Multilayer perceptron: Difference between revisions
Update OpenNN reference |
en>SamuelRiv m Undid revision 590932504 by 5.22.71.240 (talk) rm good faith - bold does not show in a heading, and I disagree with quotes around "learning" since the term is ubiquitous since the 80s |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[biology]], '''resource holding potential''' (RHP) is the ability of an animal to win an all-out fight if one were to take place. | |||
The term was coined by [[Geoff Parker]] to disambiguate physical fighting ability from the motivation to persevere in a fight (Parker, 1974<ref name="Parker74">[[Geoff Parker|Parker, GA.]] (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of animal conflicts. Journal of theoretical Biology 47, 223-243</ref>). Originally the term used was 'Resource Holding Power', but 'Resource Holding Potential' has come to be preferred. The latter emphasis on 'potential' serves as a reminder that the individual with greater RHP does not always prevail. An individual with more RHP may lose a fight if, for example, it is less motivated (has less to gain by winning) than its opponent. [[Mathematical models]] of RHP and motivation (aka resource value or V) have traditionally been based on the [[hawk-dove]] game (e.g. Hammerstein, 1981)<ref>Hammerstein, P. (1981). The role of asymmetries in animal contests. Animal Behaviour 29, 193-205.</ref> in which subjective resource value is represented by the variable 'V'. In addition to RHP and V, George Barlow (Barlow et al., 1986<ref name="Barlow_etal86">Barlow, GW., Rogers, W., Fraley, N. (1986). Do Midas cichlids win through prowess or daring? It depends. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 19, 1-8.</ref>) proposed that a third variable, which he termed 'daring', played a role in determining fight outcome. Daring (aka aggressiveness) represents an individual's tendency to initiate or escalate a contest independent of the effects of RHP and V. | |||
==Examples of the term in use== | |||
*"[...] RHP is a measure of the absolute fighting ability of the individual" (Parker, 1974).<ref name="Parker74">Parker again</ref> | |||
*"Assuming the RHP of the combatants to be equal, there are many instances of fitness pay-off imbalances between holder and attacker which should weight the dispute outcome in favour of one or other opponent by allowing it a greater expendable fitness budget. Usually the weighting favours the holder; the attacker therefore needs a correspondingly higher RHP before it may be expected to win." (Parker, 1974).<ref name="Parker74">Parker again</ref> | |||
*"Each combatant assesses relative RHP; this correlates with an absolute probability of winning the next bout (<math>C_{abs}</math>)." (Parker, 1974).<ref name="Parker74">Parker again</ref> | |||
*"The essential point is to distinguish two cases (i) information about `motivation' or `intentions' [...] (ii) information about `Resource Holding Power', or RHP (Parker, 1974b); RHP is a measure of the size, strength, weapons, etc. which would enable an animal to win an escalated contest" ([[John Maynard Smith|Maynard Smith]] 1982<ref name="JMS82">[[John Maynard Smith|Maynard Smith, J.]] (1982) ''[[Evolution and the Theory of Games]]''</ref>). | |||
*"In practice, however, the two opponents are rarely equal in fighting ability, or resource holding potential" (Bradbury & Vehrencamp, 1998<ref>Bradbury, JW. & Vehrencamp, SL. (1998). ''Principles of animal communication'' Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.</ref>). | |||
*"Motivational and physical components are assumed to be separable. [...] The motivation depends upon V, the value of the resource, and the perceived prowess and motivation of the opponent. [...] but there is an additional component. It is the readiness of the individual to risk an encounter, to dare to escalate, measured when the contest is otherwise symmetrical. It differs from V in that daring appears to be an inherent property of the individual rather than a variable motivational state that is tuned to the value of the resource" (Barlow ''et al.'' 1986).<ref name="Barlow_etal86">Barlow et al. again</ref> | |||
<!-- | |||
==Examples of other definitions== | |||
Some researchers appear to use the term to mean "whatever it is that determines fight outcome". The use of the term in this way clearly runs against the original motivation in developing the term in the first place, which was to disambiguate ability to win from motivation to persevere in a contest. Some examples include: | |||
/*not a very clear example*/ | |||
*"According to Parker (1974)<ref name="Parker74">Parker again</ref> the particular strategies exhibited by contestants in a bout (basically, escalate or withdraw) depend on the result of mutual assessment of the relative holding power of the contestants (the probability of winning)." Riechert, 1978<ref>Riechert, S.E. (1978). Games Spiders Play: Behavioral Variability in Territorial Disputes ''Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology'' '''3''':135--162.</ref> | |||
--> | |||
==See also== | |||
* [[Social defeat]] | |||
* [[Aggression]] | |||
* [[Game theory]] | |||
==References== | |||
{{reflist|2}} | |||
{{evolution}} | |||
{{Game_theory}} | |||
[[Category:Evolutionary biology terminology]] |
Revision as of 18:26, 17 January 2014
In biology, resource holding potential (RHP) is the ability of an animal to win an all-out fight if one were to take place.
The term was coined by Geoff Parker to disambiguate physical fighting ability from the motivation to persevere in a fight (Parker, 1974[1]). Originally the term used was 'Resource Holding Power', but 'Resource Holding Potential' has come to be preferred. The latter emphasis on 'potential' serves as a reminder that the individual with greater RHP does not always prevail. An individual with more RHP may lose a fight if, for example, it is less motivated (has less to gain by winning) than its opponent. Mathematical models of RHP and motivation (aka resource value or V) have traditionally been based on the hawk-dove game (e.g. Hammerstein, 1981)[2] in which subjective resource value is represented by the variable 'V'. In addition to RHP and V, George Barlow (Barlow et al., 1986[3]) proposed that a third variable, which he termed 'daring', played a role in determining fight outcome. Daring (aka aggressiveness) represents an individual's tendency to initiate or escalate a contest independent of the effects of RHP and V.
Examples of the term in use
- "[...] RHP is a measure of the absolute fighting ability of the individual" (Parker, 1974).[1]
- "Assuming the RHP of the combatants to be equal, there are many instances of fitness pay-off imbalances between holder and attacker which should weight the dispute outcome in favour of one or other opponent by allowing it a greater expendable fitness budget. Usually the weighting favours the holder; the attacker therefore needs a correspondingly higher RHP before it may be expected to win." (Parker, 1974).[1]
- "Each combatant assesses relative RHP; this correlates with an absolute probability of winning the next bout ()." (Parker, 1974).[1]
- "The essential point is to distinguish two cases (i) information about `motivation' or `intentions' [...] (ii) information about `Resource Holding Power', or RHP (Parker, 1974b); RHP is a measure of the size, strength, weapons, etc. which would enable an animal to win an escalated contest" (Maynard Smith 1982[4]).
- "In practice, however, the two opponents are rarely equal in fighting ability, or resource holding potential" (Bradbury & Vehrencamp, 1998[5]).
- "Motivational and physical components are assumed to be separable. [...] The motivation depends upon V, the value of the resource, and the perceived prowess and motivation of the opponent. [...] but there is an additional component. It is the readiness of the individual to risk an encounter, to dare to escalate, measured when the contest is otherwise symmetrical. It differs from V in that daring appears to be an inherent property of the individual rather than a variable motivational state that is tuned to the value of the resource" (Barlow et al. 1986).[3]
See also
References
43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.
I do not commonly speak about myself. I get pleasure from sharing enjoyable written content with others. I also choose to investigate the world wide web since I think you can find much to determine to choose from. When I am on the world-wide-web.
|
My name: Gladis Bickford
Age: 38 years old
Country: United States
Town: Aurora
ZIP: 80011
Address: 4182 Mckinley Avenue
|
I am 36 years old and my name is Gladis Bickford. I life in Aurora (United States).
|
I’m Gladis from Aurora doing my final year engineering in History. I did my schooling, secured 89% and hope to find someone with same interests in Fencing.
|
Im addicted to my hobby Fencing.
I try to learn Norwegian in my free time.
|
My name is Gladis (29 years old) and my hobbies are Shooting sport and Conlanging.
|
Hello! I am Gladis. I am satisfied that I can unite to the entire world. I live in United States, in the CO region. I dream to visit the different nations, to get acquainted with appealing people.
|
I'm Gladis (28) from Aurora, United States.
I'm learning Norwegian literature at a local high school and I'm just about to graduate.
I have a part time job in a backery.
|
Hi!
My name is Gladis and I'm a 21 years old girl from United States.
|
Hello! My name is Gladis.
It is a little about myself: I live in United States, my city of Aurora.
It's called often Eastern or cultural capital of CO. I've married 2 years ago.
I have two children - a son (Melva) and the daughter (Armand). We all like Fencing.
|
Hello!
I'm Norwegian male :).
I really like Sons of Anarchy!
|
Hello from United States. I'm glad to came here. My first name is Gladis.
I live in a city called Aurora in east United States.
I was also born in Aurora 36 years ago. Married in December year 2011. I'm working at the the office.
|
My name's Gladis Bickford but everybody calls me Gladis. I'm from United States. I'm studying at the university (2nd year) and I play the Trumpet for 6 years. Usually I choose songs from the famous films ;).
I have two brothers. I love Gaming, watching TV (Sons of Anarchy) and Origami.
|
I'm a 47 years old and study at the high school (History).
In my free time I'm trying to learn Norwegian. I have been twicethere and look forward to go there sometime in the future. I love to read, preferably on my ebook reader. I really love to watch American Dad and Grey's Anatomy as well as documentaries about nature. I love Fencing.
|
I'm Gladis and I live in Aurora.
I'm interested in History, Fencing and Norwegian art. I like travelling and reading fantasy.
|
I'm Gladis and I live with my husband and our 3 children in Aurora, in the CO south part. My hobbies are Lapidary, Vehicle restoration and Amateur astronomy.
|
Hello, I'm Gladis, a 22 year old from Aurora, United States.
My hobbies include (but are not limited to) Bowling, Bboying and watching Sons of Anarchy.
|
Hi there! :) My name is Gladis, I'm a student studying History from Aurora, United States.
|
I'm Gladis and I live in a seaside city in northern United States, Aurora. I'm 26 and I'm will soon finish my study at History.
|
I am Gladis from Aurora. I am learning to play the Trumpet. Other hobbies are Fencing.
|
I am Gladis and was born on 6 December 1990. My hobbies are Meteorology and Sewing.
|
My name is Gladis and I am studying Neuroscience and Business at Aurora / United States.
}
Feel free to surf to my blog: computer store elk grove village
Earlier than you decide whether stainless steel cookware is worth buying, lets first discuss what stainless steel cookware is. Chrome steel is manufactured from an alloy, or a mix of metals. Mostly, basic iron with chromium, nickel or another minor metals. The chromium supplies rust safety and gives your cookware durability. The nickel supplies rust safety as effectively, and adds a elegant look. Most properly made chrome steel cookware has copper or aluminum added to the bottom of the pan or pot. That is performed to increases the ability of the pot or pan to conduct heat.
The perfect stainless-steel cookware is the principle category, but nonetheless it is divided into several subcategories primarily based on the standard and the value range. It can be confusing to choose the best chrome steel cookware out of the classes that may meet your necessities. That is where we took a step ahead to explain you all the data that will be useful for you to understand how to choose one of the best stainless steel cookware. The most effective chrome steel cookware set is manufactured from cheap to expensive and high quality constructed pots and pans.
You can find magnetic chrome steel in the layer on the outside of some quality pieces of stainless steel. This is to make it suitable with induction stovetops, which involve the use of a quickly charging electromagnetic area to warmth cookware. Excessive-quality stainless-steel, like All-Clad , makes use of three layers of steel—the austenite layer of metal on the within, ferrite steel on the skin, and a layer of aluminum sandwiched between the 2 for optimum warmth conductivity (metal alone does not conduct heat evenly). Lesser-quality stainless steel is usually just one layer of austenitic chrome steel.
Aesthetically talking, stainless steel is a smart alternative should you prefer to display or hang pots or pans. The clean, crisp look of all stainless-steel kitchenware can remodel a mishmash of cookware into a classy décor assertion. Chrome steel kettles, such as the Cuisinart Tea Kettle will mix particular person kitchenware into a cohesive and nice entity. Take into account purchasing stainless-steel utensils as well. Already acquired a stunning stainless-steel cookware collection? The Cuisinart Chef’s Assortment stainless pot rack is perhaps the of completion for a kitchen, liberating up house and making those pots and pans readily accessible. Get the stainless-steel cookware of your culinary desires at Macy’s!
Arduous-anodized aluminum cookware is likely one of the hottest varieties of materials, despite the fact that many people don't quite perceive the construction. Onerous-anodized aluminum is plain aluminum that has been processed in a collection of chemical baths charged with an electric present. The result's a fabric that has the same superior heat conductivity as aluminum but is non-reactive with acidic foods, such as tomatoes, and twice as exhausting as stainless-steel. Two drawbacks to laborious-anodized cookware are that it is not dishwasher-protected and, because it is not magnetic, it is not going to work with induction vary tops.
The enamel over steel technique creates a bit that has the warmth distribution of carbon steel and a non-reactive, low-stick floor. Such pots are much lighter than most different pots of similar measurement, are cheaper to make than stainless-steel pots, and don't have the rust and reactivity problems with cast iron or carbon steel. citation wanted Enamel over metal is ideal for big stockpots and for other giant pans used largely for water-based cooking. Because of its mild weight and simple cleanup, enamel over metal is also common for cookware used while camping. For more about stainless steel cookware reviews look at our web site. Clad aluminium or copper edit
Distinctive specialty cookware pieces served a la carte to go with any cookware set are constructed of a sturdy Stainless Steel with a brushed exterior end. Designed with an impact bonded, aluminum disk encapsulated base which distributes warmth quickly and evenly to allow precise temperature control. Handles are riveted for durability and performance. The New Specialty Cookware is compatible for all range sorts including induction. Along with the multi use operate, another distinctive characteristic is bottom to prime interior volume markings in both quarts and metric measurement; and every bit comes with a tempered glass lid, oven safe to 350°F.
Whether or not you're a cooking enthusiasts, knowledgeable chef or just cooking for your family you already know the importance of having a totally stocked kitchen. Not solely do you need the appropriate substances, however you additionally need the proper tools to get the job done. In any sort of fundamental cooking training lesson, you will learn that stainless steel is your new greatest friend with regards to kitchen cookware. What you will also study is that high quality cooking tools does not often come at a discounted price. Because of this, it is very important take good care of your cookware! Listed below are some fundamentals for chrome steel care.
To fight the uneven heating downside, most stainless steel pans are laminations of aluminum or copper on the underside to spread the heat around, and stainless steel inside the pan to provide a cooking floor that is impervious to no matter you would possibly put inside. In my expertise, this stainless-steel floor continues to be too sticky to fry on, and should you ever burn it you get a everlasting bother spot. However, sometimes a stainless steel cooking floor turns out to be useful when you can't use aluminum (see under) so I maintain some around. Choose one thing with a fairly thick aluminum layer on the underside.
Effectively, until you’re a metals professional and go inspect the factory where the steel is made to see whether or not their manufacturing process creates a pure austenite with out corrosive materials fashioned, you’re not going to know for certain whether or not the craftsmanship of your stainless is of the best quality. I believe your finest guess is to easily purchase excessive-quality stainless-steel from the beginning, from a brand with a status for good quality. But, I think I have discovered one way which you could determine if the stainless cookware you have already got is doubtlessly reactive.
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Parker, GA. (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of animal conflicts. Journal of theoretical Biology 47, 223-243 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "Parker74" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Hammerstein, P. (1981). The role of asymmetries in animal contests. Animal Behaviour 29, 193-205.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Barlow, GW., Rogers, W., Fraley, N. (1986). Do Midas cichlids win through prowess or daring? It depends. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 19, 1-8. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "Barlow_etal86" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Maynard Smith, J. (1982) Evolution and the Theory of Games
- ↑ Bradbury, JW. & Vehrencamp, SL. (1998). Principles of animal communication Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.