Cyclic number: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>MSGJ
remove template designed for talk page
 
en>Arthur Rubin
→‎Properties of cyclic numbers: replace "base-1" with a more mathematically correct version
Line 1: Line 1:
Despair has become quite common today and the cause for this varies from  how to lose belly fat  lose weight fast (mouse click the next internet page) individual to individual. The remedy effexor is especially used to deal with melancholy, normal nervousness and social anxiousness problems in adults. This medicine is taken lose weight fast into account to be the most active amongst the new anti-depressants that are obtainable out there.<br><br><br><br>It is thought that agoraphobia has a connection to feeling insecure over a scarcity of control. Agoraphobics who discover themselves in unfamiliar environments may turn into fearful about the possibility of circumstances occurring on this unknown territory that might depart them indirectly damaged. The agoraphobic obsesses then over perceived risks which will happen in unfamiliar locations, and this obsession typically results in a excessive state of concern or panic. While agoraphobics may have panic assaults, it is the focus on unfamiliar environments triggering panic that defines their condition. An agoraphobic might panic only in unfamiliar settings in other words, whereas someone with panic dysfunction can have a panic attack at just about any time.<br><br>I help individuals with panic attack problems having been a sufferer myself. Panic assaults are attributable to shifting of the solarplexes which is well documented in ancient ayurvedic texts as NABHI CHAKRA or MANIPURA. You may get loads of references on the internet about  heart is positioned behind the belley  shifts resulting from lifting heavy weights,jerky actions, whereas doing stomach exercising etc. As there isn't a pain the sufferer notices  almost immediately the ill results are felt relying on how it has shifted.<br><br>That is why you might be seeing more and more natural cures for nervousness assaults being talked about. Folks just do not want to go on drugs and have the potential to expertise these unwanted side effects. Also, it can be argued that medicines don't clear up the problem, they simply mask it. Nervousness is all about coaching your thought processes. It may take visits to an anxiousness clinic to actually be ‘cured' of this unlucky ailment. It might take a combination of many cures. It won't be solved with a pill.<br><br>A current research showed that anxious girls usually tend to suffer uncomfortable scorching flashes during perimenopause. In one other study, baby rats of both sexes have been deprived of maternal consideration atOnce they grew up, the female rats showed measurable signs of anxiety and stress when examined in a maze; the male rats did not. A lot of the chronically anxious sufferers I see have some form of GI problem, whether or not it is nervous abdomen, IBS, diarrhea, nausea, bloating or bleeding — anxiousness appears to take its first foothold within the gut. And in case your GI tract is upset, it's nearly inconceivable to feel well — which might add to the anxiety! You might continuously relive the life-threatening occasion, and avoid the activity or place related to the center assault.
{{No footnotes|date=April 2009}}
The '''mutation–selection balance''' is a classic result in [[population genetics]]
first derived in the 1920s by [[John Burdon Sanderson Haldane]] and [[Ronald Fisher|R.A. Fisher]].   
 
A genetic variant that is deleterious will not necessarily disappear immediately from a  
population. Its frequency, when it first appears in a population of N individuals, will  
be 1/N (or 1/2N in a [[diploid]] population), and this frequency might drift up and down a  
bit before returning to zero. If the population is large enough, or if the [[mutation]]
rate <math>\mu</math> is high enough, i.e., if <math>\mu*N</math> is high enough, then one has to consider additional
mutations. In a hypothetical infinite population, the frequency will never return to  
zero. Instead, it will reach an equilibrium value that reflects the balance between
mutation (pushing the frequency upward) and [[selection]] (pushing it downward), thus
the name ''mutation–selection balance''.  
 
If 's' is the deleterious selection coefficient (the decrease in relative fitness), then the equilibrium frequency 'f' of an [[allele]] in mutation–selection balance is approximately <math>f = \mu/s</math> in [[haploid]]s, or for the case of a dominant allele in diploids. For a recessive allele in
a diploid population, <math>f = \sqrt{\mu \over{s}}</math>A useful approximation for
alleles of intermediate dominance is that f ~ <math>\mu/(sh)</math>, where h is the coefficient of  
dominance. These formulae are all approximate because
they ignore back-mutation, typically a trivial effect. 
 
The mutation–selection balance has the practical use of allowing estimates of  
mutation rates from data on deleterious alleles (see examples on pp.&nbsp;85–89 of Crow, 1986). 
For population geneticists, it provides a simple model for thinking about how
variation persists in natural populations.
 
== External links ==
* http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/ridley/a-z/Mutation-selection_balance.asp
* J. F. Crow (1986). ''Basic concepts in population, quantitative, and evolutionary genetics''. New York: W.H. Freeman. p.&nbsp;273.
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Mutation-selection balance}}
[[Category:Mutation]]
[[Category:Selection]]

Revision as of 00:04, 30 January 2014

Template:No footnotes The mutation–selection balance is a classic result in population genetics first derived in the 1920s by John Burdon Sanderson Haldane and R.A. Fisher.

A genetic variant that is deleterious will not necessarily disappear immediately from a population. Its frequency, when it first appears in a population of N individuals, will be 1/N (or 1/2N in a diploid population), and this frequency might drift up and down a bit before returning to zero. If the population is large enough, or if the mutation rate is high enough, i.e., if is high enough, then one has to consider additional mutations. In a hypothetical infinite population, the frequency will never return to zero. Instead, it will reach an equilibrium value that reflects the balance between mutation (pushing the frequency upward) and selection (pushing it downward), thus the name mutation–selection balance.

If 's' is the deleterious selection coefficient (the decrease in relative fitness), then the equilibrium frequency 'f' of an allele in mutation–selection balance is approximately in haploids, or for the case of a dominant allele in diploids. For a recessive allele in a diploid population, . A useful approximation for alleles of intermediate dominance is that f ~ , where h is the coefficient of dominance. These formulae are all approximate because they ignore back-mutation, typically a trivial effect.

The mutation–selection balance has the practical use of allowing estimates of mutation rates from data on deleterious alleles (see examples on pp. 85–89 of Crow, 1986). For population geneticists, it provides a simple model for thinking about how variation persists in natural populations.

External links