|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Shannon criteria constitute an empirical rule in [[neural engineering]] that is used for evaluation of possibility of damage from [[electrical stimulation]] to [[nervous tissue]].
| | Hello! My name is Clement. <br>It is a little about myself: I live in United States, my city of Rock Hill. <br>It's called often Eastern or cultural capital of SC. I've married 3 years ago.<br>I have two children - a son (Reda) and the daughter (Deidre). We all like Microscopy.<br><br>My homepage; [http://support.freefileopener.com/entries/56899966-Hostgator-Mysql-Version Hostgator Discounts] |
| .<ref>{{cite journal|last=Shannon|first=R.V.|title=A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation|journal=IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering|date=April 1992|volume=39|issue=4|pages=424–426|doi=10.1109/10.126616}}</ref> | |
| Shannon criteria relate two parameters for pulsed electrical stimulation - [[Charge (physics)|charge]] density per phase, D (μCoulombs/(phase•cm²)) and [[Charge (physics)|charge]] per phase Q, (μCoulombs/phase) with a dimensionless parameter k:
| |
| [[File:Shannon Plot.png|thumb|Shannon Plot]]
| |
| | |
| <math>\log D = k - \log Q</math>
| |
| | |
| According to these criteria, stimulation parameters that yield k > 1.75 could cause damage to the adjacent nervous tissue. Currently, this empirical law is applied in [[neuromodulation]] for development of implants for cortical, [[Cochlear implant|cochlear]], [[Retinal implant|retinal]],<ref>{{cite journal|last=Eiber|first=Calvin D|coauthors=Lovell, Nigel H; Suaning, Gregg J|title=Attaining higher resolution visual prosthetics: a review of the factors and limitations|journal=Journal of Neural Engineering|date=1 February 2013|volume=10|issue=1|pages=011002|doi=10.1088/1741-2560/10/1/011002}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Winter|first=Jessica O.|coauthors=Cogan, Stuart F.; Rizzo, Joseph F.|title=Retinal prostheses: current challenges and future outlook|journal=Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition|date=January 2007|volume=18|issue=8|pages=1031–1055|doi=10.1163/156856207781494403}}</ref> [[Spinal cord stimulator|spinal cord]]<ref>{{cite journal|last=Wesselink|first=WA|coauthors=Holsheimer, J; Boom, HB|title=Analysis of current density and related parameters in spinal cord stimulation.|journal=IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society|date=June 1998|volume=6|issue=2|pages=200–7|pmid=9631328}}</ref> and [[deep brain stimulation]].<ref>{{cite journal|last=Grill|first=Warren M|title=Safety considerations for deep brain stimulation: review and analysis|journal=Expert Review of Medical Devices|date=July 2005|volume=2|issue=4|pages=409–420|doi=10.1586/17434440.2.4.409}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| ==References==
| |
| {{Reflist}}
| |
| | |
| ==Further reading==
| |
| * {{cite journal|last=Merrill|first=Daniel R.|coauthors=Bikson, Marom; Jefferys, John G.R.|title=Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols|journal=Journal of Neuroscience Methods|date=February 2005|volume=141|issue=2|pages=171–198|doi=10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.020}}
| |
| | |
| [[Category:Neural engineering]]
| |
Revision as of 10:43, 4 February 2014
Hello! My name is Clement.
It is a little about myself: I live in United States, my city of Rock Hill.
It's called often Eastern or cultural capital of SC. I've married 3 years ago.
I have two children - a son (Reda) and the daughter (Deidre). We all like Microscopy.
My homepage; Hostgator Discounts