Particle deposition: Difference between revisions
en>Williams12357 |
en>ChrisGualtieri m General Fixes using AWB |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[order theory]] a '''better-quasi-ordering''' or '''bqo''' is a [[quasi-ordering]] that does not admit a certain type of bad array. Every bqo is [[well-quasi-order]]ed. | |||
== Motivation == | |||
Though [[wqo]] is an appealing notion, many important infinitary operations do not preserve [[wqo]]ness. | |||
An example due to [[Richard Rado]] illustrates this.<ref name="Rado54"/> | |||
In a 1965 paper [[Nash-Williams|Crispin Nash-Williams]] formulated the stronger notion of bqo in order to prove that the class of [[Tree (set theory)|tree]]s of height ω is [[wqo]] under the [[topological minor]] relation.<ref name="Nash-Williams65"/> Since then, many [[quasi-order]]s have been proven to be [[wqo]] by proving them to be bqo. For instance, [[Richard Laver]] established [[Roland Fraïssé|Fraïssé's]] conjecture by proving that the class of [[scattered]] [[linear order]] types is bqo.<ref name="Laver71"/> More recently, Carlos Martinez-Ranero has proven that, under the [[Proper Forcing Axiom]], the class of [[Aronszajn line]]s is bqo under the embeddability relation.<ref name="Martinez-Ranero2011"/> | |||
== Definition == | |||
It is common in bqo theory to write <math> {_*}x </math> for the sequence <math>x</math> with the first term omitted. Write <math>[\omega]^{<\omega}</math> for the set of finite, strictly increasing sequences with terms in <math>\omega</math>, and define a relation <math>\triangleleft</math> on <math>[\omega]^{<\omega}</math> as follows: <math>s\triangleleft t</math> if and only if there is <math>u</math> such that <math>s</math> is a strict initial segment of <math>u</math> and <math>t={}_*u</math>. Note that the relation <math>\triangleleft</math> is not [[Transitive relation|transitive]]. | |||
A ''block'' is a subset ''B'' of <math>[\omega]^{<\omega}</math> that contains an initial segment of every | |||
infinite subset of <math>\bigcup B</math>. For a [[quasi-order]] <math>Q</math> a ''<math>Q</math>-pattern'' is a function from a block ''B'' into <math>Q</math>. A <math>Q</math>-pattern <math>f\colon B\to Q</math> is said to be ''bad'' if <math>f(s)\not \le_Q f(t)</math> for every pair <math>s,t\in B</math> such that <math>s\triangleleft t</math>; otherwise <math>f</math> is ''good''. A [[quasi-order]] <math>Q</math> is ''better-quasi-ordered'' (''bqo'') if there is no bad <math>Q</math>-pattern. | |||
</ | |||
In order to make this definition easier to work with, Nash-Williams defines a ''barrier'' to be a block whose elements are pairwise [[Comparability|incomparable]] under the inclusion relation <math>\subset</math>. A ''<math>Q</math>-array'' is a <math>Q</math>-pattern whose domain is a barrier. By observing that every block contains a barrier, one sees that <math>Q</math> is bqo if and only if there is no bad <math>Q</math>-array. | |||
== Simpson's alternative definition == | |||
Simpson introduced an alternative definition of bqo in terms of Borel maps <math>[\omega]^{\omega}\to Q</math>, where <math>[\omega]^{\omega}</math>, the set of infinite subsets of <math>\omega</math>, is given the usual (product) topology.<ref name="Simpson85"/> | |||
Let ''<math>Q</math>'' be a quasi-order and endow <math>Q</math> with the [[discrete topology]]. A ''<math>Q</math>-array'' is a [[Borel function]] <math>[A]^{\omega}\to Q</math> for some infinite subset <math>A</math> of <math>\omega</math>. A <math>Q</math>-array <math>f</math> is ''bad'' if <math>f(X)\not\le_Q f({_*}X)</math> for every <math>X\in[A]^{\omega}</math>; | |||
<math>f</math> is ''good'' otherwise. The quasi-order <math>Q</math> is ''bqo'' if there is no bad <math>Q</math>-array in this sense. | |||
== Major theorems == | |||
Many major results in bqo theory are consequences of the Minimal Bad Array Lemma, which appears in Simpson's paper<ref name="Simpson85"/> as follows. See also Laver's paper,<ref name="Laver78"/> where the Minimal Bad Array Lemma was first stated as a result. The technique was present in Nash-Williams' original 1965 paper. | |||
Suppose <math>(Q,\le_Q)</math> is a [[quasi-order]]. A ''partial ranking'' <math>\le'</math> of <math>Q</math> is a [[well-founded]] [[partial order]]ing of <math>Q</math> such that <math>q\le'r \to q \le_Q r</math>. For bad <math>Q</math>-arrays (in the sense of Simpson) <math>f\colon [A]^{\omega}\to Q</math> and <math>g\colon [B]^{\omega}\to Q</math>, define: | |||
: <math>g\le^* f \text{ if } B\subseteq A \text{ and } g(X)\le' f(X) \text{ for every } X\in[B]^{\omega}</math> | |||
: <math>g <^* f \text{ if } B\subseteq A \text{ and } g(X) <' f(X) \text{ for every } X\in[B]^{\omega}</math> | |||
We say a bad <math>Q</math>-array <math>g</math> is ''minimal bad'' (with respect to the partial ranking <math>\le'</math>) if there is no bad <math>Q</math>-array <math>f</math> such that <math>f <^* g</math>. | |||
Note that the definitions of <math>\le^*</math> and <math><'</math> depend on a partial ranking <math>\le'</math> of <math>Q</math>. Note also that the relation <math><^*</math> is not the strict part of the relation <math>\le^*</math>. | |||
'''Theorem''' (Minimal Bad Array Lemma)'''.''' Let <math>Q</math> be a [[quasi-order]] equipped with a partial ranking and suppose <math>f</math> is a bad <math>Q</math>-array. Then there is a minimal bad <math>Q</math>-array <math>g</math> such that <math>g \le^* f</math>. | |||
==See also== | |||
* [[Well-quasi-ordering]] | |||
* [[Well-order]] | |||
==References== | |||
{{Reflist| | |||
refs= | |||
<ref name = "Laver71">{{ | |||
cite journal | |||
| last1 = Laver | |||
| first1 = Richard | |||
| title = On Fraisse's Order Type Conjecture | |||
| journal = The Annals of Mathematics | |||
| volume = 93 | |||
|issue = 1 | |||
| year = 1971 | |||
| pages = 89–111 | |||
| jstor = 1970754 | |||
| doi = 10.2307/1970754 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
<ref name="Martinez-Ranero2011">{{ | |||
cite journal | |||
| last1 = Martinez-Ranero | |||
| first1 = Carlos | |||
| title = Well-quasi-ordering Aronszajn lines | |||
| journal = Fundamenta Mathematicae | |||
| volume = 213 | |||
| issue = 3 | |||
| year = 2011 | |||
| pages = 197–211 | |||
| issn = 0016-2736 | |||
| doi = 10.4064/fm213-3-1 | |||
| mr = 2822417 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
<ref name = "Nash-Williams65">{{ | |||
cite journal | |||
| last1 = Nash-Williams | |||
| first1 = C. St. J. A. | |||
| authorlink1 = Crispin Nash-Williams | |||
| title = On well-quasi-ordering infinite trees | |||
| journal = Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society | |||
| volume = 61 | |||
| issue = 3 | |||
| year = 1965 | |||
| pages = 697–720 | |||
| issn = 0305-0041 | |||
| doi = 10.1017/S0305004100039062 | |||
| mr = 0175814 | |||
| bibcode = 1965PCPS...61..697N | |||
}}</ref> | |||
<ref name = "Rado54">{{ | |||
cite journal | |||
| last = Rado | |||
| first = Richard | |||
| authorlink = Richard Rado | |||
| title = Partial well-ordering of sets of vectors | |||
| journal = Mathematika | |||
| year = 1954 | |||
| volume = 1 | |||
| pages = 89–95 | |||
| doi = 10.1112/S0025579300000565 | |||
| mr = 0066441 | |||
| issue = 2 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
<ref name = "Simpson85">{{ | |||
cite book | |||
| last = Simpson | |||
| first = Stephen G. | |||
| chapter = BQO Theory and Fraïssé's Conjecture | |||
| title = Recursive Aspects of Descriptive Set Theory | |||
| editor1-last = Mansfield | |||
| editor1-first = Richard | |||
| editor2-last = Weitkamp | |||
| editor2-first = Galen | |||
| publisher = The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press | |||
| year = 1985 | |||
| pages = 124–38 | |||
| mr = 786122 | |||
| isbn = 978-0-19-503602-2 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
<ref name = "Laver78">{{ | |||
cite book | |||
| last = Laver | |||
| first = Richard | |||
| chapter = Better-quasi-orderings and a class of trees | |||
| title = Studies in foundations and combinatorics | |||
| editor1-last = Rota | |||
| editor1-first = Gian-Carlo | |||
| publisher = Academic Press | |||
| year = 1978 | |||
| pages = 31–48 | |||
| mr = 0520553 | |||
| isbn = 978-0-12-599101-8 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
}} | |||
[[Category:Mathematical relations]] | |||
[[Category:Order theory]] | |||
[[Category:Wellfoundedness]] |
Revision as of 18:10, 26 October 2013
In order theory a better-quasi-ordering or bqo is a quasi-ordering that does not admit a certain type of bad array. Every bqo is well-quasi-ordered.
Motivation
Though wqo is an appealing notion, many important infinitary operations do not preserve wqoness. An example due to Richard Rado illustrates this.[1] In a 1965 paper Crispin Nash-Williams formulated the stronger notion of bqo in order to prove that the class of trees of height ω is wqo under the topological minor relation.[2] Since then, many quasi-orders have been proven to be wqo by proving them to be bqo. For instance, Richard Laver established Fraïssé's conjecture by proving that the class of scattered linear order types is bqo.[3] More recently, Carlos Martinez-Ranero has proven that, under the Proper Forcing Axiom, the class of Aronszajn lines is bqo under the embeddability relation.[4]
Definition
It is common in bqo theory to write for the sequence with the first term omitted. Write for the set of finite, strictly increasing sequences with terms in , and define a relation on as follows: if and only if there is such that is a strict initial segment of and . Note that the relation is not transitive.
A block is a subset B of that contains an initial segment of every infinite subset of . For a quasi-order a -pattern is a function from a block B into . A -pattern is said to be bad if for every pair such that ; otherwise is good. A quasi-order is better-quasi-ordered (bqo) if there is no bad -pattern.
In order to make this definition easier to work with, Nash-Williams defines a barrier to be a block whose elements are pairwise incomparable under the inclusion relation . A -array is a -pattern whose domain is a barrier. By observing that every block contains a barrier, one sees that is bqo if and only if there is no bad -array.
Simpson's alternative definition
Simpson introduced an alternative definition of bqo in terms of Borel maps , where , the set of infinite subsets of , is given the usual (product) topology.[5]
Let be a quasi-order and endow with the discrete topology. A -array is a Borel function for some infinite subset of . A -array is bad if for every ; is good otherwise. The quasi-order is bqo if there is no bad -array in this sense.
Major theorems
Many major results in bqo theory are consequences of the Minimal Bad Array Lemma, which appears in Simpson's paper[5] as follows. See also Laver's paper,[6] where the Minimal Bad Array Lemma was first stated as a result. The technique was present in Nash-Williams' original 1965 paper.
Suppose is a quasi-order. A partial ranking of is a well-founded partial ordering of such that . For bad -arrays (in the sense of Simpson) and , define:
We say a bad -array is minimal bad (with respect to the partial ranking ) if there is no bad -array such that . Note that the definitions of and depend on a partial ranking of . Note also that the relation is not the strict part of the relation .
Theorem (Minimal Bad Array Lemma). Let be a quasi-order equipped with a partial ranking and suppose is a bad -array. Then there is a minimal bad -array such that .
See also
References
43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedRado54
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedNash-Williams65
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedLaver71
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedMartinez-Ranero2011
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedSimpson85
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedLaver78