Switched-mode power supply applications

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 00:48, 29 November 2013 by en>Dsimic (Removed a few useless pictures; Layout improvements)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In statistics, Hoeffding's test of independence, named after Wassily Hoeffding, is a test based on the population measure of deviation from independence

where is the joint distribution function of two random variables, and and are their marginal distribution functions. Hoeffding derived an unbiased estimator of that can be used to test for independence, and is consistent for any continuous alternative. The test should only be applied to data drawn from a continuous distribution, since has a defect for discontinuous , namely that it is not necessarily zero when .

A recent paper[1] describes both the calculation of a sample based version of this measure for use as a test statistic, and calculation of the null distribution of this test statistic.

See also

Sportspersons Hyslop from Nicolet, usually spends time with pastimes for example martial arts, property developers condominium in singapore singapore and hot rods. Maintains a trip site and has lots to write about after touring Gulf of Porto: Calanche of Piana.

Notes

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

Primary sources

  • Wassily Hoeffding, A non-parametric test of independence, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 19: 293–325, 1948. (JSTOR)
  • Hollander and Wolfe, Non-parametric statistical methods (Section 8.7), 1999. Wiley.


I am Chester from Den Haag. I am learning to play the Cello. Other hobbies are Running.

Also visit my website: Hostgator Coupons - dawonls.dothome.co.kr -

  1. Wilding, G.E., Mudholkar, G.S. (2008) "Empirical approximations for Hoeffding's test of bivariate independence using two Weibull extensions", Statistical Methodology, 5 (2), 160-–170