Mean radiant temperature: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Chronulator
sort subsections into order
 
en>Stefano Schiavon
m Fixing typo raised by BracketBot
Line 1: Line 1:
Another day I woke up and noticed - Today I have also been single for some time and after much intimidation from buddies I today find myself opted for on line dating. They assured me that there are a lot of normal, sweet and interesting individuals to meet up, therefore here goes the toss!<br>I make an effort to  tour luke bryan; [http://lukebryantickets.citizenswebcasting.com url], maintain as physically healthy as possible coming to the fitness center many times per week. I love my athletics and strive to perform or watch as numerous a potential. I'll regularly at Hawthorn matches being winter. Note: In case that you really considered shopping a hobby I do not mind, I've noticed the carnage of fumbling matches at stocktake sales.<br>My friends and fam are wonderful and spending time together at tavern gigs or meals is obviously a necessity. As I come to realize that one may not get a significant conversation together with the sound I haven't ever been in to [https://Www.Google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=night+clubs night clubs]. I additionally got 2 definitely cheeky and very cute puppies that are constantly enthusiastic to meet  [http://www.ladyhawkshockey.org luke bryan concert tickets cheap] up new individuals.<br><br>
In [[theoretical physics]], the ''''t Hooft–Polyakov monopole''' is a [[topological soliton]] similar to the [[Dirac monopole]] but without any singularities. It arises in the case of a [[Yang–Mills theory]] with a [[gauge group]] G, coupled to a [[Higgs field]] which [[spontaneous symmetry breaking|spontaneously breaks]] it down to a smaller group H via the [[Higgs mechanism]]. It was first found independently by [[Gerardus 't Hooft|Gerard 't Hooft]] and [[Alexander Markovich Polyakov|Alexander Polyakov]].<ref>{{Cite doi| 10.1016/0550-3213(74)90486-6 }}</ref><ref>A.M. Polyakov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. Pis'ma. Red. 20, 430 (1974) [JETP Lett. 20, 194 (1974)]. [http://inspirehep.net/record/90679 inSPIRES Record]</ref>


my blog post :: information on luke bryan; [http://lukebryantickets.omarfoundation.org lukebryantickets.omarfoundation.org],
Unlike the Dirac monopole, the 't Hooft–Polyakov monopole is a smooth solution with a finite total [[energy]]. The solution is localized around <math>r=0</math>. Very far from the origin, the gauge group G is broken to H, and the 't Hooft–Polyakov monopole reduces to the Dirac monopole.
 
However, at the origin itself, the G [[gauge symmetry]] is unbroken and the solution is non-singular also near the origin. The Higgs field
:<math>H_i \qquad (i=1,2,3) \,</math>
is proportional to
:<math>x_i f(|x|) \,</math>
where the adjoint indices are identified with the three-dimensional spatial indices. The gauge field at infinity is such that the Higgs field's dependence on the angular directions is pure gauge. The precise configuration for the Higgs field and the gauge field near the origin is such that it satisfies the full [[Yang–Mills–Higgs equations]] of motion.
 
==Mathematical details==
Suppose the vacuum is the [[vacuum manifold]] Σ. Then, for finite energies, as we move along each direction towards spatial infinity, the state along the path approaches a point on the vacuum manifold Σ. Otherwise, we would not have a finite energy. In topologically trivial 3&nbsp;+&nbsp;1 dimensions, this means spatial infinity is homotopically equivalent to the [[topological sphere]] ''S''<sup>2</sup>. So, the [[superselection sector]]s are classified by the second homotopy group of Σ, π<sub>2</sub>(Σ).
 
In the special case of a Yang–Mills–Higgs theory, the vacuum manifold is isomorphic to the quotient space G/H and the relevant homotopy group is π<sub>2</sub>(G/H). Note that this doesn't actually require the existence of a scalar Higgs field. Most symmetry breaking mechanisms (e.g. technicolor) would also give rise to a 't Hooft–Polyakov monopole.
 
It's easy to generalize to the case of ''d''&nbsp;+&nbsp;1 dimensions. We have π<sub>''d''−1</sub>(Σ).
 
==Monopole problem==
The "monopole problem" refers to the cosmological implications of [[Grand unification theories]] (GUT). Since monopoles are generically produced in GUT during the cooling of the universe, and since they are expected to be quite massive, their existence threatens to overclose it. This is considered a "problem" within the standard [[Big Bang]] theory. [[Cosmic inflation]] remedies the situation by diluting any primordial abundance of magnetic monopoles.
 
==References==
{{reflist}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:'T Hooft-Polyakov Monopole}}
[[Category:Magnetic monopoles|T Hooft-Polyakov monopole]]
[[Category:Gauge theories]]

Revision as of 22:09, 8 November 2013

In theoretical physics, the 't Hooft–Polyakov monopole is a topological soliton similar to the Dirac monopole but without any singularities. It arises in the case of a Yang–Mills theory with a gauge group G, coupled to a Higgs field which spontaneously breaks it down to a smaller group H via the Higgs mechanism. It was first found independently by Gerard 't Hooft and Alexander Polyakov.[1][2]

Unlike the Dirac monopole, the 't Hooft–Polyakov monopole is a smooth solution with a finite total energy. The solution is localized around . Very far from the origin, the gauge group G is broken to H, and the 't Hooft–Polyakov monopole reduces to the Dirac monopole.

However, at the origin itself, the G gauge symmetry is unbroken and the solution is non-singular also near the origin. The Higgs field

is proportional to

where the adjoint indices are identified with the three-dimensional spatial indices. The gauge field at infinity is such that the Higgs field's dependence on the angular directions is pure gauge. The precise configuration for the Higgs field and the gauge field near the origin is such that it satisfies the full Yang–Mills–Higgs equations of motion.

Mathematical details

Suppose the vacuum is the vacuum manifold Σ. Then, for finite energies, as we move along each direction towards spatial infinity, the state along the path approaches a point on the vacuum manifold Σ. Otherwise, we would not have a finite energy. In topologically trivial 3 + 1 dimensions, this means spatial infinity is homotopically equivalent to the topological sphere S2. So, the superselection sectors are classified by the second homotopy group of Σ, π2(Σ).

In the special case of a Yang–Mills–Higgs theory, the vacuum manifold is isomorphic to the quotient space G/H and the relevant homotopy group is π2(G/H). Note that this doesn't actually require the existence of a scalar Higgs field. Most symmetry breaking mechanisms (e.g. technicolor) would also give rise to a 't Hooft–Polyakov monopole.

It's easy to generalize to the case of d + 1 dimensions. We have πd−1(Σ).

Monopole problem

The "monopole problem" refers to the cosmological implications of Grand unification theories (GUT). Since monopoles are generically produced in GUT during the cooling of the universe, and since they are expected to be quite massive, their existence threatens to overclose it. This is considered a "problem" within the standard Big Bang theory. Cosmic inflation remedies the situation by diluting any primordial abundance of magnetic monopoles.

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. Template:Cite doi
  2. A.M. Polyakov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. Pis'ma. Red. 20, 430 (1974) [JETP Lett. 20, 194 (1974)]. inSPIRES Record