NTIME

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 06:28, 27 February 2013 by en>Addbot (Bot: Migrating 6 interwiki links, now provided by Wikidata on d:q1933581 (Report Errors))
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In computational complexity theory, the polynomial hierarchy (sometimes called the polynomial-time hierarchy) is a hierarchy of complexity classes that generalize the classes P, NP and co-NP to oracle machines. It is a resource-bounded counterpart to the arithmetical hierarchy and analytical hierarchy from mathematical logic.

Definitions

There are multiple equivalent definitions of the classes of the polynomial hierarchy.

  1. For the oracle definition of the polynomial hierarchy, define
    where P is the set of decision problems solvable in polynomial time. Then for i ≥ 0 define
    where AB is the set of decision problems solvable by a Turing machine in class A augmented by an oracle for some complete problem in class B. For example, , and is the class of problems solvable in polynomial time with an oracle for some NP-complete problem.
  2. For the existential/universal definition of the polynomial hierarchy, let be a language (i.e. a decision problem, a subset of {0,1}*), let be a polynomial, and define
    where is some standard encoding of the pair of binary strings x and w as a single binary string. L represents a set of ordered pairs of strings, where the first string x is a member of , and the second string w is a "short" () witness testifying that x is a member of . In other words, if and only if there exists a short witness w such that . Similarly, define
    Note that De Morgan's Laws hold: and , where Lc is the complement of L. Let be a class of languages. Extend these operators to work on whole classes of languages by the definition
    Again, De Morgan's Laws hold: and , where . The classes NP and co-NP can be defined as , and , where P is the class of all feasibly (polynomial-time) decidable languages. The polynomial hierarchy can be defined recursively as
    Note that , and . This definition reflects the close connection between the polynomial hierarchy and the arithmetical hierarchy, where R and RE play roles analogous to P and NP, respectively. The analytic hierarchy is also defined in a similar way to give a hierarchy of subsets of the real numbers.
  3. An equivalent definition in terms of alternating Turing machines defines (respectively, ) as the set of decision problems solvable in polynomial time on an alternating Turing machine with alternations starting in an existential (respectively, universal) state.

Relations between classes in the polynomial hierarchy

Pictorial representation of the polynomial time hierarchy. The arrows denote inclusion.

The definitions imply the relations:

Unlike the arithmetic and analytic hierarchies, whose inclusions are known to be proper, it is an open question whether any of these inclusions are proper, though it is widely believed that they all are. If any , or if any , then the hierarchy collapses to level k: for all , . In particular, if P = NP, then the hierarchy collapses completely.

The union of all classes in the polynomial hierarchy is the complexity class PH.

Properties

The polynomial hierarchy is an analogue (at much lower complexity) of the exponential hierarchy and arithmetical hierarchy.

It is known that PH is contained within PSPACE, but it is not known whether the two classes are equal. One useful reformulation of this problem is that PH = PSPACE if and only if second-order logic over finite structures gains no additional power from the addition of a transitive closure operator.

If the polynomial hierarchy has any complete problems, then it has only finitely many distinct levels. Since there are PSPACE-complete problems, we know that if PSPACE = PH, then the polynomial hierarchy must collapse, since a PSPACE-complete problem would be a -complete problem for some k.

Each class in the polynomial hierarchy contains -complete problems (problems complete under polynomial-time many-one reductions). Furthermore, each class in the polynomial hierarchy is closed under -reductions: meaning that for a class in the hierarchy and a language , if , then as well. These two facts together imply that if is a complete problem for , then , and . For instance, . In other words, if a language is defined based on some oracle in , then we can assume that it is defined based on a complete problem for . Complete problems therefore act as "representatives" of the class for which they are complete.

Sipser–Lautemann theorem states that the class BPP is contained in second level of polynomial hierarchy.

Kannan's theorem states that for any k, is not contained in SIZE(nk).

Toda's theorem states that the polynomial hierarchy is contained in P#P.

Problems in the polynomial hierarchy

See also

References

  1. A. R. Meyer and L. J. Stockmeyer. The Equivalence Problem for Regular Expressions with Squaring Requires Exponential Space. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE Symposium on Switching and Automata Theory, pp. 125–129, 1972. The paper that introduced the polynomial hierarchy.
  2. L. J. Stockmeyer. The polynomial-time hierarchy. Theoretical Computer Science, vol.3, pp. 1–22, 1976.
  3. C. Papadimitriou. Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley, 1994. Chapter 17. Polynomial hierarchy, pp. 409–438.
  4. 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 Section 7.2: The Polynomial Hierarchy, pp. 161–167.

Hi generally. Let me start by introducing the author, his name is Benjamin Cassity and he totally digs that address. To climb is a thing that we're totally dependent on. California is where her house is but now she is considering additional. After being beyond his part of years he became a postal service worker. See what's new on my website here: http://devolro.com/diablo-gallery



Look at my web blog :: cars