Mean curvature: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>E v popov
 
en>David Eppstein
Line 1: Line 1:
Aleta is what's written referring to her birth certificate the truth that she doesn't really for instance like being called like of the fact that. Managing people is truly what she does but she plans on substituting it. She's always loved living in [http://Www.Reddit.com/r/howto/search?q=South+Carolina South Carolina]. To drive is something her husband doesn't really like but she does. She is running and sticking to a blog here: http://[http://search.un.org/search?ie=utf8&site=un_org&output=xml_no_dtd&client=UN_Website_en&num=10&lr=lang_en&proxystylesheet=UN_Website_en&oe=utf8&q=prometeu.net&Submit=Go prometeu.net]<br><br>
'''Schwinger's quantum action principle''' is a variational approach to [[quantum field theory]] introduced by [[Julian Schwinger]]. In this approach, the '''quantum action''' is an operator. Although it is superficially different from the [[path integral formulation]] where the action is a classical function, the modern formulation of
the two formalisms are identical.


Stop by my web page - [http://prometeu.net clash of clans hack]
Suppose we have two states defined by the values of a [[complete set of commuting operators]] at two times. Let the early and late states be <math>| A \rang</math> and <math>| B \rang</math>, respectively. Suppose that there is a parameter in the Lagrangian which can be varied, usually a source for a field. The main equation of '''Schwinger's quantum action principle''' is:
 
:<math> \delta \langle B|A\rangle = i \langle B| \delta S |A\rangle,\ </math>
 
where the derivative is with respect to small changes in the parameter.
 
In the path integral formulation, the transition amplitude is represented by the sum
over all histories of <math>\exp(iS)</math>, with appropriate boundary conditions representing the states <math>| A \rang</math> and <math>| B \rang</math>. The infinitesimal change in the amplitude is clearly given by Schwinger's formula. Conversely, starting from Schwinger's formula, it is easy to show that the fields obey canonical commutation relations and the classical equations
of motion, and so have a path integral representation. Schwinger's formulation was most significant because it could treat fermionic anticommuting fields with the same formalism as bose fields, thus implicitly introducing differentiation and integration
with respect to anti-commuting coordinates.
 
==External links==
*[http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/102/22/7783] A brief (but very technical) description of Schwinger's paper
 
[[Category:Perturbation theory]]
[[Category:Quantum field theory]]
[[Category:Principles]]
 
{{quantum-stub}}

Revision as of 03:06, 13 October 2013

Schwinger's quantum action principle is a variational approach to quantum field theory introduced by Julian Schwinger. In this approach, the quantum action is an operator. Although it is superficially different from the path integral formulation where the action is a classical function, the modern formulation of the two formalisms are identical.

Suppose we have two states defined by the values of a complete set of commuting operators at two times. Let the early and late states be |A and |B, respectively. Suppose that there is a parameter in the Lagrangian which can be varied, usually a source for a field. The main equation of Schwinger's quantum action principle is:

δB|A=iB|δS|A,

where the derivative is with respect to small changes in the parameter.

In the path integral formulation, the transition amplitude is represented by the sum over all histories of exp(iS), with appropriate boundary conditions representing the states |A and |B. The infinitesimal change in the amplitude is clearly given by Schwinger's formula. Conversely, starting from Schwinger's formula, it is easy to show that the fields obey canonical commutation relations and the classical equations of motion, and so have a path integral representation. Schwinger's formulation was most significant because it could treat fermionic anticommuting fields with the same formalism as bose fields, thus implicitly introducing differentiation and integration with respect to anti-commuting coordinates.

External links

  • [1] A brief (but very technical) description of Schwinger's paper

Template:Quantum-stub