|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Multiple issues|refimprove=October 2010|overly detailed=March 2012|original research=March 2012}}
| | DTZ's auction crew in Singapore auctions all forms of residential, office and retail properties, outlets, homes, lodges, boarding houses, industrial buildings and improvement websites. Auctions are at present held as soon as a month.<br><br>Most contracts for the sale and buy of property in Singapore will incorporatestandard terms referred to as the Singapore Regulation Society's Circumstances of Sale 1999. If theterms of the sale and purchase settlement or of the choice are silent on certainpoints, then the provisions of these situations will apply. These situations mayalso be modified by specific phrases within the contract - for example, it is common forthe sale to be topic to the property being unaffected by street widening schemes. Buy from an Unlicensed Housing Developer<br><br>D19) Hougang / Punggol / Sengkang HDB House for Hire D01) Boat Quay / Raffles Place HDB Widespread Room with Aircon D05) Buona Vista / West Coast HDB Common Room with Aircon D03) Alexandra Road / Commonwealth HDB Frequent Room with Aircon D19) Hougang / Punggol / Sengkang HDB Common Room D12) Balestier / Toa Payo HDB Widespread Room D23) Bukit Batok / Bukit Panjiang HDB Widespread Room D18) Pasir Ris / Tampines HDB Home for Hire D04) Harbourfront / Telok Blangah HDB Home for Lease D20) Ang Mo Kio / Bishan / Thomson HDB Dwelling for Lease D14) Eunos / Geylang / Paya Lebar HDB Residence for Lease D27) Sembawang / Yishun HDB House for Lease D07) Beach Street / Bugis / Rochor HDB House for Lease D25) Admiralty / Woodlands HDB House for Hire D16) Bedok / Higher East Coast HDB Dwelling for Lease<br><br>A licensed and proactive actual estate skilled, Jack goes past just sourcing and marketing real property properties. Efficient and approachable, he makes the entire expertise straightforward and stress-free. D14) Eunos / Geylang / Paya Lebar Condo Common Room with Aircon D22) Boon Lay / Jurong / Tuas Condominium Widespread Room with Aircon Initially I was shocked and indignant that the property agent and ex-owner did not tell us about it,' said the proprietor. Mr Koh, 38, who has been an agent for six years, stated a colleague as soon as misplaced a sale because he got here clean. I would also go to the temples to wish and seek steering within the sale. Developers typically bid at greater and higher costs in a bullish market, resulting in property costs growing in tandem. Past [http://www.maryelizabethking.com/oxwall/blogs/post/6263 property agents singapore] Auction Lists<br><br>Post and list your house, apartment, home for Rental or Sale in our online property classifieds. Generally, the value of a property is dear in Singapore therefore comes the excessive price of properties for hire Properties for lease are total more costly and the danger of landlords having a change of coronary heart and deciding to demand vacancy without proper notice are a few of the distinct causes that outcome to people preferring to own their own home. The rental costs for personal condos can range drastically. A condo in prime areas fetch highest rental prices and these rental market prices normally rely upon its normal of luxury, amenities offered and the accessibility of the condominium. Excessive-finish condo close to Orchard Street Condominium For Sale – Paterson Residence (D09)<br><br>3Rm HDB For Rent Near Tampines MRT Blk 267 Tampines St 21 2+1 HDB unit, Totally furnished, Aircon 3Rm HDB For Hire Close to Bedok Reservoir Blk 526 Bedok North St three 2+1 HDB unit, Absolutely furnished, Obtainable Immed $2.1k Nego With my vast experience in gross sales and leases of residential property, you can be assured that your curiosity is effectively taken care of. View my full profile Joseph, thanks on your guidences and patients. Thank god in your advise else I'd have purchased the mistaken property with out realizing what difficulties it could give me." Jerry, your sufferers and non-pushy type is why we selected you over others. Properly Carried out and Thank You for recommending such a stunning residence to us" Pointers for Property Auction Sale (Sellers) |
| '''Automobile handling''' and '''vehicle handling''' are descriptions of the way wheeled vehicles perform transverse to their direction of motion, particularly during [[Cornering force|cornering]] and swerving. It also includes their [[directional stability]] when moving in steady state condition. Handling and braking are the major components of a vehicle's "active" safety. The maximum lateral acceleration is sometimes discussed separately as "road holding". (This discussion is directed at road vehicles with at least three wheels, but some of it may apply to other ground vehicles.) Automobiles driven on public roads whose engineering requirements emphasize handling over comfort and passenger space are named [[sports car]]s.
| |
| | |
| == Factors that affect a car's handling ==
| |
| === Weight distribution ===
| |
| {{Main|Weight distribution}}
| |
| | |
| ==== Center of mass height ====
| |
| The [[center of mass]] height, relative to the track, determines [[load transfer]], (related to, but not exactly [[weight transfer]]), from side to side and causes body lean. When tires of a vehicle provide a [[centripetal force]] to pull it around a turn, the [[momentum]] of the vehicle actuates [[load transfer]] in a direction going from the vehicle's current position to a point on a path [[tangent]] to the vehicle's path. This [[load transfer]] presents itself in the form of body lean.
| |
| | |
| Height of the center of mass relative to the wheelbase determines load transfer between front and rear. The car's momentum acts at its center of mass to tilt the car forward or backward, respectively during braking and acceleration. Since it is only the downward force that changes and not the location of the center of mass, the effect on over/under steer is ''opposite'' to that of an actual change in the center of mass. When a car is braking, the downward load on the front tires increases and that on the rear decreases, with corresponding change in their ability to take sideways load.
| |
| | |
| A lower center of mass is a principal performance advantage of [[sports car]]s, compared to sedans and (especially) [[SUV]]s. Some cars have body panels made of lightweight materials partly for this reason.
| |
| | |
| Body lean can also be controlled by the springs, [[anti-roll bar]]s or the [[roll center]] heights.
| |
| | |
| ==== Center of mass ====
| |
| In steady-state cornering, front-heavy cars tend to [[understeer]] and rear-heavy cars to oversteer [[Understeer_and_oversteer|(Understeer & Oversteer explained)]], all other things being equal. The [[mid-engine design]] seeks to achieve the ideal center of mass, though front-engine design has the advantage of permitting a more practical engine-passenger-baggage layout. All other parameters being equal, at the hands of an expert driver a neutrally balanced mid-engine car can corner faster, but a FR (front-engined, rear-wheel drive) layout car is easier to drive at the limit.
| |
| | |
| The rearward weight bias preferred by sports and racing cars results from handling effects during the transition from straight-ahead to cornering. During corner entry the front tires, in addition to generating part of the lateral force required to accelerate the car's [[center of mass]] into the turn, also generate a torque about the car's vertical axis that starts the car rotating into the turn. However, the lateral force being generated by the rear tires is acting in the opposite torsional sense, trying to rotate the car out of the turn. For this reason, a car with "50/50" weight distribution will understeer on initial corner entry. To avoid this problem, sports and racing cars often have a more rearward weight distribution. In the case of pure racing cars, this is typically between "40/60" and "35/65".{{Citation needed|reason = Contemporary F1, Le Mans, and Cup cars are all between 50/50 and 40/60|date=July 2010}} This gives the front tires an advantage in overcoming the car's [[moment of inertia]] (yaw angular inertia), thus reducing corner-entry understeer.
| |
| | |
| Using wheels and tires of different sizes (proportional to the weight carried by each end) is a lever automakers can use to fine tune the resulting over/understeer characteristics.
| |
| | |
| ==== Roll angular inertia ====
| |
| This increases the time it takes to settle down and follow the steering. It depends on the (square of the) height and width, and (for a uniform mass distribution) can be approximately calculated by the equation: <math>I=M(height^2+width^2)/12</math>.
| |
| | |
| Greater width, then, though it counteracts center of gravity height, hurts handling by increasing angular inertia. Some high performance cars have light materials in their fenders and roofs partly for this reason.
| |
| | |
| ==== Yaw and pitch angular inertia (polar moment) ====
| |
| Unless the vehicle is very short, compared to its height or width, these are about equal. Angular inertia determines the [[rotational inertia]] of an object for a given rate of rotation.
| |
| The [[Yaw angle|yaw]] angular inertia tends to keep the direction the car is pointing changing at a constant rate. This makes it slower to swerve or go into a tight curve, and it also makes it slower to turn straight again.
| |
| The [[Pitch (flight)|pitch]] angular inertia detracts from the ability of the suspension to keep front and back tire loadings constant on uneven surfaces and therefore contributes to bump steer.
| |
| Angular inertia is an integral over the ''square'' of the distance from the center of gravity, so it favors small cars even though the lever arms (wheelbase and track) also increase with scale. (Since cars have reasonable symmetrical shapes, the off-diagonal terms of the angular inertia [[tensor]] can usually be ignored.)
| |
| Mass near the ends of a car can be avoided, without re-designing it to be shorter, by the use of light materials for bumpers and fenders or by deleting them entirely. If most of the weight is in the middle of the car then the vehicle will be easier to spin, and therefore will react quicker to a turn.
| |
| | |
| === Suspension ===
| |
| Automobile [[suspension (vehicle)|suspension]]s have many variable characteristics, which are generally different in the front and rear and all of which affect handling. Some of these are: [[spring rate]], damping, straight ahead [[camber angle]], camber change with wheel travel, roll center height and the flexibility and vibration modes of the suspension elements. Suspension also affects unsprung weight.
| |
| | |
| Many cars have suspension that connects the wheels on the two sides, either by a [[sway bar]] and/or by a solid axle. The [[Citroën 2CV]] has interaction between the front and rear suspension.
| |
| | |
| The flexing of the frame interacts with the suspension. (See below.)
| |
| | |
| ==== Suspension travel ====
| |
| The severe handling vice of the [[Triumph TR3|TR3B]] and related cars was caused by running out of suspension travel. (See below.)
| |
| Other vehicles will run out of suspension travel with some combination of bumps and turns, with similarly catastrophic effect. Excessively modified cars also may encounter this problem.
| |
| | |
| === Tires and wheels ===
| |
| In general, softer [[rubber]], higher [[hysteresis]] rubber and stiffer cord configurations increase road holding and improve handling. On most types of poor surfaces, large diameter [[wheel]]s perform better than lower wider wheels. The depth of tread remaining greatly affects [[Hydroplaning (tires)|aquaplaning]] (riding over deep water without reaching the road surface). Increasing tire pressures reduces their [[slip angle]], but lessening the contact area is detrimental in usual surface conditions and should be used with caution.
| |
| | |
| The amount a tire meets the road is an equation between the weight of the car and the type (and size) of its tire. A 1000 kg car can depress a 185/65/15 tire more than a 215/45/15 tire longitudenally thus having better linear grip and better braking distance not to mention better aquaplaning performance, while the wider tires having better (dry) cornering resistance.
| |
| | |
| The contemporary chemical make-up of tires are dependant of the ambient and road temperatures. Ideally a tire should be soft enough to conform to the road surface (thus having good grip), but be hard enough to last for enough duration (distance) to be economically feasible. It is usually a good idea having different set of summer and winter tires for climates having these temperatures.
| |
| | |
| === Track and wheelbase ===
| |
| The [[axle track]] provides the resistance to lateral weight transfer and body lean. The [[wheelbase]] provides resistance to longitudinal weight transfer and to pitch angular inertia, and provides the torque lever arm to rotate the car when swerving. The wheelbase, however, is less important than angular inertia (polar moment) to the vehicle's ability to swerve quickly.
| |
| | |
| === Unsprung weight ===
| |
| [[File:Car diagram.jpg|right]]
| |
| Ignoring the flexing of other components, a car can be modeled as the sprung weight, carried by the springs, carried by the [[unsprung weight]], carried by the tires, carried by the road. Unsprung weight is more properly regarded as a [[mass]] which has its own inherent [[inertia]] separate from the rest of the vehicle. When a wheel is pushed upwards by a bump in the road, the inertia of the wheel will cause it to be carried further upward above the height of the bump. If the force of the push is sufficiently large, the inertia of the wheel will cause the tire to completely lift off the road surface resulting in a loss of traction and control. Similarly when crossing into a sudden ground depression, the inertia of the wheel slows the rate at which it descends. If the wheel inertia is large enough, the wheel may be temporarily separated from the road surface before it has descended back into contact with the road surface.
| |
| | |
| This unsprung weight is cushioned from uneven road surfaces only by the compressive resilience of the tire (and wire wheels if fitted), and which aids the wheel in remaining in contact with the road surface when the wheel inertia prevents close-following of the ground surface. However, the compressive resilience of the tire results in [[rolling resistance]] which requires additional kinetic energy to overcome, and the rolling resistance is expended in the tire as heat due to the flexing of the rubber and steel bands in the sidewalls of the tires. To reduce rolling resistance for improved [[Fuel economy in automobiles|fuel economy]] and to avoid overheating and failure of tires at high speed, tires are designed to have limited internal damping.
| |
| | |
| So the "wheel bounce" due to wheel inertia, or resonant motion of the unsprung weight moving up and down on the springiness of the tire, is only poorly damped, mainly by the dampers or [[shock absorber]]s of the suspension. For these reasons, high unsprung weight reduces road holding and increases unpredictable changes in direction on rough surfaces (as well as degrading [[ride quality|ride comfort]] and increasing mechanical loads).
| |
| | |
| This unsprung weight includes the wheels and tires, usually the [[brake]]s, plus some percentage of the suspension, depending on how much of the suspension moves with the body and how much with the wheels; for instance a solid axle is completely unsprung. The main factors that improve unsprung weight are a sprung differential (as opposed to [[live axle]]) and [[inboard brake]]s. (The [[De Dion tube]] suspension operates much as a live axle does, but represents an improvement because the diff is mounted to the body, thereby reducing the unsprung weight.) [[Aluminum]] wheels also help. [[Magnesium alloy wheel]]s are even lighter but corrode easily.
| |
| | |
| Since only the brakes on the driving wheels can easily be inboard, the [[Citroën 2CV]] had inertial dampers on its rear wheel hubs to damp only wheel bounce.
| |
| | |
| === Aerodynamics ===
| |
| [[Aerodynamic]] forces are generally proportional to the square of the air speed, therefore car aerodynamics become rapidly more important as speed increases. Like darts, aeroplanes, etc., cars can be stabilised by fins and other rear aerodynamic devices. However, in addition to this cars also use downforce or "negative lift" to improve road holding. This is prominent on many types of racing cars, but is also used on most passenger cars to some degree, if only to counteract the tendency for the car to otherwise produce positive lift.
| |
| | |
| In addition to providing increased adhesion, car aerodynamics are frequently designed to compensate for the inherent increase in oversteer as cornering speed increases. When a car corners, it must rotate about its vertical axis as well as translate its [[center of mass]] in an arc. However, in a tight-radius (lower speed) corner the [[angular velocity]] of the car is high, while in a longer-radius (higher speed) corner the [[angular velocity]] is much lower. Therefore, the front tires have a more difficult time overcoming the car's [[moment of inertia]] during corner entry at low speed, and much less difficulty as the cornering speed increases. So the natural tendency of any car is to understeer on entry to low-speed corners and oversteer on entry to high-speed corners. To compensate for this unavoidable effect, car designers often bias the car's handling toward less corner-entry understeer (such as by lowering the front [[roll center]]), and add rearward bias to the aerodynamic downforce to compensate in higher-speed corners. The rearward aerodynamic bias may be achieved by an airfoil or "spoiler" mounted near the rear of the car, but a useful effect can also be achieved by careful shaping of the body as a whole, particularly the aft areas
| |
| | |
| In recent years, aerodynamics have become an area of increasing focus by racing teams as well as car manufacturers. Advanced tools such as [[wind tunnels]] and [[computational fluid dynamics]] (CFD) have allowed engineers to optimize the handling characteristics of vehicles. Advanced wind tunnels such as [[Wind Shear's Full Scale, Rolling Road, Automotive Wind Tunnel]] recently built in Concord, North Carolina have taken the simulation of on-road conditions to the ultimate level of accuracy and repeatability under very controlled conditions. CFD has similarly been used as a tool to simulate aerodynamic conditions but through the use of extremely advanced computers and software to duplicate the car's design digitally then "test" that design on the computer.
| |
| | |
| === Delivery of power to the wheels and brakes ===
| |
| The coefficient of friction of rubber on the road limits the magnitude of the vector sum of the transverse and longitudinal force. So the driven wheels or those supplying the most [[brake|braking]] tend to slip sideways. This phenomenon is often explained by use of the [[circle of forces]] model.
| |
| | |
| One reason that sports cars are usually rear wheel drive is that power induced oversteer is useful, to a skilled driver, for tight curves. The weight transfer under acceleration has the opposite effect and either may dominate, depending on the conditions. Inducing understeer by applying power in a front wheel drive car is useful via proper use of "[[Left-foot braking]]." In any case, this is not an important safety issue, because power is not normally used in emergency situations. Using low gears down steep hills may cause some oversteer.
| |
| | |
| The effect of braking on handling is complicated by [[load transfer]], which is proportional to the (negative) acceleration times the ratio of the center of gravity height to the wheelbase. The difficulty is that the acceleration at the limit of adhesion depends on the road surface, so with the same ratio of front to back braking force, a car will understeer under braking on slick surfaces and oversteer under hard braking on solid surfaces. Most modern cars combat this by varying the distribution of braking in some way. This is important with a high center of gravity, but it is also done on low center of gravity cars, from which a higher level of performance is expected.
| |
| | |
| === Steering ===
| |
| Depending on the driver, [[steering]] force and transmission of road forces back to the steering wheel and the [[steering ratio]] of turns of the steering wheel to turns of the road wheels affect control and awareness. Play — free rotation of the steering wheel before the wheels rotate — is a common problem, especially in older model and worn cars. Another is friction. [[Rack and pinion]] steering is generally considered the best type of mechanism for control effectiveness. The linkage also contributes play and friction. Caster — offset of the steering axis from the [[contact patch]] — provides some of the self-centering tendency.
| |
| | |
| Precision of the steering is particularly important on ice or hard packed snow where the slip angle at the limit of adhesion is smaller than on dry roads.
| |
| | |
| The steering effort depends on the downward force on the steering tires and on the radius of the contact patch. So for constant tire pressure, it goes like the 1.5 power of the vehicle's weight. The driver's ability to exert torque on the wheel scales similarly with his size. The wheels must be rotated farther on a longer car to turn with a given radius. [[Power steering]] reduces the required force at the expense of feel. It is useful, mostly in parking, when the weight of a front-heavy vehicle exceeds about ten or fifteen times the driver's weight, for physically impaired drivers and when there is much friction in the steering mechanism.
| |
| | |
| [[Four-wheel steering]] has begun to be used on road cars (Some WW II reconnaissance vehicles had it). It relieves the effect of angular inertia by starting the whole car moving before it rotates toward the desired direction. It can also be used, in the other direction, to reduce the turning radius. Some cars will do one or the other, depending on the speed.
| |
| | |
| Steering geometry changes due to bumps in the road may cause the front wheels to steer in different directions together or independent of each other. The steering linkage should be designed to minimize this effect.
| |
| | |
| === Electronic stability control ===
| |
| {{main|Electronic stability control}}
| |
| Electronic stability control (ESC) is a computerized technology that improves the safety of a vehicle's stability by attempting to detect and prevent skids. When ESC detects loss of steering control, the system applies individual brakes to help "steer" the vehicle where the driver wants to go. Braking is automatically applied to individual wheels, such as the outer front wheel to counter oversteer, or the inner rear wheel to counter understeer.
| |
| | |
| The stability control of some cars may not be compatible with some driving techniques, such as power induced over-steer. It is therefore, at least from a sporting point of view, preferable that it can be disabled.
| |
| | |
| === Static alignment of the wheels ===
| |
| Of course things should be the same, left and right, for road cars. Camber affects steering because a tire generates a force towards the side that the top is leaning towards. This is called camber thrust. Additional front negative camber is used to improve the cornering ability of cars with insufficient camber gain.
| |
| | |
| === Rigidity of the frame ===
| |
| The frame may flex with load, especially twisting on bumps.
| |
| Rigidity is considered to help handling. At least it simplifies the suspension engineers work.
| |
| Some cars, such as the [[Mercedes-Benz 300SL]] have had high doors to allow a stiffer frame.
| |
| | |
| == Driver handling the car ==
| |
| Handling is a property of the car, but different characteristics will work well with different drivers.
| |
| | |
| === Familiarity ===
| |
| A person learns to control a car much as they learns to control their body, so the more they have driven a car or type of car the better it will handle for them. One needs to take extra care for the first few months after buying a car, especially if it differs in design from those they are used to. Other things that a driver must adjust to include changes in tires, tire pressures and load. That is, handling is not just good or bad; it is also the same or different.
| |
| | |
| === Position and support for the driver ===
| |
| Having to take up "g forces" in his/her arms interferes with a driver's precise steering. In a similar manner, a lack of support for the seating position of the driver may cause them to move around as the car undergoes rapid acceleration (through cornering, taking off or braking). This interferes with precise control inputs, making the car more difficult to control.
| |
| | |
| Being able to reach the controls easily is also an important consideration, especially if a car is being driven hard.
| |
| | |
| In some circumstances, good support may allow a driver to retain some control, even after a minor accident or after the first stage of an accident.
| |
| | |
| == External conditions that affect handling ==
| |
| === Weather ===
| |
| Weather affects handling by changing the amount of available traction on a surface. Different [[tire]]s do best in different weather. Deep water is an exception to the rule that wider tires improve road holding. (See aquaplaning under tires, below.)
| |
| | |
| === Road condition ===
| |
| Cars with relatively soft suspension and with low [[unsprung weight]] are least affected by uneven surfaces, while on flat smooth surfaces the stiffer the better. Unexpected water, ice, oil, etc. are hazards.
| |
| | |
| == Common handling problems ==
| |
| When any wheel leaves contact with the road there is a change in handling, so the suspension should keep all four (or three) wheels on the road in spite of hard cornering, swerving and bumps in the road. It is very important for handling, as well as other reasons, not to run out of suspension travel and "bottom" or "top".
| |
| | |
| It is usually most desirable to have the [[Racing setup|car adjusted]] for a small amount of [[understeer]], so that it responds predictably to a turn of the steering wheel and the rear wheels have a smaller slip angle than the front wheels. However this may not be achievable for all loading, road and weather conditions, speed ranges, or while turning under acceleration or braking. Ideally, a car should carry passengers and baggage near its center of gravity and have similar tire loading, [[camber angle]] and roll stiffness in front and back to minimise the variation in handling characteristics. A driver can learn to deal with excessive oversteer or understeer, but not if it varies greatly in a short period of time.
| |
| | |
| The most important common handling failings are;
| |
| * [[Understeer]] – the front wheels tend to crawl slightly or even slip and drift towards the outside of the turn. The driver can compensate by turning a little more tightly, but road-holding is reduced, the car's behaviour is less predictable and the tires are liable to wear more quickly.
| |
| * [[Oversteer]] – the rear wheels tend to crawl or slip towards the outside of the turn more than the front. The driver must correct by steering away from the corner, otherwise the car is liable to spin, if pushed to its limit. Oversteer is sometimes useful, to assist in steering, especially if it occurs only when the driver chooses it by applying power.
| |
| * [[Bump steer]] – the effect of irregularity of a road surface on the angle or motion of a car. It may be the result of the kinematic motion of the suspension rising or falling, causing toe-in or toe-out at the loaded wheel, ultimately affecting the yaw angle (heading) of the car. It may also be caused by defective or worn out suspension components. This will always happen under some conditions but depends on suspension, steering linkage, unsprung weight, angular inertia, differential type, frame rigidity, tires and tire pressures. If suspension travel is exhausted the wheel either bottoms or loses contact with the road. As with hard turning on flat roads, it is better if the wheel picks up by the spring reaching its neutral shape, rather than by suddenly contacting a limiting structure of the suspension.
| |
| * [[Body roll]] – the car leans towards the outside of the curve. This interferes with the driver's control, because he must wait for the car to finish leaning before he can fully judge the effect of his steering change. It also adds to the delay before the car moves in the desired direction. It also slightly changes the weight borne by the tires as described in [[weight transfer]].
| |
| * [[Load transfer|Excessive load transfer]] – On any vehicle that is cornering, the outside wheels are more heavily loaded than the inside due to the CG being above the ground. Total weight transfer (sum of front and back), in steady cornering, is determined by the ratio of the height of a car's center of gravity to its [[axle track]]. When the weight transfer equals half the vehicle's loaded weight, it will start to [[Rollover|roll over]]. This can be avoided by manually or automatically reducing the turn rate, but this causes further reduction in road-holding.
| |
| * Slow response – sideways acceleration does not start immediately when the steering is turned and may not stop immediately when it is returned to center. This is partly caused by body roll. Other causes include tires with high slip angle, and yaw and roll angular inertia. Roll angular inertia aggravates body roll by delaying it. Soft tires aggravate yaw angular inertia by waiting for the car to reach their slip angle before turning the car.
| |
| | |
| == Compromises ==
| |
| [[Ride quality]] and handling have always been a compromise - technology has over time allowed automakers to combine more of both features in the same vehicle.
| |
| High levels of comfort are difficult to reconcile with a low center of gravity, body roll resistance, low angular inertia, support for the driver, steering feel and other characteristics that make a car handle well.
| |
| | |
| For ordinary production cars, manufactures err towards deliberate understeer as this is safer for inexperienced or inattentive drivers than is oversteer. Other compromises involve comfort and utility, such as preference for a softer smoother ride or more [[seating capacity]].
| |
| | |
| [[Inboard brake]]s improve both handling and comfort but take up space and are harder to cool. Large engines tend to make cars front or rear heavy. In tires, fuel economy, staying cool at high speeds, ride comfort and long wear all tend to conflict with road holding, while wet, dry, deep water and snow road holding are not exactly compatible. [[A-arm]] or wishbone front suspension tends to give better handling, because it provides the engineers more freedom to choose the geometry, and more road holding, because the camber is better suited to radial tires, than [[MacPherson strut]], but it takes more space.
| |
| | |
| The older [[Live axle]] rear suspension technology, familiar from the [[Ford Model T]], is still widely used in most sport utility vehicles and trucks, often for the purposes of durability (and cost). The live axle suspension is still used in some sports cars, like the Ford Mustang, and is better for drag racing, but generally has problems with grip on bumpy corners, fast corners{{Citation needed|date=February 2011}} and stability at high speeds on bumpy straights.
| |
| | |
| == Aftermarket modifications and adjustments ==
| |
| {{Main|Racing setup}}
| |
| {{Unreferenced section|date=November 2008}}
| |
| Lowering the center of gravity will always help the handling (as well as reduce the chance of roll-over). This can be done to some extent by using plastic windows (or none) and light roof, hood (bonnet) and trunk (boot) lid materials, by reducing the ground clearance, etc. Increasing the track with "reversed" wheels will have a similar effect, but the wider the car the less spare room it has on the road and the farther it may have to swerve to miss an obstacle.
| |
| Stiffer springs and/or shocks, both front and rear, will generally improve handling on close to perfect surfaces, while worsening handling on less-than-perfect road conditions by "skipping" the car (and destroying grip), thus making handling the vehicle difficult. Aftermarket performance suspension kits are usually readily available.
| |
| | |
| Lighter (mostly aluminum or magnesium alloy) wheels improve handling as well as ride comfort, by lessening unsprung weight.
| |
| | |
| Moment of inertia can be reduced by using lighter bumpers and wings (fenders), or none at all.
| |
| | |
| {| border="1" style="width:600px; border-collapse:collapse" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5"
| |
| |-
| |
| ! style="background:#cce;"| Component
| |
| ! style="background:#cce;"| Reduce Under-steer
| |
| ! style="background:#cce;"| Reduce Over-steer
| |
| |-
| |
| | Weight distribution || [[center of gravity]] towards rear || center of gravity towards front
| |
| |-
| |
| | Front [[shock absorber]] || softer || stiffer
| |
| |-
| |
| | Rear shock absorber || stiffer || softer
| |
| |-
| |
| | Front [[sway bar]] || softer || stiffer
| |
| |-
| |
| | Rear sway bar || stiffer || softer
| |
| |-
| |
| | Front [[tire]] selection<sup>1</sup> || larger [[Contact patch|contact area]]² || smaller contact area
| |
| |-
| |
| | Rear tire selection || smaller contact area || larger contact area²
| |
| |-
| |
| | Front wheel rim width || larger² || smaller
| |
| |-
| |
| | Rear wheel rim width || smaller || larger²
| |
| |-
| |
| | Front tire pressure || lower pressure || higher pressure
| |
| |-
| |
| | Rear tire pressure || higher pressure || lower pressure
| |
| |-
| |
| | Front wheel [[Camber angle|camber]] || increase negative camber || reduce negative camber
| |
| |-
| |
| | Rear wheel camber || reduce negative camber || increase negative camber
| |
| |-
| |
| | Rear [[Spoiler (automotive)|spoiler]] || smaller || larger
| |
| |-
| |
| | Front height (because these usually <br /> affect camber and roll resistance) || lower front end || raise front end
| |
| |-
| |
| | Rear height || raise rear end || lower rear end
| |
| |-
| |
| | Front [[toe (automotive)|toe]] in || decrease || increase
| |
| |-
| |
| | Rear toe in || decrease || increase
| |
| |-
| |
| | colspan="3" style="background:#eee;"| 1) Tire contact area can be increased by using tires with fewer grooves in the tread pattern. Of course fewer grooves has the opposite effect in wet weather or other poor road conditions.
| |
| | |
| 2) Considering same tire width, and up to a point for the tire width.
| |
| |}
| |
| | |
| == Cars with unusual handling problems ==
| |
| Certain vehicles can be involved in a disproportionate share of [[single-vehicle accident]]s; their handling characteristics may play a role:
| |
| * [[Porsche 911|Early Porsche 911s]] — suffered from treacherous [[lift off oversteer]] (where the rear of the car loses grip as the driver lifts off the accelerator); also the inside front wheel leaves the road during hard cornering on dry pavement, causing increasing understeer. The [[sway bar|roll bar]] stiffness at the front is set to compensate for the rear-heaviness and gives neutral handling in ordinary driving. This compensation starts to give out when the wheel lifts. A skilled driver can use the 911's other features to his/her advantage, making the 911 an extremely capable sports car in expert hands. Later 911s have had increasingly sophisticated rear suspensions and larger rear tires, eliminating these problems.{{Citation needed|date=April 2010}}
| |
| * Triumph TR2, and [[Triumph TR3B|TR3]] — began to oversteer more suddenly when their inside rear wheel lifted.{{Citation needed|date=April 2010}}
| |
| * [[Volkswagen Beetle]] — (original Beetle) senstitivity to crosswinds, due to the lightness of the front of the [[rear engine]] car; and poor roll stability due to the [[swing axle]] suspension. People who drove them hard fitted reversed wheels and bigger rear tires and rims to ameliorate.{{Citation needed|date=April 2010}}
| |
| * [[Chevrolet Corvair]] - cited for dangerous handling in [[Unsafe at Any Speed]] caused by poor roll stability due to the [[swing axle]] rear suspension similar to that used in the Volkswagen Beetle. These problems were corrected with the redesign of the Corvair for 1965, however, it died from its negative publicity.
| |
| * The large, [[rear-engine design|rear-engine]] [[Tatra 87]] (known as the '[[Czechoslovakia|Czech]] secret weapon') killed so many [[Nazi]] officers during [[World War II]] that the German Army eventually forbade its officers from driving the Tatra.{{Citation needed|date=April 2010}}
| |
| * Some 1950s American "full size" cars responded very slowly to steering changes because of their very large angular inertia, softly tuned suspension which made ride quality a priority over cornering, and comfort oriented cross bias tires. ''Auto Motor und Sport'' reported on one of these that they lacked the courage to test it for top speed, probably due to their familiarity with smaller European cars and their unfamiliarity with large American cars. {{Citation needed|date=April 2010}}
| |
| * [[Dodge Omni]] and [[Plymouth Horizon]] — these early American responses to the [[Volkswagen Rabbit]] were found "unacceptable" in their initial testing by [[Consumer Reports]], due to an observed tendency to display an uncontrollable oscillating yaw from side to side under certain steering inputs. While [[Chrysler]]'s denials of this behaviour were countered by a persistent trickle of independent reports of this behaviour, production of the cars was altered to equip them with both a lighter weight steering wheel and a steering damper, and no further reports of this problem were heard.{{Citation needed|date=April 2010}}
| |
| * The [[Suzuki Samurai]] — was similarly reported by [[Consumer Reports]] to exhibit a propensity to tipping over onto two wheels, to the point where Consumer Reports claimed they were afraid to continue testing the vehicle without the attachment of outrigger wheels to catch it from completely rolling over. In its first set of tests, the Samurai performed well.<ref name="latimes2003">Consumers Union Seeks Lawsuit Shield against Suzuki http://articles.latimes.com/2003/aug/19/nation/na-consumer19</ref> R. David Little, Consumers Union's technical director, drove the light SUV through several short, hard turns, designed to simulate an emergency, such as trying to avoid a child running in front of the car. An article published several years later in a Consumer Reports anniversary issue prompted Suzuki to sue. The suit was based on the perception that Consumer Reports rigged the results: "This case is about lying and cheating by Consumers Union for its own financial motives," George F. Ball, Suzuki's managing counsel, said Monday. "They were in debt [in 1988], and they needed a blockbuster story to raise and solicit funds."<ref name="latimes2003"/> Entrepreneur Magazine reported that "Suzuki's case centered on a change CU made while testing the vehicle. After the Samurai and other SUVs completed the standard course without threatening to roll over, CU altered the course to make the turns more abrupt. The other vehicles didn't show a problem, but the Samurai tipped up and would have rolled over but for outriggers set up to prevent that outcome"<ref>SUPREME COURT LETS SUZUKI SUE http://www.entrepreneur.com/tradejournals/article/111907097.html</ref> After eight years in court the parties consented to a settlement which did not include monetary damages nor a retraction.<ref>Suzuki Resolves Dispute with Consumer magazine: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/09/business/suzuki-resolves-a-dispute-with-a-consumer-magazine.html</ref> Commenting on the settlement, Consumer Union said,"Consumers Union also says in the agreement that it "never intended to imply that the Samurai easily rolls over in routine driving conditions."<ref>Consumers Union, Suzuki settle suit http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2004-07-08-suzuki-cu_x.htm</ref> CU Vice President of Technical Policy further stated: "There is no apology. "We stand fully behind our testing and rating of the Samurai." In a joint press statement Suzuki recognized "CU’s stated commitment for objective and unbiased testing and reporting."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/core_product_safety/001236.html |title=Suzuki And Consumers Union Agree To Settle Lawsuit |publisher=Consumersunion.org |date=2004-07-08 |accessdate=2011-11-13}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| * [[Mercedes-Benz A-Class]] — a tall car with a high center of gravity; early models showed excessive body roll during sharp swerving manoeuvres and rolled over, most particularly during the Swedish [[moose test]]. This was later corrected using [[Electronic Stability Control]] and retrofitted at great expense to earlier cars.
| |
| * [[Ford Explorer]] — a dangerous tendency to blow a rear tire and flip over. Ford had constructed a vehicle with a high center of gravity - the tendency to roll over on sharp changes in direction is built into the vehicle. Ford attempted to counteract the forces of nature by specifying lower than optimum pressures in the tires in order to induce them to lose traction and slide under sideways forces rather than to grip and force the vehicle to roll over. For reasons that were never entirely clear, tires from one factory tended to blow out when under inflated, these vehicles then rolled over, which led to a spate of well publicized [[single-vehicle accident]]s.
| |
| :Ford and [[Firestone Tire and Rubber Company|Firestone]], the makers of the tires, pointed fingers at each other, with the final blame being assigned to quality control practices at a Firestone plant which was undergoing a [[Strike action|strike]]. Tires from a different Firestone plant were not associated with this problem. An internal document dated 1989 states
| |
| ::''Engineering has recommended use of tire pressures below maximum allowable inflation levels for all UN46 tires. As described previously, the reduced tire pressures increase understeer and reduce maximum cornering capacity (both 'stabilising' influences). This practice has been used routinely in heavy duty pick-up truck and car station wagon applications to assure adequate [[understeer]] under all loading conditions. Nissan (Pathfinder), Toyota, Chevrolet, and Dodge also reduce tire pressures for selected applications. While we cannot be sure of their reasons, similarities in vehicle loading suggest that maintaining a minimal level of understeer under rear-loaded conditions may be the compelling factor.'' <ref>Firestone/Ford Knowledge of Tire Safety Defect: http://www.citizen.org/autosafety/articles.cfm?ID=5336</ref>
| |
| :This contributed to build-up of heat and tire deterioration under sustained high speed use, and eventual failure of the most highly stressed tire. Of course, the possibility that slightly substandard tire construction and slightly higher than average tire stress, neither of which would be problematic in themselves, would in combination result in tire failure is quite likely. The controversy continues without unequivocal conclusions, but it also brought public attention to a generally high incidence of rollover accidents involving SUVs, which the manufacturers continue to address in various ways. A subsequent NHTSA investigation of real world accident data showed that the SUVs in question were no more likely to roll over than any other SUV, after a tread separation.<ref>http://nhthqnlas188.nhtsa.dot.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/2002/NHTSA+Denies+Firestone+Request+For+Ford+Explorer+Investigation</ref>
| |
| * The [[Jensen Motors|Jensen]] GT (hatchback coupe) — was introduced in attempt to broaden the sales base of the [[Jensen Healey]], which had up to that time been a roadster or convertible. Its road test report in ''Motor Magazine'' and a very similar one, soon after, in ''[[Road & Track]]'' concluded that it was no longer fun enough to drive to be worth that much money. They blamed it on minor suspension changes. Much more likely, the change in weight distribution was at fault{{Citation needed|date=May 2010}}. The [[Jensen Healey]] was a rather low and wide fairly expensive sports car, but the specifications of its suspension were not particularly impressive, having a solid rear axle. Unlike the [[AC Cars|AC]] Ace, with its double transverse leaf rear suspension and aluminium body, the [[Jensen Healey]] could not stand the weight of that high up metal and glass and still earn a premium price for its handling. The changes also included a cast iron exhaust manifold replacing the aluminium one, probably to partly balance the high and far back weight of the top. The factory building was used to build multi-tub truck frames.{{Citation needed|date=April 2010}}
| |
| * The rear engined [[Renault Dauphine]] earned in [[Spain]] the [[sobriquet]] of the ''"widow's car"'', due to its bad handling.{{Citation needed|date=April 2010}}
| |
| * Three-wheeled cars/vehicles have unique handling issues, especially considering whether the single wheel is at the front or back. (Motorcycles with sidecars; another matter.) Buckminster Fuller's [[Dymaxion car]] caused a sensation, but ignorance of the problems of rear-wheel-steering led to a fatal crash that destroyed its reputation.
| |
| | |
| == See also ==
| |
| * [[Auto racing]]
| |
| * [[Automotive suspension design]]
| |
| * [[Car safety]]
| |
| * [[Downforce]]
| |
| * [[Driving]]
| |
| * [[Grip (autoracing)]]
| |
| * [[Mechanical engineering]]
| |
| * [[Sports car]]
| |
| | |
| == References ==
| |
| <references/>
| |
| | |
| == External links ==
| |
| * [http://users.pandora.be/elvo Modellers often see the whole picture best.]
| |
| * [http://www.240edge.com/performance/tuning-handling.html Basics of Race Car Handling]
| |
| * [http://www.240edge.com/performance/tuning-weight.html The Effects of Weight Transfer on Handling]
| |
| * [http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/tech/0506_sccp_making_it_stick_part_1/index.html Sport compact car - Handling and cornering]
| |
| | |
| | |
| {{Automotive handling}}
| |
| {{Powertrain}}
| |
| | |
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Automobile Handling}}
| |
| [[Category:Automotive technologies]]
| |
| [[Category:Car safety]]
| |