Finite subdivision rule: Difference between revisions
en>Dekart removed Category:Mathematics; added Category:Geometry using HotCat |
en>Bobnorwal adding good article tag. Is there a reason it wasn't there? If so, just remove it -- and maybe let me know your reasoning. :) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In algebraic geometry, the '''theorem on formal functions''' states the following:<ref>{{harvnb|EGA III-1|loc=4.1.5}}</ref> | |||
:Let <math>f: X \to S</math> be a [[proper morphism]] of noetherian schemes with a coherent sheaf <math>\mathcal{F}</math> on ''X''. Let <math>S_0</math> be a closed subscheme of ''S'' defined by <math>\mathcal{I}</math> and <math>\widehat{X}, \widehat{S}</math> [[formal completion]]s with respect to <math>X_0 = f^{-1}(S_0)</math> and <math>S_0</math>. Then for each <math>p \ge 0</math> the canonical (continuous) map: | |||
::<math>(R^p f_* \mathcal{F})^\wedge \to \varprojlim_k R^p f_* \mathcal{F}_k</math> | |||
:is an isomorphism of (topological) <math>\mathcal{O}_{\widehat{S}}</math>-modules, where | |||
:*The left term is <math>\varprojlim R^p f_* \mathcal{F} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_S} \mathcal{O}_S/{\mathcal{I}^{k+1}}</math>. | |||
:*<math>\mathcal{F}_k = \mathcal{F} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_S} (\mathcal{O}_S/{\mathcal{I}}^{k+1})</math> | |||
:*The canonical map is one obtained by passage to limit. | |||
The theorem is used to deduce some other important theorems: [[Stein factorization]] and a version of [[Zariski's main theorem]] that says that a [[proper morphism|proper]] [[birational morphism]] into a [[normal variety]] is an isomorphism. Some other corollaries (with the notations as above) are: | |||
'''Corollary''':<ref>{{harvnb|EGA III-1|loc=4.2.1}}</ref> For any <math>s \in S</math>, topologically, | |||
:<math>((R^p f_* \mathcal{F})_s)^\wedge \simeq \varprojlim H^p(f^{-1}(s), \mathcal{F}\otimes_{\mathcal{O}_S} (\mathcal{O}_s/\mathfrak{m}_s^k))</math> | |||
where the completion on the left is with respect to <math>\mathfrak{m}_s</math>. | |||
'''Corollary''':<ref>{{harvnb|Hartshorne|loc=Ch. III. Corollary 11.2}}</ref> Let ''r'' be such that <math>\operatorname{dim} f^{-1}(s) \le r</math> for all <math>s \in S</math>. Then | |||
:<math>R^i f_* \mathcal{F} = 0, \quad i > r.</math> | |||
'''Corollay''':<ref>The same argument as in the preceding corollary</ref> For each <math>s \in S</math>, there exists an open neighborhood ''U'' of ''s'' such that | |||
:<math>R^i f_* \mathcal{F}|_U = 0, \quad i > \operatorname{dim} f^{-1}(s).</math> | |||
'''Corollary''':<ref>{{harvnb|Hartshorne|loc=Ch. III. Corollary 11.3}}</ref> If <math>f_* \mathcal{O}_X = \mathcal{O}_S</math>, then <math>f^{-1}(s)</math> is connected for all <math>s \in S</math>. | |||
The theorem also leads to the [[Grothendieck existence theorem]], which gives an equivalence between the category of coherent sheaves on a scheme and the category of coherent sheaves on its formal completion (in particular, it yields algebralizability.) | |||
Finally, it is possible to weaken the hypothesis in the theorem; cf. Illusie. According to Illusie (pg. 204), the proof given in EGA III is due to Serre. The original proof (due to Grothendieck) was never published. | |||
== The construction of the canonical map == | |||
Let the setting be as in the lede. In the proof one uses the following alternative definition of the canonical map. | |||
Let <math>i': \widehat{X} \to X, i: \widehat{S} \to S</math> be the canonical maps. Then we have the [[base change map]] of <math>\mathcal{O}_{\widehat{S}}</math>-modules | |||
:<math>i^* R^q f_* \mathcal{F} \to R^p \widehat{f}_* (i'^* \mathcal{F})</math>. | |||
where <math>\widehat{f}: \widehat{X} \to \widehat{S}</math> is induced by <math>f: X \to S</math>. Since <math>\mathcal{F}</math> is coherent, we can identify <math>i'^*\mathcal{F}</math> with <math>\widehat{\mathcal{F}}</math>. Since <math>R^q f_* \mathcal{F}</math> is also coherent (as ''f'' is proper), doing the same identification, the above reads: | |||
:<math>(R^q f_* \mathcal{F})^\wedge \to R^p \widehat{f}_* \widehat{\mathcal{F}}</math>. | |||
Using <math>f: X_n \to S_n</math> where <math>X_n = (X_0, \mathcal{O}_X/\mathcal{J}^{n+1})</math> and <math>S_n = (S_0, \mathcal{O}_S/\mathcal{I}^{n+1})</math>, one also obtains (after passing to limit): | |||
:<math>R^q \widehat{f}_* \widehat{\mathcal{F}} \to \varprojlim R^p f_* \mathcal{F}_n</math> | |||
where <math>\mathcal{F}_n</math> are as before. One can verify that the composition of the two maps is the same map in the lede. (cf. EGA III-1, section 4) | |||
== Notes == | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
== References == | |||
*[[Luc Illusie]], [http://staff.ustc.edu.cn/~yiouyang/Illusie.pdf Topics in Algebraic Geometry] | |||
*{{EGA|book=III-1}} | |||
*{{Hartshorne AG}} | |||
[[Category:Algebraic geometry]] |
Revision as of 20:58, 13 December 2013
In algebraic geometry, the theorem on formal functions states the following:[1]
- Let be a proper morphism of noetherian schemes with a coherent sheaf on X. Let be a closed subscheme of S defined by and formal completions with respect to and . Then for each the canonical (continuous) map:
- is an isomorphism of (topological) -modules, where
The theorem is used to deduce some other important theorems: Stein factorization and a version of Zariski's main theorem that says that a proper birational morphism into a normal variety is an isomorphism. Some other corollaries (with the notations as above) are:
Corollary:[2] For any , topologically,
where the completion on the left is with respect to .
Corollary:[3] Let r be such that for all . Then
Corollay:[4] For each , there exists an open neighborhood U of s such that
Corollary:[5] If , then is connected for all .
The theorem also leads to the Grothendieck existence theorem, which gives an equivalence between the category of coherent sheaves on a scheme and the category of coherent sheaves on its formal completion (in particular, it yields algebralizability.)
Finally, it is possible to weaken the hypothesis in the theorem; cf. Illusie. According to Illusie (pg. 204), the proof given in EGA III is due to Serre. The original proof (due to Grothendieck) was never published.
The construction of the canonical map
Let the setting be as in the lede. In the proof one uses the following alternative definition of the canonical map.
Let be the canonical maps. Then we have the base change map of -modules
where is induced by . Since is coherent, we can identify with . Since is also coherent (as f is proper), doing the same identification, the above reads:
Using where and , one also obtains (after passing to limit):
where are as before. One can verify that the composition of the two maps is the same map in the lede. (cf. EGA III-1, section 4)
Notes
43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.
References
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Template:Harvnb
- ↑ The same argument as in the preceding corollary
- ↑ Template:Harvnb