Classical Cepheid variable

In portfolio theory, a mutual fund separation theorem, mutual fund theorem, or separation theorem is a theorem stating that, under certain conditions, any investor's optimal portfolio can be constructed by holding each of certain mutual funds in appropriate ratios, where the number of mutual funds is smaller than the number of individual assets in the portfolio. Here a mutual fund refers to any specified benchmark portfolio of the available assets. There are two advantages of having a mutual fund theorem. First, if the relevant conditions are met, it may be easier (or lower in transactions costs) for an investor to purchase a smaller number of mutual funds than to purchase a larger number of assets individually. Second, from a theoretical and empirical standpoint, if it can be assumed that the relevant conditions are indeed satisfied, then implications for the functioning of asset markets can be derived and tested.

Portfolio separation in mean-variance analysis

Portfolios can be analyzed in a mean-variance framework, with every investor holding the portfolio with the lowest possible return variance consistent with that investor's chosen level of expected return (called a minimum-variance portfolio), if the returns on the assets are jointly elliptically distributed, including the special case in which they are jointly normally distributed. Under mean-variance analysis, it can be shown that every minimum-variance portfolio given a particular expected return (that is, every efficient portfolio) can be formed as a combination of any two efficient portfolios. If the investor's optimal portfolio has an expected return that is between the expected returns on two efficient benchmark portfolios, then that investor's portfolio can be characterized as consisting of positive quantities of the two benchmark portfolios.

No risk-free asset

To see two-fund separation in a context in which no risk-free asset is available, using matrix algebra, let ${\sigma }^2$ be the variance of the portfolio return, let $\mu$ be the level of expected return on the portfolio that portfolio return variance is to be minimized contingent upon, let $r$ be the vector of expected returns on the available assets, let $X$ be the vector of amounts to be placed in the available assets, let $W$ be the amount of wealth that is to be allocated in the portfolio, and let $1$ be a vector of ones. Then the problem of minimizing the portfolio return variance subject to a given level of expected portfolio return can be stated as

Minimize ${\sigma }^2$

subject to

$X^{T}r=\mu$

and

$X^{T}1=W$

where the superscript $T^{}$ denotes the transpose of a matrix. The portfolio return variance in the objective function can be written as ${\sigma }^2=X^{T}VX,$ where $V$ is the positive definite covariance matrix of the individual assets' returns. The Lagrangian for this constrained optimization problem (whose second-order conditions can be shown to be satisfied) is

$L=X^{T}VX+2\lambda (\mu -X^{T}r)+2\eta (W-X^{T}1),$

with Lagrange multipliers $\lambda$ and $\eta$.This can be solved for the optimal vector $X$ of asset quantities by equating to zero the derivatives with respect to $X$, $\lambda$, and $\eta$, provisionally solving the first-order condition for $X$ in terms of $\lambda$ and $\eta$, substituting into the other first-order conditions, solving for $\lambda$ and $\eta$ in terms of the model parameters, and substituting back into the provisional solution for $X$. The result is

$X^{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}}=\frac{W}{\mathrm{\Delta }}[(r^T{V}^{-1}r)V^{-1}1-(1^T{V}^{-1}r)V^{-1}r]+\frac{\mu }{\mathrm{\Delta }}[(1^T{V}^{-1}1)V^{-1}r-(r^T{V}^{-1}1)V^{-1}1]$

where

$\mathrm{\Delta }=(r^T{V}^{-1}r)(1^T{V}^{-1}1)-(r^T{V}^{-1}1{)}^2>0.$

For simplicity this can be written more compactly as

$X^{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}}=\alpha W+\beta \mu$

where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are parameter vectors based on the underlying model parameters. Now consider two benchmark efficient portfolios constructed at benchmark expected returns ${\mu }_1$ and ${\mu }_2$ and thus given by

$X_1^{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}}=\alpha W+\beta {\mu }_1$

and

$X_2^{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}}=\alpha W+\beta {\mu }_2.$

The optimal portfolio at arbitrary ${\mu }_3$ can then be written as a weighted average of $X_1^{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}}$ and $X_2^{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}}$ as follows:

$X_3^{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}}=\alpha W+\beta {\mu }_3=\frac{{\mu }_3-{\mu }_2}{{\mu }_1-{\mu }_2}{X}_1^{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}}+\frac{{\mu }_1-{\mu }_3}{{\mu }_1-{\mu }_2}{X}_2^{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}}.$

This equation proves the two-fund separation theorem for mean-variance analysis. For a geometric interpretation, see the Markowitz bullet.

One risk-free asset

If a risk-free asset is available, then again a two-fund separation theorem applies; but in this case one of the "funds" can be chosen to be a very simple fund containing only the risk-free asset, and the other fund can be chosen to be one which contains zero holdings of the risk-free asset. (With the risk-free asset referred to as "money", this form of the theorem is referred to as the monetary separation theorem.) Thus mean-variance efficient portfolios can be formed simply as a combination of holdings of the risk-free asset and holdings of a particular efficient fund that contains only risky assets. The derivation above does not apply, however, since with a risk-free asset the above covariance matrix of all asset returns, $V$, would have one row and one column of zeroes and thus would not be invertible. Instead, the problem can be set up as

Minimize ${\sigma }^2$

subject to

$(W-X^{T}1)r_f+X^{T}r=\mu ,$

where $r_f$ is the known return on the risk-free asset, X is now the vector of quantities to be held in the risky assets, and $r$ is the vector of expected returns on the risky assets. The left side of the last equation is the expected return on the portfolio, since $(W-X^{T}1)$ is the quantity held in the risk-free asset, thus incorporating the asset adding-up constraint that in the earlier problem required the inclusion of a separate Lagrangian constraint. The objective function can be written as ${\sigma }^2=X^{T}VX$, where now $V$ is the covariance matrix of the risky assets only. This optimization problem can be shown to yield the optimal vector of risky asset holdings

$X^{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}}=\frac{(\mu -W{r}_f)}{(r-1r_f{)}^T{V}^{-1}(r-1r_f)}{V}^{-1}(r-1r_f).$

Of course this equals a zero vector if $\mu =W{r}_f$, the risk-free portfolio's return, in which case all wealth is held in the risk-free asset. It can be shown that the portfolio with exactly zero holdings of the risk-free asset occurs at $\mu =\frac{W{r}^T{V}^{-1}(r-1r_f)}{1^T{V}^{-1}(r-1r_f)}$ and is given by

$X^{*}=\frac{W}{1^T{V}^{-1}(r-1r_f)}{V}^{-1}(r-1r_f).$

It can also be shown (analogously to the demonstration in the above two-mutual-fund case) that every portfolio's risky asset vector (that is, $X^{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}}$ for every value of $\mu$) can be formed as a weighted combination of the latter vector and the zero vector. For a geometric interpretation, see the efficient frontier with no risk-free asset.

Portfolio separation without mean-variance analysis

If investors have hyperbolic absolute risk aversion (HARA) (including the power utility function, logarithmic function and the exponential utility function), separation theorems can be obtained without the use of mean-variance analysis. For example, David Cass and Joseph Stiglitz showed in 1970 that two-fund monetary separation applies if all investors have HARA utility with the same exponent as each other.Primarily based on the most recent URA personal property value index (PPPI) flash estimates, we know that the PPPI, which represents the overall real property price development, has dipped in 2013Q4. That is the first dip the market has seen within the final 2 years.

To give you some perspective, the entire number of personal properties in Singapore (together with govt condominiums) is 297,689 in 2013Q3. Primarily based on the projection that there will be 19,302 units accomplished in 2014, the rise in residential models works out to be more than 6%. With a lot New Ec Launch Singapore provide, buyers might be spoilt for alternative and this in flip will lead to their reluctance to pay a premium for potential models. The complete textual content of the Copyright Act (Cap sixty three) and different statutes regarding IPR might be found on the Singapore Statutes Online Website online The Group's income jumped forty.1 p.c to $324.5 million from $231.6 million in FY 2013, lifted by increased development income and sales of growth properties in Singapore and China. Actual Estate Shopping for

One factor we've on this nation is a big group of "economists," and "market analysts." What's interesting about this group of real property market-watchers is that there are two very other ways wherein they predict Boomers will affect housing markets over the subsequent decade. Let's check out those two opposites and see how every can change the best way real property investors strategy their markets. The good news is that actual property buyers are prepared for either state of affairs, and there's profit in being ready. I'm excited and searching ahead to the alternatives both or each of these conditions will supply; thank you Boomers! Mapletree to further broaden past Asia Why fortune will favour the brave in Asia's closing real property frontier

The story of the 23.2 home begins with a stack of Douglas fir beams salvaged from varied demolished warehouses owned by the consumer's household for a number of generations. Design and structure innovator Omer Arbel, configured them to type a triangulated roof, which makes up one of the placing features of the home. The transient from the entrepreneur-proprietor was not solely to design a house that integrates antique wood beams, however one which erases the excellence between inside and exterior. Built on a gentle slope on a large rural acreage surrounded by two masses of previous-development forests, the indoors movement seamlessly to the outdoors and, from the within looking, one enjoys unobstructed views of the existing natural panorama which is preserved

First, there are typically extra rental transactions than gross sales transactions, to permit AV to be decided for each property primarily based on comparable properties. Second, movements in sale costs are more unstable than leases. Hence, utilizing rental transactions to derive the AV helps to maintain property tax more steady for property homeowners. If you're buying or trying to lease a property. It's tiring to call up individual property agent, organize appointments, coordinate timing and to go for particular person property viewing. What most individuals do is to have a property agent representing them who will arrange and coordinate the viewings for all the properties out there based mostly on your necessities & most well-liked timing. Rent Property District 12 Rent Property District thirteen

The Annual Worth of a property is mostly derived based mostly on the estimated annual hire that it may well fetch if it have been rented out. In determining the Annual Worth of a property, IRAS will think about the leases of similar properties within the vicinity, dimension and condition of the property, and different relevant components. The Annual Worth of a property is determined in the identical method regardless of whether the property is let-out, proprietor-occupied or vacant. The Annual Worth of land is determined at 5% of the market price of the land. When a constructing is demolished, the Annual Worth of the land is assessed by this method. Property Tax on Residential Properties Buyer Stamp Responsibility on Buy of Properties – Business and residential properties Rent House District 01

Within the event the Bank's valuation is decrease than the acquisition price, the purchaser has to pay the distinction between the purchase value and the Bank's valuation utilizing money. As such, the money required up-front might be increased so it's at all times essential to know the valuation of the property before making any offer. Appoint Lawyer The Bank will prepare for a proper valuation of the property by way of physical inspection The completion statement will present you the balance of the acquisition price that you must pay after deducting any deposit, pro-rated property tax and utility costs, upkeep prices, and different relevant expenses in addition to any fees payable to the agent and the lawyer. Stamp Responsibility Primarily based on the Purchase Price or Market Value, whichever is larger

More recently, in the dynamic portfolio optimization model of Çanakoğlu and Özekici, the investor's level of initial wealth (the distinguishing feature of investors) does not affect the optimal composition of the risky part of the portfolio. A similar result is given by Schmedders.

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.