Stall (flight): Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Ahunt
refs required as per WP:V
 
en>Monkbot
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi there! :) My name is Garland, I'm a student studying Architecture, Art, and Planning from Gerolstein, Germany.<br><br>Feel free to visit my web page ... [http://www.mistheria.com/#!arthur-falcone/zoom/cgqj/image1bik Arthur Falcone]
[[File:Graph x squared undefined at x equals two.png|thumb|right|200px|A graph of a [[parabola]] with a '''removable singularity''' at&nbsp;''x''&nbsp;=&nbsp;2]]
In [[complex analysis]], a '''removable singularity''' (sometimes called a '''cosmetic singularity''') of a [[holomorphic function]] is a point at which the function is undefined, but it is possible to define the function at that point in such a way that the function is regular in a neighbourhood of that point.
 
For instance, the function
 
:<math> f(z) = \frac{\sin z}{z} </math>
 
has a singularity at ''z'' = 0. This singularity can be removed by defining ''f''(0) := 1, which is the [[Limit of a function|limit]] of ''f'' as ''z'' tends to 0. The resulting function is holomorphic. In this case the problem was caused by ''f'' being given an [[indeterminate form]]. Taking a power series expansion for <math>\frac{\sin(z)}{z}</math> shows that
:<math> f(z) = \frac{1}{z}\left(\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^kz^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!} \right) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^kz^{2k}}{(2k+1)!} = 1 - \frac{z^2}{3!} + \frac{z^4}{5!} - \frac{z^6}{7!} + \cdots. </math>
 
Formally, if <math>U \subset \mathbb C</math> is an [[open subset]] of the [[complex plane]] <math>\mathbb C</math>, <math>a \in U</math> a point of <math>U</math>, and <math>f: U\setminus \{a\} \rightarrow \mathbb C</math> is a [[holomorphic function]], then <math>a</math> is called a '''removable singularity''' for <math>f</math> if there exists a holomorphic function <math>g: U \rightarrow \mathbb C</math> which coincides with <math>f</math> on <math>U\setminus \{a\}</math>. We say <math>f</math> is holomorphically extendable over <math>U</math> if such a <math>g</math> exists.
 
== Riemann's theorem ==
 
[[Bernhard Riemann|Riemann's]] theorem on removable singularities states when a singularity is removable:
 
''' Theorem.''' Let <math>D \subset C</math> be an open subset of the complex plane, <math>a \in D</math> a point of <math>D</math> and <math>f</math> a holomorphic function defined on the set <math>D \setminus \{a\}</math>.  The following are equivalent:
 
# <math>f</math> is holomorphically extendable over <math>a</math>.
# <math>f</math> is continuously extendable over <math>a</math>.  
# There exists a [[neighborhood (topology)|neighborhood]] of <math>a</math> on which <math>f</math> is [[bounded function|bounded]].
# <math>\lim_{z\to a}(z - a) f(z) = 0</math>.
 
The implications 1 ⇒ 2  ⇒ 3  ⇒ 4 are trivial. To prove 4 ⇒ 1, we first recall that the holomorphy of a function at <math>a</math> is equivalent to it being analytic at <math>a</math> ([[Proof that holomorphic functions are analytic|proof]]), i.e. having a power series representation. Define
 
:<math>
h(z) =
\begin{cases}
(z - a)^2 f(z) &  z \ne a ,\\
0              &  z = a .
\end{cases}
</math>
 
Clearly, ''h'' is holomorphic on ''D''&nbsp;\&nbsp;{''a''}, and there exists
:<math>h'(a)=\lim_{z\to a}\frac{(z - a)^2f(z)-0}{z-a}=\lim_{z\to a}(z - a) f(z)=0</math>
by 4, hence ''h'' is holomorphic on ''D'' and has a Taylor series about ''a'':
 
:<math>h(z) = c_0 + c_1(z-a) + c_2 (z - a)^2 + c_3 (z - a)^3 + \cdots \, .</math>
 
We have ''c''<sub>0</sub> = ''h''(''a'') = 0 and ''c''<sub>1</sub> = ''h{{'}}''(''a'') = 0; therefore
 
:<math>h(z) = c_2 (z - a)^2 + c_3 (z - a)^3 + \cdots \, .</math>
 
Hence, where z≠a, we have:
 
:<math>f(z)=h(z)/(z-a)^2 = c_2 + c_3 (z - a) + \cdots \, .</math>
 
However,
 
:<math>g(z) = c_2 + c_3 (z - a) + \cdots \, .</math>
 
is holomorphic on ''D'', thus an extension of ''f''.
 
== Other kinds of singularities ==
 
Unlike functions of a real variable, holomorphic functions are sufficiently rigid that their isolated singularities can be completely classified. A holomorphic function's singularity is either not really a singularity at all, i.e. a removable singularity, or one of the following two types:
 
#In light of Riemann's theorem, given a non-removable singularity, one might ask whether there exists a natural number <math>m</math> such that <math>\lim_{z \rightarrow a}(z-a)^{m+1}f(z)=0</math>. If so, <math>a</math> is called a '''[[pole (complex analysis)|pole]]''' of <math>f</math> and the smallest such <math>m</math> is the '''order''' of <math>a</math>. So removable singularities are precisely the [[pole (complex analysis)|pole]]s of order 0. A holomorphic function blows up uniformly near its poles.
#If an isolated singularity <math>a</math> of <math>f</math> is neither removable nor a pole, it is called an '''[[essential singularity]]'''. It can be shown that such an <math>f</math> maps every punctured open neighborhood <math>U \setminus \{a\}</math> to the entire complex plane, with the possible exception of at most one point.
 
==See also==
* [[Analytic capacity]]
* [[Removable discontinuity]]
 
== External links ==
{{Expand section|date=December 2009}}
 
[[Category:Analytic functions]]
[[Category:Meromorphic functions]]

Revision as of 11:00, 30 January 2014

A graph of a parabola with a removable singularity at x = 2

In complex analysis, a removable singularity (sometimes called a cosmetic singularity) of a holomorphic function is a point at which the function is undefined, but it is possible to define the function at that point in such a way that the function is regular in a neighbourhood of that point.

For instance, the function

has a singularity at z = 0. This singularity can be removed by defining f(0) := 1, which is the limit of f as z tends to 0. The resulting function is holomorphic. In this case the problem was caused by f being given an indeterminate form. Taking a power series expansion for shows that

Formally, if is an open subset of the complex plane , a point of , and is a holomorphic function, then is called a removable singularity for if there exists a holomorphic function which coincides with on . We say is holomorphically extendable over if such a exists.

Riemann's theorem

Riemann's theorem on removable singularities states when a singularity is removable:

Theorem. Let be an open subset of the complex plane, a point of and a holomorphic function defined on the set . The following are equivalent:

  1. is holomorphically extendable over .
  2. is continuously extendable over .
  3. There exists a neighborhood of on which is bounded.
  4. .

The implications 1 ⇒ 2 ⇒ 3 ⇒ 4 are trivial. To prove 4 ⇒ 1, we first recall that the holomorphy of a function at is equivalent to it being analytic at (proof), i.e. having a power series representation. Define

Clearly, h is holomorphic on D \ {a}, and there exists

by 4, hence h is holomorphic on D and has a Taylor series about a:

We have c0 = h(a) = 0 and c1 = hTemplate:'(a) = 0; therefore

Hence, where z≠a, we have:

However,

is holomorphic on D, thus an extension of f.

Other kinds of singularities

Unlike functions of a real variable, holomorphic functions are sufficiently rigid that their isolated singularities can be completely classified. A holomorphic function's singularity is either not really a singularity at all, i.e. a removable singularity, or one of the following two types:

  1. In light of Riemann's theorem, given a non-removable singularity, one might ask whether there exists a natural number such that . If so, is called a pole of and the smallest such is the order of . So removable singularities are precisely the poles of order 0. A holomorphic function blows up uniformly near its poles.
  2. If an isolated singularity of is neither removable nor a pole, it is called an essential singularity. It can be shown that such an maps every punctured open neighborhood to the entire complex plane, with the possible exception of at most one point.

See also

External links

Template:Expand section