Reversible reference system propagation algorithm

In mathematics, the Abel–Jacobi map is a construction of algebraic geometry which relates an algebraic curve to its Jacobian variety. In Riemannian geometry, it is a more general construction mapping a manifold to its Jacobi torus. The name derives from the theorem of Abel and Jacobi that two effective divisors are linearly equivalent if and only if they are indistinguishable under the Abel–Jacobi map.

Construction of the map

In complex algebraic geometry, the Jacobian of a curve C is constructed using path integration. Namely, suppose C has genus g, which means topologically that

$H_1(C,\mathbb{\mathbb{Z}})\cong {\mathbb{\mathbb{Z}}}^{2g}.$

Geometrically, this homology group consists of (homology classes of) cycles in C, or in other words, closed loops. Therefore we can choose 2g loops ${\gamma }_1,\dots ,{\gamma }_{2g}$ generating it. On the other hand, another, more algebro-geometric way of saying that the genus of C is g, is that

$H^0(C,K)\cong {\mathbb{ℂ}}^g,$ where K is the canonical bundle on C.

By definition, this is the space of globally defined holomorphic differential forms on C, so we can choose g linearly independent forms ${\omega }_1,\dots ,{\omega }_g$. Given forms and closed loops we can integrate, and we define 2g vectors

${\mathrm{\Omega }}_j=(\underset{{\gamma }_j}{\int }{\omega }_1,\dots ,\underset{{\gamma }_j}{\int }{\omega }_g)\in {\mathbb{ℂ}}^g.$

It follows from the Riemann bilinear relations that the ${\mathrm{\Omega }}_j$ generate a nondegenerate lattice $\mathrm{\Lambda }$ (that is, they are a real basis for ${\mathbb{ℂ}}^g\cong {\mathbb{ℝ}}^{2g}$), and the Jacobian is defined by

$J(C)={\mathbb{ℂ}}^g/\mathrm{\Lambda }.$

The Abel–Jacobi map is then defined as follows. We pick some base point $p_0\in C$ and, nearly mimicking the definition of $\mathrm{\Lambda }$, define the map

$u:C\to J(C),u(p)=(\underset{p_0}{\overset{p}{\int }}{\omega }_1,\dots ,\underset{p_0}{\overset{p}{\int }}{\omega }_g)mod\mathrm{\Lambda }.$

Although this is seemingly dependent on a path from $p_0$ to $p,$ any two such paths define a closed loop in $C$ and, therefore, an element of $H_1(C,\mathbb{\mathbb{Z}}),$ so integration over it gives an element of $\mathrm{\Lambda }.$ Thus the difference is erased in the passage to the quotient by $\mathrm{\Lambda }$. Changing base-point $p_0$ does change the map, but only by a translation of the torus.

The Abel–Jacobi map of a Riemannian manifold

Let $M$ be a smooth compact manifold. Let $\pi ={\pi }_1(M)$ be its fundamental group. Let $f:\pi \to {\pi }^{ab}$ be its abelianisation map. Let $tor=tor({\pi }^{ab})$ be the torsion subgroup of ${\pi }^{ab}$. Let $g:{\pi }^{ab}\to {\pi }^{ab}/tor$ be the quotient by torsion. If $M$ is a surface, ${\pi }^{ab}/tor$ is non-canonically isomorphic to ${\mathbb{\mathbb{Z}}}^{2g}$, where $g$ is the genus; more generally, ${\pi }^{ab}/tor$ is non-canonically isomorphic to ${\mathbb{\mathbb{Z}}}^b$, where $b$ is the first Betti number. Let $\varphi =g\circ f:\pi \to {\mathbb{\mathbb{Z}}}^b$ be the composite homomorphism.

Definition. The cover $\overline{M}$ of the manifold $M$ corresponding the subgroup $\mathrm{K}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}(\varphi )\subset \pi$ is called the universal (or maximal) free abelian cover.

Now assume M has a Riemannian metric. Let $E$ be the space of harmonic $1$-forms on $M$, with dual $E^{*}$ canonically identified with $H_1(M,\mathbb{ℝ})$. By integrating an integral harmonic $1$-form along paths from a basepoint $x_0\in M$, we obtain a map to the circle $\mathbb{ℝ}/\mathbb{\mathbb{Z}}=S^1$.

Similarly, in order to define a map $M\to H_1(M,\mathbb{ℝ})/H_1(M,\mathbb{\mathbb{Z}}{)}_{\mathbb{ℝ}}$ without choosing a basis for cohomology, we argue as follows. Let $x$ be a point in the universal cover $\tilde{M}$ of $M$. Thus $x$ is represented by a point of $M$ together with a path $c$ from $x_0$ to it. By integrating along the path $c$, we obtain a linear form, $h\to \underset{c}{\int }h$, on $E$. We thus obtain a map $\tilde{M}\to E^{*}=H_1(M,\mathbb{ℝ})$, which, furthermore, descends to a map

${\bar{A}}_M:\bar{M}\to E^{*},c\mapsto (h\mapsto \underset{c}{\int }h),$

where $\bar{M}$ is the universal free abelian cover.

Definition. The Jacobi variety (Jacobi torus) of $M$ is the torus

$J_1(M)=H_1(M,\mathbb{ℝ})/H_1(M,\mathbb{\mathbb{Z}}{)}_{\mathbb{ℝ}}.$

Definition. The Abel–Jacobi map

$A_M:M\to J_1(M),$

is obtained from the map above by passing to quotients.

The Abel–Jacobi map is unique up to translations of the Jacobi torus. The map has applications in Systolic geometry.

Abel–Jacobi theorem

The following theorem was proved by Abel: Suppose that

$D=\sum _i{n}_i{p}_i$

is a divisor (meaning a formal integer-linear combination of points of C). We can define

$u(D)=\sum _i{n}_{i}u(p_i)$

and therefore speak of the value of the Abel–Jacobi map on divisors. The theorem is then that if D and E are two effective divisors, meaning that the $n_i$ are all positive integers, then

$u(D)=u(E)$ if and only if $D$ is linearly equivalent to $E.$ This implies that the Abel–Jacobi map induces an injective map (of abelian groups) from the space of divisor classes of degree zero to the Jacobian.

Jacobi proved that this map is also surjective, so the two groups are naturally isomorphic.

The Abel–Jacobi theorem implies that the Albanese variety of a compact complex curve (dual of holomorphic 1-forms modulo periods) is isomorphic to its Jacobian variety (divisors of degree 0 modulo equivalence). For higher dimensional compact projective varieties the Albanese variety and the Picard variety are dual but need not be isomorphic.

References

• 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
  
  My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534