Percus–Yevick approximation: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Woohookitty
m WPCleaner v1.13 - Repaired 1 link to disambiguation page - (You can help) - DOI
 
en>Yobot
m External links: WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes - Replaced endash with hyphen in sortkey per WP:MCSTJR using AWB (9100)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Golda is what's created on my beginning certificate even though it is not the name on my birth certification. He functions as a bookkeeper. I am really fond of handwriting but I can't make  [http://mybrandcp.com/xe/board_XmDx25/107997 online psychic chat] it my occupation truly. Some time in the past she selected to live in Alaska and her parents reside close [http://alles-herunterladen.de/excellent-advice-for-picking-the-ideal-hobby/ psychic solutions by lynne].<br><br>my site ... [http://medialab.zendesk.com/entries/54181460-Will-You-Often-End-Up-Bored-Try-One-Of-These-Hobby-Ideas- accurate psychic predictions]
[[File:Airy plot.svg|thumb|250px|The zeros of two linearly independent solutions of the [[Airy equation]] <math>y'' - xy = 0</math> alternate, as predicted by the Sturm separation theorem.]]
In [[mathematics]], in the field of [[ordinary differential equation]]s, '''Sturm separation theorem''', named after [[Jacques Charles François Sturm]], describes the location of roots of [[homogeneous differential equation|homogeneous]] [[order (differential equation)|second order]] [[linear differential equation]]s. Basically the theorem states that given two linear independent solutions of such an equation the zeros of the two solutions are alternating.
 
== Sturm separation theorem ==
 
Given a homogeneous second order linear differential equation and two continuous linear independent solutions ''u''(''x'') and ''v''(''x'') with ''x''<sub>0</sub> and ''x''<sub>1</sub> successive roots of ''u''(''x''), then ''v''(''x'') has exactly one root in the open interval ]''x''<sub>0</sub>, ''x''<sub>1</sub>[. It is a special case of the [[Sturm-Picone comparison theorem]].
 
== Proof ==
 
Since <math>\displaystyle u</math> and <math>\displaystyle v</math> are linearly independent it follows that the Wronskian <math>\displaystyle W[u,v]</math> must satisfy <math>W[u,v](x)\equiv W(x)\neq 0</math> for all <math>\displaystyle x</math> where the differential equation is defined, say <math>\displaystyle I</math>. Without loss of generality, suppose that <math>W(x)<0\mbox{ }\forall\mbox{ }x\in I</math>. Then
:<math>u(x)v'(x)-u'(x)v(x)\neq 0.</math>
So at <math>\displaystyle x=x_0</math>
:<math>W(x_0)=-u'\left(x_0\right)v\left(x_0\right)</math>
and either <math>u'\left(x_0\right)</math> and <math>v\left(x_0\right)</math> are both positive or both negative. Without loss of generality, suppose that they are both positive. Now, at <math>\displaystyle x=x_1</math>
:<math>W(x_1)=-u'\left(x_1\right)v\left(x_1\right)</math>
and since <math>\displaystyle x=x_0</math> and <math>\displaystyle x=x_1</math> are successive zeros of <math>\displaystyle u(x)</math> it causes <math>u'\left(x_1\right)<0</math>. Thus, to keep <math>\displaystyle W(x)<0</math> we must have <math>v\left(x_1\right)<0</math>. We see this by observing that if <math>\displaystyle u'(x)>0\mbox{ }\forall\mbox{ }x\in \left(x_0,x_1\right]</math> then <math>\displaystyle u(x)</math> would be increasing (away from the <math>\displaystyle x</math>-axis), which would never lead to a zero at <math>\displaystyle x=x_1</math>. So for a zero to occur at <math>\displaystyle x=x_1</math> at most <math>u'\left(x_1\right)=0</math> (i.e., <math>u'\left(x_1\right)\leq 0</math> and it turns out, by our result from the Wronskian that <math>u'\left(x_1\right)\leq 0</math>). So somewhere in the interval <math>\left(x_0,x_1\right)</math> the sign of <math>\displaystyle v(x)</math> changed. By the [[Intermediate Value Theorem]] there exists <math>x^*\in\left(x_0,x_1\right)</math> such that <math>v\left(x^*\right)=0</math>.
 
On the other hand, there can be only one zero in <math>\left(x_0,x_1\right)</math>, because otherwise v would have two zeros and there would be no zeros of u in between, and it was just proved that this is impossible.
 
== References ==
 
*{{cite book| last = Teschl| given = G.|authorlink=Gerald Teschl| title = Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems| publisher=[[American Mathematical Society]]| place = [[Providence, Rhode Island|Providence]]| year = 2012| isbn= 978-0-8218-8328-0| url = http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~gerald/ftp/book-ode/}}
 
[[Category:Ordinary differential equations]]
[[Category:Theorems in analysis]]

Latest revision as of 16:59, 20 April 2013

The zeros of two linearly independent solutions of the Airy equation yxy=0 alternate, as predicted by the Sturm separation theorem.

In mathematics, in the field of ordinary differential equations, Sturm separation theorem, named after Jacques Charles François Sturm, describes the location of roots of homogeneous second order linear differential equations. Basically the theorem states that given two linear independent solutions of such an equation the zeros of the two solutions are alternating.

Sturm separation theorem

Given a homogeneous second order linear differential equation and two continuous linear independent solutions u(x) and v(x) with x0 and x1 successive roots of u(x), then v(x) has exactly one root in the open interval ]x0, x1[. It is a special case of the Sturm-Picone comparison theorem.

Proof

Since u and v are linearly independent it follows that the Wronskian W[u,v] must satisfy W[u,v](x)W(x)0 for all x where the differential equation is defined, say I. Without loss of generality, suppose that W(x)<0  xI. Then

u(x)v(x)u(x)v(x)0.

So at x=x0

W(x0)=u(x0)v(x0)

and either u(x0) and v(x0) are both positive or both negative. Without loss of generality, suppose that they are both positive. Now, at x=x1

W(x1)=u(x1)v(x1)

and since x=x0 and x=x1 are successive zeros of u(x) it causes u(x1)<0. Thus, to keep W(x)<0 we must have v(x1)<0. We see this by observing that if u(x)>0  x(x0,x1] then u(x) would be increasing (away from the x-axis), which would never lead to a zero at x=x1. So for a zero to occur at x=x1 at most u(x1)=0 (i.e., u(x1)0 and it turns out, by our result from the Wronskian that u(x1)0). So somewhere in the interval (x0,x1) the sign of v(x) changed. By the Intermediate Value Theorem there exists x*(x0,x1) such that v(x*)=0.

On the other hand, there can be only one zero in (x0,x1), because otherwise v would have two zeros and there would be no zeros of u in between, and it was just proved that this is impossible.

References

  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534