List of mnemonics: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>EvergreenFir
Undid revision 598042980 by 108.20.32.83 (talk)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{about|the numerical integration method|the neurological examination maneuver|Romberg's test}}
Hola. The author's name is Eusebio so he never really appreciated that name. In his professional life he can be a people manager. He's always loved living all the way through Guam and he has everything that he [http://Circumstances.net/ circumstances] there. To drive is one of those things he loves most people. He's been working about his website for several time now. Check that will out here: http://[http://Www.adobe.com/cfusion/search/index.cfm?term=&circuspartypanama&loc=en_us&siteSection=home circuspartypanama].com<br><br>


In [[numerical analysis]], '''Romberg's method''' {{Harv|Romberg|1955}} is used to estimate the [[Integral|definite integral]]
My web blog ... clash of clans cheats ([http://circuspartypanama.com Going Here])
 
:<math> \int_a^b f(x) \, dx </math>
 
by applying [[Richardson extrapolation]] {{Harv|Richardson|1911}} repeatedly on the [[trapezium rule]] or the [[rectangle rule]] (midpoint rule). The estimates generate a triangular array.  Romberg's method is a [[Newton–Cotes formulas|Newton–Cotes formula]] – it evaluates the integrand at equally-spaced points.
The integrand must have continuous derivatives, though fairly good results
may be obtained if only a few derivatives exist.
If it is possible to evaluate the integrand at unequally-spaced points, then other methods such as [[Gaussian quadrature]] and [[Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature]] are generally more accurate.
 
The method is named after [[Werner Romberg]] (1909–2003), who published the method in 1955.
 
== Method ==
 
The method can be defined inductively
 
:<math>R(0,0) = \frac{1}{2} (b-a) (f(a) + f(b))</math>
 
:<math>R(n,0) = \frac{1}{2} R(n-1,0) + h_n \sum_{k=1}^{2^{n-1}} f(a + (2k-1)h_n)</math>
 
:<math>R(n,m) = R(n,m-1) + \frac{1}{4^m-1} (R(n,m-1) - R(n-1,m-1))</math>
 
or
 
:<math>R(n,m) = \frac{1}{4^m-1} ( 4^m R(n,m-1) - R(n-1,m-1))</math>
 
where
 
:<math> n \ge m \, </math>
 
:<math> m \ge 1 \, </math>
 
:<math> h_n = \frac{b-a}{2^n}. </math>
 
In [[big O notation]], the error for ''R''(''n'',&nbsp;''m'') is {{Harv|Mysovskikh|2002}}:
 
:<math> O\left(h_n^{2m+2}\right). \, </math>
 
The zeroeth extrapolation, ''R''(''n'',&nbsp;0), is equivalent to the [[trapezoidal rule]] with 2<sup>''n''</sup>&nbsp;+&nbsp;1 points; the first extrapolation, ''R''(''n'',&nbsp;1), is equivalent to [[Simpson's rule]] with 2<sup>''n''</sup>&nbsp;+&nbsp;1 points. The second extrapolation, ''R''(''n'',&nbsp;2), is equivalent to [[Boole's rule]] with 2<sup>''n''</sup>&nbsp;+&nbsp;1 points. Further extrapolations differ from Newton Cotes formulas. In particular further Romberg extrapolations expand on Boole's rule in very slight ways, modifying weights into ratios similar as in Boole's rule. In contrast, further Newton Cotes methods produce increasingly  differing weights, eventually leading to large positive and negative weights. This is indicative of how large degree interpolating polynomial Newton Cotes methods fail to converge for many integrals, while Romberg integration is more stable.
 
When function evaluations are expensive, it may be preferable to replace the polynomial interpolation of Richardson with the rational interpolation proposed by {{Harvtxt|Bulirsch|Stoer|1967}}.
 
== A geometric example ==
To estimate the area under a curve the trapezoid rule is applied first to one-piece, then two, then four, and so on.
 
[[File:Freeform curve.gif|thumb|One-piece (click to enlarge)]] [[File:2 piece.gif|thumb|Two-piece]] [[File:4 piece.gif|thumb|Four-piece]] [[File:8 piece.gif|thumb|Eight-piece]]
 
After trapezoid rule estimates are obtained Richardson's Extrapolation is applied
 
*For the first iteration the two piece and one piece estimates are used in the formula (4 X (more accurate) - (less accurate))/3 The same formula is then used to compare the four piece and the two piece estimate, and likewise for the higher estimates
 
*For the second iteration the values of the first iteration are used in the formula (16(more accurate)-less accurate)/15
 
*The third iteration uses the next power of 4:  (64 (More accurate) - less accurate)/63 on the values derived by the second iteration.
 
*The pattern is continued until there is one estimate.
 
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|'''Number of pieces'''||'''Trapezoid estimates'''|| '''First iteration'''||'''second iteration||'''third iteration'''
|-
|                      ||                        ||'''(4MA-LA)/3'''*  || '''(16MA-LA)/15'''|| '''(64MA-LA)/63'''
|- 
|1||0  ||  (4*480-0)/3 = 640||  (16*880-640)/15 =896 ||  (64*1015.11-896)/63 = 1017.002
|-
|2||480 ||  (4*780-480)/3 = 880 || (16*1006.67-880)/15 = 1015.11.. ||
|-
|4||780 ||  (4*950-780)/3 =1006.666..  ||  ||
|-
|8||950 ||  ||  ||
|-
|-
|}
*MA stands for more accurate, LA stands for less accurate
 
== Example ==
 
As an example, the [[Gaussian function]] is integrated from 0 to 1, i.e. the [[error function]] erf(1)&nbsp;≈&nbsp;0.842700792949715.  The triangular array is calculated row by row and calculation is terminated if the two last entries in the last row differ less than 10<sup>&minus;8</sup>.
 
<pre><nowiki>
0.77174333
0.82526296  0.84310283
0.83836778  0.84273605  0.84271160
0.84161922  0.84270304  0.84270083  0.84270066
0.84243051  0.84270093  0.84270079  0.84270079  0.84270079
</nowiki></pre>
 
The result in the lower right corner of the triangular array is accurate to the digits shown.
It is remarkable that this result is derived from the less accurate approximations
obtained by the trapezium rule in the first column of the triangular array.
 
== Implementation ==
Here is an example of a computer implementation of the Romberg method (in the [[C programming language]]). It needs one vector and one variable, as well as a sub-routine Trap:
 
<source lang=c>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <math.h>
#define MAX 6
 
int main()
{
    double s[MAX];
    int i,k;
    double var ;
    for (i = 1; i< MAX; i++)
        s[i] = 1;
    for (k=1; k< MAX; k++)
    {
        for (i=1; i <=k; i++)
        {
            if (i==1)
            {
                var = s[i];
                s[i] = Trap(0, 1, pow(2, k-1));    // sub-routine Trap
            }                                      // integrated from 0 and 1
                                                    /* pow() is the number of subdivisions*/
            else
            {
                s[k]= ( pow(4 , i-1)*s[i-1]-var )/(pow(4, i-1) - 1);
                                                               
                var = s[i];
                s[i]= s[k]; 
            }
            printf ("  %f  ", s[i]);
        }
        printf ("\n");
    }
 
    return 0;
}
</source>
 
== References ==
* {{citation|last1=Richardson|first1=L. F.|title=The Approximate Arithmetical Solution by Finite Differences of Physical Problems Involving Differential Equations, with an Application to the Stresses in a Masonry Dam|journal= Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A<!--, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character--> |volume=210|issue=459-470|year=1911|pages=307–357|doi=10.1098/rsta.1911.0009|jstor=90994}}
* {{citation|last1=Romberg|first1=W.|title=Vereinfachte numerische Integration|journal=Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskab Forhandlinger|volume=28|year=1955|location=Trondheim|pages=30–36|issue=7}}
* {{citation|last=Thacher, Jr.|first=Henry C.|title=Remark on Algorithm 60: Romberg integration|journal=Communications of the ACM|volume=7|pages =420–421|date=July 1964|url=http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=364520.364542|doi=10.1145/364520.364542|issue=7}}
* {{citation|last1=Bauer|first1=F.L.|last2=Rutishauser|last3=Stiefel|first3=E.|title=New aspects in numerical quadrature|editor-last=Metropolis|editor-first=N. C., et al.|journal=Experimental Arithmetic, high-speed computing and mathematics, Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics|publisher=[[American Mathematical Society|AMS]]|year=1963|pages=199–218|first2=H.|issue=15}}
* {{citation|last1=Bulirsch|first1=Roland|last2=Stoer|first2=Josef|title= Handbook Series Numerical Integration. Numerical quadrature by extrapolation|journal=Numerische Mathematik|volume=9|year=1967|pages=271–278 |url=http://www-gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/cgi-bin/digbib.cgi?PPN362160546_0009}}
* {{citation|last=Mysovskikh|first=I.P.|contribution=Romberg method|editor-last=Hazewinkel|editor-first=Michiel|title=Encyclopaedia of Mathematics|publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]]|year=2002|isbn=1-4020-0609-8|url=http://eom.springer.de/r/r082570.htm}}
* {{Citation |last1=Press|first1=WH|last2=Teukolsky|first2=SA|last3=Vetterling|first3=WT|last4=Flannery|first4=BP|year=2007|title=Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing|edition=3rd|publisher=Cambridge University Press| publication-place=New York|isbn=978-0-521-88068-8|chapter=Section 4.3. Romberg Integration|chapter-url=http://apps.nrbook.com/empanel/index.html?pg=166}}
 
== External links ==
* [http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/loadFile.do?objectId=34&objectType=file ROMBINT] – code for [[MATLAB]] (author: Martin Kacenak)
*[http://math.fullerton.edu/mathews/n2003/RombergMod.html Module for Romberg integration]
*[http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/webintegration.html Free online integration tool using Romberg, Fox–Romberg, Gauss–Legendre and other numerical methods]
 
[[Category:Numerical integration (quadrature)]]
[[Category:Articles with example C code]]

Revision as of 05:33, 4 March 2014

Hola. The author's name is Eusebio so he never really appreciated that name. In his professional life he can be a people manager. He's always loved living all the way through Guam and he has everything that he circumstances there. To drive is one of those things he loves most people. He's been working about his website for several time now. Check that will out here: http://circuspartypanama.com

My web blog ... clash of clans cheats (Going Here)