K'' is a subring of its center such that ''R'' is [[integral extension|integal over]] ''K'' then the [[Going up and going down|going up and going down properties]] for prime ideals of ''R'' and ''K'' are satisfied. Also the ''lying over'' property (If ''p'' is a prime ideal of ''K'' then there is a prime ideal ''P'' of ''R'' such that <math>p</math> is minimal over <math>P\cap K</math>) and the ''incomparability'' property (If ''P'' and ''Q'' are prime ideals of ''R'' and <math>P\subset Q</math> then <math>P\cap K\subset Q\cap K</math>) are satisfied.
<!--Add here results about integral extensions similar to commutative case.-->
 
==The set of identities a PI-ring satisfies==
 
If ''F''&nbsp;:=&nbsp;Z<''X''<sub>1</sub>, ''X''<sub>2</sub>, ..., ''X''<sub>''N''</sub>> is the free algebra in ''N'' variables and ''R'' is a PI-ring satisfying the polynomial ''P'' in ''N'' variables, then ''P'' is in the [[Kernel (algebra)|kernel]] of any homomorphism
:<math>\tau</math>:F <math>\rightarrow</math> ''R''.
 
An ideal ''I'' of ''F'' is called '''T-ideal''' if <math>f(I)\subset I</math> for every [[endomorphism]] ''f'' of ''F''.
 
Given a PI-ring, ''R'', the set of all polynomial identities it satisfies is an [[Ideal (ring theory)|ideal]] but even more it is a T-ideal. Conversely, if ''I'' is a T-ideal of ''F'' then ''F''/''I'' is a PI-ring satisfying all identities in ''I''. It is assumed that ''I'' contains monic polynomials when PI-rings are required to satisfy monic polynomial identities.
 
==References==
{{Reflist}}
*{{eom|id=P/p072640|title=PI-algebra|first=V.N.|last= Latyshev}}
*{{eom|id=a/a110570|title=Amitsur–Levitzki theorem |first=E.|last= Formanek}}
*[http://books.google.com/books?id=Li147JZ4T6AC Polynomial identities in ring theory], Louis Halle Rowen, Academic Press, 1980, ISBN 978-0-12-599850-5
*[http://books.google.com/books?id=x8gJw5bMw2oC Polynomial identity rings], Vesselin S. Drensky, Edward Formanek, Birkhäuser, 2004, ISBN 978-3-7643-7126-5
*[http://books.google.com/books?id=ZLW_Kz_zOP8C Polynomial identities and asymptotic methods], A. Giambruno, Mikhail Zaicev, AMS Bookstore, 2005, ISBN 978-0-8218-3829-7
*[http://books.google.com/books?id=80pw1QoLSQUC Computational aspects of polynomial identities], Alexei Kanel-Belov, Louis Halle Rowen, A K Peters Ltd., 2005, ISBN 978-1-56881-163-5
 
==External links==
*{{PlanetMath|urlname=PolynomialIdentityAlgebra|title=Polynomial identity algebra}}
*{{PlanetMath|urlname=StandardIdentity|title=Standard Identity}}
*{{PlanetMath|urlname=TIdeal|title=T-ideal}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Polynomial Identity Ring}}
[[Category:Ring theory]]
[[Category:Mathematical identities]]

Revision as of 17:20, 21 January 2014

In mathematics, in the subfield of ring theory, a ring R is a polynomial identity ring if there is, for some N > 0, an element P other than 0 of the free algebra, Z<X1, X2, ..., XN>, over the ring of integers in N variables X1, X2, ..., XN such that for all N-tuples r1, r2, ..., rN taken from R it happens that

P(r1,r2,,rN)=0.

Strictly the Xi here are "non-commuting indeterminates", and so "polynomial identity" is a slight abuse of language, since "polynomial" here stands for what is usually called a "non-commutative polynomial". The abbreviation PI-ring is common. More generally, the free algebra over any ring S may be used, and gives the concept of PI-algebra.

If the degree of the polynomial P is defined in the usual way, the polynomial P is called monic if at least one of its terms of highest degree has coefficient equal to 1.

Every commutative ring is a PI-ring, satisfying the polynomial identity XY - YX = 0. Therefore PI-rings are usually taken as close generalizations of commutative rings. If the ring has characteristic p different from zero then it satisfies the polynomial identity pX = 0. To exclude such examples, sometimes it is defined that PI-rings must satisfy a monic polynomial identity.[1]

Examples

P(X1,X2)=X1X2X2X1=0
  • A major role is played in the theory by the standard identity sN, of length N, which generalises the example given for commutative rings (N = 2). It derives from the Leibniz formula for determinants
det(A)=σSNsgn(σ)i=1Nai,σ(i)
by replacing each product in the summand by the product of the Xi in the order given by the permutation σ. In other words each of the N! orders is summed, and the coefficient is 1 or −1 according to the signature.
sN(X1,,XN)=σSNsgn(σ)Xσ(1)Xσ(N)=0
The k×k matrix ring over any commutative ring satisfies a standard identity; the Amitsur–Levitzki theorem states that it satisfies s2k. The degree of this identity is optimal since the matrix ring can not satisfy any monic polynomial of degree less than 2k.
eiej = −ejei.
This ring does not satisfy sN for any N and therefore can not be embedded in any matrix ring. In fact sN(e1,e2,...,eN) = N!e1e2...eN ≠ 0. On the other hand it is a PI-ring since it satisfies [[xy], z] := xyz − xzz − zxy + zyz = 0. It is enough to check this for monomials in the e's. Now, a monomial of even degree commutes with every element. Therefore if either x or y is a monomial of even degree [xy] := xy − yx = 0. If both are of odd degree then [xy] = xy − yx = 2xy has even degree and therefore commutes with z, i.e. [[xy], z] = 0.

Properties

  • Any subring or homomorphic image of a PI-ring is a PI-ring.
  • A finite direct product of PI-rings is a PI-ring.
  • A direct product of PI-rings, satisfying the same identity, is a PI-ring.
  • It can always be assumed that the identity that the PI-ring satisfies is multilinear.
  • If a ring is finitely generated by n elements as a module over its center then it satisfies every alternating multilinear polynomial of degree larger than n. In particular it satisfies sN for N > n and therefore it is a PI-ring.
  • If R and S are PI-rings then their tensor product over the integers, RS, is also a PI-ring.
  • If R is a PI-ring, then so is the ring of n×n-matrices with coefficients in R.

PI-rings as generalizations of commutative rings

Among noncommutative rings, PI-rings satisfy the Köthe conjecture. Affine PI-algebras over a field satisfy the Kurosh conjecture, the Nullstellensatz and the catenary property for prime ideals.

If R is a PI-ring and K is a subring of its center such that R is integal over K then the going up and going down properties for prime ideals of R and K are satisfied. Also the lying over property (If p is a prime ideal of K then there is a prime ideal P of R such that p is minimal over PK) and the incomparability property (If P and Q are prime ideals of R and PQ then PKQK) are satisfied.

The set of identities a PI-ring satisfies

If F := Z<X1, X2, ..., XN> is the free algebra in N variables and R is a PI-ring satisfying the polynomial P in N variables, then P is in the kernel of any homomorphism

τ:F R.

An ideal I of F is called T-ideal if f(I)I for every endomorphism f of F.

Given a PI-ring, R, the set of all polynomial identities it satisfies is an ideal but even more it is a T-ideal. Conversely, if I is a T-ideal of F then F/I is a PI-ring satisfying all identities in I. It is assumed that I contains monic polynomials when PI-rings are required to satisfy monic polynomial identities.

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

External links

  1. J.C. McConnell, J.C. Robson, Noncommutative Noetherian Rings, Graduate studies in Mathematics, Vol 30