Adjoint bundle: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
typo corrected
 
en>Addbot
m Bot: Migrating 1 interwiki links, now provided by Wikidata on d:q4683171
Line 1: Line 1:
Friends call her Felicidad and her spouse doesn't like it at all. He currently lives in Idaho and his parents reside close by. The thing I adore most flower arranging and now I have time to take on new things. The job he's been occupying for years is a messenger.<br><br>Have a look at my web page; [http://beta.qnotes.co.kr/notice/3690 extended auto warranty]
The [[Cantor–Bernstein–Schroeder theorem]], from [[set theory]], has analogs in the context [[operator algebras]]. This article discusses such operator-algebraic results.
 
== For von Neumann algebras ==
Suppose '''M''' is a [[von Neumann algebra]] and ''E'', ''F'' are projections in '''M'''. Let ~ denote the [[Von Neumann algebra#Projections|Murray-von Neumann equivalence relation]] on '''M'''. Define a partial order « on the family of projections by ''E'' « ''F'' if ''E'' ~ ''F' '' ≤ ''F''. In other words, ''E'' « ''F'' if there exists a partial isometry ''U'' ∈ '''M''' such that ''U*U'' = ''E'' and ''UU*'' ≤ ''F''.
 
For closed subspaces ''M'' and ''N'' where projections ''P<sub>M</sub>'' and ''P<sub>N</sub>'', onto ''M'' and ''N'' respectively, are elements of '''M''', ''M'' « ''N'' if ''P<sub>M</sub>'' « ''P<sub>N</sub>''.
 
The '''Schröder–Bernstein theorem''' states that if ''M'' « ''N'' and ''N'' « ''M'', then ''M'' ~ ''N''.
 
A proof, one that is similar to a set-theoretic argument, can be sketched as follows. Colloquially, ''N'' « ''M'' means that ''N'' can be isometrically embedded in ''M''. So
 
:<math>M = M_0 \supset N_0</math>
 
where ''N''<sub>0</sub> is an isometric copy of ''N'' in ''M''. By assumption, it is also true that, ''N'', therefore ''N''<sub>0</sub>, contains an isometric copy ''M''<sub>1</sub> of ''M''. Therefore one can write
 
:<math>M = M_0 \supset N_0 \supset M_1.</math>
 
By induction,
 
:<math>M = M_0 \supset N_0 \supset M_1 \supset N_1 \supset M_2 \supset N_2 \supset \cdots .</math>
 
It is clear that
 
:<math>R = \cap_{i \geq 0} M_i = \cap_{i \geq 0} N_i.</math>
 
Let
 
:<math>M \ominus N \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} M \cap (N)^{\perp}.</math>
 
So
 
:<math>
M = \oplus_{i \geq 0} ( M_i \ominus N_i ) \quad \oplus \quad \oplus_{j \geq 0} ( N_j \ominus M_{j+1}) \quad \oplus R
</math>
 
and  
 
:<math>
N_0 = \oplus_{i \geq 1} ( M_i \ominus N_i ) \quad \oplus \quad \oplus_{j \geq 0} ( N_j \ominus M_{j+1}) \quad \oplus R.
</math>
 
Notice
 
:<math>M_i \ominus N_i \sim M \ominus N \quad \mbox{for all} \quad i.</math>
 
The theorem now follows from the countable additivity of  ~.
 
== Representations of C*-algebras ==
There is also an analog of Schröder–Bernstein for representations of [[C*-algebras]]. If ''A'' is a C*-algebra, a '''[[Gelfand Naimark theorem|representation]]''' of ''A''  is a *-homomorphism ''φ'' from ''A'' into ''L''(''H''), the bounded operators on some Hilbert space ''H''.  
 
If there exists a projection ''P'' in ''L''(''H'') where ''P'' ''φ''(''a'') = ''φ''(''a'') ''P'' for every ''a'' in ''A'', then a '''subrepresentation''' ''σ'' of ''φ'' can be defined in a natural way: ''σ''(''a'') is ''φ''(''a'') restricted to the range of ''P''. So ''φ'' then can be expressed as a direct sum of two subrepresentations ''φ'' = ''φ' '' ⊕ ''σ''.
 
Two representations ''φ''<sub>1</sub> and ''φ''<sub>2</sub>, on ''H''<sub>1</sub> and ''H''<sub>2</sub> respectively, are said to be '''unitarily equivalent''' if there exists an unitary operator ''U'': ''H''<sub>2</sub> → ''H''<sub>1</sub> such that ''φ''<sub>1</sub>(''a'')''U'' = ''Uφ''<sub>2</sub>(''a''), for every ''a''.
 
In this setting, the '''Schröder–Bernstein theorem''' reads:
 
:If two representations ''&rho;'' and ''&sigma;'', on Hilbert spaces ''H'' and ''G'' respectively, are each unitarily equivalent to a subrepresentation of the other, then they are unitarily equivalent.
 
A proof that resembles the previous argument can be outlined. The assumption implies that there exist surjective partial isometries from ''H'' to ''G'' and from ''G'' to ''H''. Fix two such partial isometries for the argument. One has
 
:<math>\rho = \rho_1 \simeq \rho_1 ' \oplus \sigma_1 \quad \mbox{where} \quad \sigma_1 \simeq \sigma.</math>
 
In turn,
 
:<math>\rho_1 \simeq \rho_1 ' \oplus (\sigma_1 ' \oplus \rho_2) \quad \mbox{where} \quad \rho_2 \simeq \rho .</math>
 
By induction,
 
:<math>
\rho_1 \simeq \rho_1 ' \oplus \sigma_1 ' \oplus \rho_2' \oplus \sigma_2 ' \cdots \simeq ( \oplus_{i \geq 1} \rho_i ' ) \oplus
( \oplus_{i \geq 1} \sigma_i '),
</math>
 
and
 
:<math>
\sigma_1 \simeq \sigma_1 ' \oplus \rho_2' \oplus \sigma_2 ' \cdots \simeq ( \oplus_{i \geq 2} \rho_i ' ) \oplus
( \oplus_{i \geq 1} \sigma_i ').
</math>
 
Now each additional summand in the direct sum expression is obtained using one of the two fixed partial isometries, so
 
:<math>
\rho_i ' \simeq \rho_j ' \quad \mbox{and} \quad \sigma_i ' \simeq \sigma_j ' \quad \mbox{for all} \quad i,j \;.
</math>
 
This proves the theorem.
 
==See also==
 
* [[Schroeder–Bernstein theorem]] for plain sets
* [[Schroeder–Bernstein theorem for measurable spaces]]
* [[Schröder–Bernstein theorems for Banach spaces]]
* [[Schröder–Bernstein property]]
 
==References==
*B. Blackadar, ''Operator Algebras'', Springer, 2006.
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Schroder-Bernstein theorems for operator algebras}}
[[Category:Von Neumann algebras]]
[[Category:C*-algebras]]

Revision as of 20:24, 16 March 2013

The Cantor–Bernstein–Schroeder theorem, from set theory, has analogs in the context operator algebras. This article discusses such operator-algebraic results.

For von Neumann algebras

Suppose M is a von Neumann algebra and E, F are projections in M. Let ~ denote the Murray-von Neumann equivalence relation on M. Define a partial order « on the family of projections by E « F if E ~ F' F. In other words, E « F if there exists a partial isometry UM such that U*U = E and UU*F.

For closed subspaces M and N where projections PM and PN, onto M and N respectively, are elements of M, M « N if PM « PN.

The Schröder–Bernstein theorem states that if M « N and N « M, then M ~ N.

A proof, one that is similar to a set-theoretic argument, can be sketched as follows. Colloquially, N « M means that N can be isometrically embedded in M. So

M=M0N0

where N0 is an isometric copy of N in M. By assumption, it is also true that, N, therefore N0, contains an isometric copy M1 of M. Therefore one can write

M=M0N0M1.

By induction,

M=M0N0M1N1M2N2.

It is clear that

R=i0Mi=i0Ni.

Let

MN=defM(N).

So

M=i0(MiNi)j0(NjMj+1)R

and

N0=i1(MiNi)j0(NjMj+1)R.

Notice

MiNiMNfor alli.

The theorem now follows from the countable additivity of ~.

Representations of C*-algebras

There is also an analog of Schröder–Bernstein for representations of C*-algebras. If A is a C*-algebra, a representation of A is a *-homomorphism φ from A into L(H), the bounded operators on some Hilbert space H.

If there exists a projection P in L(H) where P φ(a) = φ(a) P for every a in A, then a subrepresentation σ of φ can be defined in a natural way: σ(a) is φ(a) restricted to the range of P. So φ then can be expressed as a direct sum of two subrepresentations φ = φ' σ.

Two representations φ1 and φ2, on H1 and H2 respectively, are said to be unitarily equivalent if there exists an unitary operator U: H2H1 such that φ1(a)U = 2(a), for every a.

In this setting, the Schröder–Bernstein theorem reads:

If two representations ρ and σ, on Hilbert spaces H and G respectively, are each unitarily equivalent to a subrepresentation of the other, then they are unitarily equivalent.

A proof that resembles the previous argument can be outlined. The assumption implies that there exist surjective partial isometries from H to G and from G to H. Fix two such partial isometries for the argument. One has

ρ=ρ1ρ1σ1whereσ1σ.

In turn,

ρ1ρ1(σ1ρ2)whereρ2ρ.

By induction,

ρ1ρ1σ1ρ2σ2(i1ρi)(i1σi),

and

σ1σ1ρ2σ2(i2ρi)(i1σi).

Now each additional summand in the direct sum expression is obtained using one of the two fixed partial isometries, so

ρiρjandσiσjfor alli,j.

This proves the theorem.

See also

References

  • B. Blackadar, Operator Algebras, Springer, 2006.