|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{see also|Bucket argument|Inertial frame of reference}}
| | e - Shop Word - Press is a excellent cart for your on the web shopping organization. If you loved this post and you would like to obtain more facts concerning [http://makeovermyyard.com/2014/07/hello-world/ wordpress backup plugin] kindly pay a visit to our own web site. This one is one of the most beneficial features of Word - Press as this feature allows users to define the user roles. Change the site's theme and you have essentially changed the site's personality. After confirming the account, login with your username and password at Ad - Mob. In the most current edition you can customize your retailer layout and display hues and fonts similar to your site or blog. <br><br>The Internet is a vast open market where businesses and consumers congregate. Wordpress have every reason with it which promote wordpress development. This is the reason for the increased risk of Down Syndrome babies in women over age 35. t need to use the back button or the URL to get to your home page. Akismet is really a sophisticated junk e-mail blocker and it's also very useful thinking about I recieve many junk e-mail comments day-to-day across my various web-sites. <br><br>But before choosing any one of these, let's compare between the two. s cutthroat competition prevailing in the online space won. all the necessary planning and steps of conversion is carried out in this phase, such as splitting, slicing, CSS code, adding images, header footer etc. The animation can be quite subtle these as snow falling gently or some twinkling start in the track record which are essentially not distracting but as an alternative gives some viewing enjoyment for the visitor of the internet site. " Thus working with a Word - Press powered web application, making any changes in the website design or website content is really easy and self explanatory. <br><br>Digg Digg Social Sharing - This plugin that is accountable for the floating social icon located at the left aspect corner of just about every submit. I didn't straight consider near it solon than one distance, I got the Popup Ascendancy plugin and it's up and lengthways, likely you make seen it today when you visited our blog, and I yet customize it to fit our Thesis Wound which gives it a rattling uncomparable visage and search than any different popup you know seen before on any added journal, I hump arrogated asset of one of it's quatern themes to make our own. re creating a Word - Press design yourself, the good news is there are tons of Word - Press themes to choose from. The most important plugins you will need are All-in-One SEO Pack, some social bookmarking plugin, a Feedburner plugin and an RSS sign up button. If your blog employs the permalink function, This gives your SEO efforts a boost, and your visitors will know firsthand what's in the post when seeing the URL. <br><br>A sitemap is useful for enabling web spiders and also on rare occasions clients, too, to more easily and navigate your website. When you sign up with Wordpress, you gain access to several different templates and plug-in that allow you to customize your blog so that it fits in with your business website design seamlessly. Useful Plugins Uber - Menu Top Megamenu Now it is the time of sticky Top navbar. Change the entire appearance of you blog using themes with one click. You can check out the statistics of page of views for your web pages using free tools that are available on the internet. |
| | |
| [[Isaac Newton]]'s '''rotating spheres''' argument attempts to demonstrate that true [[Rotation around a fixed axis|rotational motion]] can be defined by observing the tension in the string joining two identical spheres. The basis of the argument is that all observers make two observations: the tension in the string joining the bodies (which is the same for all observers) and the rate of rotation of the spheres (which is different for observers with differing rates of rotation). Only for the truly non-rotating observer will the tension in the string be explained using only the observed rate of rotation. For all other observers a "correction" is required (a centrifugal force) that accounts for the tension calculated being different than the one expected using the observed rate of rotation.<ref name=centrifugal>
| |
| | |
| See {{cite book |title=Analytical Mechanics |page=324 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=1J2hzvX2Xh8C&pg=PA324 |isbn=0-521-57572-9 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1998 |author=Louis N. Hand, Janet D. Finch}} and {{cite book |title=The Cambridge companion to Newton |url =http://books.google.com/books?id=3wIzvqzfUXkC&pg=PA43 |author=I. Bernard Cohen, George Edwin Smith |page=43 |isbn=0-521-65696-6 |year=2002 |publisher=Cambridge University Press}}
| |
| | |
| </ref> It is one of five [[argument]]s from the "properties, causes, and effects" of true motion and rest that support his contention that, in general, true motion and rest cannot be defined as special instances of motion or rest relative to other bodies, but instead can be defined only by reference to [[absolute space]]. Alternatively, these experiments provide an [[operational definition]] of what is meant by "[[absolute rotation]]", and do not pretend to address the question of "rotation relative to ''what''?".<ref name=Cohen>{{cite book |title=The Cambridge Companion to Newton |page=43 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=3wIzvqzfUXkC&pg=PA44&dq=centrifugal+Einstein+rotating+globes&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=ACfU3U3jJ17ym_ZZ3cNMJl9oTjzKVyQCRQ#PPA43,M1 |isbn=0-521-65696-6 |year=2002 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |author=Robert Disalle (I. Bernard Cohen & George E. Smith, editors) }}</ref>
| |
| | |
| ==Background==
| |
| Newton was concerned to address the problem of how it is that we can experimentally determine the true motions of bodies in light of the fact that absolute space is not something that can be perceived. Such determination, he says, can be accomplished by observing the causes of motion (that is, ''forces'') and not simply the apparent motions of bodies relative to one another (as in the [[bucket argument]]). As an example where causes can be observed, if two [[globe]]s, floating in [[space]], are connected by a cord, measuring the amount of [[tension (mechanics)|tension]] in the cord, with no other clues to assess the situation, alone suffices to indicate how fast the two objects are revolving around the common center of mass. (This experiment involves observation of a force, the tension). Also, the sense of the rotation —whether it is in the clockwise or the counter-clockwise direction— can be discovered by applying forces to opposite faces of the globes and ascertaining whether this leads to an increase or a decrease in the tension of the cord (again involving a force). Alternatively, the sense of the rotation can be determined by measuring the apparent motion of the globes with respect to a background system of bodies that, according to the preceding methods, have been established already as not in a state of rotation, as an example from Newton's time, the [[fixed stars]].
| |
| | |
| In the 1846 Andrew Motte translation of Newton's words:<ref name=spheres>See the ''Principia'' on line at <!-- Dead link at 2010-05-13 -- [http://ia310114.us.archive.org/2/items/newtonspmathema00newtrich/newtonspmathema00newtrich.pdf Andrew Motte Translation] pp. 79-81 -- but try this instead: -->{{cite web|url=http://gravitee.tripod.com/definitions.htm|title=Definitions|work=The Principia|accessdate=2010-05-13}}</ref><ref name=Born>{{cite book |title=Einstein's Theory of Relativity |author=Max Born |page=80 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Afeff9XNwgoC&pg=PA80&vq=tension&dq=%22inertial+forces%22&lr=&as_brr=0&source=gbs_search_s&sig=ACfU3U1EU8_hilsGndZGV316wgtiVsCYNA
| |
| |isbn=0-486-60769-0 |year=1962 |publisher=Courier Dover Publications}}</ref>
| |
| {{Quotation|We have some arguments to guide us, partly from the apparent motions, which are the differences of the true motions; partly from the forces, which are the causes and effects of the true motions. For instance, if two globes kept at a given distance one from the other, by means of a cord that connects them, were revolved about their common center of gravity; we might, from the tension of the cord, discover the endeavor of the globes to recede from the axis of their motion. ... And thus we might find both the quantity and the determination of this circular motion, even in an immense vacuum, where there was nothing external or sensible with which the globes could be compared.|Isaac Newton, ''Principia'', Book 1, Scholium}}
| |
| | |
| To summarize this proposal, here is a quote from Born:<ref name=Born2>{{cite book |title=Einstein's Theory of Relativity |author=Max Born |page=82 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Afeff9XNwgoC&pg=PA76&dq=%22inertial+forces%22&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=0kiN27BqUqHaZ9CkPdqLIjr-Nnw#PPA82,M1 |isbn=0-486-60769-0 |publisher=Courier Dover Publications |year=1962 |edition=Greatly revised and enlarged}}</ref>
| |
| {{Quotation|If the earth were at rest, and if, instead, the whole stellar system were to rotate in the opposite sense once around the earth in twenty-four hours, then, according to Newton, the centrifugal forces [presently attributed to the earth's rotation] would not occur.|Max Born: ''Einstein's Theory of Relativity'', pp. 81-82}}
| |
| | |
| Mach took some issue with the argument, pointing out that the rotating sphere experiment could never be done in an ''empty'' universe, where possibly Newton's laws do not apply, so the experiment really only shows what happens when the spheres rotate in ''our'' universe, and therefore, for example, may indicate only rotation relative to the entire mass of the universe.<ref name="Cohen"/><ref name=Wheeler>{{cite book |title=Gravitation and Inertia |author=Ignazio Ciufolini, John Archibald Wheeler |pages=386–387 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=UYIs1ndbi38C&pg=RA1-PA386&dq=centrifugal+Einstein+rotating+globes&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=ACfU3U0xOM1OCQs8N3I8lPfGDgETh25QGQ#PRA1-PA387,M1 |isbn=0-691-03323-4 |year=1995 |publisher=Princeton University Press }}</ref>
| |
| {{Quotation|For me, only relative motions exist…When a body rotates relatively to the fixed stars, centrifugal forces are produced; when it rotates relatively to some different body and not relative to the fixed stars, no centrifugal forces are produced.|Ernst Mach; as quoted by [[Ignazio Ciufolini|Ciufolini]] and [[John Archibald Wheeler|Wheeler]]: ''Gravitation and Inertia'', p. 387}}
| |
| An interpretation that avoids this conflict is to say that the rotating spheres experiment does not really define rotation ''relative'' to anything in particular (for example, absolute space or fixed stars); rather the experiment is an [[operational definition]] of what is meant by the motion called ''absolute rotation''.<ref name=Cohen/>
| |
| | |
| [[File:Rotating spheres.PNG|thumb|180px|Figure 1: Two spheres tied with a string and rotating at an angular rate ω. Because of the rotation, the string tying the spheres together is under tension.]]
| |
| | |
| [[File:Rotating-sphere forces.PNG|thumb|Figure 2: Exploded view of rotating spheres in an inertial frame of reference showing the centripetal forces on the spheres provided by the tension in the tying string.]]
| |
| | |
| ==Formulation of the argument==
| |
| This sphere example was used by Newton himself to discuss the detection of rotation relative to absolute space.<ref name=Born1>{{cite book |title= Einstein's Theory of Relativity |author=Max Born |year=1962 |isbn=0-486-60769-0 |publisher=Courier Dover Publications |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Afeff9XNwgoC&pg=PA76&dq=%22inertial+forces%22&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=0kiN27BqUqHaZ9CkPdqLIjr-Nnw#PPA79,M1 |page=Figure 43, p. 79}}</ref> Checking the fictitious force needed to account for the tension in the string is one way for an observer to decide whether or not they are rotating – if the fictitious force is zero, they are not rotating.<ref name=Novikov>{{cite book |title=Relativistic Astrophysics |page=167 |author=D. Lynden-Bell (Igorʹ Dmitrievich Novikov, Bernard Jean Trefor Jones, Draza Marković, editors) |isbn=0-521-62113-5 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1996 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=KgyIGHqueFsC&pg=PA167&dq=rotating+tension+Newton&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=ACfU3U0I1UsK2DzTVsN3vxPCxhdpN0sI4g#PPA167,M1}}</ref> (Of course, in an extreme case like the [[gravitron]] amusement ride, you do not need much convincing that you are rotating, but standing on the Earth's surface, the matter is more subtle.) Below, the mathematical details behind this observation are presented.
| |
| | |
| Figure 1 shows two identical spheres rotating about the center of the string joining them. The axis of rotation is shown as a vector '''Ω''' with direction given by the [[right-hand rule]] and magnitude equal to the rate of rotation: '''|Ω|''' = ω. The angular rate of rotation ω is assumed independent of time ([[uniform circular motion]]). Because of the rotation, the string is under tension. (See [[reactive centrifugal force]].) The description of this system next is presented from the viewpoint of an inertial frame and from a rotating frame of reference.
| |
| | |
| ===Inertial frame===
| |
| | |
| Adopt an inertial frame centered at the midpoint of the string. The balls move in a circle about the origin of our coordinate system. Look first at one of the two balls. To travel in a circular path, which is ''not'' uniform motion with constant velocity, but ''circular'' motion at constant speed, requires a force to act on the ball so as to continuously change the direction of its velocity. This force is directed inward, along the direction of the string, and is called a [[centripetal force]]. The other ball has the same requirement, but being on the opposite end of the string, requires a centripetal force of the same size, but opposite in direction. See Figure 2. These two forces are provided by the string, putting the string under tension, also shown in Figure 2.
| |
| | |
| ====Rotating frame====
| |
| | |
| Adopt a rotating frame at the midpoint of the string. Suppose the frame rotates at the same angular rate as the balls, so the balls appear stationary in this rotating frame. Because the balls are not moving, observers say they are at rest. If they now apply Newton's law of inertia, they would say no force acts on the balls, so the string should be relaxed. However, they clearly see the string is under tension. (For example, they could split the string and put a spring in its center, which would stretch.)<ref name=Dainton>{{cite book |title=Time and Space |author=Barry Dainton |page=175 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=FZIpo06bdCsC&pg=PA175&dq=rotating+tension+Newton&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=ACfU3U1yoIf8yYdFe7Ulf41wde63EO0_JA#PPA175,M1 |isbn=0-7735-2306-5 |year=2001 |publisher=McGill-Queen's Press }}</ref> To account for this tension, they propose that in their frame a centrifugal force acts on the two balls, pulling them apart. This force originates from nowhere – it is just a "fact of life" in this rotating world, and acts on everything they observe, not just these spheres. In resisting this ubiquitous centrifugal force, the string is placed under tension, accounting for their observation, despite the fact that the spheres are at rest.<ref name=Knudsen>{{cite book |title=Elements of Newtonian Mechanics |page=161 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Urumwws_lWUC&pg=PA161&dq=rotating+tension+Newton&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=ACfU3U1zK8HORJgVi2tuilW280ogciSIww |isbn=3-540-67652-X |author=Jens M. Knudsen & Poul G. Hjorth |publisher=Springer |year=2000 }}</ref>
| |
| | |
| ====Coriolis force====
| |
| {{main|Coriolis effect}}
| |
| | |
| What if the spheres are ''not'' rotating in the inertial frame (string tension is zero)? Then string tension in the rotating frame also is zero. But how can that be? The spheres in the rotating frame now appear to be rotating, and should require an inward force to do that. According to the analysis of [[uniform circular motion]]:<ref name=Joos>{{cite book |title=Theoretical Physics|author= Georg Joos & Ira M. Freeman|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=vIw5m2XuvpIC&pg=PA233&dq=inauthor:joos+coriolis&ei=EpgtSMitA4vcywSokozNAw&sig=wveOPKIvSGTCKQSpw-2jFQRe79M#PPA233,M1
| |
| |page=233 |isbn=0-486-65227-0 |publisher=Courier Dover Publications |location=New York|year=1986}}</ref>
| |
| <ref name=Taylor2>{{cite book |title=Classical Mechanics |author=John Robert Taylor|pages=348–349 |location=Sausalito CA |isbn=1-891389-22-X |year=2004 |url=http://books.google.com/books?lr=&as_brr=0&q=%22include+when+you+want+to+use+Newton%27s+second+law+in+a+rotating+frame.+This+is+the+Coriolis%22&btnG=Search+Books |publisher=University Science Books}}</ref>
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \mathbf{F}_{\mathrm{centripetal}} = -m \mathbf{\Omega \ \times} \left( \mathbf{\Omega \times x_B }\right) \ </math>
| |
| :::::<math> = -m\omega^2 R\ \mathbf{u}_R \ ,</math>
| |
| | |
| where '''u'''<sub>R</sub> is a unit vector pointing from the axis of rotation to one of the spheres, and '''Ω''' is a vector representing the angular rotation, with magnitude ω and direction normal to the [[plane of rotation]] given by the [[right-hand rule]], ''m'' is the mass of the ball, and ''R'' is the distance from the axis of rotation to the spheres (the magnitude of the displacement vector, |'''x'''<sub>B</sub>| = ''R'', locating one or the other of the spheres). According to the rotating observer, shouldn't the tension in the string be twice as big as before (the tension from the centrifugal force ''plus'' the extra tension needed to provide the centripetal force of rotation)? The reason the rotating observer sees zero tension is because of yet another fictitious force in the rotating world, the [[Coriolis force]], which depends on the velocity of a moving object. In this zero-tension case, according to the rotating observer the spheres now are moving, and the Coriolis force (which depends upon velocity) is activated. According to the article [[fictitious force]], the Coriolis force is:<ref name=Joos/>
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| \mathbf{F}_{\mathrm{fict}} = - 2 m \boldsymbol\Omega \times \mathbf{v}_{B} \ </math>
| |
| | |
| :::<math> = -2m \omega \left( \omega R \right)\ \mathbf{u}_R , </math>
| |
| | |
| where ''R'' is the distance to the object from the center of rotation, and '''v'''<sub>B</sub> is the velocity of the object subject to the Coriolis force, |'''v'''<sub>B</sub>| = ω''R''.
| |
| | |
| In the geometry of this example, this Coriolis force has twice the magnitude of the ubiquitous centrifugal force and is exactly opposite in direction. Therefore, it cancels out the ubiquitous centrifugal force found in the first example, and goes a step further to provide exactly the centripetal force demanded by uniform circular motion, so the rotating observer calculates there is no need for tension in the string − the Coriolis force looks after everything.
| |
| | |
| ====General case====
| |
| | |
| What happens if the spheres rotate at one angular rate, say ω<sub>I</sub> (''I'' = inertial), and the frame rotates at a different rate ω<sub>R</sub> (''R'' = rotational)? The inertial observers see circular motion and the tension in the string exerts a centripetal inward force on the spheres of:
| |
| | |
| :<math>\mathbf{T} = -m \omega_I^2 R \mathbf{u}_R \ . </math>
| |
| | |
| This force also is the force due to tension seen by the rotating observers. The rotating observers see the spheres in circular motion with angular rate ω<sub>S</sub> = ω<sub>I</sub> − ω<sub>R</sub> (''S'' = spheres). That is, if the frame rotates more slowly than the spheres, ω<sub>S</sub> > 0 and the spheres advance counterclockwise around a circle, while for a more rapidly moving frame, ω<sub>S</sub> < 0, and the spheres appear to retreat clockwise around a circle. In either case, the rotating observers see circular motion and require a net inward centripetal force:
| |
| | |
| :<math>\mathbf{F}_{\mathrm{Centripetal}} = -m \omega_S^2 R \mathbf{u}_R \ . </math>
| |
| | |
| However, this force is not the tension in the string. So the rotational observers conclude that a force exists (which the inertial observers call a fictitious force) so that:
| |
| | |
| :<math>\mathbf{F}_{\mathrm{Centripetal}} = \mathbf{T} + \mathbf{F}_{\mathrm{Fict}}\ , </math>
| |
| | |
| or,
| |
| | |
| :<math> \mathbf{F}_{\mathrm{Fict}} = -m \left( \omega_S^2 R -\omega_I^2 R \right) \mathbf{u}_R \ . </math>
| |
| | |
| The fictitious force changes sign depending upon which of ω<sub>I</sub> and ω<sub>S</sub> is greater. The reason for the sign change is that when ω<sub>I</sub> > ω<sub>S</sub>, the spheres actually are moving faster than the rotating observers measure, so they measure a tension in the string that actually is larger than they expect; hence, the fictitious force must increase the tension (point outward). When ω<sub>I</sub> < ω<sub>S</sub>, things are reversed so the fictitious force has to decrease the tension, and therefore has the opposite sign (points inward).
| |
| | |
| =====Is the fictitious force ''ad hoc''?=====
| |
| | |
| The introduction of '''F'''<sub>Fict</sub> allows the rotational observers and the inertial observers to agree on the tension in the string. However, we might ask: "Does this solution fit in with general experience with other situations, or is it simply a "cooked up" ''[[ad hoc]]'' solution?" That question is answered by seeing how this value for '''F'''<sub>Fict</sub> squares with the general result (derived in [[Fictitious force]]):<ref name=Srivastava>Many sources are cited in [[Fictitious force]]. Here are two more: {{cite book |title=Mechanics |author=PF Srivastava |publisher=New Age International Publishers |year=2007 |isbn=978-81-224-1905-4 |location=New Delhi |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=yCw_Hq53ipsC&pg=PA46&dq=spheres+rotating++Coriolis&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=XJ1Xl2Qs1_j5RkLN70wxyUO6Vgc#PPA43,M1 |page=43 }} and {{cite book |author=NC Rana and PS Joag |year=2004 |title=Mechanics |isbn= 0-07-460315-9 |publisher=Tata McGraw-Hill |location=New Delhi |page =99ff |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=dptKVr-5LJAC&pg=PA28&dq=connected+rotating+%22two+spheres%22&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=Hu4brsD2Jkc25AOPwZLPuQ28uPE#PPA99,M1}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| :<math>
| |
| \mathbf{F}_{\mathrm{Fict}} =
| |
| - 2 m \boldsymbol\Omega \times \mathbf{v}_{B} - m \boldsymbol\Omega \times (\boldsymbol\Omega \times \mathbf{x}_B ) </math> <math>\ - m \frac{d \boldsymbol\Omega }{dt} \times \mathbf{x}_B \ .
| |
| </math>
| |
| | |
| The subscript ''B'' refers to quantities referred to the non-inertial coordinate system. Full notational details are in [[Fictitious_force#Mathematical_derivation_of_fictitious_forces|Fictitious force]]. For constant angular rate of rotation the last term is zero. To evaluate the other terms we need the position of one of the spheres:
| |
| | |
| :<math> \mathbf{x}_B = R\mathbf{u}_R \ , </math>
| |
| | |
| and the velocity of this sphere as seen in the rotating frame:
| |
| | |
| :<math>\mathbf{v}_B = \omega_SR \mathbf{u}_{\theta} \ ,</math>
| |
| | |
| where '''u'''<sub>θ</sub> is a unit vector perpendicular to '''u'''<sub>R</sub> pointing in the direction of motion.
| |
| | |
| The frame rotates at a rate ω<sub>R</sub>, so the vector of rotation is '''Ω''' = ω<sub>R</sub> '''u'''<sub>z</sub> ('''u'''<sub>z</sub> a unit vector in the ''z''-direction), and '''Ω × u'''<sub>R</sub> = ω<sub>R</sub> ('''u'''<sub>z</sub> × '''u'''<sub>R</sub>) = ω<sub>R</sub> '''u'''<sub>θ</sub> ; '''Ω × u'''<sub>θ</sub> = −ω<sub>R</sub> '''u'''<sub>R</sub>. The centrifugal force is then:
| |
| :<math>\mathbf{F}_\mathrm{Cfgl} = - m \boldsymbol\Omega \times (\boldsymbol\Omega \times \mathbf{x}_B ) =m\omega_R^2 R \mathbf{u}_R\ ,</math>
| |
| which naturally depends only on the rate of rotation of the frame and is always outward. The Coriolis force is
| |
| :<math>\mathbf{F}_\mathrm{Cor} = - 2 m \boldsymbol\Omega \times \mathbf{v}_{B} = 2m\omega_S \omega_R R \mathbf{u}_R </math>
| |
| | |
| and has the ability to change sign, being outward when the spheres move faster than the frame ( ω<sub>S</sub> > 0 ) and being inward when the spheres move slower than the frame ( ω<sub>S</sub> < 0 ).<ref>The case ω<sub>S</sub> < 0 applies to the earlier example with [[#Coriolis force|spheres at rest]] in the inertial frame.</ref> Combining the terms:<ref name=Stommel>This result can be compared with Eq. (3.3) in Stommel and Moore. They obtain the equation <math>\ddot{r}-\omega_S^2 r = 2\omega_S \omega_R r + \omega_R^2 r </math> where <math>\omega_S = \dot \phi ' </math> and <math>\omega_R = \Omega \ </math> in their notation, and the left-hand side is the radial acceleration in polar coordinates according to the rotating observers. In this example, their Eq. (3.4) for the azimuthal acceleration is zero because the radius is fixed and there is no angular acceleration. See {{cite book |title=An Introduction to the Coriolis Force |author=Henry Stommel, Dennis W. Moore |page=55 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=-JQx_t3yGB4C&printsec=frontcover&dq=coriolis+inauthor:Stommel&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=ACfU3U0gX4wrzVzo7bwD7I8HJ_bd24e2Rg#PPA55,M1 |isbn=0-231-06636-8 |publisher=Columbia University Press |year=1989}}</ref>
| |
| :<math>
| |
| \mathbf{F}_{\mathrm{Fict}} = \mathbf{F}_\mathrm{Cfgl} + \mathbf{F}_\mathrm{Cor}</math> <math> =\left( m\omega_R^2 R + 2m\omega_S \omega_R R\right) \mathbf{u}_R = m\omega_R \left( \omega_R + 2\omega_S \right) R \mathbf{u}_R </math>
| |
| ::<math>=m(\omega_I-\omega_S)(\omega_I+\omega_S)\ R \mathbf{u}_R = -m \left(\omega_S^2-\omega_I^2\right)\ R \mathbf{u}_R . </math>
| |
| Consequently, the fictitious force found above for this problem of rotating spheres is consistent with the general result and is not an ''[[ad hoc]]'' solution just "cooked up" to bring about agreement for this single example. Moreover, it is the Coriolis force that makes it possible for the fictitious force to change sign depending upon which of ω<sub>I</sub>, ω<sub>S</sub> is the greater, inasmuch as the centrifugal force contribution always is outward.
| |
| | |
| ==Rotation and cosmic background radiation==
| |
| The isotropy of the [[cosmic background radiation]] is another indicator that the universe does not rotate.<ref name=rotate>{{cite book |author=R. B. Partridge |title=3 K: The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=0-521-35254-1 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=JJc7b-0Riq4C&pg=PA279&dq=Hawking+isotropy++rotation+%22cosmic+background+radiation%22&lr=&as_brr=0#PPA279,M1 |pages=279–280 |year=1995}}, {{Cite book |title=Relativistic Astrophysics |author=D. Lynden-Bell |page=167 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=KgyIGHqueFsC&pg=PA167&dq=rotating+tension+Newton&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=ACfU3U0I1UsK2DzTVsN3vxPCxhdpN0sI4g#PPA167,M1 |isbn=0-521-62113-5 |year=1996 |edition=Igorʹ Dmitrievich Novikov, Bernard Jean Trefor Jones, Draza Marković (Editors)}}, and {{cite book |title=Big bang cosmology and the cosmic black-body radiation |edition=in ''Proc. Am. Phil. Soc.'' vol. 119, no. 5 (1975) |pages=325–348 |author=Ralph A. Alpher and Robert Herman |year=1975 |url= http://books.google.com/books?id=1T0LAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA344&dq=Hawking+isotropy++rotation+%22cosmic+background+radiation%22&lr=&as_brr=0#PPA324,M1}} {{cite book |title=Nothingness |author=Henning Genz |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Cn_Q9wbDOM0C&pg=PA275&lpg=PA275&dq=cosmic+background+%22rotation+of+the+universe%22&source=web&ots=rm3S3h9Vzx&sig=8l2bEDx4AnBfgnQmfVQ2yS7CO00&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=8&ct=result |page=275 |isbn=0-7382-0610-5 |publisher=Da Capo Press |year=2001}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| ==See also==
| |
| {{Col-begin}}
| |
| {{Col-1-of-3}}
| |
| *[[Bucket argument]]
| |
| *[[Centrifugal force (rotating reference frame)]]
| |
| *[[Fictitious force]]
| |
| *[[Mach's principle]]
| |
| {{Col-2-of-3}}
| |
| *[[Mechanics of planar particle motion]]
| |
| *[[Sagnac effect]]
| |
| *[[Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe]]
| |
| {{Col-3-of-3}}
| |
| {{Wikipedia books|Isaac Newton}}
| |
| {{col-end}}
| |
| | |
| ==References and notes==
| |
| <references/>
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Isaac Newton]]
| |
| [[Category:Classical mechanics]]
| |
| [[Category:Thought experiments in physics]]
| |
e - Shop Word - Press is a excellent cart for your on the web shopping organization. If you loved this post and you would like to obtain more facts concerning wordpress backup plugin kindly pay a visit to our own web site. This one is one of the most beneficial features of Word - Press as this feature allows users to define the user roles. Change the site's theme and you have essentially changed the site's personality. After confirming the account, login with your username and password at Ad - Mob. In the most current edition you can customize your retailer layout and display hues and fonts similar to your site or blog.
The Internet is a vast open market where businesses and consumers congregate. Wordpress have every reason with it which promote wordpress development. This is the reason for the increased risk of Down Syndrome babies in women over age 35. t need to use the back button or the URL to get to your home page. Akismet is really a sophisticated junk e-mail blocker and it's also very useful thinking about I recieve many junk e-mail comments day-to-day across my various web-sites.
But before choosing any one of these, let's compare between the two. s cutthroat competition prevailing in the online space won. all the necessary planning and steps of conversion is carried out in this phase, such as splitting, slicing, CSS code, adding images, header footer etc. The animation can be quite subtle these as snow falling gently or some twinkling start in the track record which are essentially not distracting but as an alternative gives some viewing enjoyment for the visitor of the internet site. " Thus working with a Word - Press powered web application, making any changes in the website design or website content is really easy and self explanatory.
Digg Digg Social Sharing - This plugin that is accountable for the floating social icon located at the left aspect corner of just about every submit. I didn't straight consider near it solon than one distance, I got the Popup Ascendancy plugin and it's up and lengthways, likely you make seen it today when you visited our blog, and I yet customize it to fit our Thesis Wound which gives it a rattling uncomparable visage and search than any different popup you know seen before on any added journal, I hump arrogated asset of one of it's quatern themes to make our own. re creating a Word - Press design yourself, the good news is there are tons of Word - Press themes to choose from. The most important plugins you will need are All-in-One SEO Pack, some social bookmarking plugin, a Feedburner plugin and an RSS sign up button. If your blog employs the permalink function, This gives your SEO efforts a boost, and your visitors will know firsthand what's in the post when seeing the URL.
A sitemap is useful for enabling web spiders and also on rare occasions clients, too, to more easily and navigate your website. When you sign up with Wordpress, you gain access to several different templates and plug-in that allow you to customize your blog so that it fits in with your business website design seamlessly. Useful Plugins Uber - Menu Top Megamenu Now it is the time of sticky Top navbar. Change the entire appearance of you blog using themes with one click. You can check out the statistics of page of views for your web pages using free tools that are available on the internet.