Analytic number theory: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
en>Trappist the monk
→‎Riemann zeta function: name and link Euler product
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Burnside's lemma''', sometimes also called '''Burnside's counting theorem''', the '''Cauchy-Frobenius lemma''' or the '''orbit-counting theorem''', is a result in [[group theory]] which is often  useful in taking account of [[symmetry]] when counting mathematical objects. Its various eponyms include [[William Burnside]], [[George Pólya]], [[Augustin Louis Cauchy]], and [[Ferdinand Georg Frobenius]]. The result is not due to Burnside himself, who merely quotes it in his book 'On the Theory of Groups of Finite Order', attributing it instead to {{harvtxt|Frobenius|1887}}.<ref>{{harvnb|Burnside|1897|loc=§119}}</ref>
Did we understand that almost 9 out of 10 persons with newly diagnosed kind 2 diabetes are overweight? If you are overweight, losing several weight could help you better manage the diabetes. Weight Loss Matters is an American Diabetes Association program that will assist you lose weight plus take care of the diabetes. You can lose fat plus keep it off.<br><br>This is where the [http://safedietplansforwomen.com/bmi-chart bmi chart] is misleading. Recent studies have even shown a weak plus inconsistent correlation between a significant BMI plus disease or early mortality.<br><br>He asked me for information, that I was over happy to provide. A year later, Jim has not merely lost many bmi chart men pounds, and felt greater and more energetic. He is now not just able to rest correctly and do his regular escapades without a problem. He is constantly full of energy and enthusiasm!<br><br>The Body Mass Index or BMI is an illustration of this standardized evaluator of fitness. It can be conveniently be calculated by dividing the weight in kilograms by the height in meters squared. In English system, weight in pounds is divided by height in inches. The answer is then multiplied by 703. The results are then compared with a standard set of values. Below 210 answers are representative of underweight category. Those ranging between 20 to 24 values are considered physically fit plus healthy whilst those belonging to the 25 to 30 values represent the overweight class. However, more than 30 results are considered obese. Calculation is produced manually, through a easy calculator or by online or phone based fat per height calculator applications.<br><br>There are many causes which cause weight. Let's take a look at a few of these factors. Food which is rich in fats plus carbohydrates results inside accumulation of excessive cholesterols in the body. This fat, when not completely absorbed by the body, seems to make 1 fatty over time. Saturated fatty acids that are found in butter, oil, meat etc. could make one's weight abnormal. Heredity factors equally play a big role. Obesity commonly runs inside families. Snacks, soft refreshments, quick food like burgers, pizzas, hotdogs, plus different calorie-rich foods makes one's weight go out of proportion.<br><br>With my plan, we will eat three meals bmi chart women and three snacks a day. Every person is going to have a different amount of calories that he or she could eat per day plus nevertheless lose at least 1 pound per week (and more with exercise). You start with acquiring your BMI.<br><br>That is not to state which the changes inside preference were big, with all the age of the female models seldom being above 25 years. Same applied to the alternative measurements. During the 40 years inside question the lowest Body Mass Index was 16 and highest was 20, with all the average being about middle in between (to calculate BMI see this BMI Calculator). Same used to Waist-to-Hip ratio that stayed in the range of .57 to .73.<br><br>These Television giants felt which Isagenix was thus far ahead in their thinking plus their results, and were impressed enough to give this business the greatest advertising anyone might ever get and that is free advertising.
 
In the following, let ''G'' be a [[finite set|finite]] [[group (mathematics)|group]] that [[Group action|acts]] on a [[Set (mathematics)|set]] ''X''. For each ''g'' in ''G'' let ''X<sup>g</sup>'' denote the set of [[element (mathematics)|elements]] in ''X'' that are [[fixed point (mathematics)|fixed by]] ''g''. Burnside's lemma asserts the following formula for the number of [[orbit (group theory)|orbit]]s, denoted |''X''/''G''|:<ref>{{harvnb|Rotman|1995|loc=Chapter 3}}</ref>
 
:<math>|X/G| = \frac{1}{|G|}\sum_{g \in G}|X^g|.</math>
 
Thus the number of orbits (a [[natural number]] or [[Extended real number line|+∞]]) is equal to the [[mean|average]] number of points [[fixed point (mathematics)|fixed]] by an element of ''G'' (which is also a natural number or infinity). If ''G'' is infinite, the division by |''G''| may not be well-defined; in this case the following statement in [[cardinal arithmetic]] holds:
 
:<math>|G| |X/G| = \sum_{g \in G}|X^g|.</math>
 
== Example application ==
The number of rotationally distinct colourings of the faces of a [[Cube (geometry)|cube]] using three colours can be determined from this formula as follows.
 
Let ''X'' be the set of 3<sup>6</sup> possible face colour combinations that can be applied to a cube in one particular orientation, and let the rotation group ''G'' of the cube act on ''X'' in the natural manner. Then two elements of ''X'' belong to the same orbit precisely when one is simply a rotation of the other. The number of rotationally distinct colourings is thus the same as the number of orbits and can be found by counting the sizes of the [[fixed set]]s for the 24 elements of ''G''.
 
[[Image:Face colored cube.png|thumb|Cube with coloured faces]]
* one  identity element which leaves all 3<sup>6</sup> elements of ''X'' unchanged
* six  90-degree face rotations, each of which leaves 3<sup>3</sup> of the elements of ''X'' unchanged
* three  180-degree face rotations, each of which leaves 3<sup>4</sup> of the elements of ''X'' unchanged
* eight  120-degree vertex rotations, each of which leaves 3<sup>2</sup> of the elements of ''X'' unchanged
* six  180-degree edge rotations, each of which leaves 3<sup>3</sup> of the elements of ''X'' unchanged
 
A detailed examination of these automorphisms may be found
[[Cycle_index#The_cycle_index_of_the_face_permutations_of_a_cube|here]].
 
The average fix size is thus
 
: <math> \frac{1}{24}\left(3^6+6\cdot 3^3 + 3 \cdot 3^4 + 8 \cdot 3^2 + 6 \cdot 3^3 \right) = 57. </math>
 
Hence there are 57 rotationally distinct colourings of the faces of a cube in three colours. In general, the number of rotationally distinct colorings of the faces of a cube in ''n'' colors is given by
 
: <math> \frac{1}{24}\left(n^6+3n^4 + 12n^3 + 8n^2\right). </math>
 
== Proof ==
The proof uses the [[orbit-stabilizer theorem]] and the fact that ''X'' is the disjoint union of the orbits:
 
<math>\begin{align}
\sum_{g \in G}|X^g| &= |\{(g,x)\in G\times X \mid g\cdot x = x\}| = \sum_{x \in X} |G_x| = \sum_{x \in X} \frac{|G|}{|Gx|} \\
                    &= |G| \sum_{x \in X}\frac{1}{|Gx|} = |G|\sum_{A\in X/G}\sum_{x\in A} \frac{1}{|A|} = |G| \sum_{A\in X/G} 1 \\
                    &= |G| \cdot |X/G|.
\end{align}</math>
 
==History: the lemma that is not Burnside's==
[[William Burnside]] stated and proved this lemma, attributing it to {{harvnb|Frobenius|1887}} in his 1897 book on finite groups.  But even prior to Frobenius, the formula was known to [[Cauchy]] in 1845. In fact, the lemma was apparently so well known that Burnside simply omitted to attribute it to Cauchy. Consequently, this lemma is sometimes referred to as '''[[Stigler's law of eponymy|the lemma that is not Burnside's]]'''.<ref>{{harvnb|Neumann|1979}}</ref> This is less ambiguous than it may seem: Burnside contributed many lemmas to this field.
 
== See also ==
* [[Pólya enumeration theorem]]
 
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
 
== References ==
* {{Citation | last1=Burnside | first1=William | author1-link=William Burnside | title=Theory of groups of finite order | publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] | year=1897}}. (This is the first edition; the introduction to the second edition contains Burnside's famous ''volte face'' regarding the utility of [[representation theory]].)
* {{citation | last=Frobenius |first=Ferdinand Georg |authorlink=Ferdinand Georg Frobenius |title=Ueber die Congruenz nach einem aus zwei endlichen Gruppen gebildeten Doppelmodul |journal=Crelle |volume=CI |year=1887 |page=288}}.
* {{Citation | last1=Neumann | first1=Peter M. | author1-link=Peter M. Neumann | title=A lemma that is not Burnside's | mr=562002 | year=1979 | journal=The Mathematical Scientist | issn=0312-3685 | volume=4 | issue=2 | pages=133–141}}.
* {{citation | last=Rotman |first=Joseph |title=An introduction to the theory of groups |publisher=Springer-Verlag |year=1995 |isbn=0-387-94285-8}}.
 
[[Category:Lemmas]]
[[Category:Group theory]]

Revision as of 22:11, 13 February 2014

Did we understand that almost 9 out of 10 persons with newly diagnosed kind 2 diabetes are overweight? If you are overweight, losing several weight could help you better manage the diabetes. Weight Loss Matters is an American Diabetes Association program that will assist you lose weight plus take care of the diabetes. You can lose fat plus keep it off.

This is where the bmi chart is misleading. Recent studies have even shown a weak plus inconsistent correlation between a significant BMI plus disease or early mortality.

He asked me for information, that I was over happy to provide. A year later, Jim has not merely lost many bmi chart men pounds, and felt greater and more energetic. He is now not just able to rest correctly and do his regular escapades without a problem. He is constantly full of energy and enthusiasm!

The Body Mass Index or BMI is an illustration of this standardized evaluator of fitness. It can be conveniently be calculated by dividing the weight in kilograms by the height in meters squared. In English system, weight in pounds is divided by height in inches. The answer is then multiplied by 703. The results are then compared with a standard set of values. Below 210 answers are representative of underweight category. Those ranging between 20 to 24 values are considered physically fit plus healthy whilst those belonging to the 25 to 30 values represent the overweight class. However, more than 30 results are considered obese. Calculation is produced manually, through a easy calculator or by online or phone based fat per height calculator applications.

There are many causes which cause weight. Let's take a look at a few of these factors. Food which is rich in fats plus carbohydrates results inside accumulation of excessive cholesterols in the body. This fat, when not completely absorbed by the body, seems to make 1 fatty over time. Saturated fatty acids that are found in butter, oil, meat etc. could make one's weight abnormal. Heredity factors equally play a big role. Obesity commonly runs inside families. Snacks, soft refreshments, quick food like burgers, pizzas, hotdogs, plus different calorie-rich foods makes one's weight go out of proportion.

With my plan, we will eat three meals bmi chart women and three snacks a day. Every person is going to have a different amount of calories that he or she could eat per day plus nevertheless lose at least 1 pound per week (and more with exercise). You start with acquiring your BMI.

That is not to state which the changes inside preference were big, with all the age of the female models seldom being above 25 years. Same applied to the alternative measurements. During the 40 years inside question the lowest Body Mass Index was 16 and highest was 20, with all the average being about middle in between (to calculate BMI see this BMI Calculator). Same used to Waist-to-Hip ratio that stayed in the range of .57 to .73.

These Television giants felt which Isagenix was thus far ahead in their thinking plus their results, and were impressed enough to give this business the greatest advertising anyone might ever get and that is free advertising.

Retrieved from "https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Analytic_number_theory&oldid=227138"