Boolean algebra: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
en>David Eppstein
m Reverted edits by 173.32.87.113 (talk) to last version by Seppi333
Line 1: Line 1:
{{About||bioMEMS|bioMEMS|MEMS accelerometers|accelerometer|MEMS displays|interferometric modulator display|MEMS gyroscopes|gyroscope|MEMS microphones|microphone|MEMS pressure sensors|accelerometer|MOEMS|MOEMS}}


{{technical|date=February 2012}}


Nike Free Run mænd kører grå Pris: Nike Free Run + Grå royalblue White Herresko Online til salg Pris:. Nike Free Run + Mænds Nay Blå Orange løbesko Online For Udsalgspris:. Nike Free Run mænd kører sort hvid Pris:.<br><br>Dame Nike Free. nike free tropisk twist nike free tropisk twist løbesko salg online, leverer vi nye stil nike free tropisk twist run og Nike Free Run tropisk twist run s. Tiffany blå koral nike frigør Tiffany blå Nike fri nike free neon pink Nike Free mintgrøn Tiffany blå nike sko Nike Free.<br><br>Tiffany blå Nike Free kørsler. koral nike free Nike præsenterer en strålende ny farve option for sin gratis. nike free womens mintgrøn Velkommen til vores online shopping butik NikeFreePlus. Shop for hvor man kan købe Tiffany blå Nike Run løbesko og tr.<br><br>fritage værnepligt én hvid mand som oerseer for eery tyve Slaes. Gennem hele krigen Sydstaterne tilbageholdt så meget som en tredjedel af deres kampstyrker fra frontlinjerne og spredt dem i hele områder med store slae populationer preent slae opstande. + WomensNike Free Run MensNike Free Run WomensNike Free Run MensNike Free Run Dame Nye produkter PQ Nike Free Run Herre Orange Anthracite Black White. ^ Når United Nike Air Max stater tilladt afroamerikanere nike air max til at hverve,<br><br>Nike Free løbesko ofte en alt i én kom op med at forstå mere om tilbuddet en multifunktions rigtig barfodet kører mødes med ud over det faktum, at du er i realiteten skoet. Det er virkelig let kun set oz tillader alle dine familiemedlemmer for mere information om føler kører barefoot.Womens Sko limegrøn fluorescerende. Det er også flere formål, og det betyder alt din familie slet ikke går efter mere information om virkelig, hvad bedre måde markant modstand, mens nogle af de kørende.<br><br>mintgrøn nike mintgrøn Nike løbesko salg online, leverer vi nye stil mintgrøn nike run og mintgrøn nike run sko, laveste pris online. Nike Free Tilbud vores billige Nike Free butik kan støt levere billige billige nike free sko til salg med høj kvalitet,<br><br>Nike A. nike free womens Tiffany blå er en af ​​de varme sælge sko. mint grøn Nike løbesko koral nike free billige nike free nike free womens lyserøde Dame Nike Free run Tiffany blå nike free nike gratis. You'e gjort alt din forskning på Nike Free.<br><br>ohn Thomas Financial C en agtet Tag i sektoren for finansielle Serices rektorerne for dedikation til kunders succes, integritet og serice excellence er grundstenen af ​​Amerikas mest succesrige finansiel virksomhed, ohn Thomas Financial.tiffany blå nike gratis.<br><br>womens Tiffany blå Tiffany blå nike frit løb. Klik på igennem for at se meget mere af den samlede CrimsonBrilliant Mango interaktion og få din på Nike Sportswear leverandører som begreber. Som for pitching, April var ikke helt så slemt for kastere, som det var for denne handling,<br><br>nike gratis tropisk twist nike gratis tropisk twist Run + Shield Herre løbesko. koral nike gratis koral nike gratis. Nike Free Run womens Shop for nike free womens på Nordstrom.tiffany blå frit løb Tiffany blå Nike til salg nike frigør Tiffany blå Tiffany blå Nike womens Dame Nike Free run Tiffany blå Nike.<br><br>, North Sydney NSW Australien Tlf: Fax: Frokost: Man Fre: pm pm * Sidste rækkefølge: pm inderste: Man Lør: pm pm * Sidste rækkefølge: pm Sun: pm pm * Sidste rækkefølge: pm lukket på helligdage , med undtagelse af kompenserende helligdage. Nike Free Run sko er godt designet hae mulighed for at tilbyde en gummisål, der kan tilbyde god trækkraft, mens en atlet er i bevægelse,<br><br>off Bedst sælgende Nike Free. mens endnu en del af nøjagtig den samme lawnplanted udnytte Skrå. Nike Free TR Fit Kategorier Mænd Nike Air Max Nike Air Max Nike Air Max Nike Air Max Nike Air Max VT Nike Air Max Hyper Nike Free. Ute svingel og Highland Bent sammen med bluegrassshowed kun en god intermitterende plet lider bladarealet.<br><br>indledende markedsført inde Nike Oxygen sko, ændret, hvor næsten alle sko hae blevet foretaget. Jeg gør ikke et sekund beliee at kvinder gør det, fordi det gør os føler sig bedre om ourseles. UTY kunne forbrugerne<br><br>Como Capacitarme en mi Multiniel con Poco o Nada de PresupuestoEl tpico Indlæg de 'El Multiniel es un Fraude' El Renacimiento MultinielEn el Multiniel. ? Som se le habla en las Mujeres. Tilføj til kurv Mere info \u0026 #. El Liderazgo es Como Las Ranas Las Leyes Irrefutables de Liderazgo Multiniel lang: 'es' Tweet hablar de Multiniel y ingen hablar de liderazgo es una incongruencia.<br><br>Sean Hayes kan opbygge en betydelig samt deoted fanbase for seeral år i og omkring San Francisco Bay Area. Ifølge surey, Nike er en af ​​faorite sko til professionelle atleter og almindelige mennesker. + Herre Rød Hvid Sort løbesko £.<br><br>Nike Helt gratis Operate, hvis ikke for lethed og komfort, du sandsynligvis kræve at hae specialfremstillede støvler lavet til dig KROKUS Screaming i natperioden ust ligesom øjeblikkelig post T sæt adertising og markedsføring gør det muligt for os at målrette hvem vi ønsker til reachin simple kendsgerning, Billig Free Run,<br><br>If you have any kind of questions concerning where and ways to make use of [http://youmob.com/mob.aspx?cookietest=true&mob=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lsplaza.com nike free 5.0 dame], you can call us at our own web-site.
The '''[[radio frequency]] [[electromechanical|microelectromechanical]] system''' ('''RF [[Microelectromechanical systems|MEMS]]''') [[acronym]] refers to [[electronic component]]s of which moving sub-millimeter-sized parts provide RF functionality. RF functionality can be implemented using a variety of RF technologies. Besides RF MEMS technology, III-V [[compound semiconductor]] ([[GaAs]], [[GaN]], [[indium phosphide|InP]], [[InSb]]), [[Ferrite (magnet)|ferrite]], [[ferroelectric]], [[silicon]]-based semiconductor ([[CMOS|RF CMOS]], [[SiC]] and [[SiGe]]), and [[vacuum tube]] technology are available to the RF designer. Each of the RF technologies offers a distinct trade-off between cost, [[frequency]], [[gain]], [[Large-scale integration#LSI|large-scale integration]], lifetime, [[linearity]], [[noise figure]], [[Electronic packaging|packaging]], [[power handling]], [[power consumption]], [[Circuit reliability|reliability]], ruggedness, size, [[Power supply|supply voltage]], [[switching time]] and weight.
 
== Components ==
 
There are various types of RF MEMS components, such as CMOS integrable RF MEMS [[resonators]] and [[Self-sustainability|self-sustained]] [[Microelectromechanical system oscillator|oscillators]] with small form factor and low [[phase noise]], RF MEMS [[Electronic tuner|tunable]] [[inductor]]s, and RF MEMS [[switches]], [[switched capacitor]]s and [[varactor]]s.
 
=== Switches, switched capacitors and varactors ===
 
The components discussed in this article are based on RF MEMS switches, switched capacitors and varactors. These components can be used instead of [[FET]] and [[HEMT]] switches (FET and HEMT transistors in [[common gate]] configuration), and [[PIN diode|PIN]] diodes. RF MEMS switches, switched capacitors and varactors are classified by actuation method ([[electrostatic]], electrothermal, [[magnetostatics|magnetostatic]], [[piezoelectric]]), by axis of deflection (lateral, vertical), by circuit configuration ([[Series circuits|series]], [[Shunt (electrical)|shunt]]), by [[Clamp (tool)|clamp]] configuration ([[cantilever]], fixed-fixed [[Beam (structure)|beam]]), or by contact interface ([[capacitive]], [[Ohmic contact|ohmic]]). Electrostatically-actuated RF MEMS components offer low [[insertion loss]] and high isolation, linearity, power handling and [[Q factor]], do not consume power, but require a high control voltage and [[hermetic seal|hermetic]] single-chip packaging ([[thin film]] capping, [[liquid crystal polymer|LCP]] or [[low temperature co-fired ceramic|LTCC]] packaging) or [[Wafer-level Packaging|wafer-level packaging]] ([[anodic]] or glass [[frit]] wafer bonding).
 
RF MEMS switches were pioneered by [[IBM Research|IBM Research Laboratory]], [[San Jose, California|San Jose]], [[California|CA]],<ref>K. E. Petersen: "Micro-Mechanical Membrane Switches on Silicon," IBM J. Res. & Dev., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 376-385, Jul. 1979</ref><ref>K. E. Petersen: "Silicon as a Mechanical Material," Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 420-457, May 1982</ref> [[Hughes Research Laboratories]], [[Malibu, California|Malibu]], CA,<ref>L. E. Larson: “Micro-Machined Switch and Method of Fabrication,” U.S. Patent 5,121,089, Nov. 1, 1990</ref> [[Northeastern University]] in cooperation with [[Analog Devices]], [[Boston]], [[Massachusetts|MA]],<ref>P. M. Zavracky, S. Majumder, and N. E. McGruer: "Micromechanical Switches Fabricated Using Nickel Surface Micromachining," J. Microelectromech. Syst., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3-9, Mar. 1997</ref> [[Raytheon]], [[Dallas]], [[Texas|TX]],<ref>C. L. Goldsmith, B. M. Kanack, T. Lin, B. R. Norvell, L. Y. Pang, B. Powers, C. Rhoads, D. Seymour: "Micromechanical Microwave Switching". U.S. Patent 5,619,061, Oct. 31, 1994</ref><ref>C. L. Goldsmith, Z. Yao, S. Eshelman, and D. Denniston: "Performance of Low-Loss RF MEMS Capacitive Switches," IEEE Microwave Wireless Compon. Lett., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 269-271, Aug. 1998</ref> and [[Rockwell International|Rockwell]] Science, [[Thousand Oaks]], CA.<ref name="autogenerated305">J. B. Hacker, R. E. Mihailovich, M. Kim, and J. F. DeNatale: “A Ka-band 3-Bit RF MEMS True-Time-Delay Network,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 305–308, Jan. 2003</ref> A capacitive fixed-fixed beam RF MEMS switch, as shown in Fig. 1(a), is in essence a micro-machined capacitor with a moving top electrode, which is the beam. It is generally connected in shunt with the [[transmission line]] and used in [[X-band|X]]- to W-band (77 [[GHz]] and 94&nbsp;GHz) RF MEMS components. An ohmic cantilever RF MEMS switch, as shown in Fig. 1(b), is capacitive in the up-state, but makes an ohmic contact in the down-state. It is generally connected in series with the transmission line and is used in [[Direct current|DC]] to the [[Ka band|Ka-band]] components.
 
[[File:RF MEMS.png|thumb|640px|'''Fig. 1''': (a) A capacitive fixed-fixed beam RF MEMS switch, connected in shunt to a CPW line. (b) An ohmic cantilever RF MEMS
switch, connected in series to a microstrip line.]]
 
From an electromechanical perspective, the components behave like a [[Damped spring-mass system|damped mass-spring system]], actuated by an [[electrostatic force]]. The [[spring constant]] is a function of the dimensions of the beam, as well as the [[Young's modulus]], the [[residual stress]] and the [[Poisson ratio]] of the beam material. The electrostatic force is a function of the capacitance and the [[Biasing|bias]] voltage. Knowledge of the spring constant allows for hand calculation of the pull-in voltage, which is the bias voltage necessary to pull-in the beam, whereas knowledge of the spring constant and the mass allows for hand calculation of the switching time.
 
From an RF perspective, the components behave like a series RLC circuit with negligible resistance and inductance. The up- and down-state capacitance are in the order of 50 [[Femtofarad|fF]] and 1.2 pF, which are functional values for [[millimeter-wave]] circuit design. Switches typically have a capacitance ratio of 30 or higher, while switched capacitors and varactors have a capacitance ratio of about 1.2 to 10. The loaded Q factor is between 20 and 50 in the X-, [[Ku band|Ku]]- and Ka-band.
 
RF MEMS switched capacitors are capacitive fixed-fixed beam switches with a low capacitance ratio. RF MEMS varactors are capacitive fixed-fixed beam switches which are biased below pull-in voltage. Other examples of RF MEMS switches are ohmic cantilever switches, and capacitive single pole N throw (SPNT) switches based on the axial gap [[wikt:wobble|wobble]] [[Engine|motor]].<ref>S. Pranonsatit, A. S. Holmes, I. D. Robertson and S. Lucyszyn: "Single-Pole Eight-Throw RF MEMS Rotary Switch," IEEE/ASME J. Microelectromech. Syst., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1735-1744, Dec. 2006</ref>
 
== Biasing ==
 
RF MEMS components are biased electrostatically using a bipolar [[Non-return-to-zero|NRZ]] drive voltage, as shown in Fig. 2, in order to avoid [[Failure modes of electronics|dielectric charging]]<ref>J. R. Reid and R. T. Webster: "Measurements of Charging in Capacitive Microelectromechanical Switches," Electronics Letters, vol. 38, no. 24, pp. 1544-1545, Nov. 2002</ref> and to increase the lifetime of the device. Dielectric charges exert a permanent electrostatic force on the beam. The use of a bipolar NRZ drive voltage instead of a DC drive voltage avoids dielectric charging whereas the electrostatic force exerted on the beam is maintained, because the electrostatic force varies quadratically with the DC drive voltage. Electrostatic biasing implies no current flow, allowing high-resistivity bias lines to be used instead of RF [[choking|chokes]].
 
[[File:RF MEMS BIASING.png|thumb|320px|'''Fig. 2''': Electrostatic biasing of a capacitive fixed-fixed beam RF MEMS switch, switched capacitor or varactor.]]
 
== Packaging ==
 
RF MEMS components are fragile and require wafer level packaging or single chip packaging which allow for hermetic [[Microwave cavity|cavity]] sealing. A cavity is required to allow movement, whereas hermeticity is required to prevent cancellation of the spring force by the [[Van der Waals force]] exerted by [[water]] [[droplet]]s and other [[contaminant]]s on the beam. RF MEMS switches, switched capacitors and varactors can be packaged using wafer level packaging. Large monolithic RF MEMS filters, phase shifters, and tunable [[Impedance matching|matching]] networks require single chip packaging.
 
Wafer-level packaging is implemented before wafer [[dicing]], as shown in Fig. 3(a), and is based on anodic, metal diffusion, metal [[eutectic]], glass frit, [[polymer]] [[adhesive]], and silicon fusion wafer bonding. The selection of a wafer-level packaging technique is based on balancing the [[thermal expansion coefficient]]s of the material layers of the RF MEMS component and those of the substrates to minimize the wafer [[Bending|bow]] and the residual stress, as well as on alignment and hermeticity requirements. Figures of merit for wafer-level packaging techniques are chip size, hermeticity, processing [[temperature]], (in)tolerance to alignment errors and [[surface roughness]]. Anodic and silicon fusion bonding do not require an intermediate layer, but do not tolerate surface roughness. Wafer-level packaging techniques based on a bonding technique with a [[conductive]] intermediate layer (conductive split ring) restrict the [[Bandwidth (signal processing)|bandwidth]] and isolation of the RF MEMS component. The most common wafer-level packaging techniques are based on anodic and glass frit wafer bonding. Wafer-level packaging techniques, enhanced with vertical interconnects, offer the opportunity of three-dimensional integration.
 
Single-chip packaging, as shown in Fig. 3(b), is implemented after wafer dicing, using pre-fabricated [[ceramic]] or [[organic compound|organic]] packages, such as LCP injection molded packages or LTCC packages. Pre-fabricated packages require hermetic cavity sealing through clogging, [[Moult|shedding]], [[soldering]] or [[welding]]. Figures of merit for single-chip packaging techniques are chip size, hermeticity, and processing temperature.
 
[[File:RF MEMS PACKAGING.png|thumb|320px|'''Fig. 3''': (a) Wafer-level packaging. (b) Single chip packaging of an ohmic cantilever RF MEMS switch.]]
 
== Microfabrication ==
 
An RF MEMS fabrication process is based on surface micromachining techniques, and allows for integration of SiCr or [[Tantalum nitride|TaN]] [[thin film]] resistors (TFR), metal-air-metal (MAM) capacitors, metal-insulator-metal (MIM) capacitors, and RF MEMS components. An RF MEMS fabrication process can be realized on a variety of wafers: [[compound semiconductor|III-V compound semi-insulating]], borosilicate glass, [[fused silica]] ([[quartz]]), LCP, [[sapphire]], and [[Passivation (chemistry)|passivated]] silicon wafers. As shown in Fig. 4, RF MEMS components can be fabricated in class 100 [[clean rooms]] using 6 to 8 [[optical lithography]] steps with a 5 μm contact alignment error, whereas state-of-the-art [[monolithic microwave integrated circuit|MMIC]] and [[Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit|RFIC]] fabrication processes require 13 to 25 lithography steps.
 
[[File:RF MEMS FABRICATION PROCESS.png|thumb|320px|'''Fig. 4''': RF MEMS switch, switched capacitor, or varactor fabrication process]]
 
As outlined in Fig. 4, the essential [[microfabrication]] steps are:
* Deposition of the bias lines (Fig. 4, step 1)
* Deposition of the electrode layer (Fig. 4, step 2)
* Deposition of the [[dielectric]] layer (Fig. 4, step 3)
* Deposition of the [[sacrificial]] spacer (Fig. 4, step 4)
* Deposition of seed layer and subsequent [[electroplating]] (Fig. 4, step 5)
* Beam [[Photolithography|patterning]], release and [[critical point drying]] (Fig. 4, step 6)
 
With the exception of the removal of the sacrificial spacer, which requires critical point drying, the fabrication steps are similar to CMOS fabrication process steps. RF MEMS fabrication processes, unlike [[Barium strontium titanate|BST]] or [[lead zirconate titanate|PZT]] ferroelectric and MMIC fabrication processes, do not require [[electron beam lithography]], [[molecular beam epitaxy|MBE]], or [[metal organic chemical vapor deposition|MOCVD]].
 
== Reliability ==
 
Contact interface degradation poses a reliability issue for ohmic cantilever RF MEMS switches, whereas dielectric charging beam stiction, as shown in Fig. 5(a), and humidity induced beam stiction, as shown in Fig. 5(b), pose a reliability issue for capacitive fixed-fixed beam RF MEMS switches. Stiction is the inability of the beam to release after removal of the drive voltage. A high contact pressure assures a low-ohmic contact or alleviates dielectric charging induced beam stiction. Commercially-available ohmic cantilever RF MEMS switches and capacitive fixed-fixed beam RF MEMS switches have demonstrated lifetimes in excess of 100 billion cycles at 100 [[milliwatt|mW]] of RF input power.<ref>H. S. Newman, J. L. Ebel, D. Judy, and J. Maciel: "Lifetime Measurements on a High-Reliability RF MEMS Contact Switch," IEEE Microwave Wireless Compon. Lett., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 100-102, Feb. 2008</ref><ref>C. Goldsmith, J. Maciel, and J. McKillop: "Demonstrating reliability," IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 56-60, Dec. 2007</ref> Reliability issues pertaining to high-power operation are discussed in the limiter section.
 
[[File:RF MEMS RELIABILITY.png|thumb|240px|'''Fig. 5''': (a) Dielectric charging induced beam stiction. (b) Humidity induced beam stiction.]]
 
== Applications ==
 
RF MEMS resonators are applied in filters and reference oscillators.<ref name="autogenerated251">C. Nguyen: “MEMS Technology for Timing and Frequency Control,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 251–270, Feb. 2007</ref> RF MEMS switches, switched capacitors and varactors are applied in [[phased array|electronically scanned (sub)arrays]] ([[Phase shift module|phase shifters]]) and [[software-defined radio]]s (reconfigurable [[antennas]], tunable [[band-pass filter]]s).<ref>G. M. Rebeiz: "RF MEMS, Theory, Design and Technology," John Wiley & Sons, 2003</ref>
 
=== Antennas ===
 
[[Polarization (waves)|Polarization]] and [[radiation pattern]] reconfigurability, and frequency tunability, are usually achieved by incorporation of III-V semiconductor components, such as [[Changeover switch|SPST]] switches or varactor diodes. However, these components can be readily replaced by RF MEMS switches and varactors in order to take advantage of the low insertion loss and high Q factor offered by RF MEMS technology. In addition, RF MEMS components can be integrated monolithically on low-loss dielectric substrates, such as borosilicate glass, fused silica or LCP, whereas III-V compound semi-insulating and passivated silicon substrates are generally lossier and have a higher [[dielectric constant]]. A low [[loss tangent]] and low dielectric constant are of importance for the [[Antenna efficiency|efficiency]] and the bandwidth of the antenna.
 
The prior art includes an RF MEMS frequency tunable [[fractal antenna]] for the 0.1–6&nbsp;GHz frequency range,<ref>D. E. Anagnostou et al. "Fractal Antennas with RF-MEMS Switches for Multiple Frequency Applications", in IEEE APS/URSI International Symposium, San Antonio, TX, June 2002, vol. 2, pp.22-25</ref> and the actual integration of RF MEMS switches on a self-similar [[Sierpinski gasket]] antenna to increase its number of [[Resonant frequency|resonant frequencies]], extending its range to 8&nbsp;GHz, 14&nbsp;GHz and 25&nbsp;GHz,<ref>D. E. Anagnostou, G. Zheng, M. Chryssomallis, J. Lyke, G. Ponchak, J. Papapolymerou, and C. G. Christodoulou, "Design, Fabrication and Measurements of an RF-MEMS-Based Self-Similar Re-configurable Antenna", IEEE Transactions on Antennas & Propagation, Special Issue on Multifunction Antennas and Antenna Systems, Vol. 54, Issue 2, Part 1, Feb. 2006, pp.422 – 432</ref><ref>D. E. Anagnostou, G. Zheng, J. Papapolymerou and C. G. Christodoulou, U.S. Patent 7,589,674, "Reconfigurable multifrequency antenna with RF-MEMS switches", Sept. 15, 2009.</ref> an RF MEMS radiation pattern reconfigurable [[spiral antenna]] for 6 and 10&nbsp;GHz,<ref>C. Jung, M. Lee, G. P. Li, and F. D. Flaviis: “Reconfigurable Scan-Beam Single-Arm Spiral Antenna Integrated with RF MEMS Switches,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 455–463, Feb. 2006</ref> an RF MEMS radiation pattern reconfigurable spiral antenna for the 6–7&nbsp;GHz [[frequency band]] based on packaged Radant MEMS SPST-RMSW100 switches,<ref>G. H. Huff and J. T. Bernhard: “Integration of Packaged RF MEMS Switches with Radiation Pattern Reconfigurable Square Spiral Microstrip Antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 464–469, Feb. 2006</ref> an RF MEMS [[Multi-band|multiband]] Sierpinski [[fractal antenna]], again with integrated RF MEMS switches, functioning at different bands from 2.4 to 18&nbsp;GHz,<ref>N. Kingsley, D. E. Anagnostou, M. Tentzeris, and J. Papapolymerou: “RF MEMS Sequentially Reconfigurable Sierpinski Antenna on a Flexible Organic Substrate with Novel DC-Biasing Technique,” IEEE/ASME J. Microelectromech. Syst., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1185–1192, Oct. 2007</ref> and a 2-bit Ka-band RF MEMS frequency tunable [[slot antenna]].<ref>K. Van Caekenberghe and K. Sarabandi: "A 2-Bit Ka-Band RF MEMS Frequency Tunable Slot Antenna," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 7, pp. 179-182, 2008</ref>
 
The [[Samsung Omnia W]] was the first smart phone to include a RF MEMS antenna.<ref>[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/07/wtf_is_rf_mems/ "WTF is... RF-MEMS?"]</ref>
 
=== Filters ===
 
RF [[bandpass filter]]s can be used to increase [[out-of-band]] rejection, in case the antenna fails to provide sufficient [[Selectivity (electronic)|selectivity]]. Out-of-band rejection eases the [[dynamic range]] requirement on the [[low noise amplifier|LNA]] and the [[Frequency mixer|mixer]] in the light of [[Interference (communication)|interference]]. Off-chip RF bandpass filters based on lumped bulk [[Acoustics|acoustic]] wave (BAW), [[ceramic]], [[surface acoustic wave|SAW]], quartz crystal, and [[thin film bulk acoustic resonator|FBAR]] resonators have superseded distributed RF bandpass filters based on transmission line resonators, printed on substrates with low loss tangent, or based on waveguide cavities.
 
Tunable RF bandpass filters offer a significant size reduction over switched RF bandpass [[filter bank]]s. They can be implemented using III-V semiconducting varactors, BST or PZT ferroelectric and RF MEMS resonators and switches, switched capacitors and varactors, and [[yttrium iron garnet|YIG]] ferrites. RF MEMS resonators offer the potential of [[Radio-on-a-chip|on-chip]] integration of high-Q resonators and low-loss bandpass filters. The Q factor of RF MEMS resonators is in the order of 100-1000.<ref name="autogenerated251"/> RF MEMS switch, switched capacitor and varactor technology, offers the tunable filter designer a compelling trade-off between insertion loss, linearity, power consumption, power handling, size, and switching time.<ref>R. M. Young, J. D. Adam, C. R. Vale, T. T. Braggins, S. V. Krishnaswamy, C. E. Milton, D. W. Bever, L. G. Chorosinski,  Li-Shu Chen, D. E. Crockett, C. B. Freidhoff, S. H. Talisa, E. Capelle, R. Tranchini, J. R. Fende, J. M. Lorthioir, A. R. Tories: “Low-Loss Bandpass RF Filter Using MEMS Capacitance Switches to Achieve a One-Octave Tuning Range and Independently Variable Bandwidth,” IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, vol. 3, pp. 1781-1784, Jun. 2003</ref>
 
=== Phase shifters ===
 
Passive subarrays based on RF MEMS phase shifters may be used to lower the amount of T/R modules in an [[active electronically scanned array]]. The statement is illustrated with examples in Fig. 6: assume a one-by-eight passive subarray is used for transmit as well as receive, with following characteristics: f = 38&nbsp;GHz, G<sub>r</sub> = G<sub>t</sub> = 10 [[dBi]], BW = 2&nbsp;GHz, P<sub>t</sub> = 4 [[Watt|W]]. The low loss (6.75 [[picosecond|ps]]/dB) and good power handling (500&nbsp;mW) of the RF MEMS phase shifters allow an EIRP of 40 W and a G<sub>r</sub>/T of 0.036 1/K. EIRP, also referred to as the power-aperture product, is the product of the transmit gain, G<sub>t</sub>, and the transmit power, P<sub>t</sub>. G<sub>r</sub>/T is the quotient of the receive gain and the antenna noise temperature. A high EIRP and G<sub>r</sub>/T are a prerequisite for long-range detection. The EIRP and G<sub>r</sub>/T are a function of the number of antenna elements per subarray and of the maximum scanning angle. The number of antenna elements per subarray should be chosen in order to optimize the EIRP or the EIRP x G<sub>r</sub>/T product, as shown in Fig. 7 and Fig. 8. The [[Radar#Radar equation|radar range equation]] can be used to calculate the maximum range for which targets can be detected with 10 dB of [[Signal-to-noise ratio|SNR]] at the input of the receiver.
 
<p align=center><math>{\mathrm{R = \sqrt[4]{\frac{\displaystyle {\mathrm{\lambda^2 \, EIRP \, G_R/T \, \sigma}}}{{\mathrm{\displaystyle 64 \, \pi^3 \, k_B \, BW \, SNR}}}}}}</math>
 
in which k<sub>B</sub> is the [[Boltzmann constant]], λ is the free-space wavelength, and σ is the [[Radar cross-section|RCS]] of the target. Range values are tabulated in Table 1 for following targets: a [[Mie theory|sphere]] with a radius, a, of 10&nbsp;cm (σ = π a<sup>2</sup>), a [[Dihedral (aircraft)|dihedral]] corner reflector with facet size, a, of 10&nbsp;cm (σ = 12 a<sup>4</sup>/λ<sup>2</sup>), the rear of a car (σ = 20&nbsp;m<sup>2</sup>) and for a non-evasive fighter jet (σ = 400&nbsp;m<sup>2</sup>).
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+ '''Table 1''': Maximum Detectable Range <br />(SNR = 10 dB)
|-
!
! RCS (m<sup>2</sup>)
! Range (m)
|-
| Sphere
| 0.0314
| 10
|-
| Rear of Car
| 20
| 51
|-
| Dihedral Corner Reflector
| 60.9
| 67
|-
| Fighter Jet
| 400
| 107
|}
 
[[File:RF MEMS EIRP TIMES GT VERSUS N 1.png|thumb|640px|'''Fig. 6''': EIRP x G<sub>r</sub>/T]]
 
[[File:RF MEMS EIRP VERSUS N.png|thumb|240px|'''Fig. 7''': EIRP versus number of antenna elements in a passive subarray.]]
 
[[File:RF MEMS EIRP TIMES GT VERSUS N 2.png|thumb|240px|'''Fig. 8''': EIRP x G<sub>r</sub>/T versus number of antenna elements in a passive subarray.]]
 
RF MEMS phase shifters enable wide-angle [[passive electronically scanned array]]s, such as [[Lens (optics)|lens arrays]], [[Reflective array antenna|reflect arrays]], subarrays and switched [[beamforming]] networks, with high [[effective isotropically radiated power|EIRP]] and high G<sub>r</sub>/T. The prior art in passive electronically scanned arrays, includes an X-band continuous transverse stub (CTS) array fed by a line source synthesized by sixteen 5-bit reflect-type RF MEMS phase shifters based on ohmic cantilever RF MEMS switches,<ref>J. J. Lee, C. Quan, and B. M. Pierce: “Low-Cost 2-D Electronically Scanned Array with Compact CTS Feed and MEMS Phase Shifters,” U.S. Patent 6 677 899, Jan. 13, 2004</ref><ref>C. Quan, J. J. Lee, B. M. Pierce, and R. C. Allison: “Wideband 2-D Electronically Scanned Array with Compact CTS Feed and MEMS Phase Shifters,” U.S. Patent 6 822 615, Nov. 23, 2004</ref> an X-band 2-D lens array consisting of parallel-plate [[Waveguide (electromagnetism)|waveguides]] and featuring 25,000 ohmic cantilever RF MEMS switches,<ref>J. J. Maciel, J. F. Slocum, J. K. Smith, and J. Turtle: “MEMS Electronically Steerable Antennas for Fire Control Radars,” IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag, pp. 17–20, Nov. 2007</ref> and a W-band switched beamforming network based on an RF MEMS SP4T switch and a Rotman lens [[Focal plane#Focal points and planes|focal plane]] scanner.<ref>J. Schoebel, T. Buck, M. Reimann, M. Ulm, M. Schneider, A. Jourdain, G. J. Carchon, and H. A. C. Tilmans: "Design Considerations and Technology Assessment of Phased Array Antenna Systems with RF MEMS for Automotive Radar Applications," IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1968-1975, Jun. 2005</ref>
 
The usage of true-time-delay TTD phase shifters instead of RF MEMS phase shifters allows [[Ultra-wideband|UWB]] [[radar]] [[waveform]]s with associated high range resolution, and avoids beam squinting or frequency scanning. TTD phase shifters are designed using the switched-line principle<ref name="autogenerated305"/><ref>G. L. Tan, R. E. Mihailovich, J. B. Hacker, J. F. DeNatale, and G. M. Rebeiz: “Low-loss 2- and 4-Bit TTD MEMS Phase Shifters Based on SP4T Switches,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 297–304, Jan. 2003</ref><ref>C. D. Nordquist, C. W. Dyck, G. M. Kraus, I. C. Reines, C. L. Goldsmith, W. D. Cowan, T. A. Plut, F. Austin, P. S. Finnegan, M. H. Ballance, and C. T. Sullivan: “A DC to 10&nbsp;GHz 6-Bit RF MEMS Time Delay Circuit,” IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 305–307, May 2006</ref> or the distributed loaded-line principle.<ref>N. S. Barker and G. M. Rebeiz, “Optimization of distributed MEMS phase shifters,” in IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Dig., pp. 299–302, 1999</ref><ref>A. S. Nagra and R. A. York, “Distributed Analog Phase Shifters with Low Insertion Loss: ” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1705–1711, Sep. 1999</ref><ref>J. Perruisseau-Carrier, R. Fritschi, P. Crespo-Valero, and A. K. Skrivervik: “Modeling of Periodic Distributed MEMS Application to the Design of Variable True-Time-Delay Lines,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 383–392, Jan. 2006</ref><ref>B. Lakshminarayanan and T. M. Weller: “Design and Modeling of 4-Bit Slow-Wave MEMS Phase Shifters,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 120–127, Jan. 2006</ref><ref>B. Lakshminarayanan and T. M. Weller: “Optimization and Implementation of Impedance-Matched True-Time-Delay Phase Shifters on Quartz Substrate,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 335–342, Feb. 2007</ref><ref>K. Van Caekenberghe and T. Vaha-Heikkila: "An Analog RF MEMS Slotline True-Time-Delay Phase Shifter," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 2151-2159, Sep. 2008</ref> Switched-line TTD phase shifters outperform distributed loaded-line TTD phase shifters in terms of time delay per decibel [[Noise figure|NF]], especially at frequencies up to X-band, but are inherently digital and require low-loss and high-isolation SPNT switches. Distributed loaded-line TTD phase shifters, however, can be realized analogously or digitally, and in smaller form factors, which is important at the subarray level. Analog phase shifters are biased through a single bias line, whereas multibit digital phase shifters require a parallel bus along with complex routing schemes at the subarray level.
 
{{clear}}
 
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
 
== Reading ==
* [http://www.cambridge.org/gb/knowledge/isbn/item2710256/?site_locale=en_GB ''' S. Lucyszyn (Ed), "Advanced RF MEMS", Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-89771-6, Aug. 2010''']
 
== External links ==
 
=== Conferences ===
* [http://www.ieee-mems2011.org/ IEEE MEMS 2011]
* [http://www.memswave2010.unisalento.it/ MEMSWAVE 2010]
 
=== Journals ===
* [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=84 IEEE/ASME Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems]
* [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=22 IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques]
* [http://www.iop.org/EJ/journal/JMM Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering]
 
=== Magazines ===
* [http://www.scoop.it/t/test-post-1 RF MEMS Mag - “Everything about MEMS for Telecommunications”]
* [http://www.eetimes.com/TechSearch/Search.jhtml?site_id=EE+Times&Site+ID=EE+Times&queryText=RF+MEMS&Search.x=0&Search.y=0&Search=Search EE Times]
* [http://www.electroiq.com/index/mems.html ElectroIQ]
* [http://www.smalltimes.com/ Small Times]
 
=== Newsletters ===
* [http://www.isuppli.com/mems-and-sensors/ iSuppli]
* [http://www.memsinvestorjournal.com/ MEMS Investor Journal]
 
=== R&D ===
* [http://www.darpa.mil/mto/programs/mems/index.html DARPA MEMS/NEMS Science & Technology Fundamentals (USA)]
* [ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ict/docs/micro-nanosystems/20080630-amicom_en.pdf EU FP6 AMICOM: The European NoE on RF MEMS and RF Microsystems (EU)]
* [ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ict/docs/micro-nanosystems/20080630-rf-mems-cluster-workshop-report_en.pdf EU FP7 MEMS-4-MMIC: Enabling MEMS-MMIC Technology for Cost-Effective Multifunctional RF-System Integration (EU)]
* [ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ict/docs/micro-nanosystems/20080630-memspack_en.pdf EU FP7 MEMSPACK: Zero- and First-level Packaging of RF MEMS (EU)]
* [ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ict/docs/micro-nanosystems/20080630-retina_en.pdf EU FP7 RETINA: Reliable, Tuneable and Inexpensive Antennas by Collective Fabrication Processes (EU)]
* [http://www.mmc.or.jp/e/outline-e/activities.html#fineMEMS Fine MEMS (JP)]
 
=== Software ===
* [http://www.comsol.com/products/mems/ COMSOL]
* [http://www.coventor.com Coventor]
* [http://www.intellisensesoftware.com/ IntelliSense]
* [http://rfmaxima.sourceforge.net/RF_MEMS.html rfMaxima (open-source)]
* [http://www.softmems.com/ SoftMEMS]
* [http://www-ee.eng.hawaii.edu/~garmire/sugar/ SUGAR (open-source)]
* [http://rfmems.sourceforge.net/ Verilog-AMS RF MEMS Model Library (open-source)]
* [https://nanohub.org/tools/cvgraph/index.php MEMSLab - Electromechanical actuator simulation suite]
 
=== Videos ===
* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdMjqtfOeag A 2-Bit Ka-Band RF MEMS Frequency Tunable Slot Antenna]
* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsmedmwtgfw RF MEMS CPW TTD Phase Shifter]
* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EvFJSNdN44 RF MEMS Slotline TTD Phase Shifter]
* [http://www.wat.tv/video/delfmems-rf-mems-switch-technology-26heb_2jujb_.html RF MEMS Switch technology]
* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xiX6_wbb-U RF MEMS Switch]
 
[[Category:Microelectronic and microelectromechanical systems]]

Revision as of 03:20, 27 January 2014

29 yr old Orthopaedic Surgeon Grippo from Saint-Paul, spends time with interests including model railways, top property developers in singapore developers in singapore and dolls. Finished a cruise ship experience that included passing by Runic Stones and Church.

My name is Winnie and I am studying Anthropology and Sociology and Modern Languages and Classics at Rillieux-La-Pape / France.

Also visit my web site ... hostgator1centcoupon.info

The radio frequency microelectromechanical system (RF MEMS) acronym refers to electronic components of which moving sub-millimeter-sized parts provide RF functionality. RF functionality can be implemented using a variety of RF technologies. Besides RF MEMS technology, III-V compound semiconductor (GaAs, GaN, InP, InSb), ferrite, ferroelectric, silicon-based semiconductor (RF CMOS, SiC and SiGe), and vacuum tube technology are available to the RF designer. Each of the RF technologies offers a distinct trade-off between cost, frequency, gain, large-scale integration, lifetime, linearity, noise figure, packaging, power handling, power consumption, reliability, ruggedness, size, supply voltage, switching time and weight.

Components

There are various types of RF MEMS components, such as CMOS integrable RF MEMS resonators and self-sustained oscillators with small form factor and low phase noise, RF MEMS tunable inductors, and RF MEMS switches, switched capacitors and varactors.

Switches, switched capacitors and varactors

The components discussed in this article are based on RF MEMS switches, switched capacitors and varactors. These components can be used instead of FET and HEMT switches (FET and HEMT transistors in common gate configuration), and PIN diodes. RF MEMS switches, switched capacitors and varactors are classified by actuation method (electrostatic, electrothermal, magnetostatic, piezoelectric), by axis of deflection (lateral, vertical), by circuit configuration (series, shunt), by clamp configuration (cantilever, fixed-fixed beam), or by contact interface (capacitive, ohmic). Electrostatically-actuated RF MEMS components offer low insertion loss and high isolation, linearity, power handling and Q factor, do not consume power, but require a high control voltage and hermetic single-chip packaging (thin film capping, LCP or LTCC packaging) or wafer-level packaging (anodic or glass frit wafer bonding).

RF MEMS switches were pioneered by IBM Research Laboratory, San Jose, CA,[1][2] Hughes Research Laboratories, Malibu, CA,[3] Northeastern University in cooperation with Analog Devices, Boston, MA,[4] Raytheon, Dallas, TX,[5][6] and Rockwell Science, Thousand Oaks, CA.[7] A capacitive fixed-fixed beam RF MEMS switch, as shown in Fig. 1(a), is in essence a micro-machined capacitor with a moving top electrode, which is the beam. It is generally connected in shunt with the transmission line and used in X- to W-band (77 GHz and 94 GHz) RF MEMS components. An ohmic cantilever RF MEMS switch, as shown in Fig. 1(b), is capacitive in the up-state, but makes an ohmic contact in the down-state. It is generally connected in series with the transmission line and is used in DC to the Ka-band components.

File:RF MEMS.png
Fig. 1: (a) A capacitive fixed-fixed beam RF MEMS switch, connected in shunt to a CPW line. (b) An ohmic cantilever RF MEMS switch, connected in series to a microstrip line.

From an electromechanical perspective, the components behave like a damped mass-spring system, actuated by an electrostatic force. The spring constant is a function of the dimensions of the beam, as well as the Young's modulus, the residual stress and the Poisson ratio of the beam material. The electrostatic force is a function of the capacitance and the bias voltage. Knowledge of the spring constant allows for hand calculation of the pull-in voltage, which is the bias voltage necessary to pull-in the beam, whereas knowledge of the spring constant and the mass allows for hand calculation of the switching time.

From an RF perspective, the components behave like a series RLC circuit with negligible resistance and inductance. The up- and down-state capacitance are in the order of 50 fF and 1.2 pF, which are functional values for millimeter-wave circuit design. Switches typically have a capacitance ratio of 30 or higher, while switched capacitors and varactors have a capacitance ratio of about 1.2 to 10. The loaded Q factor is between 20 and 50 in the X-, Ku- and Ka-band.

RF MEMS switched capacitors are capacitive fixed-fixed beam switches with a low capacitance ratio. RF MEMS varactors are capacitive fixed-fixed beam switches which are biased below pull-in voltage. Other examples of RF MEMS switches are ohmic cantilever switches, and capacitive single pole N throw (SPNT) switches based on the axial gap wobble motor.[8]

Biasing

RF MEMS components are biased electrostatically using a bipolar NRZ drive voltage, as shown in Fig. 2, in order to avoid dielectric charging[9] and to increase the lifetime of the device. Dielectric charges exert a permanent electrostatic force on the beam. The use of a bipolar NRZ drive voltage instead of a DC drive voltage avoids dielectric charging whereas the electrostatic force exerted on the beam is maintained, because the electrostatic force varies quadratically with the DC drive voltage. Electrostatic biasing implies no current flow, allowing high-resistivity bias lines to be used instead of RF chokes.

File:RF MEMS BIASING.png
Fig. 2: Electrostatic biasing of a capacitive fixed-fixed beam RF MEMS switch, switched capacitor or varactor.

Packaging

RF MEMS components are fragile and require wafer level packaging or single chip packaging which allow for hermetic cavity sealing. A cavity is required to allow movement, whereas hermeticity is required to prevent cancellation of the spring force by the Van der Waals force exerted by water droplets and other contaminants on the beam. RF MEMS switches, switched capacitors and varactors can be packaged using wafer level packaging. Large monolithic RF MEMS filters, phase shifters, and tunable matching networks require single chip packaging.

Wafer-level packaging is implemented before wafer dicing, as shown in Fig. 3(a), and is based on anodic, metal diffusion, metal eutectic, glass frit, polymer adhesive, and silicon fusion wafer bonding. The selection of a wafer-level packaging technique is based on balancing the thermal expansion coefficients of the material layers of the RF MEMS component and those of the substrates to minimize the wafer bow and the residual stress, as well as on alignment and hermeticity requirements. Figures of merit for wafer-level packaging techniques are chip size, hermeticity, processing temperature, (in)tolerance to alignment errors and surface roughness. Anodic and silicon fusion bonding do not require an intermediate layer, but do not tolerate surface roughness. Wafer-level packaging techniques based on a bonding technique with a conductive intermediate layer (conductive split ring) restrict the bandwidth and isolation of the RF MEMS component. The most common wafer-level packaging techniques are based on anodic and glass frit wafer bonding. Wafer-level packaging techniques, enhanced with vertical interconnects, offer the opportunity of three-dimensional integration.

Single-chip packaging, as shown in Fig. 3(b), is implemented after wafer dicing, using pre-fabricated ceramic or organic packages, such as LCP injection molded packages or LTCC packages. Pre-fabricated packages require hermetic cavity sealing through clogging, shedding, soldering or welding. Figures of merit for single-chip packaging techniques are chip size, hermeticity, and processing temperature.

File:RF MEMS PACKAGING.png
Fig. 3: (a) Wafer-level packaging. (b) Single chip packaging of an ohmic cantilever RF MEMS switch.

Microfabrication

An RF MEMS fabrication process is based on surface micromachining techniques, and allows for integration of SiCr or TaN thin film resistors (TFR), metal-air-metal (MAM) capacitors, metal-insulator-metal (MIM) capacitors, and RF MEMS components. An RF MEMS fabrication process can be realized on a variety of wafers: III-V compound semi-insulating, borosilicate glass, fused silica (quartz), LCP, sapphire, and passivated silicon wafers. As shown in Fig. 4, RF MEMS components can be fabricated in class 100 clean rooms using 6 to 8 optical lithography steps with a 5 μm contact alignment error, whereas state-of-the-art MMIC and RFIC fabrication processes require 13 to 25 lithography steps.

File:RF MEMS FABRICATION PROCESS.png
Fig. 4: RF MEMS switch, switched capacitor, or varactor fabrication process

As outlined in Fig. 4, the essential microfabrication steps are:

  • Deposition of the bias lines (Fig. 4, step 1)
  • Deposition of the electrode layer (Fig. 4, step 2)
  • Deposition of the dielectric layer (Fig. 4, step 3)
  • Deposition of the sacrificial spacer (Fig. 4, step 4)
  • Deposition of seed layer and subsequent electroplating (Fig. 4, step 5)
  • Beam patterning, release and critical point drying (Fig. 4, step 6)

With the exception of the removal of the sacrificial spacer, which requires critical point drying, the fabrication steps are similar to CMOS fabrication process steps. RF MEMS fabrication processes, unlike BST or PZT ferroelectric and MMIC fabrication processes, do not require electron beam lithography, MBE, or MOCVD.

Reliability

Contact interface degradation poses a reliability issue for ohmic cantilever RF MEMS switches, whereas dielectric charging beam stiction, as shown in Fig. 5(a), and humidity induced beam stiction, as shown in Fig. 5(b), pose a reliability issue for capacitive fixed-fixed beam RF MEMS switches. Stiction is the inability of the beam to release after removal of the drive voltage. A high contact pressure assures a low-ohmic contact or alleviates dielectric charging induced beam stiction. Commercially-available ohmic cantilever RF MEMS switches and capacitive fixed-fixed beam RF MEMS switches have demonstrated lifetimes in excess of 100 billion cycles at 100 mW of RF input power.[10][11] Reliability issues pertaining to high-power operation are discussed in the limiter section.

File:RF MEMS RELIABILITY.png
Fig. 5: (a) Dielectric charging induced beam stiction. (b) Humidity induced beam stiction.

Applications

RF MEMS resonators are applied in filters and reference oscillators.[12] RF MEMS switches, switched capacitors and varactors are applied in electronically scanned (sub)arrays (phase shifters) and software-defined radios (reconfigurable antennas, tunable band-pass filters).[13]

Antennas

Polarization and radiation pattern reconfigurability, and frequency tunability, are usually achieved by incorporation of III-V semiconductor components, such as SPST switches or varactor diodes. However, these components can be readily replaced by RF MEMS switches and varactors in order to take advantage of the low insertion loss and high Q factor offered by RF MEMS technology. In addition, RF MEMS components can be integrated monolithically on low-loss dielectric substrates, such as borosilicate glass, fused silica or LCP, whereas III-V compound semi-insulating and passivated silicon substrates are generally lossier and have a higher dielectric constant. A low loss tangent and low dielectric constant are of importance for the efficiency and the bandwidth of the antenna.

The prior art includes an RF MEMS frequency tunable fractal antenna for the 0.1–6 GHz frequency range,[14] and the actual integration of RF MEMS switches on a self-similar Sierpinski gasket antenna to increase its number of resonant frequencies, extending its range to 8 GHz, 14 GHz and 25 GHz,[15][16] an RF MEMS radiation pattern reconfigurable spiral antenna for 6 and 10 GHz,[17] an RF MEMS radiation pattern reconfigurable spiral antenna for the 6–7 GHz frequency band based on packaged Radant MEMS SPST-RMSW100 switches,[18] an RF MEMS multiband Sierpinski fractal antenna, again with integrated RF MEMS switches, functioning at different bands from 2.4 to 18 GHz,[19] and a 2-bit Ka-band RF MEMS frequency tunable slot antenna.[20]

The Samsung Omnia W was the first smart phone to include a RF MEMS antenna.[21]

Filters

RF bandpass filters can be used to increase out-of-band rejection, in case the antenna fails to provide sufficient selectivity. Out-of-band rejection eases the dynamic range requirement on the LNA and the mixer in the light of interference. Off-chip RF bandpass filters based on lumped bulk acoustic wave (BAW), ceramic, SAW, quartz crystal, and FBAR resonators have superseded distributed RF bandpass filters based on transmission line resonators, printed on substrates with low loss tangent, or based on waveguide cavities.

Tunable RF bandpass filters offer a significant size reduction over switched RF bandpass filter banks. They can be implemented using III-V semiconducting varactors, BST or PZT ferroelectric and RF MEMS resonators and switches, switched capacitors and varactors, and YIG ferrites. RF MEMS resonators offer the potential of on-chip integration of high-Q resonators and low-loss bandpass filters. The Q factor of RF MEMS resonators is in the order of 100-1000.[12] RF MEMS switch, switched capacitor and varactor technology, offers the tunable filter designer a compelling trade-off between insertion loss, linearity, power consumption, power handling, size, and switching time.[22]

Phase shifters

Passive subarrays based on RF MEMS phase shifters may be used to lower the amount of T/R modules in an active electronically scanned array. The statement is illustrated with examples in Fig. 6: assume a one-by-eight passive subarray is used for transmit as well as receive, with following characteristics: f = 38 GHz, Gr = Gt = 10 dBi, BW = 2 GHz, Pt = 4 W. The low loss (6.75 ps/dB) and good power handling (500 mW) of the RF MEMS phase shifters allow an EIRP of 40 W and a Gr/T of 0.036 1/K. EIRP, also referred to as the power-aperture product, is the product of the transmit gain, Gt, and the transmit power, Pt. Gr/T is the quotient of the receive gain and the antenna noise temperature. A high EIRP and Gr/T are a prerequisite for long-range detection. The EIRP and Gr/T are a function of the number of antenna elements per subarray and of the maximum scanning angle. The number of antenna elements per subarray should be chosen in order to optimize the EIRP or the EIRP x Gr/T product, as shown in Fig. 7 and Fig. 8. The radar range equation can be used to calculate the maximum range for which targets can be detected with 10 dB of SNR at the input of the receiver.

in which kB is the Boltzmann constant, λ is the free-space wavelength, and σ is the RCS of the target. Range values are tabulated in Table 1 for following targets: a sphere with a radius, a, of 10 cm (σ = π a2), a dihedral corner reflector with facet size, a, of 10 cm (σ = 12 a42), the rear of a car (σ = 20 m2) and for a non-evasive fighter jet (σ = 400 m2).

Table 1: Maximum Detectable Range
(SNR = 10 dB)
RCS (m2) Range (m)
Sphere 0.0314 10
Rear of Car 20 51
Dihedral Corner Reflector 60.9 67
Fighter Jet 400 107
File:RF MEMS EIRP TIMES GT VERSUS N 1.png
Fig. 6: EIRP x Gr/T
File:RF MEMS EIRP VERSUS N.png
Fig. 7: EIRP versus number of antenna elements in a passive subarray.
Fig. 8: EIRP x Gr/T versus number of antenna elements in a passive subarray.

RF MEMS phase shifters enable wide-angle passive electronically scanned arrays, such as lens arrays, reflect arrays, subarrays and switched beamforming networks, with high EIRP and high Gr/T. The prior art in passive electronically scanned arrays, includes an X-band continuous transverse stub (CTS) array fed by a line source synthesized by sixteen 5-bit reflect-type RF MEMS phase shifters based on ohmic cantilever RF MEMS switches,[23][24] an X-band 2-D lens array consisting of parallel-plate waveguides and featuring 25,000 ohmic cantilever RF MEMS switches,[25] and a W-band switched beamforming network based on an RF MEMS SP4T switch and a Rotman lens focal plane scanner.[26]

The usage of true-time-delay TTD phase shifters instead of RF MEMS phase shifters allows UWB radar waveforms with associated high range resolution, and avoids beam squinting or frequency scanning. TTD phase shifters are designed using the switched-line principle[7][27][28] or the distributed loaded-line principle.[29][30][31][32][33][34] Switched-line TTD phase shifters outperform distributed loaded-line TTD phase shifters in terms of time delay per decibel NF, especially at frequencies up to X-band, but are inherently digital and require low-loss and high-isolation SPNT switches. Distributed loaded-line TTD phase shifters, however, can be realized analogously or digitally, and in smaller form factors, which is important at the subarray level. Analog phase shifters are biased through a single bias line, whereas multibit digital phase shifters require a parallel bus along with complex routing schemes at the subarray level.

50 year old Petroleum Engineer Kull from Dawson Creek, spends time with interests such as house brewing, property developers in singapore condo launch and camping. Discovers the beauty in planing a trip to places around the entire world, recently only coming back from .

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

Reading

External links

Conferences

Journals

Magazines

Newsletters

R&D

Software

Videos

  1. K. E. Petersen: "Micro-Mechanical Membrane Switches on Silicon," IBM J. Res. & Dev., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 376-385, Jul. 1979
  2. K. E. Petersen: "Silicon as a Mechanical Material," Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 420-457, May 1982
  3. L. E. Larson: “Micro-Machined Switch and Method of Fabrication,” U.S. Patent 5,121,089, Nov. 1, 1990
  4. P. M. Zavracky, S. Majumder, and N. E. McGruer: "Micromechanical Switches Fabricated Using Nickel Surface Micromachining," J. Microelectromech. Syst., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3-9, Mar. 1997
  5. C. L. Goldsmith, B. M. Kanack, T. Lin, B. R. Norvell, L. Y. Pang, B. Powers, C. Rhoads, D. Seymour: "Micromechanical Microwave Switching". U.S. Patent 5,619,061, Oct. 31, 1994
  6. C. L. Goldsmith, Z. Yao, S. Eshelman, and D. Denniston: "Performance of Low-Loss RF MEMS Capacitive Switches," IEEE Microwave Wireless Compon. Lett., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 269-271, Aug. 1998
  7. 7.0 7.1 J. B. Hacker, R. E. Mihailovich, M. Kim, and J. F. DeNatale: “A Ka-band 3-Bit RF MEMS True-Time-Delay Network,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 305–308, Jan. 2003
  8. S. Pranonsatit, A. S. Holmes, I. D. Robertson and S. Lucyszyn: "Single-Pole Eight-Throw RF MEMS Rotary Switch," IEEE/ASME J. Microelectromech. Syst., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1735-1744, Dec. 2006
  9. J. R. Reid and R. T. Webster: "Measurements of Charging in Capacitive Microelectromechanical Switches," Electronics Letters, vol. 38, no. 24, pp. 1544-1545, Nov. 2002
  10. H. S. Newman, J. L. Ebel, D. Judy, and J. Maciel: "Lifetime Measurements on a High-Reliability RF MEMS Contact Switch," IEEE Microwave Wireless Compon. Lett., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 100-102, Feb. 2008
  11. C. Goldsmith, J. Maciel, and J. McKillop: "Demonstrating reliability," IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 56-60, Dec. 2007
  12. 12.0 12.1 C. Nguyen: “MEMS Technology for Timing and Frequency Control,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 251–270, Feb. 2007
  13. G. M. Rebeiz: "RF MEMS, Theory, Design and Technology," John Wiley & Sons, 2003
  14. D. E. Anagnostou et al. "Fractal Antennas with RF-MEMS Switches for Multiple Frequency Applications", in IEEE APS/URSI International Symposium, San Antonio, TX, June 2002, vol. 2, pp.22-25
  15. D. E. Anagnostou, G. Zheng, M. Chryssomallis, J. Lyke, G. Ponchak, J. Papapolymerou, and C. G. Christodoulou, "Design, Fabrication and Measurements of an RF-MEMS-Based Self-Similar Re-configurable Antenna", IEEE Transactions on Antennas & Propagation, Special Issue on Multifunction Antennas and Antenna Systems, Vol. 54, Issue 2, Part 1, Feb. 2006, pp.422 – 432
  16. D. E. Anagnostou, G. Zheng, J. Papapolymerou and C. G. Christodoulou, U.S. Patent 7,589,674, "Reconfigurable multifrequency antenna with RF-MEMS switches", Sept. 15, 2009.
  17. C. Jung, M. Lee, G. P. Li, and F. D. Flaviis: “Reconfigurable Scan-Beam Single-Arm Spiral Antenna Integrated with RF MEMS Switches,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 455–463, Feb. 2006
  18. G. H. Huff and J. T. Bernhard: “Integration of Packaged RF MEMS Switches with Radiation Pattern Reconfigurable Square Spiral Microstrip Antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 464–469, Feb. 2006
  19. N. Kingsley, D. E. Anagnostou, M. Tentzeris, and J. Papapolymerou: “RF MEMS Sequentially Reconfigurable Sierpinski Antenna on a Flexible Organic Substrate with Novel DC-Biasing Technique,” IEEE/ASME J. Microelectromech. Syst., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1185–1192, Oct. 2007
  20. K. Van Caekenberghe and K. Sarabandi: "A 2-Bit Ka-Band RF MEMS Frequency Tunable Slot Antenna," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 7, pp. 179-182, 2008
  21. "WTF is... RF-MEMS?"
  22. R. M. Young, J. D. Adam, C. R. Vale, T. T. Braggins, S. V. Krishnaswamy, C. E. Milton, D. W. Bever, L. G. Chorosinski, Li-Shu Chen, D. E. Crockett, C. B. Freidhoff, S. H. Talisa, E. Capelle, R. Tranchini, J. R. Fende, J. M. Lorthioir, A. R. Tories: “Low-Loss Bandpass RF Filter Using MEMS Capacitance Switches to Achieve a One-Octave Tuning Range and Independently Variable Bandwidth,” IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, vol. 3, pp. 1781-1784, Jun. 2003
  23. J. J. Lee, C. Quan, and B. M. Pierce: “Low-Cost 2-D Electronically Scanned Array with Compact CTS Feed and MEMS Phase Shifters,” U.S. Patent 6 677 899, Jan. 13, 2004
  24. C. Quan, J. J. Lee, B. M. Pierce, and R. C. Allison: “Wideband 2-D Electronically Scanned Array with Compact CTS Feed and MEMS Phase Shifters,” U.S. Patent 6 822 615, Nov. 23, 2004
  25. J. J. Maciel, J. F. Slocum, J. K. Smith, and J. Turtle: “MEMS Electronically Steerable Antennas for Fire Control Radars,” IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag, pp. 17–20, Nov. 2007
  26. J. Schoebel, T. Buck, M. Reimann, M. Ulm, M. Schneider, A. Jourdain, G. J. Carchon, and H. A. C. Tilmans: "Design Considerations and Technology Assessment of Phased Array Antenna Systems with RF MEMS for Automotive Radar Applications," IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1968-1975, Jun. 2005
  27. G. L. Tan, R. E. Mihailovich, J. B. Hacker, J. F. DeNatale, and G. M. Rebeiz: “Low-loss 2- and 4-Bit TTD MEMS Phase Shifters Based on SP4T Switches,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 297–304, Jan. 2003
  28. C. D. Nordquist, C. W. Dyck, G. M. Kraus, I. C. Reines, C. L. Goldsmith, W. D. Cowan, T. A. Plut, F. Austin, P. S. Finnegan, M. H. Ballance, and C. T. Sullivan: “A DC to 10 GHz 6-Bit RF MEMS Time Delay Circuit,” IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 305–307, May 2006
  29. N. S. Barker and G. M. Rebeiz, “Optimization of distributed MEMS phase shifters,” in IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Dig., pp. 299–302, 1999
  30. A. S. Nagra and R. A. York, “Distributed Analog Phase Shifters with Low Insertion Loss: ” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1705–1711, Sep. 1999
  31. J. Perruisseau-Carrier, R. Fritschi, P. Crespo-Valero, and A. K. Skrivervik: “Modeling of Periodic Distributed MEMS Application to the Design of Variable True-Time-Delay Lines,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 383–392, Jan. 2006
  32. B. Lakshminarayanan and T. M. Weller: “Design and Modeling of 4-Bit Slow-Wave MEMS Phase Shifters,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 120–127, Jan. 2006
  33. B. Lakshminarayanan and T. M. Weller: “Optimization and Implementation of Impedance-Matched True-Time-Delay Phase Shifters on Quartz Substrate,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 335–342, Feb. 2007
  34. K. Van Caekenberghe and T. Vaha-Heikkila: "An Analog RF MEMS Slotline True-Time-Delay Phase Shifter," IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 2151-2159, Sep. 2008