|
|
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| <!-- The French version of this article is a featured article. Large portions have been translated and inserted here in 2009. -->
| | == are Baotui == |
| [[Image:poincare.jpg|220px|thumb|right|In 1886, [[Henri Poincaré]] (pictured) proved a result that is equivalent to Brouwer's fixed-point theorem. The three-dimensional case of the exact statement was proved in 1904 by [[Piers Bohl]], and the general case in 1910 by [[Jacques Hadamard]] and [[Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer]].]]
| |
| '''Brouwer's fixed-point theorem''' is a [[fixed-point theorem]] in [[topology]], named after [[Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer|Luitzen Brouwer]]. It states that for any continuous function ''f'' with certain properties mapping a compact convex set into itself there is a point ''x''<sub>0</sub> such that ''f''(''x''<sub>0</sub>) = ''x''<sub>0</sub>. The simplest forms of Brouwer's theorem are for continuous functions ''f'' from a closed interval ''I'' in the real numbers to itself or from a closed [[Disk (mathematics)|disk]] ''D'' to itself. A more general form than the latter is for continuous functions from a [[Convex set|convex]] [[compactness|compact]] subset ''K'' of [[Euclidean space]] to itself.
| |
|
| |
|
| Among hundreds of fixed-point theorems,<ref>E.g. F & V Bayart ''[http://www.bibmath.net/dico/index.php3?action=affiche&quoi=./p/pointfixe.html Théorèmes du point fixe]'' on Bibm@th.net</ref> Brouwer's is particularly well known, due in part to its use across numerous fields of mathematics.
| | Six Heaven's Soldiers secret, a Road burst, explosion,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-28.html prada トートバッグ], both arms Kuangzhen Huatian body back again and again,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-35.html プラダ スタッズ 財布], his face showing the color of shock.<br>a trick to defeat the enemy, he actually put his secrets are breaketh six Heaven's Soldiers. Huatian between<br>are Baotui, roar: 'minimalist cold side of the road, I'll let you look at my 华天君 create your own road, minimalist way dull moon, earth and minimalist brilliance club!!! off. '<br>Om! Lance violent shaking, a deep sense of 'minimalist force', Kuangyong out from Huatian all body.<br>sharp increase combat power,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-31.html プラダ 長財布], break the cold side of the vision again, blossom, long rivers, worlds, hazy all roll off by a spear, a clean sweep,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-31.html プラダ 財布 新作 2014], Hua Tian are the spear,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-35.html prada スタッズ 財布], the assassination of the party cold sore , that point the finger of blame on the flashing red fire out of breath, a little rich and can hurt Heaven's Soldiers of blood. above<br>'This key sector of the spearhead Dan |
| In its original field, this result is one of the key theorems characterizing the topology of Euclidean spaces, along with the [[Jordan curve theorem]], the [[hairy ball theorem]] and the [[Borsuk–Ulam theorem]].<ref>See page 15 of: D. Leborgne ''Calcul différentiel et géométrie'' Puf (1982) ISBN 2-13-037495-6</ref>
| | 相关的主题文章： |
| This gives it a place among the fundamental theorems of topology.<ref>More exactly, according to Encyclopédie Universalis: ''Il en a démontré l'un des plus beaux théorèmes, le théorème du point fixe, dont les applications et généralisations, de la théorie des jeux aux équations différentielles, se sont révélées fondamentales.'' [http://www.universalis.fr/encyclopedie/T705705/BROUWER_L.htm Luizen Brouwer] by G. Sabbagh</ref> The theorem is also used for proving deep results about [[differential equation]]s and is covered in most introductory courses on [[differential geometry]].
| | <ul> |
| It appears in unlikely fields such as [[game theory]]. In economics, Brouwer's fixed-point theorem and its extension, the [[Kakutani fixed-point theorem]], play a central role in the proof of existence of general equilibrium in market economies as developed in the 1950s by economics Nobel prize winners [[Gérard Debreu]] and [[Kenneth Arrow]].
| | |
| | <li>[http://www.1ny.com.cn/plus/view.php?aid=113914 'I know that this is stolen fortune]</li> |
| | |
| | <li>[http://www.dongxiren.com/plus/view.php?aid=7712 it is not enough this qualification]</li> |
| | |
| | <li>[http://www.408yy.com/plus/feedback.php?aid=2068 間で低温側を乗って、話す]</li> |
| | |
| | </ul> |
|
| |
|
| The theorem was first studied in view of work on differential equations by the French mathematicians around [[Henri Poincaré|Poincaré]] and [[Charles Émile Picard|Picard]].
| | == Cosmic Gate' == |
| Proving results such as the [[Poincaré–Bendixson theorem]] requires the use of topological methods.
| |
| This work at the end of the 19th century opened into several successive versions of the theorem. The general case was first proved in 1910 by [[Jacques Hadamard]]<ref name="hadamard-1910">[[Jacques Hadamard]]: ''[http://archive.org/stream/introductionla02tannuoft#page/436/mode/2up Note sur quelques applications de l’indice de Kronecker]'' in [[Jules Tannery]]: ''Introduction à la théorie des fonctions d’une variable'' (Volume 2), 2nd edition, A. Hermann & Fils, Paris 1910, pp. 437–477 (French)</ref> and by [[Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer]].<ref name="brouwer-1910">[[Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer|L. E. J. Brouwer]] ''[http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?GDZPPN002264021 Über Abbildungen von Mannigfaltigkeiten]'' Mathematische Annalen 71, pp. 97–115, {{doi|10.1007/BF01456931}} (German; published 25 July 1911, written July 1910)</ref>
| |
|
| |
|
| == Statement ==
| | However, I saw a portal,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-29.html prada メンズ 財布], square cold blurted out: '! Cosmic Gate'<br>'Yes, Prince Ula indeed the master, all Fenduo this is the time and space between the door, six Union we are building this door and space,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-34.html prada], you can reach any Fenduo any such deployment of cargo and personnel exchanges , danger, mobilization of experts are very convenient, if today we encounter the eternal Big Five Dragon attack in this place,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-25.html prada トートバッグ], then immediately this time and space from the door,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-26.html プラダ 財布 迷彩], it will grazing thousands of masters, kill invading enemy! '<br>Taohuaxian sub Road.<br>'six League,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-31.html プラダ 財布 中古], is indeed the land of the three chambers of commerce, we Siniora star on a recent batch of billions of immortality goods purchases, it seems I have to give priority to six League of.' Fang Han big boast.<br>'That is, of course.' Taohuaxian child one of 'Hurrah Prince' has a little more intimate. 'Now, we send through this door, |
| The theorem has several formulations, depending on the context in which it is used and its degree of generalization.
| | 相关的主题文章： |
| The simplest is sometimes given as follows:
| | <ul> |
| | |
| | <li>[http://bbs.2026.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=8098 エッセンス、レア度も下に「石をTaibaijinxing]</li> |
| | |
| | <li>[http://www.2learn.org/cgi-bin/mojo/mojo.cgi 月と星のブレスレット]</li> |
| | |
| | <li>[http://assy1.com/vb/showthread.php?p=43966#post43966 10062]</li> |
| | |
| | </ul> |
|
| |
|
| :;In the plane: Every [[continuous function (topology)|continuous]] function from a [[Closed set|closed]] [[Disk (mathematics)|disk]] to itself has at least one fixed point.<ref>D. Violette ''[http://newton.mat.ulaval.ca/amq/bulletins/dec06/sperner.pdf Applications du lemme de Sperner pour les triangles]'' Bulletin AMQ, V. XLVI N° 4, (2006) p 17.</ref>
| | == 一緒に、よりになります == |
|
| |
|
| This can be generalized to an arbitrary finite dimension:
| | 発見された,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-31.html 財布 ブランド プラダ]？そうでなければ、私はちょうど行くQishaひょうたんに吸収feijian 7命の姿を入れて、Qisha建ジェンが構成される,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-28.html prada ピンク 財布]。 ' 「真実に従って、見つからないはずですが、悪魔の戦場のこの部分を教えるか、同様に注意するために出現ドアオープン手のひら」<br>'まあ,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-26.html 財布 プラダ レディース]。」<br><br>「私は悪魔の戦場のなぜこの作品を教えるためにドアを開いた手のひらをぼかし、知っている。それでも弟子たちは裁判が来た。千年は飛ぶしなかった飛行、餌の下でああ、治外法権無限の空、長寿ファムさえマスターだった側に、単に一般的には広大な海での普通の人のように、これらの域外悪魔は、次の餌肉の悪魔に非常に興味があり、あなたが毎年ここにこれらの弟子になっている魚の海、この作品の悪魔の戦場であり、これらの悪魔はちょうど釣りの前に、キャストJINWOZI一般のように,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-28.html prada 財布 2014]。一緒に、よりになります,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-29.html プラダ新作バッグ2014]。 '<br>側寒い思い、それが本当であるのです。 」の<br>と |
| | 相关的主题文章： |
| | <ul> |
| | |
| | <li>[http://www.maprad.com/en/index.php?item/create_form/1 が、明らかにまだ長寿ファムに無い画期的な]</li> |
| | |
| | <li>[http://www.horrorfind.com/horror-find-bin/to-your-horror/search.cgi しかし、限りアウトコールド側として、ヤンの居場所に即座に計]</li> |
| | |
| | <li>[http://www.jraf.net/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=62891 ではないエレガントに]</li> |
| | |
| | </ul> |
|
| |
|
| :;In Euclidean space:Every continuous function from a [[closed ball]] of an [[Euclidean space]] onto itself has a fixed point.<ref>Page 15 of: D. Leborgne ''Calcul différentiel et géométrie'' Puf (1982) ISBN 2-13-037495-6.</ref>
| | == 、私たちはわずかなミスをすることはできません == |
|
| |
|
| A slightly more general version is as follows:<ref>This version follows directly from the previous one because every convex compact subset of a Euclidean space is homeomorphic to a closed ball of the same dimension as the subset; see {{cite book|title=General Equilibrium Analysis: Existence and Optimality Properties of Equilibria|first=Monique|last=Florenzano|publisher=Springer|year=2003|isbn=9781402075124|page=7|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=cNBMfxPQlvEC&pg=PA7}}</ref>
| | 単にそれを精製することはできません。 '<br>「はい、それは、皇帝に対する3聖人、ペン、移動しない知恵である,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-33.html 財布 プラダ]。「風ホワイトフェザーは「唯一の慰めは、3聖人はまた私が取り扱う清永、すべての余波を継続」,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-25.html プラダの財布]。<br>「さて、あなたは教えるために手のひらを行うには、私達が保証されます。華天呉の図書館の日は宝物を取ることについての良いなだめるです,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-31.html プラダ 長財布]。、私たちはわずかなミスをすることはできません。あまり時間がありませんでした,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-31.html プラダ 長財布]。として一度場所の際にドアのあまり、彼らができるかどう「何のために計画する必要があります<br>第六百三十章アベニュー二十から四<br>「あなたのために誰も皇帝の前任者のペンのバッキングあれば低温側、あなたは何が起こるか、これを言う,[http://www.aseanacity.com/webalizer/prada-bags-28.html プラダ 財布 迷彩]？ ' バックサイクルピーク<br>、四角四角清冷たい着席、ちょうどフェザリングの中の寺院で起こったすべてのものを議論する。<br>「それは私が寺をフェザリング空間と時間の奥に、私は考えていない、理解する、侵入後に困難であり、さらには自分たちの生活を奪われる可能性 |
| | | 相关的主题文章： |
| :;Convex compact set:Every continuous function from a [[Convex set|convex]] [[Compact space|compact]] subset ''K'' of a Euclidean space to ''K'' itself has a fixed point.<ref>V. & F. Bayart ''[http://www.bibmath.net/dico/index.php3?action=affiche&quoi=./p/pointfixe.html Point fixe, et théorèmes du point fixe ]'' on Bibmath.net.</ref>
| | <ul> |
| | | |
| An even more general form is better known under a different name:
| | <li>[http://www.pharm123.com/plus/view.php?aid=229356 'Tianfei Wumo道]</li> |
| | | |
| :;[[Schauder fixed point theorem]]:Every continuous function from a convex compact subset ''K'' of a [[Banach space]] to ''K'' itself has a fixed point.<ref>C. Minazzo K. Rider ''[http://math1.unice.fr/~eaubry/Enseignement/M1/memoire.pdf Théorèmes du Point Fixe et Applications aux Equations Différentielles]'' Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis.</ref>
| | <li>[http://www.jlmxfyc.com/plus/feedback.php?aid=430 ' 'レイボーン遺物'この不滅のため]</li> |
| | | |
| ===Notes===
| | <li>[http://zhuhaicity.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=133640&fromuid=45012 「これらは私の組織の法執行チームのメンバーである「コークスが他の風邪を飛ぶ]</li> |
| The continuous function in this theorem is not required to be [[bijective]] or even [[surjective]]. Since any closed ball in Euclidean ''n''-space is homeomorphic to the closed unit ball ''D''<sup> ''n''</sup>, the theorem also has equivalent formulations that only state it for ''D''<sup> ''n''</sup>.
| | |
| | | </ul> |
| Because the properties involved (continuity, being a fixed point) are invariant under [[homeomorphism]]s, the theorem is equivalent to forms in which the domain is required to be a closed unit ball ''D''<sup> ''n''</sup>. For the same reason it holds for every set that is homeomorphic to a closed ball (and therefore also [[closed set|closed]], bounded, [[connected space|connected]], [[simply connected|without holes]], etc.).
| |
| | |
| The statement of the theorem is false if formulated for the ''open'' unit disk, the set of points with distance strictly less than 1 from the origin. Consider for example the function
| |
| :<math>f(x) = (x+1)/2</math>
| |
| which is a continuous function from the open interval (-1,1) to itself. As it shifts every point to the right, it cannot have a fixed point. (But it does have a fixed point for the closed interval [-1,1], namely f(x) = x = 1).
| |
| | |
| == Illustrations ==
| |
| The theorem has several "real world" illustrations. For example: take two sheets of graph paper of equal size with coordinate systems on them, lay one flat on the table and crumple up (without ripping or tearing) the other one and place it, in any fashion, on top of the first so that the crumpled paper does not reach outside the flat one. There will then be at least one point of the crumpled sheet that lies directly above its corresponding point (i.e. the point with the same coordinates) of the flat sheet. This is a consequence of the ''n'' = 2 case of Brouwer's theorem applied to the continuous map that assigns to the coordinates of every point of the crumpled sheet the coordinates of the point of the flat sheet immediately beneath it.
| |
| | |
| Similarly: Take an ordinary map of a country, and suppose that that map is laid out on a table inside that country. There will always be a "You are Here" point on the map which represents that same point in the country.
| |
| | |
| In three dimensions the consequence of the Brouwer fixed-point theorem is that, no matter how much you stir a cocktail in a glass, when the liquid has come to rest some point in the liquid will end up in exactly the same place in the glass as before you took any action, assuming that the final position of each point is a continuous function of its original position, and that the liquid after stirring is contained within the space originally taken up by it.
| |
| | |
| == Intuitive approach ==
| |
| === Explanations attributed to Brouwer ===
| |
| The theorem is supposed to have originated from Brouwer's observation of a cup of coffee.<ref>The interest of this anecdote rests in its intuitive and didactic character, but its accuracy is dubious. As the history section shows, the origin of the theorem is not Brouwer's work. More than 20 years earlier [[Henri Poincaré]] had proved an equivalent result, and 5 years before Brouwer P. Bohl had proved the three-dimensional case.</ref>
| |
| If one stirs to dissolve a lump of sugar, it appears there is always a point without motion.
| |
| He drew the conclusion that at any moment, there is a point on the surface that is not moving.<ref name=Arte>Cette citation provient d'une émission de télévision : ''[http://archives.arte.tv/hebdo/archimed/19990921/ftext/sujet5.html Archimède]'', [[Arte]], 21 septembre 1999</ref>
| |
| The fixed point is not necessarily the point that seems to be motionless, since the centre of the turbulence moves a little bit.
| |
| The result is not intuitive, since the original fixed point may become mobile when another fixed point appears.
| |
| | |
| Brouwer is said to have added: "I can formulate this splendid result different, I take a horizontal sheet, and another identical one which I crumple, flatten and place on the other. Then a point of the crumpled sheet is in the same place as on the other sheet."<ref name=Arte />
| |
| Brouwer "flattens" his sheet as with a flat iron, without removing the folds and wrinkles.
| |
| | |
| === One-dimensional case ===
| |
| [[File:Théorème-de-Brouwer-dim-1.svg|200px|right]]
| |
| In one dimension, the result is intuitive and easy to prove. The continuous function ''f'' is defined on a closed interval [''a'', ''b''] and takes values in the same interval. Saying that this function has a fixed point amounts to saying that its graph (dark green in the figure on the right) intersects that of the function defined on the same interval [''a'', ''b''] which maps ''x'' to ''x'' (light green).
| |
| | |
| Intuitively, any continuous line from the left edge of the square to the right edge must necessarily intersect the green diagonal. Proof: consider the function ''g'' which maps ''x'' to ''f''(''x'') - ''x''. It is ≥ 0 on ''a'' and ≤ 0 on ''b''. By the [[intermediate value theorem]], ''g'' has a [[Root of a function|zero]] in [''a'', ''b'']; this zero is a fixed point.
| |
| | |
| Brouwer is said to have expressed this as follows: "Instead of examining a surface, we will prove the theorem about a piece of string. Let us begin with the string in an unfolded state, then refold it. Let us flatten the refolded string. Again a point of the string has not changed its position with respect to its original position on the unfolded string."<ref name=Arte />
| |
| | |
| == History ==
| |
| The Brouwer fixed point theorem was one of the early achievements of [[algebraic topology]], and is the basis of more general [[fixed point theorem]]s which are important in [[functional analysis]]. The case ''n'' = 3 first was proved by [[Piers Bohl]] in 1904 (published in ''[[Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik]]''). It was later proved by [[Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer|L. E. J. Brouwer]] in 1909. [[Jacques Hadamard]] proved the general case in 1910,<ref name="hadamard-1910" /> and Brouwer found a different proof in the same year.<ref name="brouwer-1910" /> Since these early proofs were all [[Constructive proof|non-constructive]] [[indirect proof]]s, they ran contrary to Brouwer's [[intuitionist]] ideals. Methods to construct (approximations to) fixed points guaranteed by Brouwer's theorem are now known, however; see for example (Karamadian 1977) and (Istrăţescu 1981).
| |
| | |
| === Prehistory ===
| |
| [[File:Théorème-de-Brouwer-(cond-1).jpg|thumb|right|For flows in an unbounded area, or in an area with a "hole", the theorem is not applicable.]]
| |
| [[File:Théorème-de-Brouwer-(cond-2).jpg|thumb|left|The theorem applies to any disk-shaped area, where it guarantees the existence of a fixed point.]]
| |
| To understand the prehistory of Brouwer's fixed point theorem one needs to pass through [[differential equation]]s. At the end of the 19th century, the old problem<ref>See F. Brechenmacher ''[http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.2931 L'identité algébrique d'une pratique portée par la discussion sur l'équation à l'aide de laquelle on détermine les inégalités séculaires des planètes]'' CNRS Fédération de Recherche Mathématique du Nord-Pas-de-Calais</ref> of the [[stability of the solar system]] returned into the focus of the mathematical community.<ref>[[Henri Poincaré]] won the [[Oscar II, King of Sweden|King of Sweden]]'s mathematical competition in 1889 for his work on the related [[three-body problem]]: [[Jacques Tits|J. Tits]] ''[http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/actualites/celebrations2004/poincare.htm Célébrations nationales 2004]'' Site du Ministère Culture et Communication</ref>
| |
| Its solution required new methods. As noted by [[Henri Poincaré]], who worked on the [[three-body problem]], there is no hope to find an exact solution: "Nothing is more proper to give us an idea of the hardness of the three-body problem, and generally of all problems of Dynamics where there is no uniform integral and the Bohlin series diverge."<ref name=methodes>[[Henri Poincaré|H. Poincaré]] ''Les méthodes nouvelles de la mécanique céleste'' T Gauthier-Villars, Vol 3 p 389 (1892) new edition Paris: Blanchard, 1987.</ref>
| |
| He also noted that the search for an approximate solution is no more efficient:
| |
| "the more we seek to obtain precise approximations, the more the result will diverge towards an increasing imprecision.".<ref>Quotation from [[Henri Poincaré|H. Poincaré]] taken from: P. A. Miquel ''[http://www.arches.ro/revue/no03/no3art03.htm La catégorie de désordre]'', on the website of l'Association roumaine des chercheurs francophones en sciences humaines</ref>
| |
| | |
| He studied a question analogous to that of the surface movement in a cup of coffee. What can we say, in general, about the trajectories on a surface animated by a constant [[flow (mathematics)|flow]]?<ref>This question was studied in: [[Henri Poincaré|H. Poincaré]] ''Sur les courbes définies par les équations différentielles'' J. de Math. V 2 (1886)</ref> Poincaré discovered that the answer can be found in what we now call the [[topology|topological]] properties in the area containing the trajectory. If this area is [[compact space|compact]], i.e. both [[closed set|closed]] and [[bounded set|bounded]], then the trajectory either becomes stationary, or it approaches a [[limit cycle]].<ref>This follows from the [[Poincaré–Bendixson theorem]].</ref> Poincaré went further; if the area is of the same kind as a disk, as is the case for the cup of coffee, there must necessarily be a fixed point. This fixed point is invariant under all functions which associate to each point of the original surface its position after a short time interval ''t''. If the area is a circular band, or if it is not closed,<ref>Multiplication by {{frac|1|2}} on ]0, 1[<sup>2</sup> has no fixed point.</ref> then this is not necessarily the case.
| |
| | |
| To understand differential equations better, a new branch of mathematics was born. Poincaré called it ''analysis situs''. The French [[Encyclopædia Universalis]] defines it as the branch which "treats the properties of an object that are invariant if it is deformed in any continuous way, without tearing".<ref>"concerne les propriétés invariantes d'une figure lorsqu’on la déforme de manière continue quelconque, sans déchirure (par exemple, dans le cas de la déformation de la sphère, les propriétés corrélatives des objets tracés sur sa surface". From C. Houzel M. Paty ''[http://www.scientiaestudia.org.br/associac/paty/pdf/Paty,M_1997g-PoincareEU.pdf Poincaré, Henri (1854–1912)]'' Encyclopædia Universalis Albin Michel, Paris, 1999, p. 696-706</ref> In 1886, Poincaré proved a result that is equivalent to Brouwer's fixed-point theorem,<ref>Poincaré's theorem is stated in: V. I. Istratescu ''Fixed Point Theory an Introduction'' Kluwer Academic Publishers (réédition de 2001) p 113 ISBN 1-4020-0301-3</ref> although the connection with the subject of this article was not yet apparent.<ref>M.I. Voitsekhovskii ''[http://eom.springer.de/b/b017670.htm Brouwer theorem]'' Encyclopaedia of Mathematics ISBN 1-4020-0609-8</ref> A little later, he developed one of the fundamental tools for better understanding the analysis situs, now known as the [[fundamental group]] or sometimes the Poincaré group.<ref>J. Dieudonné, ''A History of Algebraic and differential Topology, 1900–1960'', pages 17–24</ref> This method can be used for a very compact proof of the theorem under discussion.<!-- fr.wikipedia has it in its article on the fundamental group, we don't -->
| |
| | |
| Poincaré's method was analogous to that of [[Émile Picard]], a contemporary mathematician who generalized the [[Cauchy–Lipschitz theorem]].<ref>See for example: [[Charles Émile Picard|É Picard]] ''[http://portail.mathdoc.fr/JMPA/PDF/JMPA_1893_4_9_A4_0.pdf Sur l'application des méthodes d'approximations successives à l'étude de certaines équations différentielles ordinaires]'' Journal de Mathématiques p 217 (1893)</ref> Picard's approach is based on a result that would later be formalised by [[Banach fixed-point theorem|another fixed-point theorem]], named after [[Stefan Banach|Banach]]. Instead of the topological properties of the domain, this theorem uses the fact that the function in question is a [[contraction mapping|contraction]].
| |
| | |
| === First proofs ===
| |
| [[Image:Hadamard2.jpg|thumb|right|[[Jacques Hadamard|Hadamard]] helped Brouwer to formalize his ideas.]]
| |
| At the dawn of the 20th century, the interest in analysis situs did not stay unnoticed. However, the necessity of a theorem equivalent to the one discussed in this article was not yet evident. Piers Bohl, a Latvian mathematician, applied topological methods to the study of differential equations.<ref>J. J. O'Connor E. F. Robertson ''[http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Bohl.html Piers Bohl]''</ref> In 1904 he proved the three-dimensional case of our theorem, but his publication was not noticed.<ref>A. D. Myskis I. M. Rabinovic ''The first proof of a fixed-point theorem for a continuous mapping of a sphere into itself, given by the Latvian mathematician P G Bohl (Russian)'' Uspekhi matematicheskikh nauk (NS) Vol 10 (N° 3) (65) (1955) pp 188–192</ref>
| |
| | |
| It was Brouwer, finally, who gave the theorem its first patent of nobility. His goals were different from those of Poincaré. This mathematician was inspired by the foundations of mathematics, especially [[mathematical logic]] and [[topology]]. His initial interest lay in an attempt to solve [[Hilbert's fifth problem]].<ref>J. J. O'Connor E. F. Robertson ''[http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Brouwer.html Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer]''</ref> In 1909, during a voyage to Paris, he met [[Poincaré]], [[Jacques Hadamard|Hadamard]] and [[Émile Borel|Borel]]. The ensuing discussions convinced Brouwer of the importance of a better understanding of Euclidean spaces, and were the origin of a fruitful exchange of letters with Hadamard. For the next four years, he concentrated on the proof of certain great theorems on this question. In 1912 he proved the [[hairy ball theorem]] for the two-dimensional sphere, as well as the fact that every continuous map from the two-dimensional ball to itself has a fixed point.<ref>H. Freudenthal ''The cradle of modern topology, according to Brouwer's inedita'' Hist. Math. 2 p 495 (1975)</ref> These two results in themselves were not really new. As Hadamard observed, Poincaré had shown a theorem equivalent to the hairy ball theorem.<ref>Freudenthal explains: "... cette dernière propriété, bien que sous des hypothèses plus grossières, ait été démontré par H. Poincaré" H. Freudenthal ''The cradle of modern topology, according to Brouwer's inedita'' Hist. Math. 2 p 495 (1975)</ref> The revolutionary aspect of Brouwer's approach was his systematic use of recently developed tools such as [[homotopy]], the underlying concept of the Poincaré group. In the following year, Hadamard generalised the theorem under discussion to an arbitrary finite dimension, but he employed different methods. H. Freudenthal comments on the respective roles as follows: <!-- NON-LITERAL QUOTATION! translated back from French -->"Compared to Brouwer's revolutionary methods, those of Hadamard were very traditional, but Hadamard's participation in the birth of Brouwer's ideas resembles that of a midwife more than that of a mere spectator."<ref>H. Freudenthal ''The cradle of modern topology, according to Brouwer's inedita'' Hist. Math. 2 p 501 (1975)</ref>
| |
| | |
| Brouwer's approach yielded its fruits, and in 1910 he also found a proof that was valid for any finite dimension,<ref name="brouwer-1910" /> as well as other key theorems such as the invariance of dimension.<ref>If an open subset of a [[manifold]] is [[homeomorphism|homeomorphic]] to an open subset of a Euclidean space of dimension ''n'', and if ''p'' is a positive integer other than ''n'', then the open set is never homeomorphic to an open subset of a Euclidean space of dimension ''p''.</ref> In the context of this work, Brouwer also generalized the [[Jordan curve theorem]] to arbitrary dimension and established the properties connected with the [[degree of a continuous mapping]].<ref>J. J. O'Connor E. F. Robertson ''[http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Brouwer.html Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer]''.</ref> This branch of mathematics, originally envisioned by Poincaré and developed by Brouwer, changed its name. In the 1930s, analysis situs became [[algebraic topology]].<ref>The term ''algebraic topology'' first appeared 1931 under the pen of David van Dantzig: J. Miller ''[http://jeff560.tripod.com/t.html Topological algebra]'' on the site Earliest Known Uses of Some of the Words of Mathematics (2007)</ref>
| |
| | |
| Brouwer's celebrity is not exclusively due to his topological work. He was also the originator and zealous defender of a way of formalising mathematics that is known as [[intuitionistic logic|intuitionism]], which at the time made a stand against [[set theory]].<ref>Later it would be shown that the formalism that was combatted by Brouwer can also serve to formalise intuitionism. For further details see [[intuitionistic logic]].</ref> While Brouwer preferred [[constructive proof]]s, ironically, the original proofs of his great topological theorems were not constructive,<ref>For a long explanation, see: J.P. Dubucs''[http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/rhs_0151-4105_1988_num_41_2_4094 L.J.E. Brouwer : Topologie et constructivisme ]'' Revue d'histoire des sciences V. 41 N°41-2 pp 133–155 (1988)</ref> and it took until 1967 for constructive proofs to be found.<ref>H. Scarf found the first algorithmic proof: M.I. Voitsekhovskii ''[http://eom.springer.de/b/b017670.htm Brouwer theorem]'' Encyclopaedia of Mathematics ISBN 1-4020-0609-8.</ref>
| |
| | |
| ===Reception===
| |
| [[Image:John f nash 20061102 2.jpg|thumb|220px|left|[[John Forbes Nash|John Nash]] used the theorem in [[game theory]] to prove the existence of an equilibrium strategy profile.]]
| |
| The theorem proved its worth in more than one way. During the 20th century numerous fixed-point theorems were developed, and even a branch of mathematics called fixed-point theory.<ref>V. I. Istratescu ''Fixed Point Theory. An Introduction'' Kluwer Academic Publishers (new edition 2001) ISBN 1-4020-0301-3.</ref>
| |
| Brouwer's theorem is probably the most important.<ref>"... Brouwer's fixed point theorem, perhaps the most important fixed point theorem." p xiii V. I. Istratescu ''Fixed Point Theory an Introduction'' Kluwer Academic Publishers (new edition 2001) ISBN 1-4020-0301-3.</ref> It is also among the foundational theorems on the topology of [[topological manifold]]s and is often used to prove other important results such as the [[Jordan curve theorem]].<ref>E.g.: S. Greenwood J. Cao'' [http://www.math.auckland.ac.nz/class750/section5.pdf Brouwer’s Fixed Point Theorem and the Jordan Curve Theorem]'' University of Auckland, New Zealand.</ref>
| |
| | |
| Besides the fixed-point theorems for more or less [[contraction mapping|contracting]] functions, there are many that have emerged directly or indirectly from the result under discussion. A continuous map from a closed ball of Euclidean space to its boundary cannot be the identity on the boundary. Similarly, the [[Borsuk–Ulam theorem]] says that a continuous map from the ''n''-dimensional sphere to '''R'''<sup>n</sup> has a pair of antipodal points that are mapped to the same point. In the finite-dimensional case, the [[Lefschetz fixed-point theorem]] provided from 1926 a method for counting fixed points. In 1930, Brouwer's fixed-point theorem was generalized to [[Banach space]]s.<ref>{{cite journal |first=J. |last=Schauder |title=Der Fixpunktsatz in Funktionsräumen |journal=[[Studia Mathematica|Studia. Math.]] |volume=2 |year=1930 |issue= |pages=171–180 |doi= }}</ref> This generalization is known as [[Fixed-point theorems in infinite-dimensional spaces|Schauder's fixed-point theorem]], a result generalized further by S. Kakutani to [[multivalued function]]s.<ref>{{cite journal |first=S. |last=Kakutani |title=A generalization of Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem |journal=Duke Math. Journal |volume=8 |year=1941 |issue=3 |pages=457–459 |doi=10.1215/S0012-7094-41-00838-4 }}</ref> One also meets the theorem and its variants outside topology. It can be used to prove the [[Hartman-Grobman theorem]], which describes the qualitative behaviour of certain differential equations near certain equilibria. Similarly, Brouwer's theorem is used for the proof of the [[Central Limit Theorem]]. The theorem can also be found in existence proofs for the solutions of certain [[partial differential equation]]s.<ref>These examples are taken from: F. Boyer ''[http://www.cmi.univ-mrs.fr/~fboyer/ter_fboyer2.pdf Théorèmes de point fixe et applications]'' CMI Université Paul Cézanne (2008–2009)</ref>
| |
| | |
| Other areas are also touched. In [[game theory]], [[John Forbes Nash|John Nash]] used the theorem to prove that in the game of [[Hex (board game)|Hex]] there is a winning strategy for white.<ref>For context and references see the article [[Hex (board game)]].</ref> In economy, P. Bich explains that certain generalizations of the theorem show that its use is helpful for certain classical problems in game theory and generally for equilibria ([[Hotelling's law]]), financial equilibria and incomplete markets.<ref>P. Bich ''[http://www.ann.jussieu.fr/~plc/code2007/bich.pdf Une extension discontinue du théorème du point fixe de Schauder, et quelques applications en économie]'' Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris (2007)</ref>
| |
| | |
| == Proof outlines ==
| |
| ===A proof using homology===
| |
| The proof uses the observation that the [[boundary (topology)|boundary]] of ''D''<sup> ''n''</sup> is ''S''<sup> ''n'' − 1</sup>, the (''n'' − 1)-[[sphere]].
| |
| | |
| [[Image:Brouwer fixed point theorem retraction.svg|thumb|right|Illustration of the retraction ''F'']]
| |
| The argument proceeds by contradiction, supposing that a continuous function ''f'' : ''D''<sup> ''n''</sup> → ''D''<sup> ''n''</sup> has ''no'' fixed point, and then attempting to derive an inconsistency, which proves that the function must in fact have a fixed point. For each ''x'' in ''D''<sup> ''n''</sup>, there is only one straight line that passes through ''f''(''x'') and ''x'', because it must be the case that ''f''(''x'') and ''x'' are distinct by hypothesis (recall that ''f'' having no fixed points means that ''f''(''x'') ≠ ''x''). Following this line from ''f''(''x'') through ''x'' leads to a point on ''S''<sup> ''n'' − 1</sup>, denoted by ''F''(''x''). This defines a continuous function ''F'' : ''D''<sup> ''n''</sup> → ''S''<sup> ''n'' − 1</sup>, which is a special type of continuous function known as a [[retract]]ion: every point of the [[codomain]] (in this case ''S''<sup> ''n'' − 1</sup>) is a fixed point of the function.
| |
| | |
| Intuitively it seems unlikely that there could be a retraction of ''D''<sup> ''n''</sup> onto ''S''<sup> ''n'' − 1</sup>, and in the case ''n'' = 1 it is obviously impossible because ''S''<sup> 0</sup> (i.e., the endpoints of the closed interval ''D''<sup> 1</sup>) is not even connected. The case ''n'' = 2 is less obvious, but can be proven by using basic arguments involving the [[fundamental group]]s of the respective spaces: the retraction would induce an injective [[group homomorphism]] from the fundamental group of ''S''<sup> 1</sup> to that of ''D''<sup> 2</sup>, but the first group is isomorphic to '''Z''' while the latter group is trivial, so this is impossible. The case ''n'' = 2 can also be proven by contradiction based on a theorem about non-vanishing [[vector field]]s.
| |
| | |
| For ''n'' > 2, however, proving the impossibility of the retraction is more difficult. One way is to make use of [[Homology (mathematics)|homology groups]]: the homology ''H''<sub>''n'' − 1</sub>(''D''<sup> ''n''</sup>) is trivial, while ''H''<sub>''n'' − 1</sub>(''S''<sup> ''n'' − 1</sup>) is infinite [[cyclic group|cyclic]]. This shows that the retraction is impossible, because again the retraction would induce an injective group homomorphism from the latter to the former group.
| |
| | |
| ===A proof using Stokes's theorem=== | |
| To prove that a map has fixed points, one can assume that it is smooth, because if a map has no fixed points then convolving it with a smooth function of sufficiently small support produces a smooth function with no fixed points. As in the proof using homology, one is reduced to proving that there is no smooth retraction ''f'' from the ball ''B'' onto its boundary ''∂B''. If ω is a volume form on the boundary then by [[Stokes Theorem]],
| |
| :<math>0<\int_{\partial B}\omega = \int_{\partial B}f^*(\omega) = \int_Bdf^*(\omega)= \int_Bf^*(d\omega)=\int_Bf^*(0) = 0</math>
| |
| giving a contradiction.
| |
| | |
| More generally, this shows that there is no smooth retraction from any non-empty smooth orientable compact manifold onto its boundary. The proof using Stokes's theorem is closely related to the proof using homology (or rather cohomology), because the form ω generates the de Rham cohomology group ''H''<sup>''n''−1</sup>(''∂B'') used in the cohomology proof.
| |
| | |
| ===A combinatorial proof=== | |
| There is also a more elementary [[combinatorial proof]], whose main step consists in establishing [[Sperner's lemma]] in ''n'' dimensions.
| |
| | |
| ===A proof by Hirsch===
| |
| There is also a quick proof, by [[Morris Hirsch]] (indeed by [[Elon Lages Lima]]), based on the impossibility of a differentiable retraction. The [[indirect proof]] starts by noting that the map ''f'' can be approximated by a smooth map retaining the property of not fixing a point; this can be done by using the [[Weierstrass approximation theorem]], for example. One then defines a retraction as above which must now be differentiable. Such a retraction must have a non-singular value, by [[Sard's theorem]], which is also non-singular for the restriction to the boundary (which is just the identity). Thus the inverse image would be a 1-manifold with boundary. The boundary would have to contain at least two end points, both of which would have to lie on the boundary of the original ball—which is impossible in a retraction.
| |
| | |
| Kellogg, Li, and Yorke turned Hirsch's proof into a constructive proof by observing that the retract is in fact defined everywhere except at the fixed points. For almost any point, q, on the boundary, (assuming it is not a fixed point) the one manifold with boundary mentioned above does exist and the only possibility is that it leads from q to a fixed point. It is an easy numerical task to follow such a path from q to the fixed point so the method is essentially constructive. Chow, Mallet-Paret, and Yorke gave a conceptually similar path-following version of the homotopy proof which extends to a wide variety of related problems.
| |
| | |
| ===A proof using the ''oriented area''===
| |
| A variation of the preceding proof does not employ the Sard's theorem, and goes as follows. If ''r'' : ''B''→∂''B'' is a smooth retraction, one considers the smooth deformation ''g<sup>t</sup>(x) := t r(x) + (1-t)x,'' and the smooth function
| |
| :<math>\varphi(t):=\int_B \operatorname{det} D g^t(x) dx</math>
| |
| Differentiating under the sign of integral it is not difficult to check that ''φ′(t)=0'' for all ''t'', so ''φ'' is a constant function, which is a contradiction because ''φ(0)'' is the ''n''-dimensional volume of the ball, while ''φ(1)'' is zero. The geometric idea is that ''φ(t)'' is the oriented area of ''g<sup>t</sup>(B)'' (that is, the Lebesgue measure of the image of the ball via ''g<sup>t</sup>'', taking into account multiplicity and orientation), and should remain constant (as it is very clear in the one-dimensional case). On the other hand, as the parameter ''t'' passes form ''0'' to ''1'' the map ''g<sup>t</sup>'' transforms continuously from the identity map of the ball, to the retraction ''r'', which is a contradiction since the oriented area of the identity coincides with the volume of the ball, while the oriented area of ''r'' is necessarily ''0'', as its image is the boundary of the ball, a set of null measure.
| |
| | |
| ===A proof using the game hex===
| |
| A quite different proof given by [[David Gale]] is based on the game of [[Hex (board game)|Hex]]. The basic theorem about Hex is that no game can end in a draw. This is equivalent to the Brouwer fixed-point theorem for dimension 2. By considering ''n''-dimensional versions of Hex, one can prove in general that Brouwer's theorem is equivalent to the [[determinacy]] theorem for Hex.<ref>{{cite journal|author=David Gale |year=1979|title=The Game of Hex and Brouwer Fixed-Point Theorem | journal=The American Mathematical Monthly | volume=86 | pages=818–827|doi=10.2307/2320146|jstor=2320146|issue=10}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| ===A proof using the Lefschetz fixed-point theorem===
| |
| The Lefschetz fixed-point theorem says that if a continuous map ''f'' from a finite simplicial complex ''B'' to itself has only isolated fixed points, then the number of fixed points counted with multiplicities (which may be negative) is equal to the Lefschetz number
| |
| :<math>\displaystyle \sum_n(-1)^nTr(f|H_n(B))</math>
| |
| and in particular if the Lefschetz number is nonzero then ''f'' must have a fixed point. If ''B'' is a ball (or more generally is contractible) then the Lefschetz number is one because the only non-zero homology group is ''H''<sup>0</sup>(''B''), so ''f'' has a fixed point.
| |
| | |
| ===A proof in a weak logical system===
| |
| In [[reverse mathematics]], Brouwer's theorem can be proved in the system [[Weak König's lemma|WKL<sub>0</sub>]], and conversely over the base system [[reverse mathematics|RCA<sub>0</sub>]] Brouwer's theorem for a square implies the [[weak König's lemma]], so this gives a precise description of the strength of Brouwer's theorem.
| |
| | |
| == Generalizations ==
| |
| The Brouwer fixed-point theorem forms the starting point of a number of more general [[fixed-point theorem]]s.
| |
| | |
| The straightforward generalization to infinite dimensions, i.e. using the unit ball of an arbitrary [[Hilbert space]] instead of Euclidean space, is not true. The main problem here is that the unit balls of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces are not [[compact space|compact]]. For example, in the Hilbert space [[Lp space|ℓ<sup>2</sup>]] of square-summable real (or complex) sequences, consider the map ''f'' : ℓ<sup>2</sup> → ℓ<sup>2</sup> which sends a sequence (''x''<sub>''n''</sub>) from the closed unit ball of ℓ<sup>2</sup> to the sequence (''y''<sub>''n''</sub>) defined by
| |
| :<math>y_0=\sqrt{1-\|x\|_2^2}\qquad\mbox{ and }\qquad y_n=x_{n-1}\quad\mbox{ for }\quad n\geq 1.</math>
| |
| It is not difficult to check that this map is continuous, has its image in the unit sphere of ℓ<sup> 2</sup>, but does not have a fixed point.
| |
| | |
| The generalizations of the Brouwer fixed-point theorem to infinite dimensional spaces therefore all include a compactness assumption of some sort, and in addition also often an assumption of [[Convex set|convexity]]. See [[fixed-point theorems in infinite-dimensional spaces]] for a discussion of these theorems.
| |
| | |
| There is also finite-dimensional generalization to a larger class of spaces: If <math>X</math> is a product of finitely many chainable continua, then every continuous function <math>f:X\rightarrow X</math> has a fixed point,<ref>{{cite journal|author=Eldon Dyer |year=1956|title=A fixed point theorem | journal=Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society| volume=7 | pages=662–672|doi=10.1090/S0002-9939-1956-0078693-4|url=http://www.ams.org/journals/proc/1956-007-04/S0002-9939-1956-0078693-4/home.html|issue=4}}</ref> where a chainable continuum is a (usually but in this case not necessarily [[Metric space|metric]]) [[Compact space|compact]] [[Hausdorff space]] of which every [[open cover]] has a finite open refinement <math>\{U_1,\ldots,U_m\}</math>, such that <math>U_i \cap U_j \neq \emptyset</math> if and only if <math>|i-j| \leq 1</math>. Examples of chainable continua include compact connected linearly ordered spaces and in particular closed intervals of real numbers.
| |
| | |
| The [[Kakutani fixed point theorem]] generalizes the Brouwer fixed-point theorem in a different direction: it stays in '''R'''<sup>''n''</sup>, but considers upper [[hemi-continuous]] [[correspondence (mathematics)|correspondences]] (functions that assign to each point of the set a subset of the set). It also requires compactness and convexity of the set.
| |
| | |
| The [[Lefschetz fixed-point theorem]] applies to (almost) arbitrary compact topological spaces, and gives a condition in terms of [[singular homology]] that guarantees the existence of fixed points; this condition is trivially satisfied for any map in the case of ''D''<sup> ''n''</sup>.
| |
| | |
| ==See also==
| |
| * [[Fixed-point theorem]]s
| |
| * [[Banach fixed-point theorem]]
| |
| * [[Schauder fixed-point theorem]]
| |
| * [[Lefschetz fixed-point theorem]]
| |
| * [[Tucker's lemma]]
| |
| * [[Kakutani fixed-point theorem]]
| |
| * [[Topological combinatorics]]
| |
| * [[Nash_equilibrium#Alternate_proof_using_the_Brouwer_fixed-point_theorem|Nash equilibrium]]
| |
| | |
| ==Notes==
| |
| {{reflist|35em}}
| |
| | |
| ==References==
| |
| *{{cite journal |first=S. N. |last=Chow |first2=J. |last2=Mallet-Paret |first3=J. A. |last3=Yorke |title=Finding zeroes of maps: Homotopy methods that are constructive with probability one |journal=Math. of Comp. |volume=32 |year=1978 |issue= |pages=887–899 |doi=10.1090/S0025-5718-1978-0492046-9 }}
| |
| *{{cite journal|author=Gale, D. |year=1979|title=The Game of Hex and Brouwer Fixed-Point Theorem | journal=The American Mathematical Monthly | volume=86 | pages=818–827|doi=10.2307/2320146|jstor=2320146|issue=10}}
| |
| *{{cite book |first=Morris W. |last=Hirsch |title=Differential Topology |location=New York |publisher=Springer |year=1988 |isbn=0-387-90148-5 }} (see p. 72–73 for Hirsch's proof utilizing non-existence of a differentiable retraction)
| |
| *{{cite book |first=V. I. |last=Istrăţescu |title=Fixed Point Theory |location= |publisher=Reidel |year=1981 |isbn=90-277-1224-7 }}
| |
| *{{cite book |editor-first=S. |editor-last=Karamadian |title=Fixed Points: Algorithms and Applications |location= |publisher=Academic Press |year=1977 |isbn=0-12-398050-X }}
| |
| *{{cite journal |first=R. B. |last=Kellogg |first2=T. Y. |last2=Li |first3=J. A. |last3=Yorke |title=A constructive proof of the Brouwer fixed point theorem and computational results |journal=SIAM J. Numer. Anal. |volume=13 |year=1976 |issue=4 |pages=473–483 |doi=10.1137/0713041 }}
| |
| *{{springer | title=Brouwer theorem | id=B/b017670 | last=Sobolev | first=V. I. | author-link=<!--Vladimir Ivanovich Sobolev-->}}
| |
| | |
| ==External links==
| |
| * [http://www.cut-the-knot.org/do_you_know/poincare.shtml#brouwertheorem Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem for Triangles] at [[cut-the-knot]]
| |
| * [http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/BrouwerFixedPointTheorem.html Brouwer theorem], from [[PlanetMath]] with attached proof.
| |
| * [http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath262/kmath262.htm Reconstructing Brouwer] at MathPages
| |
| | |
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Brouwer Fixed Point Theorem}}
| |
| [[Category:Fixed-point theorems]]
| |
| [[Category:Continuous mappings]]
| |
| [[Category:Mathematical and quantitative methods (economics)]]
| |
| [[Category:Theorems in topology]]
| |
| | |
| {{Link GA|fr}}
| |
are Baotui
Six Heaven's Soldiers secret, a Road burst, explosion,prada トートバッグ, both arms Kuangzhen Huatian body back again and again,プラダ スタッズ 財布, his face showing the color of shock.
a trick to defeat the enemy, he actually put his secrets are breaketh six Heaven's Soldiers. Huatian between
are Baotui, roar: 'minimalist cold side of the road, I'll let you look at my 华天君 create your own road, minimalist way dull moon, earth and minimalist brilliance club!!! off. '
Om! Lance violent shaking, a deep sense of 'minimalist force', Kuangyong out from Huatian all body.
sharp increase combat power,プラダ 長財布, break the cold side of the vision again, blossom, long rivers, worlds, hazy all roll off by a spear, a clean sweep,プラダ 財布 新作 2014, Hua Tian are the spear,prada スタッズ 財布, the assassination of the party cold sore , that point the finger of blame on the flashing red fire out of breath, a little rich and can hurt Heaven's Soldiers of blood. above
'This key sector of the spearhead Dan
相关的主题文章：
Cosmic Gate'
However, I saw a portal,prada メンズ 財布, square cold blurted out: '! Cosmic Gate'
'Yes, Prince Ula indeed the master, all Fenduo this is the time and space between the door, six Union we are building this door and space,prada, you can reach any Fenduo any such deployment of cargo and personnel exchanges , danger, mobilization of experts are very convenient, if today we encounter the eternal Big Five Dragon attack in this place,prada トートバッグ, then immediately this time and space from the door,プラダ 財布 迷彩, it will grazing thousands of masters, kill invading enemy! '
Taohuaxian sub Road.
'six League,プラダ 財布 中古, is indeed the land of the three chambers of commerce, we Siniora star on a recent batch of billions of immortality goods purchases, it seems I have to give priority to six League of.' Fang Han big boast.
'That is, of course.' Taohuaxian child one of 'Hurrah Prince' has a little more intimate. 'Now, we send through this door,
相关的主题文章：
一緒に、よりになります
発見された,財布 ブランド プラダ？そうでなければ、私はちょうど行くQishaひょうたんに吸収feijian 7命の姿を入れて、Qisha建ジェンが構成される,prada ピンク 財布。 ' 「真実に従って、見つからないはずですが、悪魔の戦場のこの部分を教えるか、同様に注意するために出現ドアオープン手のひら」
'まあ,財布 プラダ レディース。」
「私は悪魔の戦場のなぜこの作品を教えるためにドアを開いた手のひらをぼかし、知っている。それでも弟子たちは裁判が来た。千年は飛ぶしなかった飛行、餌の下でああ、治外法権無限の空、長寿ファムさえマスターだった側に、単に一般的には広大な海での普通の人のように、これらの域外悪魔は、次の餌肉の悪魔に非常に興味があり、あなたが毎年ここにこれらの弟子になっている魚の海、この作品の悪魔の戦場であり、これらの悪魔はちょうど釣りの前に、キャストJINWOZI一般のように,prada 財布 2014。一緒に、よりになります,プラダ新作バッグ2014。 '
側寒い思い、それが本当であるのです。 」の
と
相关的主题文章：
、私たちはわずかなミスをすることはできません
単にそれを精製することはできません。 '
「はい、それは、皇帝に対する3聖人、ペン、移動しない知恵である,財布 プラダ。「風ホワイトフェザーは「唯一の慰めは、3聖人はまた私が取り扱う清永、すべての余波を継続」,プラダの財布。
「さて、あなたは教えるために手のひらを行うには、私達が保証されます。華天呉の図書館の日は宝物を取ることについての良いなだめるです,プラダ 長財布。、私たちはわずかなミスをすることはできません。あまり時間がありませんでした,プラダ 長財布。として一度場所の際にドアのあまり、彼らができるかどう「何のために計画する必要があります
第六百三十章アベニュー二十から四
「あなたのために誰も皇帝の前任者のペンのバッキングあれば低温側、あなたは何が起こるか、これを言う,プラダ 財布 迷彩？ ' バックサイクルピーク
、四角四角清冷たい着席、ちょうどフェザリングの中の寺院で起こったすべてのものを議論する。
「それは私が寺をフェザリング空間と時間の奥に、私は考えていない、理解する、侵入後に困難であり、さらには自分たちの生活を奪われる可能性
相关的主题文章：