Adaptive quadrature: Difference between revisions
Jitse Niesen (talk | contribs) revert - Gaussian quadrature is when the weights and nodes are of a special form |
en>Mblumber Disambiguated: quadrature → Numerical integration |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[topology]], a '''preclosure operator''', or '''Čech closure operator''' is a map between subsets of a set, similar to a topological [[closure operator]], except that it is not required to be [[idempotent]]. That is, a preclosure operator obeys only three of the four [[Kuratowski closure axioms]]. | |||
== Definition == | |||
A preclosure operator on a set <math>X</math> is a map <math>[\quad]_p</math> | |||
:<math>[\quad]_p:\mathcal{P}(X) \to \mathcal{P}(X)</math> | |||
where <math>\mathcal{P}(X)</math> is the [[power set]] of <math>X</math>. | |||
The preclosure operator has to satisfy the following properties: | |||
# <math> [\varnothing]_p = \varnothing \! </math> (Preservation of nullary unions); | |||
# <math> A \subseteq [A]_p </math> (Extensivity); | |||
# <math> [A \cup B]_p = [A]_p \cup [B]_p</math> (Preservation of binary unions). | |||
The last axiom implies the following: | |||
: 4. <math>A \subseteq B</math> implies <math>[A]_p \subseteq [B]_p</math>. | |||
==Topology== | |||
A set <math>A</math> is closed (with respect to the preclosure) if <math>[A]_p=A</math>. A set <math>U\subset X</math> is open (with respect to the preclosure) if <math>A=X\setminus U</math> is closed. The collection of all open sets generated by the preclosure operator is a [[topological space|topology]]. | |||
The [[closure operator]] cl on this topological space satisfies <math>[A]_p\subseteq \operatorname{cl}(A)</math> for all <math>A\subset X</math>. | |||
==Examples== | |||
===Premetrics=== | |||
Given <math>d</math> a [[premetric]] on <math>X</math>, then | |||
:<math>[A]_p=\{x\in X : d(x,A)=0\}</math> | |||
is a preclosure on <math>X</math>. | |||
===Sequential spaces=== | |||
The [[sequential closure operator]] <math>[\quad]_\mbox{seq}</math> is a preclosure operator. Given a topology <math>\mathcal{T}</math> with respect to which the sequential closure operator is defined, the topological space <math>(X,\mathcal{T})</math> is a [[sequential space]] if and only if the topology <math>\mathcal{T}_\mbox{seq}</math> generated by <math>[\quad]_\mbox{seq}</math> is equal to <math>\mathcal{T}</math>, that is, if <math>\mathcal{T}_\mbox{seq}=\mathcal{T}</math>. | |||
==See also== | |||
* [[Eduard Čech]] | |||
==References== | |||
* A.V. Arkhangelskii, L.S.Pontryagin, ''General Topology I'', (1990) Springer-Verlag, Berlin. ISBN 3-540-18178-4. | |||
* B. Banascheski, [http://www.emis.de/journals/CMUC/pdf/cmuc9202/banas.pdf ''Bourbaki's Fixpoint Lemma reconsidered''], Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae 33 (1992), 303-309. | |||
[[Category:Closure operators]] |
Revision as of 02:17, 2 April 2013
In topology, a preclosure operator, or Čech closure operator is a map between subsets of a set, similar to a topological closure operator, except that it is not required to be idempotent. That is, a preclosure operator obeys only three of the four Kuratowski closure axioms.
Definition
A preclosure operator on a set is a map
where is the power set of .
The preclosure operator has to satisfy the following properties:
The last axiom implies the following:
Topology
A set is closed (with respect to the preclosure) if . A set is open (with respect to the preclosure) if is closed. The collection of all open sets generated by the preclosure operator is a topology.
The closure operator cl on this topological space satisfies for all .
Examples
Premetrics
Given a premetric on , then
Sequential spaces
The sequential closure operator is a preclosure operator. Given a topology with respect to which the sequential closure operator is defined, the topological space is a sequential space if and only if the topology generated by is equal to , that is, if .
See also
References
- A.V. Arkhangelskii, L.S.Pontryagin, General Topology I, (1990) Springer-Verlag, Berlin. ISBN 3-540-18178-4.
- B. Banascheski, Bourbaki's Fixpoint Lemma reconsidered, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae 33 (1992), 303-309.