Reynolds analogy: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
en>Daniele Pugliesi
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{About|flight vehicles|the topic in combustion physics|fuel mass fraction}}
I would like to introduce myself to you, I am Andrew and my spouse doesn't like it at all. Mississippi is exactly where his home is. Office supervising is where my main earnings arrives from but I've usually wanted my personal business. The preferred hobby for him and his  [http://gcjcteam.org/index.php?mid=etc_video&document_srl=696611&sort_index=regdate&order_type=desc accurate psychic readings] kids is style and he'll be starting some thing else alongside with it.<br><br>Feel free to surf to my web page phone [http://myfusionprofits.com/groups/find-out-about-self-improvement-tips-here/ psychic phone] - [http://myoceancounty.net/groups/apply-these-guidelines-when-gardening-and-grow/ visit link],
[[File:GlobalFlyer at KSC before launch.jpg|thumb|The [[Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer|GlobalFlyer]] had a fuel fraction near 85%&nbsp;— it could carry five times its weight in fuel.]]
 
In [[aerospace engineering]], an aircraft's '''fuel fraction''', '''fuel weight fraction''',<ref>{{cite book | last = Brandt | first = Steven | title = Introduction to Aeronautics: a Design Perspective | publisher = AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics & Ast) | page = 359 | year = 2004 | isbn = 1-56347-701-7 }}</ref> or a spacecraft's '''propellant fraction''', is the weight of the fuel or propellant divided by the gross take-off weight of the craft (including propellant):<ref>{{cite book | last = Vinh | first = Nguyen | title = Flight Mechanics of High-Performance Aircraft | publisher = Cambridge University Press | location = Cambridge | page = 139| year = 1993 | isbn = 0-521-47852-9 }}</ref>
 
:<math>\ \zeta = \frac{\Delta W}{W_1} </math>
 
The fractional result of this mathematical division is often expressed as a percent. For aircraft with external [[drop tank]]s, the term '''internal fuel fraction''' is used to exclude the weight of external tanks and fuel.  
 
Fuel fraction is a key parameter in determining an aircraft's range, the [[Range (aircraft)|distance it can fly without refueling]].
[[Louis Charles Breguet|Breguet]]’s aircraft [[range (aircraft)|range]] equation describes the relationship of range with [[airspeed]], [[lift-to-drag ratio]], [[Thrust specific fuel consumption|specific fuel consumption]], and the part of the total fuel fraction available for cruise, also known as the '''cruise fuel fraction''', or ''' cruise fuel weight fraction'''.<ref>{{cite book
|title=Flight Performance of Fixed and Rotary Wing Aircraft
|author=Filippone, Antonio
|year=2006
|publisher=Elsevier
|page=426
|isbn=0-7506-6817-2}}</ref>
 
==Fighter aircraft==
 
At today’s state of the art for jet [[fighter aircraft]], fuel fractions of 29 percent and below typically yield subcruisers; 33 percent provides a quasi–[[supercruise]]r; and 35 percent and above are needed for useful supercruising missions. The U.S. [[F-22 Raptor]]’s fuel fraction is 29 percent,<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20050908090849/http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=199 8200/27900 = 0.29]</ref> [[Eurofighter]] is 31 percent, both similar to those of the subcruising [[F-4 Phantom II]], [[F-15 Eagle]] and the Russian [[Mikoyan MiG-29]] "Fulcrum". The Russian supersonic interceptor, the [[Mikoyan MiG-31]] "Foxhound", has a fuel fraction of over 45 percent.<ref>[http://www.pogo.org/p/defense/do-000812-f22.htm The F-22 Program FACT VERSUS FICTION] by Everest E. Riccioni, Col. USAF, Ret.</ref> The [[Panavia Tornado]] had a relatively low internal fuel fraction of 26 percent, and frequently carried drop tanks.<ref>{{cite book | last = Spick | first = Mike | title = Brassey's Modern Fighters | publisher = Potomac Books | location = Washington | year = 2002 | pages = 51–53 | isbn = 1-57488-462-X }}</ref>
 
==Airliners==
 
Airliners typically have a fuel fraction between 25 and 45 percent, so less than half their takeoff weight is fuel. The [[Boeing 777-200]]-IGW very long range airliner has a fuel fraction of 47 percent.<ref>[http://www.mh-aerotools.de/company/paper_7/astec_2002.htm The Sonic Cruiser – A Concept Analysis] by Dr. Martin Hepperle</ref> The [[Concorde]] [[supersonic transport]] had a high fuel fraction of around 55%.<ref>[http://mae.ucdavis.edu/faculty/sarigul/AIAA_2003_0909_revised_Sep03.pdf Manned Sub-Orbital Space Transportation Vehicles<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>
 
==General aviation==
 
The [[Rutan Voyager]] took off on its [[1986 in aviation|1986]] around-the-world flight at 72 percent, the highest figure ever at the time.<ref>{{cite journal
|journal=[[Popular Mechanics]]
|title=Burt Rutan and the Ultimate Solo
|author=Noland, David
|date=February 2005
|url=http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/air_space/1262012.html?page=3
}}</ref> [[Steve Fossett]]'s [[Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer]] could attain a fuel fraction of nearly 85 percent, meaning that it carried more than five times its empty weight in fuel.<ref>
{{cite news
| first = Mike
| last = Schneider
| title = Adventurer Set for Record-Setting Flight
| url = http://www.space.com/news/ap_060206_fosset_flight.html
| agency = Associated Press
| publisher = [[Space.com]]
| date = 2006-02-06
| accessdate = 2007-03-18
| quote =  At takeoff, fuel is expected to account for almost 85 percent of the graphite-made aircraft's weight.
}}</ref>
 
== See also ==
*[[Mass ratio]]
 
==References==
{{reflist}}
 
[[Category:Aerospace engineering]]

Latest revision as of 15:12, 1 May 2014

I would like to introduce myself to you, I am Andrew and my spouse doesn't like it at all. Mississippi is exactly where his home is. Office supervising is where my main earnings arrives from but I've usually wanted my personal business. The preferred hobby for him and his accurate psychic readings kids is style and he'll be starting some thing else alongside with it.

Feel free to surf to my web page phone psychic phone - visit link,