Equivariant K-theory

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 22:45, 20 January 2014 by en>Malcolma (added Category:Algebraic K-theory; removed {{uncategorized}} using HotCat)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In model theory, a branch of mathematical logic, the Hrushovski construction generalizes the Fraïssé limit by working with a notion of strong substructure rather than . It can be thought of as a kind of "model-theoretic forcing", where a (usually) stable structure is created, called the generic. The specifics of determine various properties of the generic, with its geometric properties being of particular interest. It was initially used by Ehud Hrushovski to generate a stable structure with an "exotic" geometry, thereby refuting Zil'ber's Conjecture.

Three conjectures

The initial applications of the Hrushovski construction refuted two conjectures and answered a third question in the negative. Specifically, we have:

  • Lachlan's Conjecture Any stable 0-categorical theory is totally transcendental.
  • Zil'ber's Conjecture Any uncountably categorical theory is either locally modular or interprets an algebraically closed field.
  • Cherlin's Question Is there a maximal (with respect to expansions) strongly minimal set?

The construction

Let L be a finite relational language. Fix C a class of finite L-structures which are closed under isomorphisms and substructures. We want to strengthen the notion of substructure; let be a relation on pairs from C satisfying:

An embedding f:AD is strong if f(A)D.

We also want the pair (C, ) to satisfy the amalgamation property: if AB1,AB2 then there is a D so that each Bi embeds strongly into D with the same image for A.

For infinite D, and A, we say AD iff AX for AXD, X. For any AD, the closure of A (in D), clD(A) is the smallest superset of A satisfying cl(A)D.

Definition A countable structure G is a (C, )-generic if:

Theorem If (C, ) has the amalgamation property, then there is a unique (C, )-generic.

The existence proof proceeds in imitation of the existence proof for Fraïssé limits. The uniqueness proof comes from an easy back and forth argument.

References