Finite subdivision rule

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 20:58, 13 December 2013 by en>Bobnorwal (adding good article tag. Is there a reason it wasn't there? If so, just remove it -- and maybe let me know your reasoning. :))
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In algebraic geometry, the theorem on formal functions states the following:[1]

Let f:XS be a proper morphism of noetherian schemes with a coherent sheaf on X. Let S0 be a closed subscheme of S defined by and X^,S^ formal completions with respect to X0=f1(S0) and S0. Then for each p0 the canonical (continuous) map:
(Rpf*)limkRpf*k
is an isomorphism of (topological) 𝒪S^-modules, where

The theorem is used to deduce some other important theorems: Stein factorization and a version of Zariski's main theorem that says that a proper birational morphism into a normal variety is an isomorphism. Some other corollaries (with the notations as above) are:

Corollary:[2] For any sS, topologically,

((Rpf*)s)limHp(f1(s),𝒪S(𝒪s/msk))

where the completion on the left is with respect to ms.

Corollary:[3] Let r be such that dimf1(s)r for all sS. Then

Rif*=0,i>r.

Corollay:[4] For each sS, there exists an open neighborhood U of s such that

Rif*|U=0,i>dimf1(s).

Corollary:[5] If f*𝒪X=𝒪S, then f1(s) is connected for all sS.

The theorem also leads to the Grothendieck existence theorem, which gives an equivalence between the category of coherent sheaves on a scheme and the category of coherent sheaves on its formal completion (in particular, it yields algebralizability.)

Finally, it is possible to weaken the hypothesis in the theorem; cf. Illusie. According to Illusie (pg. 204), the proof given in EGA III is due to Serre. The original proof (due to Grothendieck) was never published.

The construction of the canonical map

Let the setting be as in the lede. In the proof one uses the following alternative definition of the canonical map.

Let i:X^X,i:S^S be the canonical maps. Then we have the base change map of 𝒪S^-modules

i*Rqf*Rpf^*(i'*).

where f^:X^S^ is induced by f:XS. Since is coherent, we can identify i'* with ^. Since Rqf* is also coherent (as f is proper), doing the same identification, the above reads:

(Rqf*)Rpf^*^.

Using f:XnSn where Xn=(X0,𝒪X/𝒥n+1) and Sn=(S0,𝒪S/n+1), one also obtains (after passing to limit):

Rqf^*^limRpf*n

where n are as before. One can verify that the composition of the two maps is the same map in the lede. (cf. EGA III-1, section 4)

Notes

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

References

  1. Template:Harvnb
  2. Template:Harvnb
  3. Template:Harvnb
  4. The same argument as in the preceding corollary
  5. Template:Harvnb