Thermal ionization: Difference between revisions
en>Chris the speller m Typo fixing per WP:HYPHEN, sub-subsection 3, points 3,4,5, replaced: chemically- → chemically using AWB (8062) |
en>Nanite |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Cancer slope factors''' (CSF) are used to estimate the risk of [[cancer]] associated with exposure to a [[carcinogen]]ic or potentially carcinogenic substance. A slope factor is an upper bound, approximating a 95% [[confidence limit]], on the increased cancer risk from a lifetime exposure to an agent by [[ingestion]] or [[inhalation]]. | |||
This estimate, usually expressed in units of proportion (of a population) affected per mg of substance/kg [[body weight]]-day, is generally reserved for use in the low-dose region of the [[dose-response relationship]], that is, for exposures corresponding to risks less than 1 in 100.<ref name="IRIS">http://www.epa.gov/iris/help_ques.htm</ref><br /> | |||
==Toxicity Assessments for Carcinogenic Effects== | |||
For carcinogens, the assumption is often made that a small number of molecular events may evoke changes in a single cell that can lead to uncontrolled cellular proliferation and eventually to a clinical diagnosis of cancer. This [[toxicity]] of carcinogens is referred to as being "non-threshold" because there is believed to be essentially no level of exposure that does not pose some probability of producing a carcinogenic response, therefore, there is no dose that can be considered to be risk-free. However, some (non-genotoxic) carcinogens may exhibit a threshold whereby doses lower than the threshold do not invoke a carcinogenic response. | |||
When evaluating cancer risks of genotoxic carcinogens, theoretically an effect threshold cannot be estimated. For [[chemical]]s that are carcinogens, a two-part evaluation to quantify risk is often employed in which the substance first is assigned a weight-of-evidence classification, and then a ''slope factor'' is calculated.<ref name ="RAGS">http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/ragsa/pdf/ch7.pdf</ref> | |||
==Generating a Slope Factor== | |||
When the chemical is a known or probable human carcinogen, a toxicity value that defines quantitatively the relationship between dose and response (i.e., the slope factor) is calculated. Because risk at low exposure levels is difficult to measure directly either by animal experiments or by [[Epidemiology|epidemiologic studies]], the development of a slope factor generally entails applying a model to the available ''[[data set]]'' and using the model to extrapolate from the relatively high doses administered to experimental animals (or the exposures noted in epidemiologic studies) to the lower exposure levels expected for human contact in the environment.<ref name="RAGS" /> | |||
==Data Sets== | |||
High-quality Human data (e.g., epidemiological studies) on carcinogens is preferable to animal data. When human data is limited, the most sensitive species is given the greatest emphasis. Occasionally, in situations where no single study is judged most appropriate, yet several studies collectively support the estimate, the [[geometric mean]] of estimates from all studies may be adopted as the slope. This practice ensures the inclusion of all relevant data.<ref name="RAGS" /> | |||
==Weight-of-Evidence Classification for Carcinogens== | |||
Slope factors are typically calculated for potential carcinogens in classes A, B1, and B2. Quantitative estimation of slope factors for the chemicals in class C proceeds on a case-by-case basis. The slope factor is used in risk assessments to estimate an upper-bound lifetime probability of an individual developing cancer as a result of exposure to a particular level of a potential carcinogen. Slope factors should always be accompanied by the ''weight of-evidence'' classification to indicate the strength of the evidence that the agent is a human carcinogen.<ref name="RAGS" /> | |||
* A = Human carcinogen | |||
* B1 = indicates that limited human data are available. | |||
* B2 = indicates sufficient evidence in animals and inadequate or no evidence in humans. | |||
* C = Possible human carcinogen | |||
* D = Not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity | |||
* E = Evidence of non-carcinogenicity for humans | |||
==Calculation of Cancer Risk== | |||
For each age interval "i", the cancer risk for exposure by a specified pathway is computed as:<ref>http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/sghandbook/riskcalcs.htm</ref> | |||
<math> | |||
\text{Risk}_i = C \cdot \frac{IR_i \cdot EF_i \cdot ED_i}{BW_i \cdot AT} \cdot SF \cdot ADAF_i | |||
</math> | |||
Where: | |||
:C = Concentration of the chemical in the contaminated environmental medium (soil or water) to which the person is exposed. The units are mg/kg for soil and mg/l for water. | |||
:IR<sub>i</sub> = Intake rate of the contaminated environmental medium for age bin "i". The units are mg/day for soil and l/day for water. | |||
:BW<sub>i</sub> = Body weight of the exposed person for age bin "i". | |||
:EF<sub>i</sub> = Exposure frequency for age bin "i" (days/year). This describes how often a person is exposed to the contaminated medium over the course of a typical year. | |||
:ED<sub>i</sub> = Exposure duration for age bin "i" (years). This describes how long a person is exposed to the contaminated medium over the course of their lifetime. | |||
:AT = Average days. This term specifies the length of time over which the average dose is calculated. For quantifying cancer risk a "lifetime" of 70 years is used (ie, 70 years times 365 days/year). | |||
:SF = Cancer slope factor (mg/kg-day)<sup>-1</sup> | |||
:ADAF = Age-dependant adjustment factor for age bin "i" (unitless) | |||
==Risk Specific Dose (RSD)== | |||
The '''Cancer Slope Factor''' is used to derive the Risk Specific Dose (RSD)(mg/kg-day) for direct-acting carcinogenic agents, those that cause chemical changes ([[mutation]]s) in [[DNA]]. It is also the default choice for carcinogens when there are insufficient data to demonstrate that the mode of action of the chemical is nonlinear. The RSD is often calculated based on a one-in-a-million extra risk (10<sup>−6</sup> risk) or a one-in-a-hundred-thousand risk (10<sup>−5</sup> risk) for other-than highly exposed individuals. The term "extra" in the definition of the RSD refers to a risk from environmental exposure to the chemical of interest above the background risk that is always present.<ref>http://water.epa.gov/learn/training/wacademy/health_page15.cfm</ref> | |||
The formula to calculate the RSD for a chemical based on a one-in-a-million extra risk (10<sup>−6</sup> risk) is: RSD = 0.000001 / CSF | |||
==Potency Factor== | |||
The CSF is also called a "potency factor" and is used to calculate the Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk by multiplying the CSF by the chronic daily intake (CDI). The CDI is the dose over a lifetime and is expressed in mg/kg-day.<ref>Environmental law, policy, and economics: reclaiming the environmental agenda By Nicholas Askounes Ashford, Charles C. Caldart (Page 87)</ref> | |||
(see also [http://www.ajdesigner.com/phprisk/risk_equation_carcinogenic_carcinogen_slope_factor.php Risk Equations and Formulas Calculator]) | |||
==References== | |||
{{Reflist}} | |||
[[Category:Oncology]] | |||
[[Category:Toxicology]] | |||
Revision as of 23:58, 21 January 2014
Cancer slope factors (CSF) are used to estimate the risk of cancer associated with exposure to a carcinogenic or potentially carcinogenic substance. A slope factor is an upper bound, approximating a 95% confidence limit, on the increased cancer risk from a lifetime exposure to an agent by ingestion or inhalation.
This estimate, usually expressed in units of proportion (of a population) affected per mg of substance/kg body weight-day, is generally reserved for use in the low-dose region of the dose-response relationship, that is, for exposures corresponding to risks less than 1 in 100.[1]
Toxicity Assessments for Carcinogenic Effects
For carcinogens, the assumption is often made that a small number of molecular events may evoke changes in a single cell that can lead to uncontrolled cellular proliferation and eventually to a clinical diagnosis of cancer. This toxicity of carcinogens is referred to as being "non-threshold" because there is believed to be essentially no level of exposure that does not pose some probability of producing a carcinogenic response, therefore, there is no dose that can be considered to be risk-free. However, some (non-genotoxic) carcinogens may exhibit a threshold whereby doses lower than the threshold do not invoke a carcinogenic response.
When evaluating cancer risks of genotoxic carcinogens, theoretically an effect threshold cannot be estimated. For chemicals that are carcinogens, a two-part evaluation to quantify risk is often employed in which the substance first is assigned a weight-of-evidence classification, and then a slope factor is calculated.[2]
Generating a Slope Factor
When the chemical is a known or probable human carcinogen, a toxicity value that defines quantitatively the relationship between dose and response (i.e., the slope factor) is calculated. Because risk at low exposure levels is difficult to measure directly either by animal experiments or by epidemiologic studies, the development of a slope factor generally entails applying a model to the available data set and using the model to extrapolate from the relatively high doses administered to experimental animals (or the exposures noted in epidemiologic studies) to the lower exposure levels expected for human contact in the environment.[2]
Data Sets
High-quality Human data (e.g., epidemiological studies) on carcinogens is preferable to animal data. When human data is limited, the most sensitive species is given the greatest emphasis. Occasionally, in situations where no single study is judged most appropriate, yet several studies collectively support the estimate, the geometric mean of estimates from all studies may be adopted as the slope. This practice ensures the inclusion of all relevant data.[2]
Weight-of-Evidence Classification for Carcinogens
Slope factors are typically calculated for potential carcinogens in classes A, B1, and B2. Quantitative estimation of slope factors for the chemicals in class C proceeds on a case-by-case basis. The slope factor is used in risk assessments to estimate an upper-bound lifetime probability of an individual developing cancer as a result of exposure to a particular level of a potential carcinogen. Slope factors should always be accompanied by the weight of-evidence classification to indicate the strength of the evidence that the agent is a human carcinogen.[2]
- A = Human carcinogen
- B1 = indicates that limited human data are available.
- B2 = indicates sufficient evidence in animals and inadequate or no evidence in humans.
- C = Possible human carcinogen
- D = Not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity
- E = Evidence of non-carcinogenicity for humans
Calculation of Cancer Risk
For each age interval "i", the cancer risk for exposure by a specified pathway is computed as:[3]
Where:
- C = Concentration of the chemical in the contaminated environmental medium (soil or water) to which the person is exposed. The units are mg/kg for soil and mg/l for water.
- IRi = Intake rate of the contaminated environmental medium for age bin "i". The units are mg/day for soil and l/day for water.
- BWi = Body weight of the exposed person for age bin "i".
- EFi = Exposure frequency for age bin "i" (days/year). This describes how often a person is exposed to the contaminated medium over the course of a typical year.
- EDi = Exposure duration for age bin "i" (years). This describes how long a person is exposed to the contaminated medium over the course of their lifetime.
- AT = Average days. This term specifies the length of time over which the average dose is calculated. For quantifying cancer risk a "lifetime" of 70 years is used (ie, 70 years times 365 days/year).
- SF = Cancer slope factor (mg/kg-day)-1
- ADAF = Age-dependant adjustment factor for age bin "i" (unitless)
Risk Specific Dose (RSD)
The Cancer Slope Factor is used to derive the Risk Specific Dose (RSD)(mg/kg-day) for direct-acting carcinogenic agents, those that cause chemical changes (mutations) in DNA. It is also the default choice for carcinogens when there are insufficient data to demonstrate that the mode of action of the chemical is nonlinear. The RSD is often calculated based on a one-in-a-million extra risk (10−6 risk) or a one-in-a-hundred-thousand risk (10−5 risk) for other-than highly exposed individuals. The term "extra" in the definition of the RSD refers to a risk from environmental exposure to the chemical of interest above the background risk that is always present.[4]
The formula to calculate the RSD for a chemical based on a one-in-a-million extra risk (10−6 risk) is: RSD = 0.000001 / CSF
Potency Factor
The CSF is also called a "potency factor" and is used to calculate the Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk by multiplying the CSF by the chronic daily intake (CDI). The CDI is the dose over a lifetime and is expressed in mg/kg-day.[5]
(see also Risk Equations and Formulas Calculator)
References
43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.
- ↑ http://www.epa.gov/iris/help_ques.htm
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/ragsa/pdf/ch7.pdf
- ↑ http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/sghandbook/riskcalcs.htm
- ↑ http://water.epa.gov/learn/training/wacademy/health_page15.cfm
- ↑ Environmental law, policy, and economics: reclaiming the environmental agenda By Nicholas Askounes Ashford, Charles C. Caldart (Page 87)