|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Unreferenced|date=November 2006}}
| | Greetings! I am Marvella and I really feel comfortable when individuals use the full name. I am a meter reader but I strategy on changing it. It's not a common thing but what she likes doing is foundation jumping and now she is attempting to make money with it. South Dakota is where me and my spouse live.<br><br>Also visit my homepage ... [http://www.article-galaxy.com/profile.php?a=165109 home std test kit] |
| | |
| '''Spot–future parity''' (or spot-futures parity) is a parity condition that should theoretically hold, or opportunities for [[arbitrage]] exist. Spot–future parity is an application of the [[law of one price]]. In plain English, if I can purchase a good today for price S and conclude a contract to sell it one month from today for price F, the difference in price should be no greater than the cost of using money minus any expenses (or earnings) from holding the asset; if the difference is greater, I would have an opportunity to buy and sell the "spots" and "futures" for a risk-free profit.
| |
| | |
| The parity condition is that if an [[asset]] can be purchased today and held until the exercise of a [[futures contract]], the value of the future should equal the current [[spot price]] ''adjusted for'' the cost of money, [[dividend]]s, "[[convenience yield]]" and any [[cost of carry|carrying cost]]s (such as storage).
| |
| | |
| The spot-future parity condition does ''not'' say that prices ''must'' be equal (once adjusted), but rather that when the condition is not met, it should be possible to sell one and purchase the other for a risk-free profit, that is, to undertake arbitrage. In highly liquid and developed markets, actual prices on the spot and futures markets may effectively fulfill the condition. When the condition is consistently not met for a given asset, the implication is that some condition of the market prevents effective arbitration; possible reasons include high transaction costs, regulations and legal restrictions, low [[liquidity]], or poor enforceability of legal contracts.
| |
| | |
| Spot–future parity can be used for virtually any asset where a future may be purchased, but is particularly common in [[currency market]]s, [[commodities]], stock futures markets, and [[bond market]]s. It is also essential to price determination in [[swap (finance)|swap]] markets.
| |
| | |
| In the complete form:
| |
| :<math> F = Se^{(r+y-q-u)T}</math>
| |
| | |
| Where:
| |
| : F, S represent the cost of the good on the futures market and the spot market, respectively.
| |
| : e is the mathematical constant for the [[e (mathematical constant)|base of the natural logarithm]].
| |
| : r is the applicable interest rate (for arbitrage, the cost of borrowing), stated at the continuous compounding rate.
| |
| : y is the storage cost over the life of the contract.
| |
| : q are any dividends accruing to the asset over the period between the spot contract (i.e. today) and the delivery date for the futures contract.
| |
| : u is the [[convenience yield]], which includes any costs incurred (or lost benefits) due to not having physical possession of the asset during the contract period.
| |
| : T is the time period applicable (fraction of a year) to delivery of the [[forward contract]].
| |
| | |
| This may be simplified depending on the nature of the asset applicable; it is often seen in the form below, which applies for an asset with no dividends, storage or convenience costs. Alternatively, r can be seen as the net total cost of carrying (that is, the sum of interest, dividends, convenience and storage). Note that the formulation assumes that [[transaction costs]] are insignificant.
| |
| | |
| Simplified form:
| |
| :<math> F = Se^{rT}</math>
| |
| | |
| ==Pricing of existing futures contracts==
| |
| Existing futures contracts can be priced using elements of the spot-futures parity equation, where K is the settlement price of the existing contract, <math>S_0</math> is the current spot price and <math>P_0</math> is the (expected) value of the existing contract today:
| |
| : <math> P_0 = S_0 - K e^{-rT}</math>
| |
| which upon application of the spot-futures parity equation becomes:
| |
| : <math> P_0 = (F_0 - K)e^{-rT}</math>
| |
| Where <math>F_0</math> is the forward price today.
| |
| | |
| ==See also== | |
| *[[Contango]]
| |
| *[[Backwardation]]
| |
| *[[Put–call parity]]
| |
| | |
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Spot-Future Parity}}
| |
| [[Category:Finance]]
| |
| [[Category:Financial economics]]
| |
Greetings! I am Marvella and I really feel comfortable when individuals use the full name. I am a meter reader but I strategy on changing it. It's not a common thing but what she likes doing is foundation jumping and now she is attempting to make money with it. South Dakota is where me and my spouse live.
Also visit my homepage ... home std test kit