Sagitta (geometry): Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>CiaPan
etymology
en>Rflats
m →‎Formulas: Corrected the first formula. The "l" under the square root is not multiplied by 0.5
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- ******* NOTE *******Please do not add any films to this list if they are not cited properly. A proper citation would meet [[WP:Reliability]] and would state clearly that the film in question was a box office bomb. If you cannot cite the film, do not add it or it will be reverted immediately -->
<br><br>How about a nice Pocket Knife ? Bizarre? I don't assume so. Just think about it for a minute. It's a gift that is carried round in a pocket (or a handbag or pocket book) most of the time. So in case you look at it like that, then your [http://Sss.chaoslab.ru/tracker/mim_plugs/newticket?reporter=anonymous&summary=AttributeError%3A+%27Environment%27+object+has+no+attribute+%27get_db_cnx%27&description=A+pocket+knife+is+a+man%27s+best+good+friend+%28after+a+dog+of+course%29+however+discovering+the+very+best+pocker+knife+sharpener+to+sharpen+that+pocket+knife+can+sometimes+be+somewhat+little+bit+of+a+problem.+In+case+you+are+not+glad+throughout+the+first+30+days+of+your+purchase%2C+we%27ll+accept+a+return+and+course+of+a+refund.+Most+of+all+everybody+must+have+a+pocket+knife+and+discover+a+What+is+the+finest+pocket+knife+on+the+market%3F+Are+you+continue+to+in+search+of+a+great+high+quality+pocket+knife+%3F+What+you+want+to+know+to+decide+on+the+perfect+pocket+knife%21%0D%0A%0D%0A%0D%0A%0D%0AThe+Old+Timer+152+OT%2C+higher+often+known+as+the+Schrade+Sharpfinger%2C+has+been+in+production+for+over+40+years+now.+With+it+is+fixed%2C+full+tang+and+really+distinctive+blade+it+is+a+well-known+classic+design.+It+has+an+up+swept+blade+which+supplies+the+knife+more+cutting+surface.+The+blade+has+the+ideal+shape+for+skinning+and+caping.%C2%A0It+has+a+noticed+reduce+Delrin+deal+with+with+rounded+edges%2C+rivited+to+the+tang.+When+you+consider+that+this+%5Bhttp%3A%2F%2Fsearch.Huffingtonpost.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dknife%2Bsells%26s_it%3Dheader_form_v1+knife+sells%5D+for+simply+over+%2420%2C+the+sheath+is+likewise+moderately+good.+Thick+pure+leather+with+rivets+and+a+button+retention+clasp.+At+the+moment%2C+Schrade+knives+are+produced+by+the+Taylor+Manufacturers%2C+LLC%2C+following+the+exact+same+necessities+for+high+quality.+These+knives+are+manufactured+from+the+greatest+high+quality+merchandise+provided.%0D%0A%0D%0AAnd+a+lot+relies+on+when+and+where+you+are+sharpening+your+pocket+knife.+In+the+event+you%27re+doing+it+at+dwelling+in+the+consolation+of+a+shed%2C+with+plenty+of+time+on+your+fingers+then+you+definitely%27ll+probably+be+utilizing+a+different+sharpener+than+you%27ll+if+you+happen+to%27re+out+tenting+and+you+need+that+pocket+knife+in+a+hurry%2C+and+it%27s+blunt.+These+are+among+the+issues+you+need+to+preserve+at+the+back+of+your+thoughts+when+looking+for+the+best+best+pocket+knife.+With+this+suggestions+in+the+back+of+your+thoughts%2C+now+you+can+comfortably+select+the+very+best+knives+to+buy.+Now%2C+we+will+have+a+look+at+the+top+of+finest+pocket+knives+you+should+buy+There+are+three+basic+blades+sorts+for+pocket+knives.+The+next+is+a+bit+of+details+about+the+kinds+of+blades+for+pocket+knives.+Complete+Pocket+Knife+Reviews+Knife+Care%0D%0A%0D%0AIt+looks+like+just+yesterday+that+the+neighborhood+children+and+I+were+sitting+within+the+%E2%80%9Ctalking+tree%2C%E2%80%9D+a+large+camphor+tree+on+the+border+between+the+neighborhood+and+native+fern+fields.+We+might+focus+on+neighborhood+enterprise+in+the+tree+%28therefore+the+title%29.+It+was+also+where+we+may+go+to+get+high+above+the+bottom+and+carve+with+our+knives.+We+found+a+way+of+satisfaction+in+carving+our+names+into+designated+places+on+the+tree.+Barlow-Knives+is+a+second+era+enterprise.+We%27ve+got+been+selling+barlow+knives+on+the+internet+since+web+commerce+started.++If+you+have+any+inquiries+with+regards+to+wherever+and+how+to+use+%5Bhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.Thebestpocketknifereviews.com%2F+Best+Pocket+knives+Under+%2450%5D%2C+you+can+make+contact+with+us+at+the+page.+This+table+comprises+a+list+of+the+top+5+best+electrical+knife+sharpeners+as+reviewed+by+actual+customers%2C+with+consideration+to+the+features%2C+durability%2C+and+price.%0D%0A%0D%0AFor+individuals+who+are+looking+to+purchase+a+knife+mainly+for+outside+activities+like+searching+and+fishing+or+some+Bear+Grylls+model+adventure+then+Kershaw+Leek+knife+is+essentially+the+most+appropriate+one+as+a+result+of+it+has+assisted+opening+system.+This+knife+is+part+of+Kershaw+Leek%27s+collection+knives.+In+case+you+are+searching+for+a+knife+with+a+sharp+blade+then+undoubtedly+you+might+go+for+Kershaw+Leek+knife+Pen+knife.+A+pen+knife+is+hinged+at+each+ends+of+the+deal+with%2C+and+usually+has+two+or+three+blades+at+each+finish.+The+pen+knife+was+initially+designed+to+chop+or+sharpen+pen+quills+for+writing.+The+pen+knife+is+good+in+order+for+you+a+couple+of+sort+of+blade.+It%27s+also+small+and+light-weight+and+won%27t+be+noticeable+in+the+pocket+of+gown+garments.+A+SHARP+KNIFE+%28OR+INSTRUMENT%29+IS+ONE+OF+THE+BEST%0D%0A%0D%0AA+multi+software+knife+provides+multiple+tools+whereas+a+multi+blade+knife+merely+offers+a+number+of+blades.+A+multi+instrument+knife+can+have+multi+blades+but+a+multi+blade+can%27t+have+a+multi+software.+Is+there+Such+a+Thing+as+an+Ideal+Pocket+Knife+Materials%3F+easyazon-image+align%3D%22left%22+asin%3D%22B009L65SQK%22+locale%3D%22us%22+top%3D%22one+hundred+sixty%22+src%3D%22-%2Fphotos%2FI%2F51CgKsywgsL._SL160_.jpg%22+width%3D%22160%22As+a+result+of+most+pocket+knives%2C+particularly+in+the+case+of+multi+device+and+multi+blade+knives%2C+are+folding+knives+that+have+a+variety+of+sections+and+crevasses+in+their+design+as+well+as+pivots+that+want+ample+care%2C+you+have+to+pick+a+knife+with+probably+the+most+lenient+but+long-lasting+blade+and+deal+with+supplies.+4.37%22+three.38%22+Stainless+Steel+%288Cr13MoV%29+7.seventy+five%22+%24+four.5+Buck+110+Searching+Pocket+Knife+Baladeo+Float+Knife%0D%0A%0D%0AThe+Ontario+RTAK-II+is+a+brilliant+giant+survival+knife+featuring+a+10.25%22+blade+product+of+1095+carbon+metal+with+a+flat+finish+for+defense.+The+knife+is+massive+enough+for+any+survival+activity+you+place+it+to%2C+and+makes+an+ideal+chopper.+The+thick+Micarta+deal+with+is+detachable+for+cleaning.+The+sheath+is+a+deluxe+Nylon+combat+sort+system+with+a+pocket+on+the+front+and+plastic+liner+for+the+blade.+Enhancements+on+this+model+over+the+now+discontinued+RTAK-I+include+a+greater+end+on+the+blade%2C+better+guard+built+into+the+handle+design+and+total+superior+match+and+finish.+Mil-spec+phosphate+finish.+Lanyard+gap.&create=Create considered] more often than not. How cool is that? And there are [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade swiss knife] lots of completely different sorts of pocket knives for many completely different folks. Let's start with Case Knives and Buck Knives They actually make some cool (and high quality) pocket knives that may enable you match that hard to search out individual.<br><br>Some open quick (just like the Thumb Stud), some open actually quick (just like the Emerson Wave), whereas others require two palms and time (Nail Nick). It isn’t nearly fast deployment here. A few of these methods make the shape factor considerably bigger, which isn’t best in our opinion (like the Spyderco Round Hole), h ere is a web site the place you can start your research. We’ve found that the Thumb Stud and the Nail Nick appear to be dependable methods of blade opening, whereas protecting the profile slim for in-pocket carry. There are lots others so that you can experiment with although.<br><br>Knife sharpeners fall into just a few totally different categories and we are able to divide them up a pair methods. There are handbook knife sharpeners and electric knife sharpeners. Each forms of sharpeners use a specific materials to remove metal from the knife blade, often stone, ceramic, or diamond. Whatever the sort, the sharpening material has various grits, ranging from very coarse to extremely advantageous. Coarse materials remove the steel in a short time, which is helpful for very uninteresting blades or when reprofiling a knife edge to a different angle (Extra on reprofiling later!). The finer grits are used later within the process, very like sanding down a piece of wooden furnishings.<br><br>The very best survival knife sharpener dates back to assist simply how much time you might need. I favor to utilize a stainless-steel blade sharpener identical to chef’s possibility model. We've a lot of kitchen's knifes thus it feels right to have the energy sharpener as a result of fact we will easily genuinely easily contact up a brand new knife before we start meals preparation. Others corresponding to hikers or perhaps backpackers should have the handy possibility for only a chef's knife sharpener. This generates a challenge though do not get apprehensive! It is potential to pick some fabulous possibilities similar to Smith’s survival knife sharpeners.<br><br>A folding knife is an absolute should-have for anybody, be it an avid outdoorsman or a city dweller. Folding knives are compact, simply deployed, and are handy for a wide range of duties. You will by no means know the importance of a folding knife till you end up needing one for a process round the home or on a visit. There numerous choices for folding knives in the market right now for a lot of functions. From survival knives to useful little pocket knives, you will see that enough decisions to pick and choose from earlier than you discover the perfect folding knife for yourself.<br><br>The second reason for these knives being referred to as the very best steak knives is that also they are favored by their customers. These knives have gained public favor in the realm of steak knives for the reasons of quality, talked about above, and the explanations of ergonomics. These knives are given the best possible handles that you will [http://thesaurus.com/browse/pocketknife buy knives online] discover on this planet. The handles on these knives make them simple to handle and hold thereby ensuring that the meal shouldn't be disturbed by the need to choose up a fallen knife or to get an excellent grip on a knife that's already within the hand.<br><br>nd on my list of the most effective tactical folding knives is the Spyderco Navy G-10 which is regarded by many experts as one of the best navy service knife. Not only does it have all the advantages of a folding knife, it additionally has the sting and durability that comes with a straight blade. That includes a ten [http://www.thebestpocketknifereviews.com/ top rated pocket knives] inch lengthy blade when prolonged, the Spyderco Military G-10 positive takes up a fair quantity of pocket area! You actually need to be cautious whereas handling this knife as a result of it’s super sharp and I’ve cut myself on fairly a couple of events without intending to take action.<br><br>You should definitely examine your local laws, especially in case you are planning to purchase one on-line. For most of us pocket knives are only helpful tools, however they could be used as weapons too. So, these days they face several legal restrictions. The size of the blade is more likely to be regulated in some states, turning unlawful to carry around pocket knives with a blade larger than a certain measurement. The identical could happen with sure varieties of pocket knives , you will need to have special care with switchblades as a result of they're the probably to be banned.<br><br>Once a blade is shaped and hardened, the innovative receives its last grind. The procedures, facets and angles used to complete an edge additional affect the preliminary sharpness and edge-holding ability of the blade. Like metal hardness, there is no single good edge end. Too narrow an angle and the blade's vanguard is too skinny to resist deflection and dulling, whereas too blunt an angle on that forefront doesn’t really feel nearly as sharp in actual usage. Like questions of fabric and hardening, be happy to analyze the totally different characteristics of the hollow grind, the sting angle and single vs. double bevel.
A film released in theaters is considered a '''[[box office bomb|bomb]]''' when it fails to [[Break-even (economics)|break even]] at the [[box office]] by a large amount, thus losing money for the studio and/or production company that invested in it. Unless officially acknowledged by studios, figures of losses are usually rough estimates at best. This is mostly due to [[Hollywood accounting]] practices that typically manipulate profits or keep information on costs a secret in order to avoid profit-sharing agreements.
 
In some cases, the production studio can make profits from a box office bomb when ancillary revenues are taken into account, such as [[Home video|home media]] sales and rentals, [[television broadcast]] rights, licensing rights, or from selling distribution rights and covering costs before it is released, so a box office bomb can still eventually break even after its theatrical run. Included on the list is a chart of films that failed to recover their production costs on their theatrical run from worldwide box office revenue, ranked by the [[Real versus nominal value (economics)|nominal value]] of their losses.
 
Because studios rarely release official distribution, [[Release print|prints]], and [[Film promotion|advertising]] costs for most films, costs are limited to production budgets. The losses presented in this list are just an indication for the size of the failure and do not represent precisely the actual losses by studios.
 
==Estimating loss==
Production outfits do not retain all of the box office revenue their films generate, and their share—which can often be variable throughout a film's run—largely depends on their deals with distributors and exhibitors as well as the various taxes that are imposed. For example, the tax filings for [[Cinemark Theatres]] in 2010 showed that 54.5 percent of the box office revenues were paid to distributors. Earnings from outside of the US and Canada are even harder to gauge because of various cost factors, like the "[[United States dollar|dollar]] fluctuat[ing] against foreign currencies" and tariffs. Because of this, it is not possible to calculate exactly how much a film has earned for its backers, but industry analysts regularly apply the rule of thumb that film studios take half of the box office receipts, with theaters taking the other half; thus, a film would normally need to make twice its production budget worldwide to break even.<ref>{{cite web |date=January 31, 2011 |first=Charlie |last=Jane Anders |title=How much money does a movie need to make to be profitable? |url=http://io9.com/5747305/how-much-money-does-a-movie-need-to-make-to-be-profitable |work=[[io9]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=July 31, 1995 |first=Bernard |last=Weinraub |title='Waterworld' Disappointment As Box Office Receipts Lag |url=http://www.nytimes.com/1995/07/31/business/waterworld-disappointment-as-box-office-receipts-lag.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm |work=[[The New York Times]] |accessdate=July 21, 2013 |quote=(Studios only earn about half of a film's gross; the rest goes to theater owners).}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=September 8, 1999 |first=Richard |last=Natale |title=Company Town : Company Town Film Profit Report |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1999/sep/08/business/fi-7832 |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013 |quote=Notes: Cost estimates are for production only. Only half of box-office receipts come back to the studio.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=November 14, 2012 |first=Dorothy |last=Pomerantz |title=The Biggest Box Office Flops Of 2012 |url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/dorothypomerantz/2012/11/14/2012s-biggest-movie-turkeys/ |work=[[Forbes]] |accessdate=July 21, 2013 |quote=Keep in mind that to begin to even imagine breaking even a film needs to earn at least twice its production budget at the box office.}}</ref>
 
In keeping with industry analyses, losses are calculated by subtracting the production budget from half of the theatrical box office revenues:
 
:<math>{TWG \over 2} - {PB}</math>
 
* ''TWG'' is the total worldwide box office gross
* ''PB'' is the [[production budget]].  
<!-- ******* NOTE *******Please do not add any films to this list if they are not cited properly.  A proper citation would meet [[WP:Reliability]] and would state clearly that the film in question was a box office bomb. If you cannot cite the film, do not add it or it will be reverted immediately -->
==Biggest box office bombs==
With a worldwide box-office gross of around $39.0 million on a production budget of $150 million, ''Mars Needs Moms'' is estimated to be the biggest box office bomb based on absolute loss on worldwide gross. However, such claims usually refer to losses when only taking into account theatrical revenue and production budget. It is not immediately clear which film loses the most when home video and television income, which can form a significant portion of a film's earnings, and the prints and advertising budget, which can inflate a film's overall cost, are factored in. In addition to the $250 million production budget, it was estimated that Disney spent $100 million on worldwide marketing for ''John Carter'',<ref>{{cite web |date=August 17, 2012 |first=Jay A. |last=Fernandez |title='John Carter': Disney Scrambles to Save its $250 Million Gamble |url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/john-carter-from-mars-taylor-kitsch-budget-box-office-294822 |work=[[The Hollywood Reporter]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}</ref> causing Disney to ultimately take a $160 million [[write-off]] on the film.<ref>{{cite web |title=Split screens: A tale of two Tinseltowns |date=February 23, 2013  |work=[[The Economist]] |url=http://www.economist.com/news/business/21572218-tale-two-tinseltowns-split-screens |accessdate=September 7, 2013}}</ref> The cost of ''Sahara'' also spiraled out of control: ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' provided an extensive special report about the film's financial troubles two years after its release, which included an actual loss of $105 million through 2006.<ref group="#" name="sahara"/>
 
Sometimes a film can be financed by selling its distribution rights to cover costs before production begins. [[C2 Pictures]] made deals with Warner Bros., Sony Pictures, and Toho-Towa to release ''[[Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines]]'' in their respective territories in return for $149 million, with another $11 million earned by transferring the copyright to German tax shelters. The final budget was estimated to be $187.3 million, so at least 85% of costs had been covered for the producers before any box office revenue came in.<ref>{{cite web |date=May 9, 2005 |first=Edward J. |last=Epstein |title=Concessions Are for Girlie Men |url=http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/the_hollywood_economist/2005/05/concessions_are_for_girlie_men.html |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate.com]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}</ref>
 
Only the revenues from theatrical exhibition and production budgets at their nominal value are included here, which sees ''Mars Needs Moms'' rank in the top position. Up to eight films in total have lost in excess of $100 million. The films on this chart have all had a theatrical run since 1995, and films that have not played since then do not appear on the chart due to ticket-price inflation, population size, and ticket purchasing trends not being considered. The most represented years are 1999, 2001, and 2005, all with five films.
:{{legend|#b6fcb6|size=50%|{{†|alt=film currently playing}} ''Background shading indicates films playing in the week commencing {{Days before now|{{#switch: {{CURRENTDAYNAME}} |Saturday=1 |Sunday=2 |Monday=3 |Tuesday=4 |Wednesday=5 |Thursday=6 |0}}}} in theaters around the world''.}}<!-- Please do not remove this, or else the highlighting in the table becomes unintelligible. The date is set to update every Friday according to UTC time. -->
 
{| class="wikitable sortable plainrowheaders"  style="margin:auto; margin:auto;"
|+Biggest box office bombs
! scope="col" | Rank
! scope="col" | Title
! scope="col" | Production budget
! scope="col" | Worldwide gross
! scope="col" | Estimated losses
! scope="col" | Year
! scope="col" class="unsortable"|Ref
|-
|1
! scope="row" | ''[[Mars Needs Moms]]''
|align="right"| $150,000,000
|align="right"| $38,992,758
|align="right"| $130,503,621
| style="text-align:center;"| 2011
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="mars needs moms">
''Mars Needs Moms''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=marsneedsmoms.htm |title=Mars Needs Moms (2011) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=May 10, 2011 |first=Marc |last=Graser |title=‘Mars’ flop dents Disney earnings |url=http://variety.com/2011/film/news/mars-flop-dents-disney-earnings-1118036719/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|2
! scope="row" | {{sort|13th Warrior|''[[The 13th Warrior]]''}}
|align="right"| $100—160,000,000
|align="right"| $61,698,899
|align="right"| $69,150,551—129,150,551
| style="text-align:center;"| 1999
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="13th warrior">
''The 13th Warrior''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=13thwarrior.htm |title=The 13th Warrior (1999) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite book |last=Sklar |first=Elizabeth S. |title=The Vikings on Film: Essays on Depictions of the Nordic Middle Ages |publisher=[[McFarland & Company]] |year=2011 |isbn=9780786460441 |page=[http://books.google.com/books?id=NgJTucLZauYC&pg=PA121&lpg=PA121&dq=production+budget+13th+warrior&source=bl&ots=MdSOT-3HoS&sig=bw2fCir_WvC6LE44nfnld6bbsaI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=I5ftUZftHIfy8ATprYGABw&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Despite%20a%20lavish%20production%20budget%2013th%20warrior&f=false 122] |quote=Despite a lavish production budget for which estimates range from $100,000,000 to $160,000,000 with an additional $25,000 expenditure for marketing...}}
</ref>
|-
|3
! scope="row"  | {{sort|Lone Ranger|''[[The Lone Ranger (2013 film)|The Lone Ranger]]''}}
|align="right"| $225—250,000,000
|align="right"| $260,502,115
|align="right"| $94,748,943—119,748,943
| style="text-align:center;"| 2013
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="lone ranger">
''The Lone Ranger''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=loneranger.htm |title=The Lone Ranger (2013) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=November 15, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=June 25, 2013 |first=Marc |last=Graser |title=Disney, Jerry Bruckheimer See ‘Lone Ranger’ as New Genre-Bending Superhero |url=http://variety.com/2013/film/news/disney-jerry-bruckheimer-see-lone-ranger-as-new-genre-bending-superhero-1200501501/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 2, 2013 |quote=The picture cost approximately $250 million to produce... Studio reps say the pic cost around $225 million, but sources say it was considerably higher.}}
</ref>
|-
|4
! scope="row" | ''[[R.I.P.D.]]''  
|align="right"| $130—154,000,000
|align="right"| $78,324,220  
|align="right"| $90,837,890—114,837,890
| style="text-align:center;"| 2013
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="ripd">
''R.I.P.D.''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=ripd.htm |title=R.I.P.D. (2013) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=November 15, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=July 21, 2013 |first=Nikki |last=Finke |title=#1 ‘The Conjuring’ Scares Up $41.5M Weekend But Other New Films Sink Or Soft: ‘R.I.P.D.’, ‘Turbo’, ‘Red 2′, As Sizzling Summer Fizzles |url=http://www.deadline.com/2013/07/the-conjuring-big-1-with-a-cinemascore-but-every-other-new-film-soft-or-sinking/ |work=[[Deadline.com]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|5
! scope="row" | ''[[John Carter (film)|John Carter]]''
|align="right"| $250,000,000
|align="right"| $282,778,100
|align="right"| $108,610,950
| style="text-align:center;"| 2012
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''John Carter''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=johncarterofmars.htm |title=John Carter (2012) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=February 22, 2012 |first=Jordan |last=Zakarin |title='John Carter' Producers On Budget Rumors & Creating Mars |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/22/john-carter-producers-on-budget-rumors-creating-mars_n_1293248.html |work=[[The Huffington Post]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|6
! scope="row" | ''[[Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within]]''
|align="right"| $115—145,000,000
|align="right"| $85,131,830
|align="right"| $72,434,085—102,434,085
| style="text-align:center;"| 2001
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="final fantasy">
''Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=finalfantasy.htm |title=Final Fantasy: The Spirit Within (2001) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget ($115M): {{cite web |date=October 5, 2001 |first=Alex |last=Pham |title=Japan's Square Quits the Movie Business |url=http://articles.latimes.com/2001/oct/05/business/fi-53689 |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |accessdate=August 10, 2013}}
* Production budget ($145M): {{cite web |date=January 30, 2002 |first=Tim |last=Ryan |title=‘Fantasy’ movie
studio to close |url=http://archives.starbulletin.com/2002/01/30/news/story1.html |work=[[Honolulu Star-Bulletin]] |accessdate=August 10, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|7
! scope="row" | ''[[Jack the Giant Slayer]]''
|align="right"| $185—200,000,000
|align="right"| $197,687,603
|align="right"| $86,156,199—101,156,199
| style="text-align:center;"| 2013
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Jack the Giant Slayer''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=jackthegiantkiller.htm |title=Jack the Giant Slayer (2013) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=February 28, 2013 |first=Grady |last=Smith |title=Box office preview: 'Jack the Giant Slayer' hopes to climb higher than '21 And Over' |url=http://insidemovies.ew.com/2013/02/28/box-office-preview-jack-the-giant-slayer-21-and-over/ |work=[[Entertainment Weekly]] |accessdate=July 23, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|8
! scope="row" | ''[[Sahara (2005 film)|Sahara]]''
|align="right"| $160,000,000
|align="right"| $119,269,486
|align="right"| $100,365,257
| style="text-align:center;"| 2005
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="sahara">
''Sahara''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=sahara.htm |title=Sahara (2007) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=April 15, 2007 |first=Glenn F. |last=Bunting |title=$78 million of red ink? |url=http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-movie15apr15,0,4543905,full.story |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |accessdate=July 13, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|9
! scope="row" | ''[[Stealth (film)|Stealth]]''
|align="right"| $135,000,000
|align="right"| $76,932,872
|align="right"| $96,533,564
| style="text-align:center;"| 2005
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="stealth">
''Stealth''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=stealth.htm |title=Stealth (2005) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=November 14, 2005 |first=John |last=Horn |title=Hurry. Somebody call Spider-Man |url=http://articles.latimes.com/2005/nov/14/entertainment/et-sony14 |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |accessdate=August 10, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|10
! scope="row" | {{sort|Adventures of Pluto Nash|''[[The Adventures of Pluto Nash]]''}}
|align="right"| $100,000,000
|align="right"| $7,103,973
|align="right"| $96,448,014
| style="text-align:center;"| 2002
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="adventures of pluto nash">
''The Adventures of Pluto Nash''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=plutonash.htm |title=The Adventures of Pluto Nash (2002) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]]|accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=August 11, 2012 |first=Andrew |last=Stewart |title=B.O. reality gets lost in perception |url=http://variety.com/2012/film/news/b-o-reality-gets-lost-in-perception-1118057706/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|11
! scope="row" | {{sort|Alamo|''[[The Alamo (2004 film)|The Alamo]]''}}
|align="right"| $107,000,000
|align="right"| $25,819,961
|align="right"| $94,090,020
| style="text-align:center;"| 2004
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="alamo">
''The Alamo''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=alamo.htm |title=The Alamo (2004) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=March 24, 2004 |first=Sharon |last=Waxman |title=A Battle Disney May Never Forget; For 'The Alamo,' a Long and Bumpy Road, From Conception to Release |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/24/movies/battle-disney-may-never-forget-for-alamo-long-bumpy-road-conception-release.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm |work=[[The New York Times]] |accessdate=August 10, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|12
! scope="row" | ''[[Green Lantern (film)|Green Lantern]]''
|align="right"| $200,000,000
|align="right"| $219,851,172
|align="right"| $90,074,414
| style="text-align:center;"| 2011
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Green Lantern''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=greenlantern.htm |title=Green Lantern (2011) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=June 16, 2011 |first=Andrew |last=Stewart |title=‘Green Lantern’ looks to shine at box office |url=http://variety.com/2011/film/news/green-lantern-looks-to-shine-at-box-office-1118038698/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|13
! scope="row" | ''[[Cutthroat Island]]''
|align="right"| $98,000,000
|align="right"| $18,517,322
|align="right"| $88,741,339
| style="text-align:center;"| 1995
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="cutthroat island">
''Cutthroat Island''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web |title=Cutthroat Island |work=[[The Numbers (website)|The Numbers]] |publisher=Nash Information Services |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1995/0CTIL.php |accessdate=July 23, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=January 11, 1999 |first=Andrew |last=Hindes |title=Arnold outbonds ‘em |url=http://variety.com/1999/film/news/arnold-outbonds-em-1117490113/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|14
! scope="row" | ''[[Evan Almighty]]''
|align="right"| $175,000,000
|align="right"| $173,418,781
|align="right"| $88,290,610
| style="text-align:center;"| 2007
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Evan Almighty''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=evanalmighty.htm |title=Evan Almighty (2007) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=June 25, 2007 |first1=Pamela |last1=McClintock |first2=Michael |last2=Fleming |title=‘Evan’ struggles to find right audience |url=http://variety.com/2007/film/news/evan-struggles-to-find-right-audience-1117967614/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|15
! scope="row" | ''[[Treasure Planet]]''
|align="right"| $140,000,000
|align="right"| $109,578,115
|align="right"| $85,210,943
| style="text-align:center;"| 2002
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Treasure Planet''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=treasureplanet.htm |title=Treasure Planet (2002) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=April 12, 2004 |first=Meredith |last=Amdur |title=For Disney, it’s a season on the brink |url=http://variety.com/2004/film/news/for-disney-it-s-a-season-on-the-brink-1117903177/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|16
! scope="row" | ''[[Town & Country (film)|Town & Country]]''
|align="right"| $90,000,000
|align="right"| $10,372,291
|align="right"| $84,813,855
| style="text-align:center;"| 2001
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Town & Country''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=townandcountry.htm |title=Town & Country (2001) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=April 24, 2001 |first=Charles |last=Lyons |title=New Line nixes ‘Town’ meeting |url=http://variety.com/2001/film/news/new-line-nixes-town-meeting-1117797747/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|17
! scope="row" | ''[[Supernova (2000 film)|Supernova]]''
|align="right"| $90,000,000
|align="right"| $14,828,081
|align="right"| $82,585,960
| style="text-align:center;"| 2000
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=supernova.htm |title=Supernova (2000) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]]|accessdate=July 12, 2013}}</ref>
|-
|18
! scope="row" | ''[[The Nutcracker in 3D]]''
|align="right"| $90,000,000
|align="right"| $16,178,959
|align="right"| $81,910,521
| style="text-align:center;"| 2010
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''The Nutcracker in 3D''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=nutcracker3d.htm |title=The Nutcracker in 3D (2010) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=July 25, 2011 |first=Justin |last=Kroll |title=Chernin, U nab ‘Nutcracker’ pitch |url=http://variety.com/2011/film/news/chernin-u-nab-nutcracker-pitch-1118040388/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|19
! scope="row" | ''[[Windtalkers]]''
|align="right"| $115—120,000,000
|align="right"| $77,628,265
|align="right"| $76,185,868—81,185,868
| style="text-align:center;"| 2002
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Windtalkers''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=windtalkers.htm |title=Windtalkers (2002) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=June 30, 2002 |first=Carl |last=DiOrio |title=Limping Lion loses Levin |url=http://variety.com/2002/film/news/limping-lion-loses-levin-1117869214/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|20
! scope="row" | {{sort|Wolfman|''[[The Wolfman (2010 film)|The Wolfman]]''}}
|align="right"| $150,000,000
|align="right"| $139,789,765
|align="right"| $80,105,118
| style="text-align:center;"| 2010
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''The Wolfman''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=wolfman.htm |title=The Wolfman (2010) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=October 31, 2011 |first=Borys |last=Kit |title=Universal's New Wolf-Man Movie Begins Shooting, Will Head Straight to DVD |url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/universal-wolf-man-movie-255259 |work=[[The Hollywood Reporter]] |accessdate=August 10, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|21
! scope="row" | ''[[XXX: State of the Union]]''
|align="right"| $113,100,000
|align="right"| $71,022,693
|align="right"| $77,588,654
| style="text-align:center;"| 2005
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=xxx2.htm |title=XXX: State of the Union (2005) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 16, 2013}}</ref><ref name="the wrap">{{cite web |date=September 1, 2011 |first1=Brent |last1=Lang |first2=Sharon |last2=Waxman |title=Inside the Revolution Library: Where Joe Roth Went Wrong |url=http://www.thewrap.com/movies/article/inside-revolution-studios-confidential-sales-document-why-joe-roth-failed-30659 |work=[[The Wrap]] |accessdate=July 16, 2013}}</ref>
|-
|22
! scope="row" | ''[[Hugo (film)|Hugo]]''
|align="right"| $150—170,000,000
|align="right"| $185,770,160
|align="right"| $57,114,920—77,114,920
| style="text-align:center;"| 2011
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Hugo''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=hugocabret.htm |title=Hugo (2012) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 22, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=November 22, 2011 |first=Amy |last=Kaufman |title=Movie Projector: 'Breaking Dawn' to devour three new family films |url=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/11/muppets-arthur-christmas-hugo-box-office.html |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |accessdate=July 22, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|23
! scope="row" | ''[[How Do You Know]]''
|align="right"| $100,000,000
|align="right"| $48,668,907
|align="right"| $75,665,547
| style="text-align:center;"| 2010
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''How Do You Know''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=jimbrooks10.htm |title=How Do You Know (2010) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=December 9, 2010 |first=Kim |last=Masters |title=EXCLUSIVE: 'How Do You Know' Price Tag: $120 Million, $50 Million Just for Talent |url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/price-tag-120-million-50-58410 |work=[[The Hollywood Reporter]] |accessdate=July 23, 2013 |quote=''THR'' has learned that the film, which centers on a love triangle, cost $120 million to make, though the studio drove that down to about $100 million thanks to tax rebates from Pennsylvania and D.C.}}
</ref>
|-
|24
! scope="row" | ''[[Cowboys & Aliens]]''
|align="right"| $163,000,000
|align="right"| $174,822,325
|align="right"| $75,588,838
| style="text-align:center;"| 2011
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Cowboys & Aliens''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=cowboysandaliens.htm |title=Cowboys & Aliens (2011) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=July 29, 2011 |first=Marc |last=Graser |title=A fistful of ambitions for Platinum’s ‘Cowboys’ |url=http://variety.com/2011/film/news/a-fistful-of-ambitions-for-platinum-s-cowboys-1118040592/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|25
! scope="row" | {{sort|Great Raid|''[[The Great Raid]]''}}
|align="right"| $80,000,000
|align="right"| $10,769,311
|align="right"| $74,615,345
| style="text-align:center;"| 2005
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''The Great Raid''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=greatraid.htm |title=The Great Raid (2005) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=July 17, 2005 |first= |last= |title=Escape from limbo-land |url=http://variety.com/2005/film/news/escape-from-limbo-land-1117926042/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|26
! scope="row" | {{sort|Sound of Thunder|''[[A Sound of Thunder (film)|A Sound of Thunder]]''}}
|align="right"| $80,000,000
|align="right"| $11,665,465
|align="right"| $74,167,268
| style="text-align:center;"| 2005
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''A Sound of Thunder''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=soundofthunder.htm |title=A Sound of Thunder (2005) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=March 6, 2001 |first=Brendan |last=Kelly |title=‘Sound’ shoot off as strike threat looms |url=http://variety.com/2001/film/news/sound-shoot-off-as-strike-threat-looms-1117794870/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|27
! scope="row" | ''[[Around the World in 80 Days (2004 film)|Around the World in 80 Days]]''
|align="right"| $110,000,000
|align="right"| $72,178,895
|align="right"| $73,910,553
| style="text-align:center;"| 2004
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Around the World in 80 Days''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=aroundtheworldin80days.htm |title=Around the World in 80 Days (2004) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=January 12, 2003 |first=Dana |last=Harris |title=Inside Move: On Walden bond |url=http://variety.com/2003/film/news/inside-move-on-walden-bond-1117878525/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|28
! scope="row" | ''[[Speed Racer (film)|Speed Racer]]''
|align="right"| $120,000,000
|align="right"| $93,945,766
|align="right"| $73,027,117
| style="text-align:center;"| 2008
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Speed Racer''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=speedracer.htm |title=Speed Racer (2008) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=June 13, 2008 |first=Anne |last=Thompson |title=Why ‘Speed Racer’ sputtered |url=http://variety.com/2008/film/news/why-speed-racer-sputtered-1117987417/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|29
! scope="row" | ''[[Gigli]]''
|align="right"| $75,600,000
|align="right"| $7,266,209
|align="right"| $71,966,896
| style="text-align:center;"| 2003
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=gigli.htm |title=Gigli (2003) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 16, 2013}}</ref><ref name="the wrap"/>
|-
|30
! scope="row" | ''[[Alexander (film)|Alexander]]''
|align="right"| $155,000,000
|align="right"| $167,298,192
|align="right"| $71,350,904
| style="text-align:center;"| 2004
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Alexander''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=alexander.htm |title=Alexander (2004) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=November 20, 2004 |first=Sharon |last=Waxman |title=Breaking Ground With a Gay Movie Hero |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/20/movies/MoviesFeatures/20alex.html?_r=0 |work=[[The New York Times]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|31
! scope="row" | ''[[Monkeybone]]''
|align="right"| $75,000,000
|align="right"| $7,622,365
|align="right"| $71,188,818
| style="text-align:center;"| 2001
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Monkeybone''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=monkeybone.htm |title=Monkeybone (2001) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=February 6, 2009 |first=Sam |last=Thielman |title=Selick puts stop motion in Focus |url=http://variety.com/2009/film/news/selick-puts-stop-motion-in-focus-1117999694/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|32
! scope="row" | {{sort|Postman|''[[The Postman (film)|The Postman]]''}}
|align="right"| $80,000,000
|align="right"| $17,626,234
|align="right"| $71,186,883
| style="text-align:center;"| 1997
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=postman.htm |title=The Postman (1997) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}</ref>
|-
|33
! scope="row" | ''[[Peter Pan (2003 film)|Peter Pan]]''
|align="right"| $130,600,000
|align="right"| $121,975,011
|align="right"| $69,612,495
| style="text-align:center;"| 2003
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=peterpan03.htm |title=Peter Pan (2003) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 16, 2013}}</ref><ref name="the wrap"/>
|-
|34
! scope="row" | ''[[Zoom (film)|Zoom]]''
|align="right"| $75,600,000
|align="right"| $12,506,188
|align="right"| $69,346,906
| style="text-align:center;"| 2006
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=zoom.htm |title=Zoom (2006) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 16, 2013}}</ref><ref name="the wrap"/>
|-
|35
! scope="row" | ''[[Poseidon (film)|Poseidon]]''
|align="right"| $160,000,000
|align="right"| $181,674,817
|align="right"| $69,162,592
| style="text-align:center;"| 2006
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Poseidon''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=poseidon.htm |title=Poseidon (2006) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=May 16, 2006 |first=John |last=Horn |title=Investors hope to cruise but sometimes sink |url=http://articles.latimes.com/2006/may/16/entertainment/et-virtual16 |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|36
! scope="row" | ''[[Beloved (film)|Beloved]]''
|align="right"| $80,000,000
|align="right"| $22,852,487
|align="right"| $68,573,757
| style="text-align:center;"| 1998
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=beloved.htm |title=Beloved (1998) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}</ref>
|-
|37
! scope="row" | ''[[K-19: The Widowmaker]]''
|align="right"| $100,000,000
|align="right"| $65,716,126
|align="right"| $67,141,937
| style="text-align:center;"| 2002
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''K-19: The Widowmaker''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=k19.htm |title=K-19: The Widowmaker (2002) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=March 4, 2001 |first=Robert W. |last=Welkos |title=Venturing Into Rough Seas |url=http://articles.latimes.com/2001/mar/04/entertainment/ca-32984 |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|38
! scope="row" | ''[[Land of the Lost (film)|Land of the Lost]]''
|align="right"| $100,000,000
|align="right"| $68,777,554
|align="right"| $65,611,223
| style="text-align:center;"| 2009
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Land of the Lost''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=landofthelost.htm |title=Land of the Lost (2009) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=June 5, 2009 |first=Hank |last=Stuever |title=A 'Land' Where Most Jokes Go to Waste |url=http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2009-06-05/news/36852238_1_ferrell-ron-burgundy-dinosaurs |work=[[The Washington Post]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|39
! scope="row" | ''[[Conan the Barbarian (2011 film)|Conan the Barbarian]]''
|align="right"| $90,000,000
|align="right"| $48,795,021
|align="right"| $65,602,490
| style="text-align:center;"| 2011
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Conan the Barbarian''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=conan3d.htm |title=Conan the Barbarian (2011) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=August 21, 2011 |first=Nikki |last=Finke |title=Autopsy Report: LG’s ‘Conan The Barbarian’ |url=http://www.deadline.com/2011/08/autopsy-report-lgs-conan-the-barbarian/ |work=[[Deadline.com]] |accessdate=August 9, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|40
! scope="row" | {{sort|Astronaut's Wife|''[[The Astronaut's Wife]]''}}
|align="right"| $75,000,000
|align="right"| $19,598,588
|align="right"| $65,200,706
| style="text-align:center;"| 1999
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=astronautswife.htm |title=The Astronaut's Wife (1999) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}</ref>
|-
|41
! scope="row" | ''[[Dudley Do-Right (film)|Dudley Do-Right]]''
|align="right"| $70,000,000
|align="right"| $9,974,410
|align="right"| $65,012,795
| style="text-align:center;"| 1999
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=dudleydo-right.htm |title=Dudley Do-Right (1999) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}</ref>
|-
|42
! scope="row" | ''[[Chill Factor (film)|Chill Factor]]''
|align="right"| $70,000,000
|align="right"| $11,263,966
|align="right"| $64,368,017
| style="text-align:center;"| 1999
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=chillfactor.htm |title=Chill Factor (1999) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}</ref>
|-
|43
! scope="row" | ''[[Red Planet (film)|Red Planet]]''
|align="right"| $80,000,000
|align="right"| $33,463,969
|align="right"| $63,268,016
| style="text-align:center;"| 2000
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=redplanet.htm |title=Red Planet (2000) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}</ref>
|-
|44
! scope="row" | ''[[Ali (film)|Ali]]''
|align="right"| $107,000,000
|align="right"| $87,713,825
|align="right"| $63,143,088
| style="text-align:center;"| 2001
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=ali.htm |title=Ali (2001) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 21, 2013}}</ref>
|-
|45
! scope="row" | ''[[Osmosis Jones]]''
|align="right"| $70,000,000
|align="right"| $14,026,418
|align="right"| $62,986,791
| style="text-align:center;"| 2001
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">
''Osmosis Jones''
* Total worldwide gross: {{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=osmosisjones.htm |title=Osmosis Jones (2001) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 13, 2013}}
* Production budget: {{cite web |date=August 12, 2001 |first=Carl |last=DiOrio |title=Horny hijinks heat up B.O. |url=http://variety.com/2001/film/news/horny-hijinks-heat-up-b-o-1117851071/ |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |accessdate=August 7, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
|46
! scope="row" | ''[[Instinct (film)|Instinct]]''
|align="right"| $80,000,000
|align="right"| $34,105,207
|align="right"| $62,947,397
| style="text-align:center;"| 1999
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=instinct.htm |title=Instinct (1999) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 21, 2013}}</ref>
|-
|47
! scope="row" | ''[[Sphere (film)|Sphere]]''
|align="right"| $80,000,000
|align="right"| $37,020,277
|align="right"| $61,489,862
| style="text-align:center;"| 1998
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=sphere.htm |title=Sphere (1998) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}</ref>
|-
|48
! scope="row" | ''[[Lolita (1997 film)|Lolita]]''
|align="right"| $62,000,000
|align="right"| $1,071,255
|align="right"| $61,464,373
| style="text-align:center;"| 1997
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=lolita98.htm |title=Lolita (1997) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}</ref>
|-
|49
! scope="row" | ''[[Hard Rain (film)|Hard Rain]]''
|align="right"| $70,000,000
|align="right"| $19,870,567
|align="right"| $60,064,717
| style="text-align:center;"| 1998
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=hardrain.htm |title=Hard Rain (1998) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 12, 2013}}</ref>
|-
|50
! scope="row" | ''[[Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever]]''
|align="right"| $70,000,000
|align="right"| $19,924,033
|align="right"| $60,037,984
| style="text-align:center;"| 2002
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=ecksvssever.htm |title=Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever (2002) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=September 28, 2013}}</ref>
|-
|}
 
==Biggest box office bombs adjusted for inflation==
{| class="wikitable sortable plainrowheaders"  style="margin:auto; margin:auto;"
|+Biggest box office bombs adjusted for inflation
! scope="col" | Rank
! scope="col" | Title
! scope="col" | Estimated losses <br> {{small|([[Constant dollars|constant $]])}}
! scope="col" | Year
! scope="col" class="unsortable"|Ref
|-
| 1
! scope="row" | {{sort|13th Warrior|''[[The 13th Warrior]]''}}
| style="text-align:right;"| ${{nts|{{Inflation|US|69150550.50|1999}}}}—{{nts|{{Inflation|US|129150550.50|1999}}}}
| style="text-align:center;"| 1999
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="13th warrior"/>
|-
| 2
! scope="row" | ''[[Cutthroat Island]]''{{ref|a|[a]}}
| style="text-align:right;"| ${{nts|{{Inflation|US|88741339|1995}}}}
| style="text-align:center;"| 1995
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="cutthroat island"/>
|-
| 3
! scope="row" | ''[[Mars Needs Moms]]''
| style="text-align:right;"| ${{nts|{{Inflation|US|130503621|2011}}}}
| style="text-align:center;"| 2011
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="mars needs moms"/>
|-
| 4
! scope="row" | ''[[Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within]]''
| style="text-align:right;"| ${{nts|{{Inflation|US|72434085|2001}}}}—{{nts|{{Inflation|US|102434085|2001}}}}
| style="text-align:center;"| 2001
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="final fantasy"/>
|-
| 5
! scope="row" | {{sort|Adventures of Pluto Nash|''[[The Adventures of Pluto Nash]]''}}
| style="text-align:right;"| ${{nts|{{Inflation|US|96448013.50|2002}}}}
| style="text-align:center;"| 2002
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="adventures of pluto nash"/>
|-
| 6
! scope="row" | {{sort|Fall of the Roman Empire|''[[The Fall of the Roman Empire (film)|The Fall of the Roman Empire]]''}}
| style="text-align:right;"| ${{nts|{{Inflation|US|16625000|1964}}}}
| style="text-align:center;"| 1964
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=The Fall of the Roman Empire |work=[[The Numbers (website)|The Numbers]] |publisher=Nash Information Services |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1964/0FFRM.php |accessdate=July 16, 2013}}</ref>
|-
| 7
! scope="row" | ''[[Sahara (2005 film)|Sahara]]''
| style="text-align:right;"| ${{nts|{{Inflation|US|100365257|2005}}}}
| style="text-align:center;"| 2005
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="sahara"/>
|-
| 8
! scope="row" | {{sort|Lone Ranger|''[[The Lone Ranger (2013 film)|The Lone Ranger]]''}}
| style="text-align:right;"| ${{nts|{{Inflation|US|94748943|2013}}}}—{{nts|{{Inflation|US|119748943|2013}}}}
| style="text-align:center;"| 2013
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="lone ranger"/>
|-
| 9
! scope="row" | ''[[Heaven's Gate (film)|Heaven's Gate]]''
| style="text-align:right;"| ${{nts|{{Inflation|US|42257834.50|1980}}}}
| style="text-align:center;"| 1980
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#">{{cite web|url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=heavensgate.htm |title=Heaven's Gate (1980) |work=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=July 16, 2013}}</ref>
|-
| 10
! scope="row"  | ''[[R.I.P.D.]]''
| style="text-align:right;"| ${{nts|{{Inflation|US|90837890|2013}}}}—{{nts|{{Inflation|US|114837890|2013}}}}
| style="text-align:center;"| 2013
| style="text-align:center;"|<ref group="#" name="ripd"/>
|-
|}
 
; Notes
*<sup>{{note|a|a}}</sup> ''Cutthroat Island'' was once listed as having the "largest box office loss" by ''[[Guinness World Records]]'',<ref>{{cite web |work=[[Guinness World Records]] |publisher=[[HIT Entertainment]] |title=Largest Box Office Loss |url=http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/content_pages/record.asp?recordid=50762 |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20051127180839/http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/content_pages/record.asp?recordid=50762 |archivedate=November 27, 2005 |accessdate=July 16, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=July 8, 2013 |first=Pamela |last=McClintock |title=Why 'Mars Needs Moms' bombed for Disney |url=http://www.today.com/id/42095009/ns/today-today_entertainment/t/why-mars-needs-moms-bombed-disney/#.UeYMj9KxSug |work=[[The Hollywood Reporter]] |accessdate=July 16, 2013 |quote=Other infamous financial flops include Renny Harlin's pirate pic Cutthroat Island -- listed in the Guinness Book of Records as the biggest bomb of all time -- Sahara, The Adventures of Pluto Nash and Gigli.}}</ref> but the category has since been retired.
 
==See also==
*[[List of films considered the worst]]
*[[List of highest-grossing films]]
 
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
 
;Box-office sources
{{reflist|group="#"|2}}
{{Lists of box office number-one films}}
[[Category:Film and video terminology]]
[[Category:Lists of worsts]]

Latest revision as of 15:28, 11 December 2014



How about a nice Pocket Knife ? Bizarre? I don't assume so. Just think about it for a minute. It's a gift that is carried round in a pocket (or a handbag or pocket book) most of the time. So in case you look at it like that, then your considered more often than not. How cool is that? And there are swiss knife lots of completely different sorts of pocket knives for many completely different folks. Let's start with Case Knives and Buck Knives They actually make some cool (and high quality) pocket knives that may enable you match that hard to search out individual.

Some open quick (just like the Thumb Stud), some open actually quick (just like the Emerson Wave), whereas others require two palms and time (Nail Nick). It isn’t nearly fast deployment here. A few of these methods make the shape factor considerably bigger, which isn’t best in our opinion (like the Spyderco Round Hole), h ere is a web site the place you can start your research. We’ve found that the Thumb Stud and the Nail Nick appear to be dependable methods of blade opening, whereas protecting the profile slim for in-pocket carry. There are lots others so that you can experiment with although.

Knife sharpeners fall into just a few totally different categories and we are able to divide them up a pair methods. There are handbook knife sharpeners and electric knife sharpeners. Each forms of sharpeners use a specific materials to remove metal from the knife blade, often stone, ceramic, or diamond. Whatever the sort, the sharpening material has various grits, ranging from very coarse to extremely advantageous. Coarse materials remove the steel in a short time, which is helpful for very uninteresting blades or when reprofiling a knife edge to a different angle (Extra on reprofiling later!). The finer grits are used later within the process, very like sanding down a piece of wooden furnishings.

The very best survival knife sharpener dates back to assist simply how much time you might need. I favor to utilize a stainless-steel blade sharpener identical to chef’s possibility model. We've a lot of kitchen's knifes thus it feels right to have the energy sharpener as a result of fact we will easily genuinely easily contact up a brand new knife before we start meals preparation. Others corresponding to hikers or perhaps backpackers should have the handy possibility for only a chef's knife sharpener. This generates a challenge though do not get apprehensive! It is potential to pick some fabulous possibilities similar to Smith’s survival knife sharpeners.

A folding knife is an absolute should-have for anybody, be it an avid outdoorsman or a city dweller. Folding knives are compact, simply deployed, and are handy for a wide range of duties. You will by no means know the importance of a folding knife till you end up needing one for a process round the home or on a visit. There numerous choices for folding knives in the market right now for a lot of functions. From survival knives to useful little pocket knives, you will see that enough decisions to pick and choose from earlier than you discover the perfect folding knife for yourself.

The second reason for these knives being referred to as the very best steak knives is that also they are favored by their customers. These knives have gained public favor in the realm of steak knives for the reasons of quality, talked about above, and the explanations of ergonomics. These knives are given the best possible handles that you will buy knives online discover on this planet. The handles on these knives make them simple to handle and hold thereby ensuring that the meal shouldn't be disturbed by the need to choose up a fallen knife or to get an excellent grip on a knife that's already within the hand.

nd on my list of the most effective tactical folding knives is the Spyderco Navy G-10 which is regarded by many experts as one of the best navy service knife. Not only does it have all the advantages of a folding knife, it additionally has the sting and durability that comes with a straight blade. That includes a ten top rated pocket knives inch lengthy blade when prolonged, the Spyderco Military G-10 positive takes up a fair quantity of pocket area! You actually need to be cautious whereas handling this knife as a result of it’s super sharp and I’ve cut myself on fairly a couple of events without intending to take action.

You should definitely examine your local laws, especially in case you are planning to purchase one on-line. For most of us pocket knives are only helpful tools, however they could be used as weapons too. So, these days they face several legal restrictions. The size of the blade is more likely to be regulated in some states, turning unlawful to carry around pocket knives with a blade larger than a certain measurement. The identical could happen with sure varieties of pocket knives , you will need to have special care with switchblades as a result of they're the probably to be banned.

Once a blade is shaped and hardened, the innovative receives its last grind. The procedures, facets and angles used to complete an edge additional affect the preliminary sharpness and edge-holding ability of the blade. Like metal hardness, there is no single good edge end. Too narrow an angle and the blade's vanguard is too skinny to resist deflection and dulling, whereas too blunt an angle on that forefront doesn’t really feel nearly as sharp in actual usage. Like questions of fabric and hardening, be happy to analyze the totally different characteristics of the hollow grind, the sting angle and single vs. double bevel.