|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Disputed|date=April 2010}}
| | Bonus: WP Twin and WP Twin Auto Backup: (link to ) While not a theme, I think this software is essential if you are maintaining your Wordpress blog or regularly create new blog sites. You can either install Word - Press yourself or use free services offered on the web today. This is a service where people write articles using a specific keyword you have given them. Donor oocytes and menopausal pregnancy: Oocyte donation to women of advanced reproductive age: pregnancy results and obstetrical outcomes in patients 45 years and older. If you are happy with your new look then click "Activate 'New Theme'" in the top right corner. <br><br> |
|
| |
|
| An LC circuit can be quantized using the same methods as [[harmonic potential|Quantum harmonic oscillator]]. An '''LC circuit''' is a variety of '''resonant circuit''' or '''tuned circuit''' and consists of an [[inductor]], represented by the letter L, and a [[capacitor]], represented by the letter C. When connected together, an [[electric current]] can alternate between them at the circuit's [[resonant frequency]]: Since an LC circuit is nothing more than a harmonic oscillator where charge is the conjugate variable, the quantum mechanically solution is known exactly.
| | Luckily, for Word - Press users, WP Touch plugin transforms your site into an IPhone style theme. The higher your blog ranks on search engines, the more likely people will find your online marketing site. We also help to integrate various plug-ins to expand the functionalities of the web application. It primarily lays emphasis on improving the search engine results of your website whenever a related query is typed in the search box. W3C compliant HTML and a good open source powered by Word - Press CMS site is regarded as the prime minister. <br><br>Digital photography is a innovative effort, if you removethe stress to catch every position and viewpoint of a place, you free yourself up to be more innovative and your outcomes will be much better. The following piece of content is meant to make your choice easier and reassure you that the decision to go ahead with this conversion is requited with rich benefits:. Whether or not it's an viewers on your web page, your social media pages, or your web page, those who have a present and effective viewers of "fans" are best best for provide provides, reductions, and deals to help re-invigorate their viewers and add to their main point here. Nonetheless, with stylish Facebook themes obtainable on the Globe Broad Internet, half of your enterprise is done previously. If you liked this write-up and you would like to get a lot more facts pertaining to [http://xib.me/wordpressbackupplugin475781 wordpress dropbox backup] kindly go to our webpage. Websites using this content based strategy are always given top scores by Google. <br><br>It is the convenient service through which professionals either improve the position or keep the ranking intact. Quttera - Quttera describes itself as a 'Saa - S [Software as a Service] web-malware monitoring and alerting solution for websites of any size and complexity. re creating a Word - Press design yourself, the good news is there are tons of Word - Press themes to choose from. If you choose a blog then people will be able to post articles on your site and people will be able to make comments on your posts (unless you turn comments off). It does take time to come up having a website that gives you the much needed results hence the web developer must be ready to help you along the route. <br><br>More it extends numerous opportunities where your firm is at comfort and rest assured of no risks & errors. Automated deal feed integration option to populate your blog with relevant deals. It's not a secret that a lion share of activity on the internet is takes place on the Facebook. If this is not possible you still have the choice of the default theme that is Word - Press 3. Get started today so that people searching for your type of business will be directed to you. |
| | |
| :<math>\omega = \sqrt{1 \over LC}</math>
| |
| | |
| where '''L''' is the [[inductance]] in [[Henry (unit)|henries]], and '''C''' is the [[capacitance]] in [[farad]]s. The [[angular frequency]] <math>\omega\,</math> has units of [[radian]]s per second. A capacitor stores energy in the electric field between the plates, which can be written as follows:
| |
| | |
| :<math>U=\frac{1}{2} C V^2 =\frac{Q^2}{2C}</math> since <math>C=\frac{Q}{V}</math>
| |
| | |
| Likewise, an inductor stores energy in the magnetic field depending on the current, which can be written as follows:
| |
| | |
| :<math>U=\frac{1}{2} L I^2 =\frac{\phi^2}{2L}</math> since <math>\phi=L I \ </math>
| |
| | |
| Using charge as the conjugate variable, and magnetic flux as the conjugate "momentum", one can develop a Schrödinger equation to describe the stored energy in the system.
| |
| | |
| :<math>i \hbar \frac{d\psi}{dt} = - \frac{\hbar^2}{2 L} \nabla^2 \psi+\frac{Q^2}{2C} \psi </math> where <math> \psi </math> is a function of charge
| |
| | |
| ==One-dimensional harmonic oscillator==
| |
| | |
| ===Hamiltonian and energy eigenstates===
| |
| [[Image:HarmOsziFunktionen.png|thumb|Wavefunction representations for the first eight bound eigenstates, ''n'' = 0 to 7. The horizontal axis shows the position ''x''. The graphs are not normalised]]
| |
| | |
| [[Image:QHarmonicOscillator.png|right|thumb|Probability densities <nowiki>|</nowiki>''ψ<sub>n</sub>''(''x'')<nowiki>|</nowiki><sup>2</sup> <!--or in pseudoTeX: <math>\left |\psi_n(x)\right |^2</math> --> for the bound eigenstates, beginning with the ground state (''n'' = 0) at the bottom and increasing in energy toward the top. The horizontal axis shows the position ''x'', and brighter colors represent higher probability densities.]]
| |
| Like the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator problem, an LC circuit can be quantized by either solving the Schrödinger equation or using creation and annihilation operators. The energy stored in the inductor can be looked at as a "kinetic energy term" and the energy stored in the capacitor can be looked at as a "potential energy term".
| |
| | |
| The Hamiltonian of such a system is:
| |
| | |
| :<math> H=\frac{\phi^2}{2L} + \frac{1}{2} L \omega ^2 Q^2</math>
| |
| | |
| where Q is the charge operator, and <math> \phi </math> is the magnetic flux operator. The first term represents the energy stored in an inductor, and the second term represents the energy stored in a capacitor. In order to find the energy levels and the corresponding energy eigenstates, we must solve the time-independent Schrödinger equation,
| |
| | |
| :<math> H |\psi> =E |\psi> \ </math>
| |
| :<math>E \psi = - \frac{\hbar^2}{2 L} \nabla^2 \psi+\frac{1}{2} L \omega ^2 Q^2 \psi </math>
| |
| | |
| Since an LC circuit really is an electrical analog to the harmonic oscillator, solving the Schrödinger equation yields a family of solutions (the Hermite polynomials).
| |
| | |
| :<math> \left\langle Q | \psi_n \right\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{1}{2^n\,n!}} \cdot \left(\frac{L\omega}{\pi \hbar}\right)^{1/4} \cdot \exp
| |
| \left(- \frac{L\omega Q^2}{2 \hbar} \right) \cdot H_n\left(\sqrt{\frac{L\omega}{\hbar}} Q \right) </math>
| |
| :<math> n = 0, 1, 2, \ldots</math>
| |
| | |
| ==Magnetic Flux as a Conjugate Variable==
| |
| A completely equivalent solution can be found using magnetic flux as the conjugate variable where the conjugate "momentum" is equal to capacitance times the time derivative of magnetic flux. The conjugate "momentum" is really the charge.
| |
| | |
| :<math> \pi = C \frac{d\phi}{dt}</math>
| |
| | |
| Using Kirchhoff's Junction Rule, the following relationship can be obtained:
| |
| | |
| :<math>C \frac{dV}{dt} + \frac{1}{L} \int_0^t V\,dt \, =0</math>
| |
| | |
| Since <math> V= \frac{d\phi}{dt} </math>, the above equation can be written as follows:
| |
| | |
| :<math>C \frac{d^2 \phi}{dt^2} + \frac{1}{L} \phi \, =0</math>
| |
| | |
| Converting this into a Hamiltonian, one can develop a Schrödinger equation as follows:
| |
| | |
| :<math>i \hbar \frac{d\psi}{dt} = - \frac{\hbar^2}{2 C} \nabla^2 \psi+\frac{\phi^2}{2L} \psi </math> where <math> \psi </math> is a function of magnetic flux
| |
| | |
| ==Quantization of coupled LC circuits==
| |
| Two inductively coupled LC circuits have a non-zero mutual inductance. This is equivalent to a pair of harmonic oscillators with a kinetic coupling term.
| |
| | |
| The Lagrangian for an inductively coupled pair of LC circuits is as follows:
| |
| | |
| :<math> L= \frac{1}{2} L_1 \frac{dQ_1}{dt} ^2 + \frac{1}{2} L_2 \frac{dQ_2}{dt} ^2+ m \frac{dQ_1}{dt} \frac{dQ_2}{dt} - \frac{Q_1^2}{2C_1} - \frac{Q_2^2}{2C_2} </math>
| |
| | |
| As usual, the Hamiltonian is obtained by a Legendre transform of the Lagrangian.
| |
| | |
| :<math> H=\frac{1}{2} L_1 \frac{dQ_1}{dt} ^2 + \frac{1}{2} L_2 \frac{dQ_2}{dt} ^2+ m \frac{dQ_1}{dt} \frac{dQ_2}{dt} + \frac{Q_1^2}{2C_1} + \frac{Q_2^2}{2C_2} </math>
| |
| | |
| Promoting the observables to quantum mechanical operators yields the following Schrödinger equation.
| |
| | |
| :<math>E \psi = - \frac{\hbar^2}{2 L_1} \frac{d^2 \psi}{d Q_1^2} - \frac{\hbar^2}{2 L_2} \frac{d^2 \psi}{d Q_2^2}- \frac{\hbar^2}{m} \frac{d^2 \psi}{d Q_1 d Q_2} +\frac{1}{2} L_1 \omega ^2 Q_1^2 \psi+\frac{1}{2} L_2 \omega ^2 Q_2^2 \psi </math>
| |
| | |
| One cannot proceed further using the above coordinates because of the coupled term. However, a coordinate transformation from the wave function as a function of both charges to the wave function as a function of the charge difference <math> Q_d </math>, where <math> Q_d =Q_1-Q_2</math> and a coordinate <math> Q_c </math>(somewhat analagous to a "Center-of-Mass"), the above Hamiltonian can be solved using the Separation of Variables technique.
| |
| | |
| The CM coordinate is as seen below:
| |
| | |
| :<math> Q_c=\frac{L_1 Q_1 +L_2 Q_2}{L_1 + L_2} </math>
| |
| | |
| The Hamiltonian under the new coordinate system is as follows:
| |
| | |
| :<math>E \psi = - \frac{\hbar^2 (1-\lambda)}{2 (L_1+L_2)} \frac{d^2 \psi}{d Q_c^2} - \frac{\hbar^2 (1-\lambda)}{2 \mu} \frac{d^2 \psi}{d Q_d^2}+\frac{1}{2} \mu \omega ^2 Q_d^2 \psi</math>
| |
| | |
| In the above equation <math> \lambda </math> is equal to <math> \frac{2 m}{L_1 + L_2} </math> and <math> \mu </math> equals the reduced inductance.
| |
| | |
| The separation of variables technique yields two equations, one for the "CM" coordinate that is the differential equation of a free particle, and the other for the charge difference coordinate, which is the Schrödinger equation for a harmonic oscillator.
| |
| | |
| :<math>E \psi_c = - \frac{\hbar^2 (1-\lambda)}{2 (L_1+L_2)} \frac{d^2 \psi_c}{d Q_c^2} </math>
| |
| | |
| :<math>E \psi_d = - \frac{\hbar^2 (1-\lambda)}{2 \mu} \frac{d^2 \psi_d}{d Q_d^2}+\frac{1}{2} \mu \omega ^2 Q_d^2 \psi_d </math>
| |
| | |
| The solution for the first differential equation once the time dependence is appended resembles a plane wave, while the solution of the second differential equation is seen above.
| |
| | |
| ==Hamiltonian mechanics==
| |
| | |
| ===Classical case===
| |
| Stored energy (Hamiltonian) for classical LC circuit:
| |
| :<math>\mathcal{H} = \frac{q^2(t)}{2C} + \frac{p^2(t)}{2L} \ </math>
| |
| Hamiltonian's equations:
| |
| :<math>\frac{\partial \mathcal{H}(q,p)}{\partial q} = \frac{q(t)}{C} = -\dot{p}(t) \ </math>
| |
| :<math>\frac{\partial \mathcal{H}(q,p)}{\partial p} = \frac{p(t)}{L} = -\dot{q}(t) \ </math>,
| |
| | |
| where <math>q(t) = Cv(t) \ </math> stored capacitor charge (or electric flux) and <math>p(t) = Li(t) \ </math> magnetic momentum (magnetic flux),
| |
| <math>v(t) - \ </math> capacitor voltage and <math>i(t) - \ </math> inductance current, <math>t - \ </math> time variable.
| |
| | |
| Nonzero initial conditions:
| |
| At <math>q(0), p(0) \ </math> we shall have oscillation frequency:
| |
| :<math>\omega = \frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}} \ </math>,
| |
| | |
| and wave impedance of the LC circuit (without dissipation):
| |
| :<math>\rho = \sqrt{\frac{L}{C}} \ </math>
| |
| | |
| Hamiltonian's equations solutions:
| |
| At <math>t \ge 0 \ </math> we shall have the following values of charges, magnetic flux and energy:
| |
| | |
| :<math>\mathbf{q} = q(0) + j\frac{p(0)}{\omega L} \ </math>
| |
| :<math><q(t) = Re[\mathbf{q}e^{-j\omega t}] \ </math>
| |
| :<math>p(t) = Im[\omega L\mathbf{q}e^{-j\omega t}] \ </math>
| |
| :<math>\mathcal{H} = \frac{|\mathbf{q}|^2}{2C} = constant \ </math>
| |
| | |
| ====Definition of the Phasor====
| |
| In the general case the wave amplitudes can be defined in the complex space
| |
| | |
| :<math>a(t) = a_1(t) + ja_2(t) \ </math>
| |
| where <math>j = \sqrt{-1} \ </math>.
| |
| | |
| <math>a_1(t) = \frac{q(t)}{q(0)} \ </math>,
| |
| | |
| where <math>q(0) = D(0)S_C = \sqrt{\frac{2\hbar}{\rho}} \ </math> - electric charge at zero time, <math>S_C - \ </math> capacitance area.
| |
| | |
| <math>a_2(t) = \frac{p(t)}{p(0)} \ </math>,
| |
| | |
| where <math>p(0) = \sqrt{2\hbar \rho} \ </math> - magnetic flux at zero time,
| |
| <math>S_L - \ </math> inductance area.
| |
| Note that, at the equal area elements
| |
| :<math>S_C = S_L = S_q \ </math>
| |
| | |
| we shall have the following relationship for the wave impedance:
| |
| :<math>\rho = \sqrt{\frac{L}{C}} = \frac{q(0)}{p(0)}</math>.
| |
| | |
| Wave amplitude and energy could be defined as:
| |
| :<math>a(t) = ae^{-j\omega t} \ </math>
| |
| :<math>\mathcal{H} = \hbar \omega [a_1^2(t) + a_2^2(t)] = \hbar \omega |a|^2 \ </math>.
| |
| | |
| ===Quantum case===
| |
| In the quantum case we have the following definition for momentum operator:
| |
| :<math>\hat{p} = -j\hbar \frac{\partial }{\partial q}</math>
| |
| Momentum and charge operators produce the following commutator:
| |
| :<math>[\hat{q},\hat{p}] = j\hbar \ </math>.
| |
| | |
| Amplitude operator can be defined as:
| |
| :<math>\hat {a} = \hat {a_1} + j\hat {a_2} = \frac{\hat {q}}{q_0} + j\frac{\hat {p}}{p_0} \ </math>,
| |
| and phazor: | |
| :<math>\hat {a(t)} = \hat {a}e^{-j\omega t} \ </math>.
| |
| Hamilton's operator will be:
| |
| :<math>\hat{\mathcal{H}} \hbar \omega [\hat{a}_1^2(t) + \hat {a}_2^2(t)] = \hbar \omega [\hat {a}\hat {a}^\dagger + 1/2] \ </math>
| |
| Amplitudes commutators:
| |
| :<math>[\hat{a}_1(t),\hat{a}_2(t)] = j/2 \ </math>
| |
| :<math>[\hat{a}(t),\hat{a}^\dagger(t)] = 1 \ </math>.
| |
| Heisenberg uncertainty principle:
| |
| :<math>\langle \Delta \hat{a}_1^2(t) \rangle \langle \Delta \hat{a}_2^2(t) \rangle \ge \frac{1}{16} \ </math>.
| |
| | |
| ====Wave impedance of free space====
| |
| When wave impedance of quantum LC circuit takes the value of free space
| |
| :<math>\rho_0 = \sqrt{\frac{L_0}{C_0}} = \sqrt{\frac{\mu_0}{\epsilon_0}} = 2\alpha \frac{h}{e^2}</math>,
| |
| where <math>e - \ </math> electron charge and <math>\alpha - \ </math> fine structure constant,
| |
| then "electric" and "magnetic" fluxes at zero time point will be:
| |
| :<math>q_0 = \sqrt{\frac{2\hbar}{\rho_0}} = \frac{e}{\sqrt{2\pi \alpha}} \ </math>
| |
| :<math>p_0 = \sqrt{2\hbar \rho_0} = \phi_0\sqrt{\frac{2\alpha}{\pi}} \ </math>,
| |
| where <math>\phi_0 = \frac{h}{e} - \ </math> magnetic flux quantum.
| |
| | |
| ==Quantum LC circuit paradox==
| |
| | |
| ===General formulation===
| |
| In the classical case the energy of LC circuit will be:
| |
| :<math>W_{LC} = W_C + W_L, \ </math>
| |
| where <math>W_C = 0.5CV_C^2 - \ </math> capacitance energy, and
| |
| <math>W_L = 0.5LI_L^2- \ </math> inductance energy. Furthermore, there are the following relationships between charges (electric or magnetic) and voltages or currents:
| |
| :<math>Q_C = CV_C \ </math>
| |
| :<math>\Phi_L = LI_L. \ </math>
| |
| Therefore the maximal values of capacitance and inductance energies will be:
| |
| :<math>W_{max} = W_{LC} = \frac{Q_{C0}^2}{2C} + \frac{\Phi_{L0}^2}{2L}. \ </math>
| |
| Note that the resonance frequency <math>\omega_0 = 1/\sqrt{LC} \ </math> has nothing to do with the energy in the classical case. But it has the following relationship with energy in the quantum case:
| |
| :<math>W_0 = \frac{\hbar \omega_0}{2} = \frac{\hbar}{2\sqrt{LC}}. \ </math>
| |
| So, in the quantum case, by filling capacitance with the one electron charge:
| |
| :<math>Q_{C0} = e = CV_C \ </math> and <math>W_C = \frac{e^2}{2C}. \ </math>
| |
| | |
| The relationship between capacitance energy and the ground state oscillator energy will then be:
| |
| :<math>\xi_C = \frac{W_C}{W_0} = \frac{2\pi}{R_H}\sqrt{\frac{L}{C}} = 2\pi \cdot \frac{\rho_q}{R_H}. \ </math>
| |
| where <math>\rho_q = \sqrt{L/C} \ </math> quantum impedance of LC circuit.
| |
| The quantum impedance of the quantum LC circuit could be in practice of the two types{{clarify|date=January 2014}}:
| |
| :<math>\rho_q = \sqrt{\frac{L}{C}} = \begin{cases} \rho_w = 2\alpha R_H, & \mbox{ - wave impedance } \\ \rho_{DOS} = R_H, & \mbox{ - DOS impedance } \end{cases}</math>
| |
| So, the energy relationships will be:
| |
| :<math>\xi_C = \frac{W_C}{W_0} = 2\pi\frac{\rho_q}{R_H} = \begin{cases} 4\pi \alpha, & \mbox{at }\rho_w \\ 2\pi, & \mbox{at }\rho_{DOS} \end{cases}</math>
| |
| and that is the main problem of the quantum LC circuit: ''energies stored on capacitance and inductance are not equal to the ground state energy of the quantum oscillator''.
| |
| This energy problem produces the quantum LC circuit paradox (QLCCP).{{Citation needed|date=April 2010}}
| |
| | |
| ===Possible solution===
| |
| Some simple solution of the QLCCP could be found in the following way. Yakymakha (1989) <ref name =Yakym2>Yakymakha O.L.(1989). ''High Temperature Quantum Galvanomagnetic Effects in the Two- Dimensional Inversion Layers of MOSFET's'' (In Russian). Kyiv: Vyscha Shkola. p. 91. ISBN 5-11-002309-3. [http://eqworld.ipmnet.ru/ru/library/books/Yakimaha1989ru.djvu djvu]</</ref>(eqn.30) proposed the following DOS quantum impedance definition:
| |
| :<math>\rho_{DOS}^{ij} = \frac{\Delta \Phi_j}{\Delta Q_i} = \frac{i}{j}R_H, \ </math>
| |
| where <math>\Delta \Phi_j = j\Phi_0- \ </math> magnetic flux, and
| |
| <math>\Delta Q_i = ie- \ </math> electric flux, <math>i, j = integer.</math>
| |
| | |
| So, there are no electric or magnetic charges in the quantum LC circuit, but electric and magnetic fluxes only. Therefore, not only in the DOS LC circuit, but in the other LC circuits too, there are the electromagnetic waves only.
| |
| Thus, the quantum LC circuit is the minimal geometrical/topological value of the quantum waveguide, in which there no electric or magnetic charges, but electromagnetic waves only.
| |
| Now we should consider the quantum LC circuit as an "black wave box" (BWB), which has no electric or magnetic charges, but waves.
| |
| Furthermore, this BWB could be "closed" (in Bohr atom or in the vacuum for photons), or "open" (as for QHE and Josephson junction).
| |
| So, the quantum LC circuit should has BWB and "input - output" supplements. The total energy balance should be calculated with considering of "input" and "output" devices.
| |
| Without "input - output" devices, the energies "stored" on capacitances and inductances are virtual or "characteristics", as in the case of characteristic impedance (without dissipation).
| |
| Very close to this approach now are Devoret (2004),<ref name =Devoret2>Devoret M.H., Martinis J.M. (2004). "Implementing Qubits with Superconducting Integrated Circuits". Quantum Information Processing, v.3, N1.
| |
| [http://www.springerlink.com/content/p3p4014256526027/ Pdf]</ref> which consider Josephson junctions with quantum inductance, Datta impedance of Schrödinger waves (2008) <ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timir_Datta also Datta & Tsu http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0311479</ref> and Tsu (2008),<ref name =Tsu2>Raphael Tsu and Timir Datta (2008) “Conductance and Wave Impedance of Electrons”.
| |
| Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Hangzhou, China, March 24–28
| |
| [http://piers.mit.edu/piersproceedings/download.php?file=cGllcnMyMDA4aGFuZ3pob3V8NUEyXzEyNjMucGRmfDA3MDkwNjE0NDY1NA== Pdf]</ref> which consider quantum wave guides.
| |
| | |
| ===Explanation for DOS quantum LC circuit===
| |
| As presented below, the resonance frequency for QHE is:
| |
| :<math>\omega_Q = \sqrt{\frac{1}{L_{QA}C_{QA}}} = \frac{\omega_B}{2\pi}, \ </math>
| |
| where <math>\omega_B = eB/m- \ </math>cyclotron frequency,
| |
| <math>L_{QA} = \frac{4\pi R_H }{\omega_B} \ </math> and
| |
| <math>C_{QA} = \frac{4\pi }{R_H\omega_B}. \ </math>
| |
| The scaling current for QHE will be:
| |
| :<math>I_B = \frac{e\omega_B}{4\pi}. \ </math>
| |
| Therefore, the inductance energy will be:
| |
| :<math>W_L = \frac{L_{QA}I_B^2}{2} = \frac{\hbar \omega_B}{4}. \ </math>
| |
| So for quantum magnetic flux <math>\Phi_0 = h/e \ </math>, inductance energy is half as much as the ground state oscillation energy. This is due to the spin of electron (there are two electrons on Landau level on the same quantum area element). Therefore, the inductance/capacitance energy considers the total Landau level energy per spin.
| |
| | |
| ===Explanation for "wave" quantum LC circuit===
| |
| By analogy to the DOS LC circuit, we have
| |
| :<math>W_0 = \frac{1}{2}\cdot \frac{W_C}{2\pi \alpha} = \frac{\gamma_{BY}W_C}{2} \ </math>
| |
| two times lesser value due to the spin. But here there is the new dimensionless fundamental constant:
| |
| :<math>\gamma_{BY} = \frac{1}{2\pi \alpha} \ </math>
| |
| which considers topological properties of the quantum LC circuit. This fundamental constant first appeared in the Bohr atom for Bohr radius:
| |
| :<math>a_B = \gamma_{BY}\cdot \lambda_0, \ </math>
| |
| where <math>\lambda_0 = h/m_0c - \ </math> Compton wavelength of electron.
| |
| | |
| Thus, the wave quantum LC circuit has no charges in it, but electromagnetic waves only. So capacitance or inductance "characteristic energies" are
| |
| <math>\gamma_{BY}- \ </math>times less than the total energy of the oscillator. In other words, charges "disappear" at the "input" and "generate" at the "output" of the wave LC circuit, adding energies to keep balance.
| |
| | |
| ==Total energy of quantum LC circuit==
| |
| Energy stored on the quantum capacitance:
| |
| :<math>W_C = \frac{Q_C^2}{2C} = 2\pi \alpha W_{LC}. \ </math> | |
| Energy stored on the quantum inductance:
| |
| :<math>W_L = \frac{\Phi_L^2}{2L} = 2\pi \alpha W_{LC}. \ </math>
| |
| Resonance energy of the quantum LC circuit:
| |
| :<math>W_{LC} = \hbar \omega_{LC} = \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{LC}}. \ </math>
| |
| Thus, the total energy of the quantum LC circuit should be:
| |
| :<math>W_{tot} = W_{LC} + W_C + W_L. \ </math>
| |
| In the general case, resonance energy <math>W_{LC} \ </math> could be due to the "rest mass" of electron, energy gap for Bohr atom, etc.
| |
| However, energy stored on capacitance <math>W_C \ </math> is due to electric charge. Actually, for free electron and Bohr atom LC circuits we have quantized electric fluxes, equal to the electronic charge,
| |
| <math>e \ </math>.
| |
| | |
| Furthermore, energy stored on inductance <math>W_L \ </math> is due to magnetic momentum. Actually, for Bohr atom we have Bohr Magneton:
| |
| :<math>\mu_B = \frac{e\hbar}{2m_0} = 0.5e\nu_BS_B = \frac{ea_B^2}{\sqrt{L_BC_B}}. \ </math>
| |
| In the case of free electron, Bohr Magneton will be:
| |
| :<math>\mu_e = 0.5e\nu_eS_e = 0.5e\frac{m_0c^2}{h}\frac{\lambda_0^2}{2\pi} = \frac{e\hbar}{2m_0}, \ </math>
| |
| the same, as for Bohr atom.
| |
| | |
| ==Applications==
| |
| | |
| ===Electron as LC circuit===
| |
| Electron capacitance could be presented as the spherical capacitor:
| |
| :<math>C_e = \frac{4\pi \epsilon_0}{\frac{1}{r_e} - \frac{1}{r_e+\lambda_0}} = \frac{\epsilon_0\lambda_0}{2\pi}, \ </math>
| |
| where <math>r_e = \frac{\lambda_0}{2\sqrt{2}\pi} - \ </math> electron radius and <math>\lambda_0 - \ </math>Compton wavelength.
| |
| | |
| Note, that this electron radius is consistent with the standard definition of the spin. Actually, rotating momentum of electron is:
| |
| :<math>l_e = m_0\omega_e r_e^2 = \hbar/2, \ </math>
| |
| where <math>\omega_e = m_0c^2/\hbar \ </math> is considered.
| |
| | |
| Spherical inductance of electron:
| |
| :<math>L_e = \frac{\mu_0\lambda_0}{2\pi}. \ </math>
| |
| Characterictic impedance of electron:
| |
| :<math>\rho_e = \sqrt{\frac{L_e}{C_e}} = \sqrt{\frac{\mu_0}{\epsilon_0}} = \rho_0 = 2\alpha R_H. \ </math>
| |
| Resonance frequency of electron LC circuit:
| |
| :<math>\omega_e = \sqrt{\frac{1}{L_eC_e}} = \frac{2\pi c}{\lambda_0} = \frac{m_0c^2}{\hbar}. \ </math>
| |
| Induced electric flux on electron capacitance:
| |
| :<math>Q_e = C_eV_e. \ </math>
| |
| Energy, stored on electron capacitance:
| |
| :<math>W_{Ce} = \frac{C_eV_e^2}{2} = \frac{Q_e^2}{2C_e} = 2\pi \alpha W_0, \ </math>
| |
| where <math>W_0 = m_0c^2 - \ </math> is the "rest energy" of electron. So, induced electric flux will be:
| |
| :<math>Q_e = \sqrt{2\alpha m_0c^2\epsilon_0 \lambda_0} = e. \ </math>
| |
| Thus, through electron capacitance we have quantized electric flux, equal to the electron charge.
| |
| | |
| Magnetic flux through inductance:
| |
| :<math>\Phi_e = L_eI_e. \ </math>
| |
| Magnetic energy, stored on inductance:
| |
| :<math>W_{Le} = \frac{L_eI_e^2}{2} = \frac{\Phi_e^2}{2L_e} = 2\pi \alpha W_0. \ </math>
| |
| So, induced magnetic flux will be:
| |
| :<math>\Phi_e = \sqrt{2\mu_0 hc\alpha} = 2\alpha \Phi_0. \ </math>
| |
| where <math>\Phi_0 = h/e - \ </math> magnetic flux quantum. Thus, through electron inductance there are no quantization of magnetic flux.
| |
| | |
| ===Bohr atom as LC circuit===
| |
| Bohr radius:
| |
| :<math>a_B = \frac{\lambda_0}{2\pi \alpha} \ </math>
| |
| where <math>\lambda_0 = \frac{h}{m_0c} - \ </math> Compton wavelength of electron,
| |
| <math>\alpha - \ </math> fine structure constant.
| |
| | |
| Bohr atomic surface:
| |
| :<math>S_B = 4\pi a_B^2 \ </math>.
| |
| Bohr inductance:
| |
| :<math>L_B = \frac{\mu_0}{\lambda_0}\cdot S_B \ </math>.
| |
| Bohr capacitance:
| |
| :<math>C_B = \frac{\epsilon_0}{\lambda_0}\cdot S_B \ </math>.
| |
| Bohr wave impedance:
| |
| :<math>\rho_B = \sqrt{\frac{L_B}{C_B}} = \sqrt{\frac{\mu_0}{\epsilon_0}} = \rho_0. \ </math>
| |
| Bohr angular frequency:
| |
| :<math>\omega_B = \sqrt{\frac{1}{L_BC_B}} = \frac{\alpha^2}{2}\cdot \frac{m_0c^2}{\hbar} = \frac{2\pi c}{\lambda_B}, \ </math>
| |
| where <math>\lambda_B = \frac{4\pi a_B}{\alpha }- \ </math> Bohr wavelength for the first energy level.
| |
| | |
| Induced electric flux of the Bohr first energy level:
| |
| :<math>Q_B = C_BV_B. \ </math>
| |
| Energy, stored on the Bohr capacitance:
| |
| :<math>W_CB = \frac{C_BV_B^2}{2} = \frac{Q_B^2}{2C_B} = 2\pi \alpha W_B, \ </math>
| |
| where <math>W_B = \hbar \omega_B - \ </math> is the Bohr energy. So, induced electric flux will be:
| |
| :<math>Q_B = \sqrt{2\pi \alpha^3m_0c^2C_B} = e. \ </math>
| |
| Thus, through the Bohr capacitance we have quatized electric flux, equal to the electron charge.
| |
| | |
| Magnetic flux through the Bohr inductance:
| |
| :<math>W_LB = \frac{L_BI_B^2}{2} = \frac{\Phi_B^2}{2L_B} = 2\pi \alpha W_0. \ </math>
| |
| So, induced magnetic flux will be:
| |
| :<math>\Phi_B = \frac{\pi \alpha^2ec}{\lambda_0}L_B = 2\alpha \Phi_0. \ </math>
| |
| Thus, through the Bohr inductance there are no quantization of magnetic flux.
| |
| | |
| ===Photon as LC circuit===
| |
| Photon "resonant angular frequency":
| |
| :<math>\omega_w = \sqrt{\frac{1}{L_wC_w}}. \ </math>
| |
| Photon "wave impedance":
| |
| :<math>\rho_w = \sqrt{\frac{L_w}{C_w}} = \sqrt{\frac{\mu_0}{\epsilon_0}} = \rho_0. \ </math>
| |
| Photon "wave inductance":
| |
| :<math>L_w = \frac{\rho_0}{\omega_w}. \ </math>
| |
| Photon "wave capacitance":
| |
| :<math>C_w = \frac{1}{\rho_0\omega_w}. \ </math>
| |
| Photon "magnetic flux quantum":
| |
| :<math>\phi_w = L_wI_w = \phi_0 = \frac{h}{e}. \ </math>
| |
| Photon "wave current":
| |
| :<math>I_w = \frac{h}{eL_w} = \frac{e\omega_w}{2\alpha}. \ </math>
| |
| | |
| ===Quantum Hall effect as LC circuit===
| |
| In the general case 2D- density of states (DOS) in a solid could be defined by the following:
| |
| | |
| :<math>D_{2D} = \frac{m^*}{\pi \hbar^2} \ </math>,
| |
| | |
| where <math>m^* = \xi m_0 - \ </math> current carriers effective mass in a solid, <math>m_0 - \ </math> electron mass, and <math>\xi - \ </math> dimensionless parameter, which considers band structure of a solid. So, the quantum inductance can be defined as follows:
| |
| | |
| :<math>L_{QL} = \phi_0^2\cdot D_{2D} = \xi \cdot L_{Q0}</math>,
| |
| | |
| where <math>L_{Q0} 8\pi \beta \cdot L_{QY} \ </math> - the ‘’ideal value’’ of quantum inductance at <math>\xi = 1 \ </math> and another ideal quantum inductance:
| |
| | |
| :<math>L_{QY} = \frac{\mu_0}{\lambda_0} = H/m^2 \ </math>, (3)
| |
| where <math>\mu_0 - \ </math> [[Vacuum permeability|magnetic constant]],
| |
| <math>\beta = \frac{1}{4\alpha} - \ </math> magnetic “fine structure constant”<ref name=autogenerated1>Yakymakha O.L.(1989). ''High Temperature Quantum Galvanomagnetic Effects in the Two- Dimensional Inversion Layers of MOSFET's'' (In Russian). Kyiv: Vyscha Shkola. p.91. ISBN 5-11-002309-3. [http://eqworld.ipmnet.ru/ru/library/books/Yakimaha1989ru.djvu djvu]</ref>(p. 62), <math>\alpha - \ </math> [[fine structure constant]] and <math>\lambda_0 - \ </math> [[Compton wavelength]] of electron, first defined by Yakymakha (1994)<ref name =Yakym1>Yakymakha O.L., Kalnibolotskij Y.M. (1994). "Very-low-frequency resonance of MOSFET amplifier parameters". ''Solid- State Electronics'' 37(10),1739-1751 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-1101(94)00152-6 Pdf]</ref> in the spectroscopic investigations of the silicon MOSFETs.
| |
| | |
| Since defined above quantum inductance is per unit area, therefore its absolute value will be in the QHE mode:
| |
| :<math>L_{QA} = \frac{L_{QL}}{n_B} \ </math>,
| |
| where the carrier concentration is:
| |
| :<math>n_B = \frac{eB}{h} \ </math>,
| |
| and <math>h - \ </math> is the Planck constant. | |
| By analogically, the absolute value of the quantum capacitance will be in the QHE mode:
| |
| | |
| :<math>C_{QA} = \frac{C_{QL}}{n_B} \ </math>,
| |
| where
| |
| :<math>C_{QL} = e^2\cdot D_{2D} = \xi \cdot C_{Q0}</math>,
| |
| is DOS definition of the quantum capacitance according to Luryi,<ref name =Luryi>Serge Luryi (1988). "Quantum capacitance device". ''Appl.Phys.Lett.'' 52(6). [http://www.ece.sunysb.edu/~serge/63.pdf Pdf]</ref> <math>C_{Q0} = 8\pi \alpha \cdot C_{QY} \ </math> - quantum capacitance ‘’ideal value’’ at <math>\xi = 1 \ </math>, and other quantum capacitance:
| |
| | |
| :<math>C_{QY} = \frac{\epsilon_0}{\lambda_0} = 3.6492417 F/m^2 \ </math>,
| |
| where <math>\epsilon_0 - \ </math> [[dielectric constant]], first defined by Yakymakha (1994)<ref name =Yakym1 /> > in the spectroscopic investigations of the silicon MOSFETs.
| |
| The standard wave impedance definition for the QHE LC circuit could be presented as:
| |
| | |
| :<math>\rho_Q = \sqrt{\frac{L_{QA}}{C_{QA}}} = \sqrt{\frac{\phi_0^2}{e^2}} = \frac{h}{e^2} = R_H \ </math>,
| |
| where <math>R_H = \frac{h}{e^2} = 25.812813 k\Omega \ </math> von Klitzing constant for resistance.
| |
| | |
| The standard resonant frequency definition for the QHE LC circuit could be presented as:
| |
| | |
| :<math>\omega_Q = \frac{1}{\sqrt{L_{QA}C_{QA}}} = \frac{\hbar \omega_c}{\phi_0e} = \frac{\omega_c}{2\pi}</math>,
| |
| where <math>\omega_c = \frac{eB}{m^*} - \ </math> standard cyclotron frequency in the magnetic field B.
| |
| | |
| Hall scaling current quantum will be:
| |
| :<math>I_H = \frac{h}{eL_{QA}} = \frac{e\omega_B}{4\pi} \ </math>,
| |
| where <math>\omega_B = \frac{eB}{m^*} - \ </math> Hall angular frequency. | |
| | |
| ===Josephson junction as LC circuit===
| |
| Electromagnetic induction (Faraday) low:
| |
| :<math>V_{ind} = \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial t} = -L\frac{\partial I}{\partial t}, \ </math>
| |
| where <math>\Phi - \ </math> magnetic flux, <math>L - \ </math> Josephson junction quantum inductance and
| |
| <math>I - \ </math> Josephson junction current.
| |
| DC Josephson equation for current:
| |
| :<math>I = I_J\cdot \sin \phi, \ </math>
| |
| where <math>I_J - \ </math> Josephson scale for current,
| |
| <math>\phi - \ </math> phase difference between superconductors.
| |
| Current derivative on time variable will be:
| |
| :<math>\frac{\partial I}{\partial t} = I_J \cos \phi \cdot \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}. \ </math>
| |
| AC Josephson equation:
| |
| :<math>\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} = \frac{q}{\hbar}V = \frac{2\pi}{\Phi_0}V, \ </math>
| |
| where <math>\hbar- \ </math> reduced Planck constant, <math>\Phi_0 = h/2e- </math> Josephson magnetic flux quantum,
| |
| <math>q = 2e \ </math> and <math>e - \ </math> electron charge.
| |
| Combining equations for derivatives yields junction voltage:
| |
| :<math>V = \frac{\Phi_0}{2\pi I_J}\cdot \frac{1}{\cos \phi}\cdot \frac{\partial I}{\partial t} = L_J\cdot \frac{\partial I}{\partial t}, \ </math>
| |
| where
| |
| :<math>L_J = \frac{\Phi_0}{2\pi I_J}\cdot \frac{1}{\cos \phi} \ </math>
| |
| is the Devoret (1997) <ref name =Devoret1>Devoret M.H. (1997). "Quantum Fluctuations". Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. pp.351-386. [http://qulab.eng.yale.edu/documents/reprints/Houches_fluctuations.pdf Pdf]</ref> quantum inductance.
| |
| | |
| AC Josephson equation for angular frequency:
| |
| :<math>\omega_J = \frac{q}{\hbar}\cdot V. \ </math>
| |
| Resonance frequency for Josephson LC circuit:
| |
| :<math>\omega_J = \sqrt{\frac{1}{L_JC_J}}. \ </math>
| |
| where <math>C_J - \ </math> is the Devoret quantum capacitance, that can be defined as:
| |
| :<math>C_J = \frac{1}{L_J\omega_J^2} = \frac{\Phi_0I_J}{V_0^2}\cdot \frac{\cos \phi}{2\pi}. \ </math>
| |
| Quantum wave impedance of Josephson junction:
| |
| :<math>\rho_J = \sqrt{\frac{L_J}{C_J}} = \frac{V_0}{I_J}\cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{\cos \phi}}. \ </math>
| |
| For <math>V_0 = 0,1 </math>mV and <math>I_J = 0,2 \mu</math>A wave impedance will be <math>\rho_J = 500 \Omega. \ </math>
| |
| | |
| ===Flat Atom as LC circuit===
| |
| Quantum capacitance of ''Flat Atom'' (FA):
| |
| :<math>C_{F0} = \frac{\epsilon_0}{\lambda_0}\cdot S_{F0} = 5.1805\cdot 10^{-7} \ </math>F.
| |
| Quantum inductance of FA:
| |
| :<math>L_{F0} = \frac{\mu_0}{\lambda_0}\cdot S_{F0} = 7.3524\cdot 10^{-2} \ </math>H.
| |
| Quantum area element of FA:
| |
| :<math>S_{F0} = \frac{h}{m_0\omega_{F0}} = 1.4196\cdot 10^{-7}m^2 \ </math>.
| |
| Resonance frequency of FA:
| |
| :<math>\omega_{F0} = \sqrt{\frac{1}{L_{F0}C_{F0}}} = 5123.9 \ </math>rad/s.
| |
| Characteristic impedunce of FA:
| |
| :<math>\rho_{F0} = \sqrt{\frac{L_{F0}}{C_{F0}}} = \rho_0 = 2\alpha R_H. \ </math>
| |
| Total electric charge on the first energy level of FA:
| |
| :<math>Q_{F1} = e\sqrt{\frac{S_{F0}}{S_B}} = 2\cdot 10^6 e \ </math>,
| |
| where <math>S_B = 4\pi a_B^2 - \ </math> Bohr quantum area element.
| |
| First FA was discovered by Yakymakha (1994)<ref name =Yakym1 /> as very low frequency resonance on the p- channel MOSFETs.
| |
| Contrary to the spherical Bohr atom, the FA has gyperbolic dependence on the number of energy level (n)<ref name =Yakym3>Yakymakha O.L., Kalnibolotskij Y.M., Solid- State Electronics, vol.38, No.3,1995.,pp.661-671 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-1101(94)90221-6 pdf]</ref>
| |
| :<math>\omega_{F0n} = \frac{\omega_{F0}}{n}. \ </math>
| |
| | |
| ==See also==
| |
| *[[LC circuit]]
| |
| *[[Harmonic oscillator]]
| |
| *[[Quantum harmonic oscillator]]
| |
| *[[Quantum Electromagnetic Resonator]]
| |
| | |
| ==References==
| |
| {{Reflist}}
| |
| | |
| ==Sources==
| |
| | |
| * W. H. Louisell, “Quantum Statistical Properties of Radiation” (Wiley, New York, 1973)
| |
| * Michel H.Devoret. Quantum Fluctuation in Electric Circuit.[http://research.yale.edu/boulder/Boulder-2005/ReadingMaterial-2005/devoret_quantum_fluct_les_houches.pdf PDF]
| |
| * Fan Hong-yi, Pan Xiao-yin. Chin.Phys.Lett. No9(1998)625.[http://cpl.iphy.ac.cn/qikan/manage/wenzhang/0150625.pdf PDF]
| |
| * Xu, Xing-Lei; Li, Hong-Qi; Wang, Ji-Suo Quantum fluctuations of mesoscopic damped double resonance RLC circuit with mutual capacitance inductance coupling in thermal excitation state. Chinese Physics, Volume 16, Issue 8, pp. 2462–2470 (2007).[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ChPhy..16.2462X]
| |
| * Hong-Qi Li, Xing-Lei Xu and Ji-Suo Wang. Quantum Fluctuations of the Current and Voltage in Thermal Vacuum State for Mesoscopic Quartz Piezoelectric Crystal. [http://www.springerlink.com/content/t56269h3773x5163/]
| |
| * Boris Ya. Zel’dovich. Impedance and parametric excitation of oscillators. UFN, 2008, v. 178, No 5 [http://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=ufn&paperid=596&option_lang=rus PDF]
| |
| | |
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Quantum LC Circuit}}
| |
| [[Category:Quantum models]]
| |
| [[Category:Quantum information science]]
| |