|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Image:TDCfullview.jpg|thumb|right|U.S. Navy Mk III Torpedo Data Computer, the standard US Navy torpedo fire control computer during World War II. Later in World War II (1943), the TDC Mk III was replaced by the TDC Mk IV, which was an improved and larger version of the Mk III.]]
| | 1 Cath Kidston<br>If you want something a bit different, this quirky travel bag from Britain�s favourite vintage designer has a generous internal pocket, plus two side-pockets, all with zip fastenings, so there�s room for everything.<br>There�s a removable shoulder strap and in-built luggage tag.<br>�75, cathkidston.co.u<br> |
| | 2 Go Travel Pack Fla<br> |
| | A lovely carry-on-sized roller case made of a lightweight yet sturdy material. It also features an ingenious folding mechanism, which means the empty case collapses down to a fraction of its size for easy storage<br><br> |
|
| |
|
| The '''Torpedo Data Computer (TDC)''' was an early [[electromechanical]] [[analog computer]] used for [[torpedo]] [[fire-control system|fire-control]] on [[US Navy|American]] [[submarine]]s during [[World War II]]. [[Royal Navy#1914–1945|Britain]], [[Kriegsmarine|Germany]], and [[Imperial Japanese Navy|Japan]] also developed automated torpedo fire control equipment, but none were as advanced as the [[US Navy]]'s TDC,<ref name=JapanGermany>{{cite book | last = Friedman | first = Norman | title = US Submarines Through 1945: An Illustrated Design History | year = 1995 | publisher = Naval Institute Press | isbn=1-55750-263-3 | pages = 195 }}</ref> as it was able to automatically track the target rather than simply offering an instantaneous firing solution. This unique capability of the TDC set the standard for submarine torpedo [[Fire-control system|fire control]] during World War II.<ref name=computermuseum>{{cite web | title = Analog Computers | work = Lexikon's History of Computing | year = 1995 | url = http://www.computermuseum.li/Testpage/AnalogComputers.htm#Restoration | accessdate = 2006-07-03 }}
| |
| </ref><ref name=OtherTrackers>While the TDC's target tracking abilities were unique for submarine torpedo fire control during WWII, target tracking was used on surface ship torpedo fire control systems by a number of nations (see references in this article to [http://www.hnsa.org/doc/destroyer/ddfc/index.htm US destroyer] and [http://www.fischer-tropsch.org/primary_documents/gvt_reports/USNAVY/USNTMJ%20Reports/USNTMJ-200F-0086-0124%20Report%20O-32.pdf Japanese torpedo fire control]). The TDC was the first analog computer to miniaturize the capability enough for deployment on a submarine.</ref>
| |
|
| |
|
| Replacing the previously standard hand-held [[slide rule]]-type devices (known as the "banjo" & "is/was"),<ref>Beach, ''Run Silent, Run Deep''</ref> the TDC was designed to provide fire-control solutions for submarine torpedo firing against [[ship]]s running on the surface (surface warships used a different computer).<ref>[http://www.hnsa.org/doc/destroyer/ddfc/index.htm]</ref> It had an array of handcranks, dials, and switches for data input and display.<ref>[http://www.fleetsubmarine.com/tdc.html]</ref> To generate a fire control solution, it required inputs on
| | �85, go-travelproducts.c<br> |
| *submarine course and speed, which were read automatically from the submarine's [[gyrocompass]] and [[pitometer log]]
| | 3 Boden Colourpop B<br> |
| *estimated target course, speed, and range information (obtained using data from the submarine's [[periscope]], [[Target Bearing Transmitter]] (TBT),<ref>[http://www.bowfin.org/website/bowfin/bowfin_systems/TBT/tbt.htm]</ref> [[radar]], and [[sonar]])
| | This colourful, jute cotton companion has all the room you�ll need for aeroplane essentials and the sturdy leather handles and webbing shoulder strap means you won�t have to compromise on weighty bits and pieces. It doubles up as a useful beach bag and is available in a range of colour<br><br> |
| *torpedo type and speed (type was needed to deal with the different torpedo ballistics)<!--This was accounted for by changing cams in the machine, but can't recall if the source is Blair, Grider, O'Kane, or Beach...or somewhere else...-->
| | �39.20, boden.co<br>k |
| | 4 Antler Business 100 Landscape Mobile Off<br><br> |
|
| |
|
| The TDC performed the [[trigonometry|trigonometric]] calculations required to compute a target intercept course for the torpedo. It also had an electromechanical interface to the torpedoes, allowing it to automatically set courses while torpedos were still in their tubes, ready to be fired.
| | Boasting all the zips and padded pockets that business travellers could hope for, this also has a combination lock, two wheels for easy manoeuvrability, a piggyback strap to attach it to other luggage and even a clear plastic liquids bag for removal at security chec<br><br> |
|
| |
|
| The TDC's target tracking capability was used by the fire control party to continuously update the fire control solution even while the submarine was maneuvering. The TDC's target tracking ability also allowed the submarine to accurately fire torpedoes even when the target was temporarily obscured by smoke or fog. | | �139, antler.c<br>uk |
| | 5 M&S Mock Crocodile Skin Trim Hol<br>ll |
| | The patent touch makes this look a lot [http://tinyurl.com/kecvhhb discount ugg boots] more expensive than it is. Ideal for business use or weekends away, it�s generous in size, as well as practical, with a wipe-clean surface and an in-built luggage <br><br> |
|
| |
|
| The TDC was a rather bulky addition to the sub's [[conning tower]] and required two extra crewmen: one as an expert in its maintenance, the other as its actual operator. Despite these drawbacks, the use of the TDC was an important factor in the successful [[commerce raiding]] program conducted by American submarines during the [[Pacific war|Pacific]] campaign of World War II. Accounts of the American submarine campaign in the Pacific often cite the use of TDC.<ref name=clear>{{cite book | last = O'Kane | first = Richard | title = Clear The Bridge:The War Patrols of the U.S.S. Tang | publisher = Bantam Books | year = 1977 | location = New York | isbn= 0-553-14516-9}}</ref><ref name=wahoo>{{cite book | last = O'Kane | first = Richard | title = Wahoo: The Patrols of America's Most Famous World War II Submarine | publisher = Bantam Books | year = 1987 | location = New York | isbn= 0-553-28161-5}}; Beach, Edward L., Jr., Captain, USN (rtd). ''Run Silent, Run Deep'', ''passim''; Beach, ''Dust on the Sea'', ''passim''; Grider, George. ''War Fish'', ''passim''; Blair, Clay, Jr. ''Silent Victory'' (New York: Bantam, 1976), ''passim''.</ref> Some officers became highly skilled in its use,<ref>[[Robert E. Dornin|Dusty Dornin]] was widely agreed to be the best. Blair, p.357.</ref> and the navy set up a training school for its use.<ref>Blair, p.357.</ref>
| | �45, marksandspence<br>com |
| | 6 Luggo Robo<br>Bag |
| | This funky suitcase for kids has wheels that light up in red, blue and green when it moves along. It�s got plenty of storage compartments and [http://Imgur.com/hot?q=retractable retractable] straps so little�uns can use it as a backpack,<br>oo. |
| | �40, sciencemuseumshop<br>o.uk |
| | 7 Jack Wolfskin Trek & R<br>l 40 |
| | The front section of this suitcase is a travelling office, with room for your smartphone, files and even your laptop, while in the main compartment four mesh pouches provide ample room [http://tinyurl.com/kecvhhb http://tinyurl.com/kecvhhb] for clothing, shoes and a wash bag. There�s a telescopic handle and smooth-glide wheels or you can turn it into a hands-free ruc<br><br>k. |
|
| |
|
| Two [[Greater Underwater Propulsion Power Program|upgraded]] World War II-era U.S. Navy fleet submarines ({{USS|Tusk|SS-426|6}} and {{USS|Cutlass|SS-478|2}}) with their TDCs continue to serve with [[Taiwan Navy|Taiwan's navy]] and [[San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park|U.S. Nautical Museum]] staff are assisting them with maintaining their equipment.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.maritime.org/taiwan/index.htm|title=Museum documents an operating US, WW II built submarine in Taiwan.|accessdate=2008-07-13}}</ref> The museum also has a fully restored and functioning TDC from {{USS|Pampanito|SS-383|6}}, docked in [[San Francisco]].
| | �160, jack-wolfski<br>co.uk |
| | 8 De Bruir Par<br>huter |
| | Here�s a bag that you�ll actually want to age. Artisan leatherworker Garvan de Bruir�s innovative design means that it fits comfortably against the back, moulding itself to your body with continuous wear. Available in various sizes, it�s made from robust bridle leather with chunky stitching <br><br>il. |
|
| |
|
| ==Background== | | �460, [https://Www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=debruir&btnI=lucky debr<br>r].com |
| | 9 Antler Cabin B1 <br><br>case |
|
| |
|
| ===History===
| | This lightweight, locking trolley system moves around effortlessly, thanks to its eight-wheel drive. The high-shine polycarbonate, available in various colours, is incredibly strong and the interior is bright and well designed. There�s even a 10-year w<br><br>nty. |
| The problem of aiming a [[torpedo]] has occupied military engineers since [[Robert Whitehead]] developed the modern torpedo in the 1860s. These early torpedoes ran at a preset depth on a straight course (consequently they are frequently referred to as "straight runners"). This was the state of the art in torpedo guidance until the development of the homing torpedo during the latter part of [[World War II]].<ref name=othertorps>There were other forms of torpedo guidance attempted throughout WWII. Notable are the Japanese human-guided ''[[Kaiten]]'' and German [[G7e#G7e/T3|pattern running]] and [[acoustic homing]] types for attacking convoys. Today, most submarine-launched torpedoes are wire-guided with terminal homing.</ref> The vast majority of submarine torpedoes during World War II were straight running and these continued in use for many years after World War II.<ref name=USMk14his>{{cite web|url = http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/1592/ustorp5.htm|title= Part Five: Post WW-II Submarine Launched/ Heavyweight Torpedoes|accessdate=2006-07-26|author= Frederick J Milford|date= October 1997|work= US Navy Torpedoes|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20060523064716/http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/1592/ustorp5.htm|archivedate=2006-05-23}}</ref> In fact, two World War II-era straight running torpedoes — fired by the British nuclear-powered submarine {{HMS|Conqueror|S48|6}} — sank the [[ARA General Belgrano|ARA ''General Belgrano'']] in 1982.
| |
|
| |
|
| During [[World War I]], computing a target intercept course for a torpedo was a manual process where the fire control party was aided by various [[slide rule]]s<ref name=fleetsub>{{cite web | title = Torpedo Data Computer | work = FleetSubmarine.com | year = 2002 | url = http://www.maritime.org/tdc.htm | accessdate = 2006-07-03 }}
| | �129, [http://tinyurl.com/kecvhhb discount ugg boots] ant<br>r.co.uk |
| </ref> (the U.S. examples were colloquially called "banjo", for its shape, and "Is/Was", for predicting where a target will be based on where it is and was)<ref>Holwitt, Joel I. ''"Execute Against Japan"'', Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University, 2005, p.147; Beach, Edward L., Jr. ''Run Silent, Run Deep''.</ref> or mechanical calculator/sights.<ref name = dread>{{cite web |title = Firing a Torpedo Using A Mechanical Computing Sight |work=The Dreadnought Project |url =http://www.dreadnoughtproject.org/tfs/index.php/Torpedo_Director|year=2000 | | 10 [http://tinyurl.com/kecvhhb ugg boots sale] Jane Shear<br>ng Tote |
| |accessdate=2006-07-11}}</ref> These were often "woefully inaccurate",<ref>Holwitt, p. 147.</ref> which helps explain why torpedo spreads were advised.
| | This spacious, comfortable and exceptionally robust tote is perfect if you�re after hand [http://tinyurl.com/kecvhhb ugg boots sale] luggage that will double up as a stylish handbag once you�ve reached your destination. Suitable for all seasons and all occasions, it�s also reversible and will last y<br><br>ears. |
|
| |
|
| During World War II, Germany,<ref>[http://www.msichicago.org/exhibit/U505/virtualtour/photo_tour/contower.html]</ref> Japan,<ref>[http://web.ukonline.co.uk/chalcraft/sm/attack.html Britain]</ref> and the United States each developed [[analog computer]]s to automate the process of computing the required torpedo course.<ref name=JapanTechnology>{{cite book | last = Jackson, USNR | first = Lt.(jg) J.G. | url=http://www.fischer-tropsch.org/primary_documents/gvt_reports/USNAVY/USNTMJ%20Reports/USNTMJ-200F-0086-0124%20Report%20O-32.pdf | title = Japanese Torpedo Fire Control | date = February 1946 | publisher = US Naval Technical Mission to Japan | id = Fascicle O-1, Target O-32 | format=PDF}}</ref>
| | �229, uggaustralia.co.uk |
| | |
| In 1932, the [[Bureau of Ordnance]] (BuOrd) initiated development of the TDC with [[Arma Corporation]] and [[Ford Instruments]].<ref name="Holwitt, p.147">Holwitt, p.147.</ref> This culminated in the "very complicated" Mark 1 in 1938.<ref name="Holwitt, p.147"/> This was retrofitted into older boats, beginning with [[USS Dolphin (SS-169)|''Dolphin'']] and up through the newest [[Salmon class submarine|''Salmon'']]s.<ref name="Holwitt, p.147"/>
| |
| | |
| The first submarine designed to use the TDC was {{USS|Tambor|SS-198|2}},<ref name=Tambor>{{cite web | last = Mohl | first = Michael | title = Tambor (SS-198) | work = NavSource Online: Submarine Photo Archive | year = 2006 | url = http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/08198.htm | accessdate = 2006-08-01 }}</ref> launched in 1940 with the Mark III, located in the [[conning tower]].<ref name="Holwitt, p.147"/> (This differed from earlier outfits.)<ref>Beach, Edward L., Jr. ''Dust on the Sea''.</ref> It proved to be the best torpedo fire control system of [[World War II]].<ref>Holwitt, p.147; Friedman, Norman. ''U.S. Submarines Through 1945'' (Annapolis: U.S. Naval Institute Press, 1995), p.195.</ref><!--This appears to conflict with the Technical Mission assessment.-->
| |
| | |
| In 1943, the Torpedo Data Computer Mark IV was developed to support the [[Mark 18 torpedo|Mark 18]] torpedo.<ref name=Mk18>The Mark 18 was electric and therefore wakeless and difficult for surface forces to trace. On the downside, it was slower than the Mark 14. This made it more difficult to aim accurately because larger gyro angles were involved. Even so, thousands of them were fired during WWII.</ref><ref name=clearMk18>{{cite book | last = O'Kane | first = Richard | title = Clear The Bridge:The War Patrols of the U.S.S. Tang | publisher = Bantam Books | year = 1977 | location = New York | pages = 221 | id = ISBN= 0-553-14516-9}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| Both the Mk III and Mk IV TDC were developed by Arma Corporation (now American Bosch Arma).
| |
| | |
| ===The problem of aiming a straight-running torpedo===
| |
| [[Image:FiringGeometry.png|noframe|thumb|Figure 2: Illustration of general torpedo fire-control problem]]
| |
| | |
| A straight-running torpedo has a [[gyroscope]]-based control system that ensures that the torpedo will run a straight course. The torpedo can run on a course different from that of the submarine by adjusting a parameter called the gyro angle, which sets the course of the torpedo relative to the course of the submarine (see Figure 2). The primary role of the TDC is to determine the gyro angle setting required to ensure that the torpedo will strike the target.
| |
| | |
| Determining the gyro angle required the real-time solution of a complex [[Trigonometry|trigonometric]] equation (see Equation 1 for a simplified example). The TDC provided a continuous solution to this equation using data updates from the submarine's navigation sensors and the TDC's target tracker. The TDC was also able to automatically update all torpedo gyro angle settings simultaneously with a fire control solution, which improved the accuracy over systems that required manual updating of the torpedo's course.<ref name=AutomatedGyroSetting>{{cite book | last = Friedman | first = Norman | title = US Submarines Through 1945: An Illustrated Design History | year = 1995 | publisher = Naval Institute Press | isbn=1-55750-263-3 | pages = 196 }}</ref>
| |
| | |
| The TDC enables the submarine to launch the torpedo on a course different from that of the submarine, which is important tactically. Otherwise the submarine would need to be pointed at the projected intercept point in order to launch a torpedo.<ref name="GyroPointing">Torpedoes were developed by the United States with this capability during WWI. However, without automated fire control it was difficult to realize the full advantages of this approach.</ref> Requiring the entire vessel to be pointed in order to launch a torpedo would be time consuming, require precise submarine course control, and would needlessly complicate the torpedo firing process. The TDC with target tracking gives the submarine the ability to maneuver independently of the required target intercept course for the torpedo.
| |
| | |
| As is shown in Figure 2, in general, the torpedo does not actually move in a straight path immediately after launch and it does not instantly accelerate to full speed, which are referred to as torpedo ballistic characteristics. The ballistic characteristics are described by three parameters: reach, turning radius, and corrected torpedo speed. Also, the target bearing angle is different from the point of view of the periscope versus the point of view of the torpedo, which is referred to as torpedo tube parallax.<ref name = parallax>{{cite book | editor = Commander Submarine Force, United States Atlantic Fleet | title = Submarine Torpedo Fire Control Manual | origdate = 1950-02 | date = 2006-04-16 | url = http://www.hnsa.org/doc/attack/index.htm | pages = 1–12 | chapter = Definitions | accessdate = 2006-08-22 }}</ref> These factors are a significant complication in the calculation of the gyro angle and the TDC must compensate for their effects.
| |
| | |
| Straight running torpedoes were usually launched in salvo (i.e. multiple launches in a short period of time)<ref name="spread">{{cite book | editor = Commander Submarine Force, United States Atlantic Fleet | title = Submarine Torpedo Fire Control Manual | origdate = 1950-02 | date = 2006-04-16 | url = http://www.hnsa.org/doc/attack/index.htm | pages = 1–9 | chapter = Definitions | accessdate = 2006-08-22 }}</ref> or a spread (i.e. multiple launches with slight angle offsets)<ref name="spread"/> to increase the probability of striking the target given the inaccuracies present in the measurement of angles, target range, target speed, torpedo track angle, and torpedo speed.
| |
| | |
| Salvos and spreads were also launched to strike tough targets multiple times to ensure their destruction.<ref name = doctrine>{{cite book | title = Current Submarine Doctrine | editor = Commander Submarine Force, Pacific Fleet | origdate = 1944-02 | date = 2006-02-17 | pages = paragraph 4614 | chapter = Attacks -- General (Chapter IV, Section 1) | chapterurl = http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/ss-doc-4.htm | url = http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/sub_doctrine.htm | accessdate = 2006-07-02 }}</ref> The TDC supported the firing of torpedo salvos by allowing short time offsets between firings and torpedo spreads by adding small angle offsets to each torpedo's gyro angle. Before the [[ROKS Cheonan sinking|sinking]] of [[South Korea]]'s [[ROKS Cheonan (PCC-772)|ROKS ''Cheonan'']] by [[North Korea]] in 2010, the last warship sunk by a submarine torpedo attack, the [[ARA General Belgrano|ARA ''General Belgrano'']] in 1982, was struck by two torpedoes from a three torpedo spread.<ref name=belgrano_attack>{{citation| url=http://www.geocities.com/nmdecke/Submarines.html| title = Submarines 1950-2000, a study in unused potential| accessdate = 2006-08-20| author = Nathan Decker | date = July 2005|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20070317172208/http://www.geocities.com/nmdecke/Submarines.html|archivedate=2007-03-17}}</ref>
| |
| [[Image:TDC innerds.JPG|thumb|right|A look inside the TDC]]
| |
| | |
| To accurately compute the gyro angle for a torpedo in a general engagement scenario, the target course, range, and bearing must be accurately known. During World War II, target course, range, and bearing estimates often had to be generated using periscope observations, which were highly subjective and error prone. The TDC was used to refine the estimates of the target's course, range, and bearing through a process of
| |
| *estimating the target's course, speed, and range based on observations.
| |
| *using the TDC to predict the target's position at a future time based on the estimates of the target's course, speed, and range.
| |
| *comparing the predicted position against the actual position and correcting the estimated parameters as required to achieve agreement between the predictions and observation. Agreement between prediction and observation means that the target course, speed, and range estimates are accurate.
| |
| | |
| Estimating the target's course was generally considered the most difficult of the observation tasks. The accuracy of the result was highly dependent on the experience of the skipper. During combat, the actual course of the target was not usually determined but instead the skippers determined a related quantity called "[[angle on the bow]]." Angle on the bow is the angle formed by the target course and the line of sight to the submarine. Some skippers, like the legendary [[Dick O'Kane|Richard O'Kane]], practiced determining the angle on the bow by looking at [[Imperial Japanese Navy|IJN]] ship models mounted on a calibrated [[lazy Susan]] through an inverted binocular barrel.<ref name="Okane">{{cite book | last = O'Kane | first = RIchard H. | title = Wahoo: The Patrols of America's Most Famous World War II Submarine | origyear = 1987 | accessdate = 2006-10-22 | edition = Bantam | year = 1989 | publisher = Bantam | location = New York | isbn= 0-553-28161-5 | pages = 108–109 | chapter = Part 4: Chapter 1 }}</ref>
| |
| | |
| To generate target position data versus time, the TDC needed to solve the equations of motion for the target relative to the submarine. The equations of motion are differential equations and the TDC used mechanical integrators to generate its solution.<ref name=CBC>{{cite web | last = Bromley | first = Allan | title = Analog Computing Devices | work = Computing Before Computers | year = 1990 | url = http://ed-thelen.org/comp-hist/CBC.html | accessdate = 2006-07-22 }}</ref>
| |
| | |
| The TDC needed to be positioned near other [[fire-control system|fire control]] equipment to minimize the amount of electromechanical interconnect. Because submarine space within the pressure hull was limited, the TDC needed to be as small as possible. On World War II submarines, the TDC and other fire control equipment was mounted in the [[conning tower]], which was a very small space.<ref name=silent>{{cite video | people = Wise, Robert (Director-One scene shows how cramped a conning tower could be.) |date = 1958 | title = Run Silent, Run Deep | medium = Film | location = Pacific Ocean}}</ref>
| |
| The packaging problem was severe and the performance of some early torpedo fire control equipment was hampered by the need to make it small.<ref name=USSubHis>{{cite book | last = Friedman | first = Norman | title = US Submarines Through 1945: An Illustrated Design History | year = 1995 | publisher = Naval Institute Press | isbn=1-55750-263-3 | pages = 350 }}</ref>
| |
| | |
| ===TDC functional description===
| |
| Since the TDC actually performed two separate functions, generating target position estimates and computing torpedo firing angles, the TDC actually consisted of two types of analog computers:
| |
| | |
| *Angle solver: This computer calculates the required gyro angle. The TDC had separate angle solvers for the forward and aft torpedo tubes.
| |
| *Position keeper: This computer generates a continuously updated estimate of the target position based on earlier target position measurements.<ref name = positionkeeper>{{cite book | editor = Commander Submarine Force, United States Atlantic Fleet | title = Submarine Torpedo Fire Control Manual | origdate = 1950-02 | date = 2006-04-16 | url = http://www.hnsa.org/doc/attack/index.htm | pages = 4–2 | chapter = Chapter 4: The Torpedo Fire Control Party | accessdate = 2006-08-22 }}</ref>
| |
| | |
| ====Angle solver====
| |
| The equations implemented in the angle solver can be found in the Torpedo Data Computer manual.<ref name="tdcv3">{{cite book | editor = Bureau of Ordnance | title = Torpedo Data Compter Mk 3 Mods 5 to 12| origdate = 1944-06 | date = June 1944 | url = http://www.hnsa.org/doc/tdc/index.htm }}</ref> The Submarine Torpedo Fire Control Manual<ref name="tdc">{{cite book | editor = Commander Submarine Force, United States Atlantic Fleet | title = Submarine Torpedo Fire Control Manual | origdate = 1950-02 | date = 2006-04-16 | url = http://www.hnsa.org/doc/attack/index.htm | accessdate = 2006-08-22 }}</ref> discusses the calculations in a general sense and a greatly abbreviated form of that discussion is presented here.
| |
| | |
| The general torpedo fire control problem is illustrated in Figure 2. The problem is made more tractable if we assume:
| |
| *The periscope is on the line formed by the torpedo running along its course
| |
| *The target moves on a fixed course and speed
| |
| *The torpedo moves on a fixed course and speed
| |
| | |
| [[Image:Intercept.png|noframe|thumb|Figure 3: The torpedo fire control triangle]]
| |
| | |
| As can be seen in Figure 2, these assumptions are not true in general because of the torpedo ballistic characteristics and torpedo tube parallax. Providing the details as to how to correct the torpedo gyro angle calculation for ballistics and parallax is complicated and beyond the scope of this article. Most discussions of gyro angle determination take the simpler approach of using Figure 3, which is called the torpedo fire control triangle.<ref name="clear"/><ref name = "wahoo"/> Figure 3 provides an accurate model for computing the gyro angle when the gyro angle is small, usually less than 30°.<ref name = SmallGyro>{{cite book | editor = Commander Submarine Force, United States Atlantic Fleet | title = Submarine Torpedo Fire Control Manual | origdate = 1950-02 | date = 2006-04-16 | url = http://www.hnsa.org/doc/attack/index.htm | pages = 8–8, 8–9 | chapter = Theory of Approach and Attack | accessdate = 2006-08-19 }}</ref>
| |
| | |
| The effects of parallax and ballistics are minimal for small gyro angle launches because the course deviations they cause are usually small enough to be ignorable. U.S. submarines during World War II preferred to fire their torpedoes at small gyro angles because the TDC's fire control solutions were most accurate for small angles.<ref name = Doctrine>{{cite book | editor = Commander Submarine Force, Pacific Fleet | title = Current Submarine Doctrine | origdate = 1944-02 | url = http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/sub_doctrine.htm | accessdate = 2006-08-19 | publisher = Department of the Navy | date = 2006-02-17 | id = USF 25(A) | pages = paragraph 4509 | chapter = Attacks -- General (Chapter IV, Section 1) | chapterurl = http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/ss-doc-4.htm. }}</ref>
| |
| | |
| The problem of computing the gyro angle setting is a trigonometry problem that is simplified by first considering the calculation of the deflection angle, which ignores torpedo ballistics and parallax.<ref name = Deflection>{{cite book | editor = Commander Submarine Force, United States Atlantic Fleet | title = Submarine Torpedo Fire Control Manual | origdate = 1950-02 | date = 2006-04-16 | url = http://www.hnsa.org/doc/attack/index.htm | pages = 1–2 | chapter = Definitions | accessdate = 2006-08-19 }}</ref>
| |
| For small gyro angles, ''θ<sub>Gyro</sub> ≈ θ<sub>Bearing</sub> - θ<sub>Deflection</sub>''. A direct application of the [[law of sines]] to Figure 3 produces Equation 1.
| |
| <div style="background:#f8f8f8; float:left; width:80px;margin:0 0 0em 0em; padding:0 1em; border:0px solid #bbb;" >(Equation 1)
| |
| </div>
| |
| <div style="background:#F8F8F8; float;margin:0 0 0em 0em; padding:0 0em;">
| |
| <math>\frac{\left \Vert v_{Target} \right \| }{ \sin(\theta_{Deflection}) } = \frac{\left \Vert v_{Torpedo} \right \| }{ \sin(\theta_{Bow}) } </math> </div>
| |
| where
| |
| :''v<sub>Target</sub>'' is the velocity of the target.
| |
| :''v<sub>Torpedo</sub>'' is the velocity of the torpedo.
| |
| :''θ<sub>Bow</sub>'' is the angle of the target ship bow relative to the periscope line of sight.
| |
| :''θ<sub>Deflection</sub>'' is the angle of the torpedo course relative to the periscope line of sight.
| |
| | |
| Range plays no role in Equation 1, which is true as long as the three assumptions are met. In fact, Equation 1 is the same equation solved by the mechanical sights of [http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/images/h41000/h41761.jpg steerable torpedo tubes] used on surface ships during World War I and World War II. Torpedo launches from steerable torpedo tubes meet the three stated assumptions well. However, an accurate torpedo launch from a submarine requires parallax and torpedo ballistic corrections when gyro angles are large. These corrections require knowing range accurately. When the target range was not known, torpedo launches requiring large gyro angles were not recommended.<ref name = AccurateRange>{{cite book | editor = Commander Submarine Force, United States Atlantic Fleet | title = Submarine Torpedo Fire Control Manual | origdate = 1950-02 | date = 2006-04-16 | url = http://www.hnsa.org/doc/attack/index.htm | pages = 8–10 | chapter = Chapter 8: Theory of Approach and Attack | accessdate = 2006-08-21 }}</ref>
| |
| | |
| Equation 1 is frequently modified to substitute track angle for deflection angle (track angle is defined in Figure 2, ''θ<sub>Track</sub>=θ<sub>Bow</sub>+θ<sub>Deflection</sub>''). This modification is illustrated with Equation 2.
| |
| <div style="background:#f8f8f8; float:left; width:80px;margin:0 0 0em 0em; padding:0 1em; border:0px solid #bbb;" >(Equation 2)
| |
| </div>
| |
| <div style="background:#F8F8F8; float;margin:0 0 0em 0em; padding:0 0em;">
| |
| <math>\frac{\left \Vert v_{Target} \right \| }{ \sin(\theta_{Deflection}) } = \frac{\left \Vert v_{Torpedo} \right \| }{ \sin(\theta_{Track}-\theta_{Deflection})}</math>
| |
| </div>
| |
| | |
| where
| |
| :''θ<sub>Track</sub>'' is the angle between the target ship's course and the torpedo's course.
| |
| | |
| [[Image:DeflectionAngle.png|noframe|thumb|Figure 4: Deflection angle versus track angle and target speed (''θ<sub>Gyro</sub> = 0<sup>o</sub>'').]]
| |
| | |
| A number of publications<ref name = OptimumTrackAngle>{{cite book | editor = Commander Submarine Force, United States Atlantic Fleet | title = Submarine Torpedo Fire Control Manual | origdate = 1950-02 | date = 2006-04-16 | url = http://www.hnsa.org/doc/attack/index.htm | pages = 8–9 | chapter = Chapter 8: Theory of Approach and Attack | accessdate = 2006-08-19 }}</ref><ref name="Clear2">{{cite book | last = O'Kane | first = Richard | title = Clear The Bridge:The War Patrols of the U.S.S. Tang | publisher = Bantam Books | year = 1977 | location = New York | chapter = Part V, Chapter 3 | page = 303 | isbn= 0-553-14516-9}}</ref> state the optimum torpedo track angle as 110° for a Mk 14 (46 knot weapon). Figure 4 shows a plot of the deflection angle versus track angle when the gyro angle is 0° (''i.e''., ''θ<sub>Deflection</sub>=θ<sub>Bearing</sub>'').<ref name="track">Most work on computing intercept angles is done using track angle as a variable. This is because track angle is a strictly a function of the target's course and speed along with the torpedo's course and speed. It removes the complexities associated with parallax and torpedo ballistics.</ref> Optimum track angle is defined as the point of minimum deflection angle sensitivity to track angle errors for a given target speed. This minimum occurs at the points of zero slope on the curves in Figure 4 (these points are marked by small triangles).
| |
| | |
| The curves show the solutions of Equation 2 for deflection angle as a function of target speed and track angle. Figure 4 confirms that 110° is the optimum track angle for a {{convert|16|kn|km/h|0|sing=on}} target, which would be a common ship speed.<ref name = TargetSpeed>
| |
| {{cite book | editor = Commander Submarine Force, United States Atlantic Fleet | title = Submarine Torpedo Fire Control Manual | origdate = 1950-02 | date = 2006-04-16 | url = http://www.hnsa.org/doc/attack/index.htm | pages = 5–25 | chapter = Chapter 5: Duties of the Fire Control Party | accessdate = 2006-08-19 }}</ref>
| |
| | |
| There is fairly complete documentation available for a Japanese torpedo fire control computer that goes through the [http://home.comcast.net/~mbiegert/Work/HistOfTech/TDC/Model.htm details of correcting for the ballistic and parallax factors]. While the TDC may not have used exactly the same approach, it was likely very similar.
| |
| | |
| ====Position keeper====
| |
| As with the angle solver the equations implemented in the angle solver can found in the Torpedo Data Computer manual.<ref name="tdcv3" /> Similar functions were implemented in the rangekeepers for surface ship-based fire control systems. For a general discussion of the principles behind the position keeper, see [[Rangekeeper]].
| |
| | |
| ==Notes and references==
| |
| {{reflist|2}}
| |
| | |
| ==External links==
| |
| *[http://www.maritime.org/tdc.htm USS Pampanito: Article on the Pampanito's TDC.]
| |
| *[http://www.usscod.org/tdc.html Torpedo Data Computer Mk IV]
| |
| *[http://web.mit.edu/STS.035/www/PDFs/Newell.pdf A. Ben Clymer: ''The mechanical analog Computers of Hannibal Ford and William Newell''], IEEE Annals of the history of computing
| |
| *[http://www.bergall.org/320/patrol/torpedo.html US Torpedo History: Good description of operational use of the Mk 14, Mk 18, and Mk 23]
| |
| *[http://www.hnsa.org/doc/tdc/index.htm Original Manual for the ''Torpedo Data Computer Mark 3''], Historic naval ships association
| |
| *[http://home.comcast.net/~mbiegert/Work/HistOfTech/TDC/Model.htm Discussion of the torpedo ballistic and parallax corrections used by the Imperial Japanese Navy]
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Submarines]]
| |
| [[Category:Military computers]]
| |
| [[Category:Analog computers]]
| |
| [[Category:Electro-mechanical computers]]
| |
1 Cath Kidston
If you want something a bit different, this quirky travel bag from Britain�s favourite vintage designer has a generous internal pocket, plus two side-pockets, all with zip fastenings, so there�s room for everything.
There�s a removable shoulder strap and in-built luggage tag.
�75, cathkidston.co.u
2 Go Travel Pack Fla
A lovely carry-on-sized roller case made of a lightweight yet sturdy material. It also features an ingenious folding mechanism, which means the empty case collapses down to a fraction of its size for easy storage
�85, go-travelproducts.c
3 Boden Colourpop B
This colourful, jute cotton companion has all the room you�ll need for aeroplane essentials and the sturdy leather handles and webbing shoulder strap means you won�t have to compromise on weighty bits and pieces. It doubles up as a useful beach bag and is available in a range of colour
�39.20, boden.co
k
4 Antler Business 100 Landscape Mobile Off
Boasting all the zips and padded pockets that business travellers could hope for, this also has a combination lock, two wheels for easy manoeuvrability, a piggyback strap to attach it to other luggage and even a clear plastic liquids bag for removal at security chec
�139, antler.c
uk
5 M&S Mock Crocodile Skin Trim Hol
ll
The patent touch makes this look a lot discount ugg boots more expensive than it is. Ideal for business use or weekends away, it�s generous in size, as well as practical, with a wipe-clean surface and an in-built luggage
�45, marksandspence
com
6 Luggo Robo
Bag
This funky suitcase for kids has wheels that light up in red, blue and green when it moves along. It�s got plenty of storage compartments and retractable straps so little�uns can use it as a backpack,
oo.
�40, sciencemuseumshop
o.uk
7 Jack Wolfskin Trek & R
l 40
The front section of this suitcase is a travelling office, with room for your smartphone, files and even your laptop, while in the main compartment four mesh pouches provide ample room http://tinyurl.com/kecvhhb for clothing, shoes and a wash bag. There�s a telescopic handle and smooth-glide wheels or you can turn it into a hands-free ruc
k.
�160, jack-wolfski
co.uk
8 De Bruir Par
huter
Here�s a bag that you�ll actually want to age. Artisan leatherworker Garvan de Bruir�s innovative design means that it fits comfortably against the back, moulding itself to your body with continuous wear. Available in various sizes, it�s made from robust bridle leather with chunky stitching
il.
�460, debr
r.com
9 Antler Cabin B1
case
This lightweight, locking trolley system moves around effortlessly, thanks to its eight-wheel drive. The high-shine polycarbonate, available in various colours, is incredibly strong and the interior is bright and well designed. There�s even a 10-year w
nty.
�129, discount ugg boots ant
r.co.uk
10 ugg boots sale Jane Shear
ng Tote
This spacious, comfortable and exceptionally robust tote is perfect if you�re after hand ugg boots sale luggage that will double up as a stylish handbag once you�ve reached your destination. Suitable for all seasons and all occasions, it�s also reversible and will last y
ears.
�229, uggaustralia.co.uk