Codazzi tensor: Difference between revisions
en>Salimfadhley Added {{citation style}} and {{context}} tags to article (TW) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= | In algebra, the '''Krull–Akizuki theorem''' states the following: let ''A'' be a one-dimensional reduced noetherian ring,<ref>In this article, a ring is commutative and has unity.</ref> ''K'' its [[total ring of fractions]]. If ''B'' is a subring of a finite extension ''L'' of ''K'' containing ''A'' and is not a field, then ''B'' is a one-dimensional noetherian ring. Furthermore, for every nonzero ideal ''I'' of ''B'', <math>B/I</math> is finite over ''A''.<ref>{{harvnb|Bourbaki|1989|loc=Ch VII, §2, no. 5, Proposition 5}}</ref> | ||
Note that the theorem does not say that ''B'' is finite over ''A''. The theorem does not extend to higher dimension. One important consequence of the theorem is that the [[integral closure]] of a [[Dedekind domain]] ''A'' in a finite extension of the field of fractions of ''A'' is again a Dedekind domain. This consequence does generalize to a higher dimension: the [[Mori–Nagata theorem]] states that the integral closure of a noetherian domain is a [[Krull domain]]. | |||
== Proof == | |||
Here, we give a proof when <math>L = K</math>. Let <math>\mathfrak{p}_i</math> be minimal prime ideals of ''A''; there are finitely many of them. Let <math>K_i</math> be the field of fractions of <math>A/{\mathfrak{p}_i}</math> and <math>I_i</math> the kernel of the natural map <math>B \to K \to K_i</math>. Then we have: | |||
:<math>A/{\mathfrak{p}_i} \subset B/{I_i} \subset K_i</math>. | |||
Now, if the theorem holds when ''A'' is a domain, then this implies that ''B'' is a one-dimensional noetherian domain since each <math>B/{I_i}</math> is and since <math>B = \prod B/{I_i}</math>. Hence, we reduced the proof to the case ''A'' is a domain. Let <math>0 \ne I \subset B</math> be an ideal and let ''a'' be a nonzero element in the nonzero ideal <math>I \cap A</math>. Set <math>I_n = a^nB \cap A + aA</math>. Since <math>A/aA</math> is a zero-dim noetherian ring; thus, [[artinian ring|artinian]], there is an ''l'' such that <math>I_n = I_l</math> for all <math>n \ge l</math>. We claim | |||
:<math>a^l B \subset a^{l+1}B + A.</math> | |||
Since it suffices to establish the inclusion locally, we may assume ''A'' is a local ring with the maximal ideal <math>\mathfrak{m}</math>. Let ''x'' be a nonzero element in ''B''. Then, since ''A'' is noetherian, there is an ''n'' such that <math>\mathfrak{m}^{n+1} \subset x^{-1} A</math> and so <math>a^{n+1}x \in a^{n+1}B \cap A \subset I_{n+2}</math>. Thus, | |||
:<math>a^n x \in a^{n+1} B \cap A + A.</math> | |||
Now, assume ''n'' is a minimum integer such that <math>n \ge l</math> and the last inclusion holds. If <math>n > l</math>, then we easily see that <math>a^n x \in I_{n+1}</math>. But then the above inclusion holds for <math>n-1</math>, contradiction. Hence, we have <math>n = l</math> and this establishes the claim. It now follows: | |||
:<math>B/{aB} \simeq a^l B/a^{l+1} B \subset (a^{l +1}B + A)/a^{l+1} B \simeq A/{a^{l +1}B \cap A}.</math> | |||
Hence, <math>B/{aB}</math> has finite length as ''A''-module. In particular, the image of ''I'' there is finitely generated and so ''I'' is finitely generated. Finally, the above shows that <math>B/{aB}</math> has zero dimension and so ''B'' has dimension one. <math>\square</math> | |||
== References == | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
*http://books.google.com/books?id=APPtnn84FMIC&lpg=PA83&ots=2L9MiWbIYZ&dq=krull%20akizuki&pg=PA85#v=onepage&q=krull%20akizuki&f=false | |||
*[[Nicolas Bourbaki]], ''Commutative algebra'' | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Krull-Akizuki theorem}} | |||
[[Category:Theorems in algebra]] |
Latest revision as of 02:42, 4 June 2013
In algebra, the Krull–Akizuki theorem states the following: let A be a one-dimensional reduced noetherian ring,[1] K its total ring of fractions. If B is a subring of a finite extension L of K containing A and is not a field, then B is a one-dimensional noetherian ring. Furthermore, for every nonzero ideal I of B, is finite over A.[2]
Note that the theorem does not say that B is finite over A. The theorem does not extend to higher dimension. One important consequence of the theorem is that the integral closure of a Dedekind domain A in a finite extension of the field of fractions of A is again a Dedekind domain. This consequence does generalize to a higher dimension: the Mori–Nagata theorem states that the integral closure of a noetherian domain is a Krull domain.
Proof
Here, we give a proof when . Let be minimal prime ideals of A; there are finitely many of them. Let be the field of fractions of and the kernel of the natural map . Then we have:
Now, if the theorem holds when A is a domain, then this implies that B is a one-dimensional noetherian domain since each is and since . Hence, we reduced the proof to the case A is a domain. Let be an ideal and let a be a nonzero element in the nonzero ideal . Set . Since is a zero-dim noetherian ring; thus, artinian, there is an l such that for all . We claim
Since it suffices to establish the inclusion locally, we may assume A is a local ring with the maximal ideal . Let x be a nonzero element in B. Then, since A is noetherian, there is an n such that and so . Thus,
Now, assume n is a minimum integer such that and the last inclusion holds. If , then we easily see that . But then the above inclusion holds for , contradiction. Hence, we have and this establishes the claim. It now follows:
Hence, has finite length as A-module. In particular, the image of I there is finitely generated and so I is finitely generated. Finally, the above shows that has zero dimension and so B has dimension one.
References
43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.
- http://books.google.com/books?id=APPtnn84FMIC&lpg=PA83&ots=2L9MiWbIYZ&dq=krull%20akizuki&pg=PA85#v=onepage&q=krull%20akizuki&f=false
- Nicolas Bourbaki, Commutative algebra
- ↑ In this article, a ring is commutative and has unity.
- ↑ Template:Harvnb