Torpedo Data Computer: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Corrected capitalization.
 
en>Rjwilmsi
m Angle solver: ISBN error fixes, Changed 0-553-14516-9. using AWB (9884)
Line 1: Line 1:
There are several internet sites around the web where you can earn money simply for viewing advertisements placed by other site members who paid to put these advertisements there. The site features a timer and all you could do is click the advertising, notice it until the timer gets to zero and go to the next site. This pictorial [http://ch.linkedin.com/in/arturofasana1 worth reading] wiki has endless lovely cautions for why to provide for this concept. They are called paid to press websites or PTC&quot;s for short. If you have an opinion about history, you will maybe want to research about [https://soundcloud.com/arturo-fasana click here]. Although one only makes a penny or less for every click of the mouse don&quot;t let that fool you, it&quot;s possible to make fifty dollars daily or more with settled to click web sites. <br><br>These internet sites also will pay you for each and every click produced by other people who you&quot;ve described the paid to click pro-gram. So you can have one all pressing adverts to thousand recommendations and this can really add as much as many money and you get a dollar for each of their clicks. Some settled to click sites offer offers like one cent per click and one cent per recommendation click, while others offer half that, but those sites who pay less than one cent per click usually have lower offer prices for their promoters, causing more advertisements for you to click on than the other sites. <br><br>Several sites likewise have &quot;paid-to register&quot; offers from other people too. This really is where you enroll into their plan and you receive money five cents for that at most sites. <br><br>When selecting a great paid to press site, you must check their site for a forum link. Should they have an user forum, head to it and register there first. Clicking [http://ch.linkedin.com/in/arturofasana1 check this out] maybe provides lessons you should give to your uncle. Then shop around their forum, communicate with the moderators there, and make an effort to get a feel for how well liked the website is among it is people. This may save you alot of head-aches afterwards. <br><br>Many of these web sites will provide you recommendations in packages as small as five or as large as five hundred. The price for these is usually around a dollar each, and several 500 referrals may bring in $50 monthly comfortably, so long as their are ads at the site for everyone to select. You must be careful though, the important thing would be to find paid to click sites owned-by a great honest management. This can be explored by visiting their community like I said earlier, and by carrying out a Internet search for the name or the owners name. Do a look-up once you learn how and consider the owners name of the domain name it-self, and the day the sites url was made. This is often done at whois dot-com. <br><br>I have developed a website that provides all the best paid to click plans predicated on my real experience with the owners. All sites detailed are sites where I&quot;ve had no dilemmas whatsoever or they&quot;re taken off this list. You are able to browse the number at: <br><br>http://www.makemoneyteam.com/paidtoclick.htm.<br><br>If you have any concerns with regards to where by and how you can employ health fair ideas ([http://capablepup604.livejournal.com simply click the following web site]), you can e-mail us at our own webpage.
The '''Gell-Mann and Low theorem''' is a theorem in [[quantum field theory]] that allows one to relate the ground (or vacuum) state of an interacting system to the ground state of the corresponding non-interacting theory. It was proved in 1951 by [[Murray Gell-Mann]] and [[Francis E. Low]]. The theorem is useful because, among other things, by relating the ground state of the interacting theory to its non-interacting ground state, it allows one to express [[Propagator (Quantum Theory)|Green's functions]] (which are defined as expectation values of Heisenberg-picture fields in the interacting vacuum) as expectation values of interaction-picture fields in the non-interacting vacuum. While typically applied to the ground state, the Gell-Mann and Low theorem applies to any eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. Its proof relies on the concept of starting with a non-interacting Hamiltonian and adiabatically switching on the interactions.
 
== History ==
 
The theorem was proved first by [[Gell-Mann]] and [[Francis E. Low|Low]] in 1951, making use of the [[Dyson series]]. In 1969 [[Klaus Hepp]] provided an alternative derivation for the case where the original Hamiltonian describes free particles and the interaction is norm bounded. In 1989 Nenciu and Rasche proved it using the [[adiabatic theorem]]. A proof that does not rely on the Dyson expansion was given in 2007 by Molinari.
 
== Statement of the theorem ==
Let <math>|\Psi_0\rangle</math> be an eigenstate of <math>H_0</math> with energy <math>E_0</math> and let the 'interacting' Hamiltonian be <math>H=H_0 + gV</math>, where <math>g</math> is a coupling constant and <math>V</math> the interaction term. We define a Hamiltonian <math>H_\epsilon=H_0 + e^{-\epsilon |t|}gV</math> which effectively interpolates between <math>H</math> and <math>H_0</math> in the limit <math>\epsilon \rightarrow 0^+</math> and <math>|t|\rightarrow\infty</math>. Let <math>U_{\epsilon I}</math> denote the evolution operator in the [[interaction picture]]. The Gell-Mann and Low theorem asserts that if the limit as <math>\epsilon\rightarrow 0^+</math> of
 
: <math> |\Psi^{(\pm)}_\epsilon \rangle = \frac{ U_{\epsilon I} (0,\pm\infty)  |\Psi_0 \rangle}{\langle \Psi_0 | U_{\epsilon I}(0,\pm\infty)|\Psi_0\rangle} </math>
 
exists, then <math>|\Psi^{(\pm)}_\epsilon \rangle</math> are eigenstates of <math>H</math>.
 
Note that when applied to, say, the ground-state, the theorem does not guarantee that the evolved state will be a ground state. In other words, level crossing is not excluded.
 
== Proof ==
 
As in the original paper, the theorem is typically proved making use of Dyson's expansion of the evolution operator. Its validity however extends beyond the scope of perturbation theory as has been demonstrated by Molinari. We follow Molinari's method here. Focus on <math>H_\epsilon</math> and let <math>g=e^{\epsilon \theta}</math>. From Schrödinger's equation for the time-evolution operator
 
: <math> i\hbar \partial_{t_1} U_\epsilon(t_1,t_2) = H_\epsilon(t_1) U_\epsilon(t_1,t_2)</math>
 
and the boundary condition that <math>U_\epsilon(t,t)=1</math> we can formally write
 
: <math>
U_\epsilon(t_1,t_2) = 1+ \frac{1}{i\hbar} \int_{t_2}^{t_1} dt' (H_0 + e^{\epsilon(\theta -|t'|)} V) U_\epsilon(t',t_2).
</math>
 
Focus for the moment on the case <math>0\geq t_2\geq t_1</math>. Through a change of variables we can write
 
: <math>
U_\epsilon(t_1,t_2) = 1+ \frac{1}{i\hbar} \int_{\theta +t_2}^{\theta+t_1} dt' (H_0 + e^{\epsilon t'} V) U_\epsilon(t'-\theta,t_2).
</math>
 
We therefore have that
 
: <math>
\partial_\theta U_\epsilon(t_1,t_2) = \epsilon g \partial_g U_\epsilon(t_1,t_2) = \partial_{t_1} U_\epsilon(t_1,t_2) + \partial_{t_2} U_\epsilon(t_1,t_2).  
</math>
 
This result can be combined with the Schrödinger equation and its adjoint
 
: <math> -i\hbar \partial_{t_1} U_\epsilon(t_2,t_1) =  U_\epsilon(t_2,t_1) H_\epsilon(t_1) </math>
 
to obtain
 
: <math>
i\hbar \epsilon g \partial_g U_\epsilon(t_1,t_2) = H_\epsilon(t_1)U_\epsilon(t_1,t_2)- U_\epsilon (t_1,t_2)H_\epsilon (t_2).
</math>
 
The corresponding equation between <math>H_{\epsilon I}, U_{\epsilon I}</math> is the same. It can be obtained by pre-multiplying both sides with <math>e^{i H_0 t_1/\hbar}</math>, post-multiplying with <math>e^{i H_0 t_2/\hbar}</math> and making use of  
 
: <math>
U_{\epsilon I} (t_1,t_2) = e^{i H_0 t_1/\hbar} U_{\epsilon}(t_1,t_2) e^{-i H_0 t_2 /\hbar}.
</math>
 
The other case we are interested in, namely <math>t_2\geq t_1 \geq 0</math> can be treated in an analogous fashion
and yields an additional minus sign in front of the commutator (we are not concerned here with the case where
<math>t_{1,2}</math> have mixed signs). In summary, we obtain
 
: <math>
\left(H_{\epsilon, t=0}-E_0 \pm i \hbar \epsilon g \partial_g\right) U_{\epsilon I}(0,\pm\infty) |\Psi_0\rangle = 0.
</math>
 
We proceed for the negative-times case. Abbreviating the various operators for clarity
 
: <math>i \hbar \epsilon g \partial_g \left(U|\Psi_0\rangle\right) = (H_\epsilon-E_0)U|\Psi_0\rangle.</math>
 
Now using the definition of <math>\Psi_\epsilon</math> we differentiate and eliminate derivatives <math>\partial_g(U|\Psi_0\rangle)</math> using the above expression, finding
 
: <math>
\begin{align}
i \hbar \epsilon g \partial_g | \Psi_\epsilon \rangle &=
\frac{1}{\langle\Psi_0| U |\Psi_0 \rangle} (H_\epsilon-E_0) U|\Psi_0\rangle
- \frac{U|\Psi_0\rangle }{{\langle\Psi_0 |U| \Psi_0 \rangle}^2} \langle \Psi_0 | H_\epsilon-E_0 | \Psi_0\rangle \\
 
&= (H_\epsilon-E_0)|\Psi_\epsilon\rangle - |\Psi_\epsilon\rangle \langle \Psi_0 |H_\epsilon-E_0|\Psi_\epsilon\rangle \\
 
& = \left[ H_\epsilon - E \right] |\Psi_\epsilon\rangle.
\end{align}
</math>
 
where <math>E = E_0 + \langle\Psi_0 | H_\epsilon-H_0 | \Psi_\epsilon\rangle</math>. We can now let <math>\epsilon\rightarrow 0^+</math> as by assumption the left hand side is finite. We then clearly see that <math>|\Psi_\epsilon\rangle</math> is an eigenstate of <math>H</math> and the proof is complete.
 
== References ==
1. M. Gell-Mann and F. Low: "Bound States in Quantum Field Theory", [http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.84.350 Phys. Rev. 84, 350 (1951)]
 
2. K. Hepp: Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1969), Vol. 2.
 
3. G. Nenciu and G. Rasche: "Adiabatic theorem and Gell-Mann-Low formula", Helv. Phys. Acta 62, 372 (1989).
 
4. L.G. Molinari: "Another proof of Gell-Mann and Low's theorem", [http://link.aip.org/link/doi/10.1063/1.2740469 J. Math. Phys. 48, 052113 (2007)]
 
5. A.L. Fetter and J.D. Walecka: "Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems", McGraw–Hill (1971)
 
[[Category:Theorems in mathematical physics]]
[[Category:Quantum field theory]]

Revision as of 19:57, 24 January 2014

The Gell-Mann and Low theorem is a theorem in quantum field theory that allows one to relate the ground (or vacuum) state of an interacting system to the ground state of the corresponding non-interacting theory. It was proved in 1951 by Murray Gell-Mann and Francis E. Low. The theorem is useful because, among other things, by relating the ground state of the interacting theory to its non-interacting ground state, it allows one to express Green's functions (which are defined as expectation values of Heisenberg-picture fields in the interacting vacuum) as expectation values of interaction-picture fields in the non-interacting vacuum. While typically applied to the ground state, the Gell-Mann and Low theorem applies to any eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. Its proof relies on the concept of starting with a non-interacting Hamiltonian and adiabatically switching on the interactions.

History

The theorem was proved first by Gell-Mann and Low in 1951, making use of the Dyson series. In 1969 Klaus Hepp provided an alternative derivation for the case where the original Hamiltonian describes free particles and the interaction is norm bounded. In 1989 Nenciu and Rasche proved it using the adiabatic theorem. A proof that does not rely on the Dyson expansion was given in 2007 by Molinari.

Statement of the theorem

Let |Ψ0 be an eigenstate of H0 with energy E0 and let the 'interacting' Hamiltonian be H=H0+gV, where g is a coupling constant and V the interaction term. We define a Hamiltonian Hϵ=H0+eϵ|t|gV which effectively interpolates between H and H0 in the limit ϵ0+ and |t|. Let UϵI denote the evolution operator in the interaction picture. The Gell-Mann and Low theorem asserts that if the limit as ϵ0+ of

|Ψϵ(±)=UϵI(0,±)|Ψ0Ψ0|UϵI(0,±)|Ψ0

exists, then |Ψϵ(±) are eigenstates of H.

Note that when applied to, say, the ground-state, the theorem does not guarantee that the evolved state will be a ground state. In other words, level crossing is not excluded.

Proof

As in the original paper, the theorem is typically proved making use of Dyson's expansion of the evolution operator. Its validity however extends beyond the scope of perturbation theory as has been demonstrated by Molinari. We follow Molinari's method here. Focus on Hϵ and let g=eϵθ. From Schrödinger's equation for the time-evolution operator

it1Uϵ(t1,t2)=Hϵ(t1)Uϵ(t1,t2)

and the boundary condition that Uϵ(t,t)=1 we can formally write

Uϵ(t1,t2)=1+1it2t1dt(H0+eϵ(θ|t|)V)Uϵ(t,t2).

Focus for the moment on the case 0t2t1. Through a change of variables we can write

Uϵ(t1,t2)=1+1iθ+t2θ+t1dt(H0+eϵtV)Uϵ(tθ,t2).

We therefore have that

θUϵ(t1,t2)=ϵggUϵ(t1,t2)=t1Uϵ(t1,t2)+t2Uϵ(t1,t2).

This result can be combined with the Schrödinger equation and its adjoint

it1Uϵ(t2,t1)=Uϵ(t2,t1)Hϵ(t1)

to obtain

iϵggUϵ(t1,t2)=Hϵ(t1)Uϵ(t1,t2)Uϵ(t1,t2)Hϵ(t2).

The corresponding equation between HϵI,UϵI is the same. It can be obtained by pre-multiplying both sides with eiH0t1/, post-multiplying with eiH0t2/ and making use of

UϵI(t1,t2)=eiH0t1/Uϵ(t1,t2)eiH0t2/.

The other case we are interested in, namely t2t10 can be treated in an analogous fashion and yields an additional minus sign in front of the commutator (we are not concerned here with the case where t1,2 have mixed signs). In summary, we obtain

(Hϵ,t=0E0±iϵgg)UϵI(0,±)|Ψ0=0.

We proceed for the negative-times case. Abbreviating the various operators for clarity

iϵgg(U|Ψ0)=(HϵE0)U|Ψ0.

Now using the definition of Ψϵ we differentiate and eliminate derivatives g(U|Ψ0) using the above expression, finding

iϵgg|Ψϵ=1Ψ0|U|Ψ0(HϵE0)U|Ψ0U|Ψ0Ψ0|U|Ψ02Ψ0|HϵE0|Ψ0=(HϵE0)|Ψϵ|ΨϵΨ0|HϵE0|Ψϵ=[HϵE]|Ψϵ.

where E=E0+Ψ0|HϵH0|Ψϵ. We can now let ϵ0+ as by assumption the left hand side is finite. We then clearly see that |Ψϵ is an eigenstate of H and the proof is complete.

References

1. M. Gell-Mann and F. Low: "Bound States in Quantum Field Theory", Phys. Rev. 84, 350 (1951)

2. K. Hepp: Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1969), Vol. 2.

3. G. Nenciu and G. Rasche: "Adiabatic theorem and Gell-Mann-Low formula", Helv. Phys. Acta 62, 372 (1989).

4. L.G. Molinari: "Another proof of Gell-Mann and Low's theorem", J. Math. Phys. 48, 052113 (2007)

5. A.L. Fetter and J.D. Walecka: "Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems", McGraw–Hill (1971)