Exponential smoothing: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
"formulae" to "formula" (plural to singular); "y" to "x" because x is used everywhere else for the same thing
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Barrett–Crane model''' is a model in [[quantum gravity]] which was defined using the [[Plebanski action]].<ref name=Barrett1998>{{citation
I'm Sommer (18) from Bregnano, Italy. <br>I'm learning French literature at a local university and I'm just about to graduate.<br>I have a part time job in a backery.<br><br>Also visit my web page - [http://Ommarelard.Mustafahosny.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6988:2012-05-29-05-44-49&catid=5:trials&Itemid=18 Fifa 15 Coin Generator]
| author = Barrett, John W.; Louis Crane
| title = Relativistic spin networks and quantum gravity
| journal = J.Math.Phys. 39
| volume = 39
| pages = 3296–3302
| doi = 10.1063/1.532254
| year = 1998
|arxiv = gr-qc/9709028 |bibcode = 1998JMP....39.3296B }}</ref><ref name=Barrett>{{citation
| author = Barrett, John W.; Louis
Crane,
| title = A Lorentzian signature model for quantum general relativity
| journal = Classical and Quantum Gravity
| volume = 17
| doi = 10.1088/0264-9381/17/16/302
|arxiv = gr-qc/9904025 |bibcode = 2000CQGra..17.3101B }}</ref>
 
The <math>B</math> field in the action is supposed to be a <math>so(3, 1)</math>-valued [[2-form]], i.e. taking values in the [[Lie algebra]] of a [[special orthogonal group]]. The term
 
:<math>B^{ij} \wedge B^{kl}</math>  
 
in the action has the same symmetries as it does to provide the [[Einstein-Hilbert action]]. But the form of
 
:<math>B^{ij}</math>
 
is not unique and can be posed by the different forms:
*<math>\pm e^i \wedge e^j</math>
*<math>\pm \epsilon^{ijkl} e_k \wedge e_l</math>
where <math>e^i</math> is the [[tetrad]] and <math>\epsilon^{ijkl}</math> is the [[antisymmetric symbol]] of the <math>so(3, 1)</math>-valued 2-form fields.
 
The Plebanski action can be constrained to produce the [[BF model]] which is a theory of no local [[degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)|degrees of freedom]]. [[John W. Barrett]] and [[Louis Crane]] modeled the analogous constraint on the summation over [[spin foam]].
 
The Barrett–Crane model on spin foam quantizes the [[Plebanski action]], but its [[functional integration|path integral]] amplitude corresponds to the degenerate <math>B</math> field and not the specific definition 
 
:<math>B^{ij} = e^i \wedge e^j</math>,
 
which formally satisfies the [[Einstein's field equation]] of [[general relativity]]. However, if analysed with the tools of [[loop quantum gravity]] the Barrett–Crane model gives an incorrect long-distance limit [http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0883], and so the model is not identical to loop quantum gravity.
 
==See also==
* [[EPRL model]]
 
==References==
{{reflist}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Barrett-Crane model}}
[[Category:Loop quantum gravity]]
 
 
{{physics-stub}}

Revision as of 19:27, 26 February 2014

I'm Sommer (18) from Bregnano, Italy.
I'm learning French literature at a local university and I'm just about to graduate.
I have a part time job in a backery.

Also visit my web page - Fifa 15 Coin Generator