Finite subdivision rule: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Dekart
 
en>Bobnorwal
adding good article tag. Is there a reason it wasn't there? If so, just remove it -- and maybe let me know your reasoning. :)
Line 1: Line 1:
It is highly enjoyable to put on these boots, as they include various types of high heels and can be coordinated with many different jeans and skirts.<br>Some readers may be aware of an article that appeared in the April 5 Wall Street Journal in which Colby was named among several colleges and universities that allegedly falsify information sent to college guidebooks. President William Cotter, who described the article as responded with a letter to the editor.<br>http://caphsa.org/coach/?key=coach-factory-purses-25 <br /> http://caphsa.org/coach/?key=coach-outlet-coach-factory-60 <br /> http://caphsa. For those who have virtually any issues with regards to wherever along with the best way to utilize [http://www.restaurantcalcuta.com/outlet/ugg.asp Cheap Uggs For Sale], you possibly can contact us in our web-site. org/coach/?key=coach-handbags-outlet-store-23 <br /> http://caphsa.org/coach/?key=handbags-coach-outlet-store-28 <br /> http://caphsa.org/coach/?key=coach-factory-out-40 <br /> <br>http://www.icozero.com/index.php?title=Bags_Outlet_-_An_In_Depth_Anaylsis_on_What_Works_and_What_Doesn_t<br>http://weymouthwarriors.net/phpnuke/modules.php?name=Your_Account&op=userinfo&username=SSlw
In algebraic geometry, the '''theorem on formal functions''' states the following:<ref>{{harvnb|EGA III-1|loc=4.1.5}}</ref>
:Let <math>f: X \to S</math> be a [[proper morphism]] of noetherian schemes with a coherent sheaf <math>\mathcal{F}</math> on ''X''. Let <math>S_0</math> be a closed subscheme of ''S'' defined by <math>\mathcal{I}</math> and <math>\widehat{X}, \widehat{S}</math> [[formal completion]]s with respect to <math>X_0 = f^{-1}(S_0)</math> and <math>S_0</math>. Then for each <math>p \ge 0</math> the canonical (continuous) map:
::<math>(R^p f_* \mathcal{F})^\wedge \to \varprojlim_k R^p f_* \mathcal{F}_k</math>
:is an isomorphism of (topological) <math>\mathcal{O}_{\widehat{S}}</math>-modules, where
:*The left term is <math>\varprojlim R^p f_* \mathcal{F} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_S} \mathcal{O}_S/{\mathcal{I}^{k+1}}</math>.
:*<math>\mathcal{F}_k = \mathcal{F} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_S} (\mathcal{O}_S/{\mathcal{I}}^{k+1})</math>
:*The canonical map is one obtained by passage to limit.
 
The theorem is used to deduce some other important theorems: [[Stein factorization]] and a version of [[Zariski's main theorem]] that says that a [[proper morphism|proper]] [[birational morphism]] into a [[normal variety]] is an isomorphism. Some other corollaries (with the notations as above) are:
 
'''Corollary''':<ref>{{harvnb|EGA III-1|loc=4.2.1}}</ref> For any <math>s \in S</math>, topologically,
:<math>((R^p f_* \mathcal{F})_s)^\wedge \simeq \varprojlim H^p(f^{-1}(s), \mathcal{F}\otimes_{\mathcal{O}_S} (\mathcal{O}_s/\mathfrak{m}_s^k))</math>
where the completion on the left is with respect to <math>\mathfrak{m}_s</math>.
 
'''Corollary''':<ref>{{harvnb|Hartshorne|loc=Ch. III. Corollary 11.2}}</ref> Let ''r'' be such that <math>\operatorname{dim} f^{-1}(s) \le r</math> for all <math>s \in S</math>. Then
:<math>R^i f_* \mathcal{F} = 0, \quad i > r.</math>
 
'''Corollay''':<ref>The same argument as in the preceding corollary</ref> For each <math>s \in S</math>, there exists an open neighborhood ''U'' of ''s'' such that
:<math>R^i f_* \mathcal{F}|_U = 0, \quad i > \operatorname{dim} f^{-1}(s).</math>
 
'''Corollary''':<ref>{{harvnb|Hartshorne|loc=Ch. III. Corollary 11.3}}</ref> If <math>f_* \mathcal{O}_X = \mathcal{O}_S</math>, then <math>f^{-1}(s)</math> is connected for all <math>s \in S</math>.
 
The theorem also leads to the [[Grothendieck existence theorem]], which gives an equivalence between the category of coherent sheaves on a scheme and the category of coherent sheaves on its formal completion (in particular, it yields algebralizability.)
 
Finally, it is possible to weaken the hypothesis in the theorem; cf. Illusie. According to Illusie (pg. 204), the proof given in EGA III is due to Serre. The original proof (due to Grothendieck) was never published.
 
== The construction of the canonical map ==
Let the setting be as in the lede. In the proof one uses the following alternative definition of the canonical map.
 
Let <math>i': \widehat{X} \to X, i: \widehat{S} \to S</math> be the canonical maps. Then we have the [[base change map]] of <math>\mathcal{O}_{\widehat{S}}</math>-modules
:<math>i^* R^q f_* \mathcal{F} \to R^p \widehat{f}_* (i'^* \mathcal{F})</math>.
where <math>\widehat{f}: \widehat{X} \to \widehat{S}</math> is induced by <math>f: X \to S</math>. Since <math>\mathcal{F}</math> is coherent, we can identify <math>i'^*\mathcal{F}</math> with <math>\widehat{\mathcal{F}}</math>. Since <math>R^q f_* \mathcal{F}</math> is also coherent (as ''f'' is proper), doing the same identification, the above reads:
:<math>(R^q f_* \mathcal{F})^\wedge \to R^p \widehat{f}_* \widehat{\mathcal{F}}</math>.
Using <math>f: X_n \to S_n</math> where <math>X_n = (X_0, \mathcal{O}_X/\mathcal{J}^{n+1})</math> and <math>S_n = (S_0, \mathcal{O}_S/\mathcal{I}^{n+1})</math>, one also obtains (after passing to limit):
:<math>R^q \widehat{f}_* \widehat{\mathcal{F}} \to \varprojlim R^p f_* \mathcal{F}_n</math>
where <math>\mathcal{F}_n</math> are as before. One can verify that the composition of the two maps is the same map in the lede. (cf. EGA III-1, section 4)
 
== Notes ==
{{reflist}}
 
== References ==
*[[Luc Illusie]], [http://staff.ustc.edu.cn/~yiouyang/Illusie.pdf Topics in Algebraic Geometry]
*{{EGA|book=III-1}}
*{{Hartshorne AG}}
 
 
 
[[Category:Algebraic geometry]]

Revision as of 20:58, 13 December 2013

In algebraic geometry, the theorem on formal functions states the following:[1]

Let f:XS be a proper morphism of noetherian schemes with a coherent sheaf on X. Let S0 be a closed subscheme of S defined by and X^,S^ formal completions with respect to X0=f1(S0) and S0. Then for each p0 the canonical (continuous) map:
(Rpf*)limkRpf*k
is an isomorphism of (topological) 𝒪S^-modules, where

The theorem is used to deduce some other important theorems: Stein factorization and a version of Zariski's main theorem that says that a proper birational morphism into a normal variety is an isomorphism. Some other corollaries (with the notations as above) are:

Corollary:[2] For any sS, topologically,

((Rpf*)s)limHp(f1(s),𝒪S(𝒪s/msk))

where the completion on the left is with respect to ms.

Corollary:[3] Let r be such that dimf1(s)r for all sS. Then

Rif*=0,i>r.

Corollay:[4] For each sS, there exists an open neighborhood U of s such that

Rif*|U=0,i>dimf1(s).

Corollary:[5] If f*𝒪X=𝒪S, then f1(s) is connected for all sS.

The theorem also leads to the Grothendieck existence theorem, which gives an equivalence between the category of coherent sheaves on a scheme and the category of coherent sheaves on its formal completion (in particular, it yields algebralizability.)

Finally, it is possible to weaken the hypothesis in the theorem; cf. Illusie. According to Illusie (pg. 204), the proof given in EGA III is due to Serre. The original proof (due to Grothendieck) was never published.

The construction of the canonical map

Let the setting be as in the lede. In the proof one uses the following alternative definition of the canonical map.

Let i:X^X,i:S^S be the canonical maps. Then we have the base change map of 𝒪S^-modules

i*Rqf*Rpf^*(i'*).

where f^:X^S^ is induced by f:XS. Since is coherent, we can identify i'* with ^. Since Rqf* is also coherent (as f is proper), doing the same identification, the above reads:

(Rqf*)Rpf^*^.

Using f:XnSn where Xn=(X0,𝒪X/𝒥n+1) and Sn=(S0,𝒪S/n+1), one also obtains (after passing to limit):

Rqf^*^limRpf*n

where n are as before. One can verify that the composition of the two maps is the same map in the lede. (cf. EGA III-1, section 4)

Notes

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

References

  1. Template:Harvnb
  2. Template:Harvnb
  3. Template:Harvnb
  4. The same argument as in the preceding corollary
  5. Template:Harvnb