Type (model theory)

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 07:12, 16 August 2013 by en>Trovatore (move the idea to the first sentence -- maybe that addresses some of the objection. My formulation is open to criticism; model theory was never my specialty)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A multiple-conclusion logic is one in which logical consequence is a relation, , between two sets of sentences (or propositions). ΓΔ is typically interpreted as meaning that whenever each element of Γ is true, some element of Δ is true; and whenever each element of Δ is false, some element of Γ is false.

This form of logic was developed in the 1970s by D. J. Shoesmith and Timothy Smiley[1] but has not been widely adopted.

Some logicians favor a multiple-conclusion consequence relation over the more traditional single-conclusion relation on the grounds that the latter is asymmetric (in the informal, non-mathematical sense) and favors truth over falsity (or assertion over denial).

See also

References

  1. D. J. Shoesmith and T. J. Smiley, Multiple Conclusion Logic, Cambridge University Press, 1978


Template:Logic-stub