Lieb–Liniger model: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Bibcode Bot
m Adding 0 arxiv eprint(s), 4 bibcode(s) and 0 doi(s). Did it miss something? Report bugs, errors, and suggestions at User talk:Bibcode Bot
 
Line 1: Line 1:
They are typically a free website that are pre-designed for enabling businesses of every size in marking the presence on the internet and allows them in showcasing the product services and range through images, contents and various other elements. Affilo - Theme is the guaranteed mixing of wordpress theme that Mark Ling use for his internet marketing career. This CMS has great flexibility to adapt various extensions and add-ons. Dead links are listed out simply because it will negatively have an influence on the website's search engine rating. It is found that most of the visitors only look for the results that are displayed on the first page of the search engines and so if you get the service from professional service providers then they strive for the first page ranking of your site and improve the online visibility. <br><br>These folders as well as files have to copied and the saved. You may either choose to link only to the top-level category pages or the ones that contain information about your products and services. We also help to integrate various plug-ins to expand the functionalities of the web application. If you beloved this posting and you would like to obtain a lot more info pertaining to [http://GET7.pw/backup_plugin_147024 backup plugin] kindly visit our web site. These four plugins will make this effort easier and the sites run effectively as well as make other widgets added to a site easier to configure. This can be done by using a popular layout format and your unique Word - Press design can be achieved in other elements of the blog. <br><br>Saying that, despite the launch of Wordpress Express many months ago, there has still been no sign of a Wordpress video tutorial on offer UNTIL NOW. Note:  at a first glance WP Mobile Pro  themes do not appear to be glamorous or fancy. Use this section to change many formatting elements. The first thing you need to do is to choose the right web hosting plan. Premium vs Customised Word - Press Themes - Premium themes are a lot like customised themes but without the customised price and without the wait. <br><br>The disadvantage is it requires a considerable amount of time to set every thing up. Quttera - Quttera describes itself as a 'Saa - S [Software as a Service] web-malware monitoring and alerting solution for websites of any size and complexity. re creating a Word - Press design yourself, the good news is there are tons of Word - Press themes to choose from. If you choose a blog then people will be able to post articles on your site and people will be able to make comments on your posts (unless you turn comments off). Look for experience: When you are searching for a Word - Press developer you should always look at their experience level. <br><br>Millions of individuals and organizations are now successfully using this tool throughout the world. s ability to use different themes and skins known as Word - Press Templates or Themes. The days of spending a lot of time and money to have a website built are long gone. Change the entire appearance of you blog using themes with one click. You can check out the statistics of page of views for your web pages using free tools that are available on the internet.
{{technical|date=November 2010}}
 
EMSR stands for Expected Marginal Seat Revenue and is a very popular [[heuristic]] in [[Revenue Management]]. There are two versions: EMSRa<ref>Belobaba, P. P., Air Travel Demand and Airline Seat Inventory Management. Flight Transportation Laboratory. Cambridge, MIT. PhD, 1987</ref> and EMSRb,<ref>Belobaba, P. P., Optimal vs. heuristic methods for nested seat allocation. Presentation at ORSA/TIMS Joint National Meeting, 1992</ref> both of which were introduced by Belobaba. Both methods are for ''n''-class, static, single-resource problems. Because the models are static some assumptions apply: classes are indexed in such a way that the fare for the highest class, <math>r_{1}</math>, is higher than the fare for the next highest class, <math>r_{2}</math>, so <math>r_{1}</math> > <math>r_{2}</math> > ... > <math>r_{n}</math>; demand arrives in a strict low to high order in stages that are indexed with ''j'' as well; demand for class ''j'' is distributed with cdf <math>F_j(x)</math>. For simplicity it is also assumed that demand, capacity and the distributions are continuous, although it is not very difficult to drop this assumption.
 
==EMSRa==
EMSRa is the first version that Belobaba came up with. The idea behind the heuristic is to add the protection limits that are calculated by applying [[Littlewood's rule]] to successive classes. Suppose that we are in stage ''j+1'' and we want to calculate how much capacity we need to protect for stages ''j, j-1,..., 1''. Then we are actually calculating protection limit <math>y</math><sub>j</sub>. To do so we consider every class in ''j, j-1,..., 1'' and compare that class, indexed with ''k'', with ''j+1'' in isolation. For every combination of ''k'' and ''j+1'' we compute the protection level for that class with [[Littlewood's rule]]:
 
:<math>P ( D_k > y_k^{j+1}) = \frac{r_{j+1}}{r_k}</math>
 
The idea of EMSRa then is to add all these protection limits to get the protection limit for <math>y_j</math>.
 
:<math>y_j = \sum_{k=1}^j y_k^{j+1}</math>
 
However, there is a problem with this method because it does not take the statistical averaging effect into account. Suppose, for example, that classes ''1'' to ''j'' have the same fare ''r'', then EMSRa will calculate the protection limit for <math>y_{j+1}</math> with
 
:<math> P( D_k > y_k^{j+1}) = \frac{r_{j+1}}{r}</math>
 
However, because the fare for all these classes is the same they should be aggregated. EMSRa will calculate protection limits that are too conservative. In other words, it will reserve too many seats for the higher fares, thereby rejecting too many low fare bookings. Although having equal fares is not realistic this will also happen if the difference between fares is small. Therefore EMSRb was invented.
 
==EMSRb==
One of the most widely used RM heuristics is EMSRb. It is simple and produces under certain conditions close to optimal results. Belobaba reports studies in which both EMSRa and EMSRb were compared. He shows that EMSRb is consistently within 0.5 percent of the optimal solution, while EMSRa under certain conditions can deviate more than 1.5 percent from the optimal solution. However, with mixed order of arrival and frequent reoptimization both methods perform well.<ref>Belobaba, P. P., Optimal vs. heuristic methods for nested seat allocation. Presentation at ORSA/TIMS Joint National Meeting, 1992</ref> There is also study by Polt that shows mixed results.<ref>Polt, S., Back to the roots: New results on leg optimization. In 1999 AGIFORS Reservations and Yield Management Study Group Symposium, London, UK, 1999</ref>
 
EMSRb is also based on an approximation that compares two classes, but it does take the statistical averaging effect into account. Instead of aggregating protection levels, as EMSRa does, it aggregates demand. Suppose we are again in stage <math>j+1</math> and we want to calculate the protection limit <math>y</math><sub>j</sub>. Then first all future demand for classes ''j, j-1,…, 1'' is aggregated:
 
:<math>S_j = \sum_{k=1}^j D_k</math>
 
and the weighted revenues  are calculated:
 
:<math> \overline{r}_j = \frac{\sum_{k=1}^j r_k \cdot D_k}{\sum_{k=1}^j D_k}</math>
 
Then, again with Littlewood’s rule, the protection limit for classes ''j'' and higher is calculated such that:
 
:<math> P( S_j > y_j ) = \frac{r_{j+1}}{\overline{r}_j}</math>
 
Usually demand is considered to be independent and distributed normally with a mean  and a variance . Using that the protection limits can be calculated as:
 
:<math> y_j = \mu_j + z_\alpha \cdot \sigma_j</math>
 
with the mean and variance of the demand to come as <math>\mu_j = \sum_{k=1}^j \mu_k</math> and <math>\sigma_j^2 = \sum_{k=1}^j \sigma_k^2</math> respectively. <math>z_\alpha</math> is calculated with the inverse of the normal distribution <math>z_\alpha = \phi^{-1}(1-\frac{r_{j+1}}{\overline{r}_j})</math>. This is done for each j, giving the protection limit for every class.
 
==References==
<!--- See [[Wikipedia:Footnotes]] on how to create references using <ref></ref> tags which will then appear here automatically -->
{{Reflist}}
 
==See also==
* [[Yield management]]
* [[Littlewood's rule]]
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Expected Marginal Seat Revenue}}
[[Category:Pricing]]

Revision as of 13:41, 25 January 2014

My name is Winnie and I am studying Anthropology and Sociology and Modern Languages and Classics at Rillieux-La-Pape / France.

Also visit my web site ... hostgator1centcoupon.info

EMSR stands for Expected Marginal Seat Revenue and is a very popular heuristic in Revenue Management. There are two versions: EMSRa[1] and EMSRb,[2] both of which were introduced by Belobaba. Both methods are for n-class, static, single-resource problems. Because the models are static some assumptions apply: classes are indexed in such a way that the fare for the highest class, r1, is higher than the fare for the next highest class, r2, so r1 > r2 > ... > rn; demand arrives in a strict low to high order in stages that are indexed with j as well; demand for class j is distributed with cdf Fj(x). For simplicity it is also assumed that demand, capacity and the distributions are continuous, although it is not very difficult to drop this assumption.

EMSRa

EMSRa is the first version that Belobaba came up with. The idea behind the heuristic is to add the protection limits that are calculated by applying Littlewood's rule to successive classes. Suppose that we are in stage j+1 and we want to calculate how much capacity we need to protect for stages j, j-1,..., 1. Then we are actually calculating protection limit yj. To do so we consider every class in j, j-1,..., 1 and compare that class, indexed with k, with j+1 in isolation. For every combination of k and j+1 we compute the protection level for that class with Littlewood's rule:

P(Dk>ykj+1)=rj+1rk

The idea of EMSRa then is to add all these protection limits to get the protection limit for yj.

yj=k=1jykj+1

However, there is a problem with this method because it does not take the statistical averaging effect into account. Suppose, for example, that classes 1 to j have the same fare r, then EMSRa will calculate the protection limit for yj+1 with

P(Dk>ykj+1)=rj+1r

However, because the fare for all these classes is the same they should be aggregated. EMSRa will calculate protection limits that are too conservative. In other words, it will reserve too many seats for the higher fares, thereby rejecting too many low fare bookings. Although having equal fares is not realistic this will also happen if the difference between fares is small. Therefore EMSRb was invented.

EMSRb

One of the most widely used RM heuristics is EMSRb. It is simple and produces under certain conditions close to optimal results. Belobaba reports studies in which both EMSRa and EMSRb were compared. He shows that EMSRb is consistently within 0.5 percent of the optimal solution, while EMSRa under certain conditions can deviate more than 1.5 percent from the optimal solution. However, with mixed order of arrival and frequent reoptimization both methods perform well.[3] There is also study by Polt that shows mixed results.[4]

EMSRb is also based on an approximation that compares two classes, but it does take the statistical averaging effect into account. Instead of aggregating protection levels, as EMSRa does, it aggregates demand. Suppose we are again in stage j+1 and we want to calculate the protection limit yj. Then first all future demand for classes j, j-1,…, 1 is aggregated:

Sj=k=1jDk

and the weighted revenues are calculated:

rj=k=1jrkDkk=1jDk

Then, again with Littlewood’s rule, the protection limit for classes j and higher is calculated such that:

P(Sj>yj)=rj+1rj

Usually demand is considered to be independent and distributed normally with a mean and a variance . Using that the protection limits can be calculated as:

yj=μj+zασj

with the mean and variance of the demand to come as μj=k=1jμk and σj2=k=1jσk2 respectively. zα is calculated with the inverse of the normal distribution zα=ϕ1(1rj+1rj). This is done for each j, giving the protection limit for every class.

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

See also

  1. Belobaba, P. P., Air Travel Demand and Airline Seat Inventory Management. Flight Transportation Laboratory. Cambridge, MIT. PhD, 1987
  2. Belobaba, P. P., Optimal vs. heuristic methods for nested seat allocation. Presentation at ORSA/TIMS Joint National Meeting, 1992
  3. Belobaba, P. P., Optimal vs. heuristic methods for nested seat allocation. Presentation at ORSA/TIMS Joint National Meeting, 1992
  4. Polt, S., Back to the roots: New results on leg optimization. In 1999 AGIFORS Reservations and Yield Management Study Group Symposium, London, UK, 1999