Bending: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>0x0077BE
Added back the navbox. Not sure how to get Solid Mechanics auto-expanded so that it's obvious where Bending fits in.
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[mathematics]] and [[functional analysis]] a '''direct integral''' is a generalization of the concept of [[direct sum]]. The theory is most developed for direct integrals of [[Hilbert space]]s and direct integrals of [[von Neumann algebra]]s.  The concept was introduced in 1949 by [[John von Neumann]] in one of the papers in the series ''On Rings of Operators''.  One of von Neumann's goals in this paper was to reduce the classification of (what are now called) von Neumann algebras on separable Hilbert spaces to the classification of so-called factors.  Factors are analogous to full matrix algebras over a field, and von Neumann wanted to prove a continuous analogue of the [[Artin–Wedderburn theorem]] classifying semi-simple rings.
Hello and welcome. My title is Irwin and I completely dig that title. South Dakota is where I've always been residing. To gather coins is a thing that I'm totally addicted to. Managing people has been his day job for a while.<br><br>my website :: [http://www.pornextras.info/user/CM54 pornextras.info]
 
Results on direct integrals can be viewed as generalizations of results about finite dimensional [[C*-algebra]]s of matrices; in this case the results are easy to prove directly.  The infinite-dimensional case is complicated by measure-theoretic technicalities.
 
Direct integral theory was also used by [[George Mackey]] in his analysis of [[system of imprimitivity|systems of imprimitivity]] and his general theory of [[induced representation]]s of locally compact separable groups.
 
== Direct integrals of Hilbert spaces ==
The simplest example of a direct integral are the ''L''<sup>2</sup> spaces associated to a (σ-finite) countably additive measure μ on a [[measurable space]] ''X''.  Somewhat more generally  one can consider a separable Hilbert space ''H'' and the space of square-integrable ''H''-valued functions
 
:<math> L^2_\mu(X, H). </math>
 
'''Terminological note''': The terminology adopted by the literature on the subject is followed here,  according to which a measurable space ''X'' is referred to as a ''Borel space'' and the elements of the distinguished σ-algebra of ''X'' as Borel sets, regardless of whether or not the underlying  σ-algebra comes from a topological space (in most examples it does). A Borel space is ''standard'' [[if and only if]] it is isomorphic to the underlying Borel space of a [[Polish space]].  Given a countably additive measure μ on ''X'', a measurable set is one that differs from a Borel set by a [[null set]].   The measure μ on ''X'' is a ''standard'' measure if and only if there is a null set ''E'' such that its complement ''X'' &minus; ''E'' is a [[standard Borel space]]. All measures considered here are σ-finite.
 
'''Definition'''.  Let  ''X'' be a Borel space equipped with a countably additive measure μ.  A ''measurable family of Hilbert spaces'' on (''X'', μ) is a family {''H''<sub>''x''</sub>}<sub>''x''∈ ''X''</sub>, which is locally equivalent to a trivial family in the following sense:  There is a countable  partition
 
:<math> \{X_n\}_{1 \leq n \leq \omega} </math>
 
by measurable subsets of ''X'' such that
 
:<math> H_x = \mathbf{H}_n \quad  x \in X_n </math>
 
where '''H'''<sub>''n''</sub> is the canonical ''n''-dimensional Hilbert space, that is
 
:<math> \mathbf{H}_n = \left\{ \begin{matrix} \mathbb{C}^n & \mbox{ if } n < \omega \\ \ell^2 & \mbox{ if } n = \omega \end{matrix}\right. </math>
 
A ''cross-section'' of {''H''<sub>''x''</sub>}<sub>''x''∈ ''X''</sub> is a family {''s''<sub>''x''</sub>}<sub>''x'' ∈ ''X''</sub> such that ''s''<sub>''x''</sub>  ∈ ''H''<sub>''x''</sub> for all ''x'' ∈ ''X''.  A cross-section is measurable [[if and only if]] its restriction to each partition element ''X''<sub>''n''</sub> is measurable.  We will identify measurable cross-sections ''s'', ''t'' that are equal [[almost everywhere]].  Given a measurable family of Hilbert spaces
 
:<math> \int^\oplus_X H_x \ d \mu(x) </math>
 
consists of equivalence classes (with respect to almost everywhere equality) of measurable square integrable cross-sections of {''H''<sub>''x''</sub>}<sub>''x''∈ ''X''</sub>. This is a Hilbert space under the inner product
 
:<math> \langle s \mid t \rangle = \int_X \langle s(x) \mid t(x) \rangle  d \mu(x) </math>
 
Given the local nature of our definition, many definitions applicable to single Hilbert spaces apply to measurable families of Hilbert spaces as well.
 
'''Remark'''.  This definition is apparently more restrictive than the one given by von Neumann and discussed in Dixmier's classic treatise on von Neumann algebras. In the more general definition, the Hilbert space ''fibers'' ''H''<sub>''x''</sub> are allowed to vary from point to point without having a local triviality requirement (local in a measure-theoretic sense). One of the main theorems of the von Neumann theory is to show that in fact the more general definition can be reduced to the simpler one given here.
 
Note that the direct integral of a measurable family of Hilbert spaces depends only on the measure class of the measure μ; more precisely:
 
'''Theorem'''. Suppose μ, ν are σ-finite countably additive measures on ''X'' that have the same sets of measure 0. Then the mapping
 
:<math> s \mapsto \bigg(\frac{d \mu}{d \nu}\bigg)^{1/2} s </math>
 
is a unitary operator
 
:<math> \int^\oplus_X H_x \ d \nu(x) \rightarrow \int^\oplus_X H_x \ d \mu(x). </math>
 
=== Example ===
 
Technically the simplest examples are when ''X'' is a countable set and μ is a discrete measure. Throughout the article, we will consider the following running example in which ''X'' = '''N''' and μ is counting measure on '''N'''.  In this case any sequence {''H''<sub>''k''</sub>} of separable Hilbert spaces can be considered as a measurable family.  Moreover
 
:<math> \int^\oplus_X H_x \ d \mu(x) \cong \bigoplus_{k \in \mathbb{N}} H_k </math>
 
== Decomposable operators ==
 
In our running example, any bounded linear operator ''T'' on
 
: <math> H = \bigoplus_{k \in \mathbb{N}} H_k </math>
 
is given by an infinite matrix
 
:<math> \begin{bmatrix} T_{1 1} & T_{1 2} & \cdots & T_{1 n} & \cdots \\ T_{2 1} & T_{2 2} & \cdots & T_{2 n} & \cdots \\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \cdots \\
T_{n 1} & T_{n 2} & \cdots & T_{n n} & \cdots \\
\vdots & \vdots & \cdots & \vdots & \ddots
\end{bmatrix}. </math>
 
Let us consider operators that are ''block diagonal'', that is all entries off the diagonal are zero.  We call these operators ''decomposable''.  These operators can be characterized as those that commute with diagonal matrices:
 
:<math> \begin{bmatrix} \lambda_{1} & 0 & \cdots & 0 & \cdots \\ 0 & \lambda_{2} & \cdots & 0 & \cdots \\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \cdots \\
0 & 0 & \cdots & \lambda_{n} & \cdots \\
\vdots & \vdots & \cdots & \vdots & \ddots
\end{bmatrix}. </math>
 
We now proceed to the general definition: A family of bounded operators {''T''<sub>''x''</sub>}<sub>''x''∈ ''X''</sub> with ''T''<sub>''x''</sub> ∈ L(''H''<sub>''x''</sub>) is said to be ''strongly measurable'' if and only if its restriction to each ''X''<sub>''n''</sub> is strongly measurable. This makes sense because ''H''<sub>''x''</sub> is constant on ''X''<sub>''n''</sub>.
 
Measurable families of operators with an essentially bounded norm, that is
 
:<math> \operatorname{ess-sup}_{x \in X} \|T_x\| < \infty </math>
 
define bounded linear operators
 
:<math> \int^\oplus_X \ T_x d \mu(x)  \in \operatorname{L}\bigg(\int^\oplus_X H_x \ d \mu(x)\bigg) </math>
 
acting in a pointwise fashion, that is
 
:<math> \bigg[\int^\oplus_X \ T_x d \mu(x) \bigg] \bigg(\int^\oplus_X \ s_x d \mu(x) \bigg) =  \int^\oplus_X \ T_x(s_x) d \mu(x). </math>
 
Such operators are said to be ''decomposable''. 
 
Examples of decomposable operators are those defined by scalar-valued (i.e. '''C'''-valued) measurable functions λ on ''X''.  In fact,
 
'''Theorem'''.  The mapping
 
: <math> \phi: L^\infty_\mu(X) \rightarrow \operatorname{L}\bigg(\int^\oplus_X H_x \ d \mu(x)\bigg) </math>
 
given by
 
:<math> \lambda \mapsto \int^\oplus_X \ \lambda_x d \mu(x) </math>
 
is an involutive algebraic isomorphism onto its image.
 
For this reason we will identify ''L''<sup>∞</sup><sub>μ</sub>(''X'') with the image of φ.
 
'''Theorem''' Decomposable operators are precisely those that are in the operator commutant of the abelian algebra ''L''<sup>∞</sup><sub>μ</sub>(''X'').
 
=== Decomposition of Abelian von Neumann algebras ===
 
The spectral theorem has many variants.  A particularly powerful version is as follows:
 
'''Theorem'''. For any Abelian von Neumann algebra '''A''' on a separable Hilbert space ''H'', there is a standard Borel space ''X'' and a measure μ on ''X'' such that it is unitarily equivalent as an operator algebra to ''L''<sup>∞</sup><sub>μ</sub>(''X'') acting on a direct integral of Hilbert spaces
 
: <math> \int_X^\oplus H_x d \mu(x). \quad</math>
 
To assert '''A''' is unitarily equivalent to ''L''<sup>∞</sup><sub>μ</sub>(''X'') as an operator algebra means that there is a unitary
 
:<math> U: H \rightarrow \int_X^\oplus H_x d\mu(x) </math>
 
such that ''U'' '''A''' ''U''* is the algebra of diagonal operators ''L''<sup>∞</sup><sub>μ</sub>(''X''). Note that this asserts more than just the algebraic equivalence of '''A''' with the algebra of diagonal operators.
 
This version however does not explicitly state how the underlying standard Borel space ''X'' is obtained.  There is a uniqueness result for the above decomposition.
 
'''Theorem'''.  If the Abelian von Neumann algebra '''A''' is unitarily equivalent to both ''L''<sup>∞</sup><sub>μ</sub>(''X'') and ''L''<sup>∞</sup><sub>ν</sub>(''Y'')  acting on the direct integral spaces
 
: <math> \int_X^\oplus H_x d \mu(x), \quad  \int_Y^\oplus K_y d \nu(y) </math>
 
and μ, ν are standard measures, then there is a Borel isomorphism
 
:<math>\varphi: X - E \rightarrow Y - F </math>
 
where ''E'', ''F'' are null sets such that
 
:<math> K_{\phi(x)} = H_x \quad \mbox{almost everywhere} </math>
 
φ is a measure class isomorphism, that is φ and its inverse preserve sets of measure 0.
 
This previous two theorems provide the complete classification of Abelian von Neumann algebras on separable Hilbert spaces. Note that this classification actually takes into account the realization of the von Neumann algebra as an algebra of operators.  If we only consider the underlying von Neumann algebra independently of its realization as a von Neumann algebra, then its structure is determined by very simple measure-theoretic invariants.
 
== Direct integrals of von Neumann algebras ==
 
Let {''H''<sub>''x''</sub>}<sub>''x'' ∈ ''X''</sub> be a measurable family of Hilbert spaces.  A family of von Neumann algebras {''A''<sub>''x''</sub>}<sub>''x'' ∈ ''X''</sub>
with
 
:<math> A_x \subseteq \operatorname{L}(H_x) </math>
 
is measurable [[if and only if]] there is a countable set ''D'' of measurable operator families that pointwise generate {''A''<sub>''x''</sub>} <sub>''x'' ∈ ''X''</sub>as a von Neumann algebra in the following sense: For almost all ''x'' ∈ ''X'',
 
:<math> \operatorname{W^*}(\{S_x: S \in D\}) = A_x </math>
 
where W*(''S'') denotes the von Neumann algebra generated by the set ''S''. If {''A''<sub>''x''</sub>}<sub>''x'' ∈ ''X''</sub> is a measurable family of von Neumann algebras, the direct integral of von Neumann algebras
 
:<math> \int_X^\oplus A_x d\mu(x) </math>
 
consists of all operators of the form
 
:<math> \int_X^\oplus T_x d\mu(x)  </math>
 
for ''T''<sub>''x''</sub> ∈ ''A''<sub>''x''</sub>.
 
One of the main theorems of von Neumann and Murray in their original series of papers is a proof of the decomposition theorem: Any von Neumann algebra is a direct integral of factors.  We state this precisely below.
 
'''Theorem'''.  If {''A''<sub>''x''</sub>}<sub>''x'' ∈ ''X''</sub> is a measurable family of von Neumann algebras and μ is standard, then the family of operator commutants is also measurable and
 
:<math> \bigg[\int_X^\oplus A_x d\mu(x)\bigg]' = \int_X^\oplus A'_x d\mu(x). </math>
 
== Central decomposition ==
 
Suppose ''A'' is a von Neumann algebra. let '''Z'''(''A'') be the [[center (algebra)|center]] of ''A'', that is the set of operators in ''A'' that commute with all operators ''A'', that is
 
:<math> \mathbf{Z}(A) = A \cap A' </math>
 
'''Z'''(''A'') is an Abelian von Neumann algebra.
 
'''Example'''. The center of L(''H'') is 1-dimensional.  In general, if ''A'' is a von Neumann algebra, if the center is 1 dimensional we say ''A'' is a '''factor'''.
 
Now suppose ''A'' is a von Neumann algebra whose center contains a sequence of minimal pairwise orthogonal non-zero projections {''E''<sub>''i''</sub>}<sub>''i'' ∈ '''N'''</sub> such that
 
:<math> 1 = \sum_{i \in \mathbb{N}} E_i </math>
 
Then ''A'' ''E''<sub>''i''</sub> is a von Neumann algebra on the range ''H''<sub>''i''</sub> of ''E''<sub>''i''</sub>.  It is easy to see ''A'' ''E''<sub>''i''</sub> is a factor.  Thus in this special case
 
:<math> A = \bigoplus_{i \in \mathbb{N}} A E_i </math>
 
represents ''A'' as a direct sum of factors.  This is a special case of the central decomposition theorem of von Neumann.
 
In general, we can apply the structure theorem of Abelian von Neumann algebras that represents Z('''A''') as an algebra of scalar diagonal operators.  In any such representation, all the operators in '''A''' are decomposable operators.  In fact, we can use this to prove the basic result of von Neumann that any von Neumann algebra admits a decomposition into factors.
 
'''Theorem'''. Suppose
 
:<math> H = \int_X^\oplus H_x d \mu(x) </math>
 
is a direct integral decomposition of ''H'' and '''A''' is a von Neumann algebra on ''H'' so that Z('''A''') is represented by the algebra of scalar diagonal operators ''L''<sup>∞</sup><sub>μ</sub>(''X'') where ''X'' is a standard Borel space. Then
 
:<math> \mathbf{A} = \int^\oplus_X A_x d \mu(x) </math>
 
where for almost all ''x'' ∈ ''X'', ''A''<sub>''x''</sub> is a von Neumann algebra that is a ''factor''.
 
== Measurable families of representations ==
 
If ''A'' is a separable C*-algebra, we can consider measurable families of non-degenerate *-representations of ''A''; recall that in case ''A'' has a unit, non-degeneracy is equivalent to unit-preserving.  By the general correspondence that exists between strongly continuous unitary representations of a locally compact group ''G'' and non-degenerate *-representations of the groups C*-algebra C*(''G''), the theory for C*-algebras immediately provides a decomposition theory for representations of separable locally compact groups.
 
'''Theorem'''. Let ''A'' be a separable C*-algebra and π a non-degenerate involutive representation of ''A'' on a separable Hilbert space ''H''.  Let W*(π) be the von Neumann algebra generated by the operators π(''a'') for ''a'' ∈ ''A''.  Then corresponding to any central decomposition of W*(π) over a standard measure space (''X'', μ) (which as stated is unique in a measure theoretic sense), there is a measurable family of factor representations
 
:<math> \{\pi_x\}_{x \in X} </math>
 
of ''A'' such that
 
:<math> \pi(a) = \int_X^\oplus \pi_x(a) d \mu(x), \quad \forall a \in A. </math>
 
Moreover, there is a subset ''N'' of ''X'' with μ measure zero, such that π<sub>''x''</sub>, π<sub>''y''</sub> are disjoint whenever ''x'', ''y'' ∈ ''X'' &minus; ''N'', where representations are said to be ''disjoint'' if and only if there are no [[intertwining operator]]s between them.
 
One can show that the direct integral can be indexed on the so-called ''quasi-spectrum'' ''Q'' of ''A'', consisting of quasi-equivalence classes of factor representations of ''A''. 
Thus there is a standard measure μ on ''Q'' and a measurable family of factor representations indexed on ''Q'' such that π<sub>''x''</sub> belongs to the class of ''x''. This decomposition is essentially unique.  This result is  fundamental  in the theory of group representations.
 
== References ==
 
* [[J. Dixmier]],  ''Von Neumann algebras'', ISBN 0-444-86308-7
* J. Dixmier, ''C* algebras'' ISBN 0-7204-0762-1
* [[G. W. Mackey]], ''The Theory of Unitary Group Representations'', The University of Chicago Press, 1976.
* [[J. von Neumann]], [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-486X%28194904%292%3A50%3A2%3C401%3AOROORT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-H On Rings of Operators. Reduction Theory] The Annals of Mathematics  2nd Ser., Vol. 50, No. 2 (Apr., 1949), pp.&nbsp;401–485.
 
[[Category:Functional analysis]]
[[Category:Measure theory]]
[[Category:Von Neumann algebras]]

Revision as of 18:46, 2 March 2014

Hello and welcome. My title is Irwin and I completely dig that title. South Dakota is where I've always been residing. To gather coins is a thing that I'm totally addicted to. Managing people has been his day job for a while.

my website :: pornextras.info