|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{about|the estimation technique|Fermi's question about extraterrestrial life|Fermi paradox}}
| | Hello! <br>I'm Norwegian female :D. <br>I really love Inline Skating!<br><br>My homepage [http://gospelrocks.org/?p=22024 fifa coin generator] |
| In [[Physics]] or [[engineering]] [[education]], a '''Fermi problem''', '''Fermi question''', or '''Fermi estimate''' is an [[Estimation theory|estimation]] problem designed to teach [[dimensional analysis]], [[approximation]], and the importance of clearly identifying one's assumptions. Named after physicist [[Enrico Fermi]], such problems typically involve making justified guesses about quantities that seem impossible to compute given limited available information.
| |
| | |
| Fermi was known for his ability to make good approximate calculations with little or no actual data, hence the name. One example is his estimate of the strength of the [[atomic bomb]] detonated at the [[Trinity test]], based on the distance travelled by pieces of paper dropped from his hand during the blast.<ref>[http://www.lanl.gov/history/story.php?story_id=13 The Trinity Test, History @ Los Alamos, Los Alamos National Laboratory official website]</ref> Fermi's estimate of 10 kilotons of TNT was remarkably close to the now-accepted value of around 20 kilotons.
| |
| | |
| ==Examples of Fermi problems==
| |
| The classic Fermi problem, generally attributed to Fermi,<ref>Referred to as a Fermi problem in Lufkin, Dan. [http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1396#more-1396 "Comment on 'Generalization and truth'"]. ''[[Language Log]]''{{reliable source|date=January 2013}}</ref> is "''How many [[piano tuner]]s are there in [[Chicago]]?''" A typical solution to this problem involves multiplying a series of estimates that yield the correct answer if the estimates are correct. For example, we might make the following assumptions:
| |
| # There are approximately 5,000,000 people living in Chicago.
| |
| # On average, there are two persons in each household in Chicago.
| |
| # Roughly one household in twenty has a piano that is tuned regularly.
| |
| # Pianos that are tuned regularly are tuned on average about once per year.
| |
| # It takes a piano tuner about two hours to tune a piano, including travel time.
| |
| # Each piano tuner works eight hours in a day, five days in a week, and 50 weeks in a year.
| |
| | |
| From these assumptions, we can compute that the number of piano tunings in a single year in Chicago is
| |
| | |
| :(5,000,000 persons in Chicago) / (2 persons/household) × (1 piano/20 households) × (1 piano tuning per piano per year) = 125,000 piano tunings per year in Chicago.
| |
| | |
| We can similarly calculate that the average piano tuner performs
| |
| | |
| :(50 weeks/year)×(5 days/week)×(8 hours/day)/(2 hours to tune a piano) = 1000 piano tunings per year per piano tuner.
| |
| | |
| Dividing gives
| |
| | |
| :(125,000 piano tunings per year in Chicago) / (1000 piano tunings per year per piano tuner) = 125 piano tuners in Chicago.
| |
| | |
| A famous example of a Fermi-problem-like estimate is the [[Drake equation]], which seeks to estimate the number of intelligent civilizations in the galaxy. The basic question of why, if there is a significant number of such civilizations, ours has never encountered any others is called the [[Fermi paradox]].
| |
| | |
| ==Advantages and scope==
| |
| Scientists often look for Fermi estimates of the answer to a problem before turning to more sophisticated methods to calculate a precise answer. This provides a useful check on the results: where the complexity of a precise calculation might obscure a large error, the simplicity of Fermi calculations makes them far less susceptible to such mistakes. (Performing the Fermi calculation first is preferable because the intermediate estimates might otherwise be biased by knowledge of the calculated answer.)
| |
| | |
| Fermi estimates are also useful in approaching problems where the optimal choice of calculation method depends on the expected size of the answer. For instance, a Fermi estimate might indicate whether the internal stresses of a structure are low enough that it can be accurately described by [[linear elasticity]]; or if the estimate already bears significant relationship in [[scale (disambiguation)|scale]] relative to some other value, for example, if a structure will be over-engineered to withstand loads several times greater than the estimate.
| |
| | |
| Although Fermi calculations are often not accurate, as there may be many problems with their assumptions, this sort of analysis does tell us what to look for to get a better answer. For the above example, we might try to find a better estimate of the number of pianos tuned by a piano tuner in a typical day, or look up an accurate number for the population of Chicago. It also gives us a rough estimate that may be good enough for some purposes: if we want to start a store in Chicago that sells piano tuning equipment, and we calculate that we need 10,000 potential customers to stay in business, we can reasonably assume that the above estimate is far enough below 10,000 that we should consider a different business plan (and, with a little more work, we could compute a rough upper bound on the number of piano tuners by considering the most extreme ''reasonable'' values that could appear in each of our assumptions).
| |
| | |
| == Explanation ==
| |
| Fermi estimates generally work because the estimations of the individual terms are often close to correct, and overestimates and underestimates help cancel each other out. That is, if there is no consistent bias, a Fermi calculation that involves the multiplication of several estimated factors (such as the number of piano tuners in Chicago) will ''probably'' be more accurate than might be first supposed.
| |
| | |
| In detail, multiplying estimates corresponds to adding their logarithms; thus one obtains a sort of [[Wiener process]] or [[random walk]] on the [[logarithmic scale]], which diffuses as <math>\sqrt{n}</math> (in number of terms ''n''). In discrete terms, the number of overestimates minus underestimates will have a [[binomial distribution]]. In continuous terms, if one makes a Fermi estimate of ''n'' steps, with [[standard deviation]] <math>\sigma</math> units on the log scale from the actual value, then the overall estimate will have standard deviation <math>\sqrt{n}\sigma</math>, since the standard deviation of a sum scales as <math>\sqrt{n}</math> in the number of summands.
| |
| | |
| For instance, if one makes a 9-step Fermi estimate, at each step overestimating or underestimating the correct number by a factor of 2 (or with a standard deviation 2), then after 9 steps the standard error will have grown by a logarithmic factor of <math>\sqrt{9}=3</math>, so <math>2^3=8</math>. Thus one will expect to be within 1/8 to 8 times the correct value – within an [[order of magnitude]], and much less than the worst case of erring by a factor of <math>2^9=512</math> (about 2.7 orders of magnitude). If one has a shorter chain or estimates more accurately, the overall estimate will be correspondingly better.
| |
| | |
| == See also ==
| |
| * [[Handwaving]]
| |
| * [[Orders of approximation]]
| |
| * [[Stein's example]]
| |
| * [[Back-of-the-envelope calculation]]
| |
| * [[Heuristic]]
| |
| | |
| ==Notes and references==
| |
| {{reflist}}
| |
| | |
| ==Further reading==
| |
| | |
| There are a number of university level courses devoted to estimation and the solution of Fermi problems. The materials for these courses are a good source for additional Fermi problem examples and material about solution strategies
| |
| * [http://mit.edu/6.055/ 6.055J / 2.038J The Art of Approximation in Science and Engineering] taught by [http://mit.edu/sanjoy/www/ Sanjoy Mahajan] at the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]] (MIT).
| |
| * [http://www.lions.odu.edu/~lweinste/courses/309s08.html Physics on the Back of an Envelope] taught by Lawrence Weinstein at [[Old Dominion University]].
| |
| * [http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/sanjoy/oom/1997/ Order of Magnitude Physics] taught by Sterl Phinney and Peter Goldreich at the [[California Institute of Technology]].
| |
| * [http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/mmt/frontiers/web/index2.html Chapter 2: Discoveries on the Back of an Envelope] from ''Frontiers of Science: Scientific Habits of Mind'' taught by [[David Helfand]] at [[Columbia University]]
| |
| | |
| ==External links==
| |
| *The [[University of Maryland, College Park|University of Maryland]] Physics Education Group maintains a [http://www.physics.umd.edu/perg/fermi/fermi.htm collection of Fermi problems].
| |
| * [http://www.google.com/base/a/1551686/D2256477437979091778 An example of a Fermi Problem relating to total gasoline consumed by cars since the invention of cars- and compares it to the output of the energy released by the sun.]{{dead link|date=November 2012}}
| |
| * Lawrence Weinstein & John A. Adam, [http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8625.html ''Guesstimation: Solving the World's Problems on the Back of a Cocktail Napkin''] Princeton University Press. 2008. ISBN 0-691-12949-5. ISBN 978-1-4008-2444-1. A textbook on Fermi problems.
| |
| * Aaron Santos, ''How Many Licks?: Or, How to Estimate Damn Near Anything''. Running Press. 2009. ISBN 0-7624-3560-7. ISBN 978-0-7624-3560-9.
| |
| * [http://gowers.wordpress.com/2012/06/08/how-should-mathematics-be-taught-to-non-mathematicians/ "How should mathematics be taught to non-mathematicians?"], [[Timothy Gowers]]
| |
| | |
| {{orders of magnitude wide}}
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Physics education]]
| |
| [[Category:Dimensional analysis]]
| |
| [[Category:Enrico Fermi|Problem]]
| |